mobile-menu-icon
GM Authority

Uber Fires Top Self-Driving Car Chief Amid Pressure From Ongoing Lawsuit

The ride-sharing and self-driving car industry is a volatile one with persons of expertise valued around $10 million per person. General Motors and many other automakers are all looking to carve their place in the blooming industry. However, one major figure of the industry is now a free agent.

The New York Times reports Anthony Levandowski has been fired from Uber, previously of Google. Levandowski left Google to start Otto, which was acquired by Uber last year. Amid the acquisition, Google’s self-driving car unit, Waymo, sued Uber for allegedly stealing trade secrets. Levandowski is said to be the cornerstone of the insider information, and is accused of using the Google/Waymo trade secrets to develop driverless car technology for Uber.

Uber has urged Levandowski to cooperate with the lawsuit for months, but recently invoked his fifth amendment rights to avoid self-incrimination. When he missed an internal deadline to hand over information, Uber terminated him.

The bigger picture is how incredibly valuable Levandowski is to the industry. He has spent years to become an expert in the budding field and was reportedly integral in every facet of Uber’s self-driving car program. To underscore the importance, General Motors itself has bet big on ride sharing and autonomous technology. The automaker acquired Cruise Automation for over $1 billion—it has spent quite a bit of cash to keep its talent from leaving the subsidiary now owned wholly by GM, too.

GM also poured $500 million into Lyft to develop a fleet of autonomous ride-sharing cars nationwide. At the same time, Lyft also announced a newfound partnership with Waymo.

The industry is fluid and ever changing and it’s poised to stay that way for some time.

Former GM Authority staff writer.

Subscribe to GM Authority

For around-the-clock GM news coverage

We'll send you one email per day with the latest GM news. It's totally free.

Comment

  1. I expect the SAE to finish their specifications for autonomy vehicles, so all the companies can work on similar requirements with their own engineers and programmers. Then this example of lawsuit for using company secrets can be minimized. And if every manufacturer follow SAE’s regulations and specifications, then any autonomous car can communicate with others, and unify driver operations.

    Reply

Leave a comment

Cancel