GM’s autonomous vehicle technology division, Cruise, is in the crosshairs following an incident in San Francisco wherein two of the company’s robotaxis reportedly blocked emergency crews from transporting a patient to the hospital, where the patient later died. The San Francisco Fire Department says that while the delay was minimal, it contributed to the poor patient outcome. Cruise, however, has denied the accusation, saying it has video proof that its robotaxis did not impede emergency vehicles.
According to a recent report from NBC Bay Area, the incident occurred on August 14th around 11 p.m. after a driver hit a pedestrian. The San Francisco Fire Department says that emergency medical services arrived on the scene, but ran into an issue maneuvering around two Cruise robotaxis that were blocking the road. The San Francisco Fire Department states that “this delay, no matter how minimal, contributed to a poor patient outcome,” going on to state that “the fact that Cruise autonomous vehicles continue to block ingress to critical 911 calls is unacceptable.”
Meanwhile, Cruise is pushing back on the San Francisco Fire Department report, saying that video captured by the AVs show the two robotaxis in fact did not obstruct emergency crews.
“Throughout the entire duration the AV is stopped, traffic remains unblocked and flowing to the right of the AV,” a Cruise spokesperson said in a statement. “The ambulance behind the AV had a clear path to pass the AV as other vehicles, including the ambulance, proceeded to do so. As soon as the victim was loaded into the ambulance, the ambulance left the scene immediately and was never impeded from doing so by the AV.”
Cruise did not release video of the incident, stating that it was proprietary material. However, NBC Bay Area was given access to review a 13 minute video of the incident, and says that it does indeed show what Cruise describes.
Cruise has faced increasing criticism as it expands its operations across the country, including accusations that Cruise robotaxis have caused traffic jams and collided with a fire truck.
Subscribe to GM Authority for more GM Cruise news, GM technology news, GM electric vehicle news, and around-the-clock GM news coverage.
Comments
🙁
Dirty rotten liars. The fact that cars could get around to the right of these pieces of crap does not absolve the fact that vehicles are supposed to pull to the side to let the ambulance through. I hope someone sues the crap out of Cruise for this.
I see drivers not move over for emergency vehicles all the time with them having to come to a complete stop. Should those drivers be sued as well.
Those drivers should be ticketed. Can’t do that to a drone.
It’s pretty lame to justify bad behavior by pointing to other bad behavior.
Outlaw these menaces now!
Yes! Two wrongs don’t make a right!
Hmm, human driver hits a pedestrian…but Cruise is being blamed for the pedestrians death.
Next well hear that it was a pair of AVs that were on the opposite side of town from where the incident occurred.
The human driver never guaranteed that they would not have accidents like Cruise is.
Well an AV has hit/killed a pedestrian. Remember uber/phoenix?
I am guessing that the SF emergency vehicles were not a GM brand. I expect Cruise to win over that lawsuit and demand a public apology from the SF government so Cruise is cleared.
Don’t count on it….
Not in SF
The entire city of SF is a mess, homeless running in the streets like squirrels on drugs, I’m not sure why anyone would want to do business there. Anybody that has been there recently may know what I mean.
The article was informative & helpful in demonstrating the progress & problems associated with the riderless vehicle experiment taking place in our society. The responses however show nothing more than Conformation Bias which as we should know by now is rampant in our society.