When the 2013 GMC Acadia arrives at dealerships this fall, it will carry a base price of $34,875. The price, which includes an $825 destination charge, is $2,040 higher than the outgoing 2012 model that starts at $32,835.
The 2013 GMC Acadia (and its Saturn Outlook-like tail lamps) will feature an upgraded exterior and interior elements, including standard Rear Park Assist, rearview camera, leather-wrapped steering wheel with audio controls, Color Touch Radio with HD radio, USB port, signature LED daytime running lights, and interior ambient lighting. In addition, “most trim levels” (according to GMC) will come with standard IntelliLink infotainment and industry-first center airbag.
The top-of-the-line Denali trim will start at $46,770 including destination and will offer a power tilt and telescoping steering column, Head-Up Display, Side Blind Zone Alert and Rear Cross Traffic Alert as standard equipment.
Both Edmundns.com and ALG have named the 2012 Acadia to their respective lists of the industry’s residual value leaders, making the full-size crossover a segment leader in retained value (projected residual value of a vehicle after five years of ownership) — and we see no reason why the 2013 model wouldn’t be able to maintain those accolades into the future.
Are you considering a 2013 Acadia? Talk to us in the comments!
[nggallery id=400] [nggallery id=399]
Comments
$2000 for a MMC?
Honda is charging $200 for a FMC on the Accord. Methinks GM is getting to greedy.
What’s a Honda?
Lawnmower company.
I thought they made weedwackers. Can I get a MMC in one of those?
you’re comparing an Accord to an Acadia??
Perhaps the line of thinking is that it’s a full-size sedan vs. a full-size crossover… even though the Accord is more mid-size than it is full-size.
but then shouldn’t it be comparing Pilot to Acadia?? I mean I hope people take notice but Traverse will fill that gap of it’s starting price… and i wouldn’t even put Accord a full-size even though it’s as big as a Lucerne. But speaking of Accord it got me a little worried about Malibu, first is the fuel economy since the V6 of the Accord will go 5.7s and goes up to 34 mpg on that V6 and it makes me worried about the Turbo Malibu of what the mileage will be like plus the 0-60 times.What do you think Alex?
The Accord is nowhere near the size of the Lucerne. As for the performance, I’ve said it before — this is not a game of who can get the best 0-60 time. Not the segment at all.
True but if you see the V6 offering of the altima, camry, and accord they’re about in the 5 second range and in altima’s case it has .86 skidpad
Anybody saw that Buick announces the pricing on the Enclave?
http://gmauthority.com/blog/2012/09/buick-prices-2013-enclave-at-39270/
You should read this:
http://gmauthority.com/blog/2012/09/buick-prices-2013-enclave-at-39270/
I know I posted this in early morning before the guys at authority even posted