Retired investment banker and former Obama Auto Task Force member Harry J. Wilson is looking to be voted onto GM’s board of directors in the name of pushing GM to repurchase $8 billion worth of its own stock.
Yesterday, GM released a statement on the matter. GM’s statement is available just below, but we’d like to highlight a few noteworthy items from the statement:
- In looking to secure a seat on GM’s board, Mr. Wilson has nominated himself as a candidate to stand for election at the company’s 2015 annual shareholders meeting.
- Mr. Wilson’s goal to get GM to commit to buying back $8 billion of its stock is a proposal that would need to be voted on as well. If approved, the repurchase would need to be completed within one year of the 2015 annual shareholders meeting.
- Mr. Wilson is acting on behalf of himself and four investment funds that together own roughly 31.2 million shares, of 1.9 percent of the company’s common stock.
- Mr. Wilson will receive a percentage of the investment group’s profits from their investment in GM.
- Mr. Wilson first informed the company of his interest in being nominated to GM’s Board of Directors at a meeting with GM’s Chief Executive Officer on Februray 3, 2015, a meeting requested by Mr. Wilson for other purposes.
- The GM Board of Directors and management team are committed to acting in the best interests of all shareholders and are always open to constructive ideas to enhance shareholder value.
GM’s management team is successfully executing a plan that is continuing to build a strong and sustainable business for the long term.
Following is GM’s statement in its entirety:
General Motors today announced that it has received notice from Harry J. Wilson regarding the intent to nominate himself as candidate to stand for election to the GM Board of Directors at the company’s 2015 annual meeting of stockholders and bring before the annual meeting a proposal that the company commit to completing $8 billion of share repurchases on or before the first anniversary of the 2015 annual meeting.
Mr. Wilson’s notice indicated that he is acting with and on behalf of himself and four investment funds that support his election and proposal: the Taconic Parties, Appaloosa Parties, HG Vora Parties and the Hayman Parties, which together own approximately 31.2 million shares, or approximately 1.9 percent, of the company’s common stock. Mr. Wilson’s notice further indicates a fee arrangement under which he will receive a percentage of the group’s profits from their investment in GM.
Mr. Wilson first informed the company of his interest in being nominated to GM’s Board of Directors at a meeting with GM’s Chief Executive Officer on Feb. 3, 2015, a meeting requested by Mr. Wilson for other purposes. He disclosed the identity of the members of his group for the first time in his notice, submitted just before the deadline of midnight, Feb. 9. GM has had regular contact with some of the investors identified in the group, including as recently as after its earnings announcement on Feb. 4, and at no time in discussions with GM have they indicated an interest or intent to nominate directors to the GM board.
The Board’s Directors and Corporate Governance Committee will evaluate the proposed director nominee based on the criteria set forth in the company’s Corporate Governance Principles and Director Qualification Standards and make a recommendation based on the best interests of all shareholders. GM shareholders are not required to take any action at this time.
The GM Board of Directors and management team are committed to acting in the best interests of all shareholders and are always open to constructive ideas to enhance shareholder value. GM’s management team is successfully executing a plan that is continuing to build a strong and sustainable business for the long term. The company recently announced strong fourth quarter results, its best-ever fourth quarter consolidated EBIT-adjusted, and its 20th consecutive quarter of profitability. These results capped strong core operating performance for the year, the first under the leadership of CEO Mary Barra, despite significant challenges faced by the company and the industry. Importantly, the company is on track with its financial objectives for 2016 and beyond.
GM recently announced an expected 20 percent increase of the quarterly dividend to 36 cents per share to be declared as part of the board’s regularly scheduled second quarter 2015 common stock dividend declaration process. This expected dividend increase reflects the confidence the company has in the growing strength of the business. As the company gets more clarity on several business open items related to recalls, it expects to continue to evaluate further return of capital to shareholders as soon as the second half of this year. The board and management have demonstrated their ongoing commitment to return value to shareholders through a series of previous actions, including the repurchase of $5.5 billion of stock from the U.S. Treasury in 2012 and the initiation of a strong quarterly dividend of 30 cents per share on its common stock in 2014.
The company’s intention to increase the dividend is consistent with its balanced capital allocation strategy. Its goal is to maximize long-term shareholder value through both stock price appreciation and return of capital via dividends and share repurchases. The company continually evaluates the appropriate approach to returning value to shareholders in a manner consistent with its customer-focused strategic plan to lead in product and technology, grow its business in China and its captive finance company GM Financial, deliver core operating efficiencies, and allocate capital prudently.
Comments
Most of the current directors were appointed during the period GM was primarily government controlled and the selection criteria has the taint of political connections. The sooner new directors are appointed based of industry acumen the greater likelihood that shareholder value will improve through stronger confidence in the board. Wilson hardly fits this latter category.
Which of the directors do you think is not qualified? You do not just want all “industry” folks for a well rounded board.
http://www.gm.com/company/aboutGM/board_of_directors0.html
And 6 out of 13 is not most.
The danger here is when you get a person like this they can often do damage all in the name of profits while a company is trying to rebuild.
You want a board that has different backgrounds and views but one that will do no harm to the company. Not saying that is what will happen here but it has with past renegade investor representatives.
There is nothing wrong at all to expect a profit and return on the investment but for strong long term grow it takes steady investment over time and some of these groups will not wait for that anymore.
Right now GM is just getting back to where they are showing profits and return and to mess with this now or the leader ship they have in place now would be trouble.
You start making waves and major changes again you will end up with a corporate version of the Cleveland Browns.