Update: and here’s the full story on the 2015 Chevy Colorado.
Even though we’re mere hours from Chevrolet’s unveiling of the 2015 Colorado at the 2013 Los Angeles Auto Show, the visual beans have been spilled early on the midsize pickup truck, with North America-market Colorado displayed in a video, which has since been pulled down, but some managed to nab a screen shot just in time.
How do you like the looks of the “personal lifestyle” truck? Sound off in the comments.
Comments
I think it looks good. Wonder what the powertrains are going to be…
I really like the front of the truck, way better than the one for the oversea’s market. I will not hesitate to test drive it.
Looks great, can’t wait to see it in person and to see powertrain and color options.
Going to look good in my driveway!
Front end looks slightly Explorer-ish (possibly the headlights), but that’s not a bad thing. I like it!
I think it looks great. I’m glad they didn’t follow the trend of making vehicles more car-like and kept it a truck. Good job chevy
Approved. The little truck finally reversed the nonsense that has been occurring in the truck division of late. But I can’t help but feel that more than a little has to do with the fact that the idiots at the truck division couldn’t mess up an already good looking truck too much. Let’s see how the other idiots in the marketing department fair. And for those who disagree that they are idiots, look back at that dumb commercial that actually admits that the Silverado is second to both Ram and Ford. Somebody…no…EVERYBODY…needs to be fired for that ad.
Report MB TEST DATA :Mercedes Benz have worse classes than before thus
1. C-class (W204 except C63 AMG coupe,S204) all classes
2. CL-class (C215,C216) all classes
3. CLS-class (W219,W218) all classes includes CLS shooting brake all classes
4. E-class (W212 includes coupe,S212,V212) all classes
5. G63 AMG : 3 km/liter in city,1 km/liter on highway
6. GL-class (X164) all classes
7. GLK-class (X204) all classes
8. M-class (W163,W164) all classes
9. ML-class (W166) all classes
10. S-class (W221,S221,W222) all classes
11. SL-class (R231) all classes
12. SLK-class (R170,R171,R172) all classes
1st to 12th classes except 5th class are low traction ,easy slide ,tail flick, have economy 1-5 km/liter and below 1 km/liter. Cause of low traction ,easy slide ,tail flick, have economy 1-5 km/liter and below 1 km/liter is rear track than front track in Mercedes Benz classes included AMG,Brabus,Lorinser. The interior in all classes,over 170 cm people are Inconvenient.
The Mercedes Benz CGI turbo intercooler,CGI biturbo intercooler, petrol engine turbo intercooler and petrol engine biturbo intercooler classes included AMG, Brabus, Lorinser are unstable horsepower ,unstable torque ,have economy 1-5 km/liter and below 1 km/liter. In both ones make happen both thing, will have economy 1-3 km/liter and below 1 km/liter.
Well I guess I’m in the minority on this one. I greatly prefer the Holden and World market styling to this. Not that this is Bad. Just more of the same US mid size/compact truck “hey look at me I’m a big boy truck! Just smaller…No really, I am!”
To my eyes a mid-size/compact truck should have styling that reflects and embraces it’s smaller diminshions. It should trumpet it’s smaller, nimbler, more efficient,size. Maybe even appear “scrappyl and eager”. The traditional styling of US compacts, and midsizers just comes off as “I couldn’t afford a Real Truck, so I bought this…”.
I never second guess the capability of Japanese non-fullsize trucks. Almost everyone does so with US non-fullsize trucks.
Looks good chevy , sure hope you offer a column shifter for more leg room.
Richard….ok, that was a totally asinine comment…the commercial says that Silverado is second to no one!!! Wow, clear out your ears dude!
I Love the look of this new truck, have been following its resurrection for awhile and am glad it looks like a Truck, not a car, like the overseas models.
I will be attending the auto show in Toronto, just to sit in this. I just hope that it is not priced to high.