The approval was the last hurdle for the deal to go through, which would transfer ownership of the legendary American SUV brand to the privately-owned Chinese maker of special-use vehicles, structural components for highways, bridges, and construction equipment for only $150 million. This amount is nearly 70 percent less than GM originally valued the brand in bankruptcy court in the summer of 2009.
In the beginning of 2010, GM extended the deadline for the sale until the end of February.
“It’s only normal for the Chinese government not to approve the deal,” said Lin Huaibin, a Shanghai-based analyst for IHS Global Insight. “To allow this type of vehicle on a large scale isn’t in line with government policy.” What government policy, exactly? In an effort to reduce oil imports and pollution, China has been encouraging automakers to produce more fuel-efficient cars such as hybrids.
If approved, the deal was expected to secure nearly 3,000 Hummer manufacturing and sales jobs in the U.S. As of now, these jobs – including som at the Shreveport, LA plant – are in limbo.
What’s interesting here is that both parties have agreed to the deal and want it to go through. Tengzhong has previously stated that its plans include bringing Hummer into markets outside the U.S., which currently makes up more than two-thirds of the brand’s sales. Tengzhong also planned to develop more fuel-efficient SUVs, according to CEO Yang Yi.
The deal may still come to fruition even without approval from the Chinese government. This may happen by taking advantage of a few international loopholes. For what it’s worth, reports of China’s government having blocked Tengzhong’s bid are “not accurate,” according to Wang Chao, assistant commerce minister. Apparently, China’s Ministry of Commerce has not yet received an application for the acquisition, Chao said.
Let’s hope this doesn’t turn into the Saab Sales Saga, round two.
[Source: BusinessWeek]Moving opposite to market trends.
With four model years recommended for purchase.
This example is a former NCRS award winner.
Many automakers oppose right-to-repair laws citing cybersecurity concerns.
Breaking out the spec sheets for a comparison.