mobile-menu-icon
GM Authority

Consumer Reports reliability ratings..

Viewing 4 reply threads
  • Author
    Posts
    • #38261
      moose3763
      Participant

      I had read that if more than 3 percent of a certain car model has problems, Consumer Reports gives it a worse than average reliability rating..shouldnt it be more than say, 20 percent???

    • #39609
      Babersher
      Participant

      Thats a good point, but the problem is Consumer Reports rates relatively new cars, and as we all know, new things dont have much problems so if a new(by new I mean one or two year old which is also the range i think CR uses for their reliability ratings) car has 3% of its components already gone bad, when really nothing should have gone bad at this point in its life, than it probably will have 20% problems in 5 years. Lets say a new car has 1% problems in the first year or two, then it probably will have 10% problems in 5 years.

      So because there rating relatively new cars they have to much more strict on their grading curve.

      BTW, CR is an extremely unreliable , biased, and fickle source. Trust them at your own peril.

    • #39610
      Alex Luft
      Keymaster

      @Babersher True… Although I don’t know if it’s appropriate or accurate to use linear grading in determining part failure throughout a car’s life. Interesting question…

    • #39611
      Babersher
      Participant

      I dont think its a good method either, but thats how I think CR does it.

      Another reason to not use CR.

    • #39726
      Vic1212
      Participant

      CR is a biased kind of magazine. Majority of the domestic cars that they rate are unreliable and they rate foreign ones reliable since it’s their “favorite”

Viewing 4 reply threads
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Subscribe to GM Authority

For around-the-clock GM news coverage

We'll send you one email per day with the latest GM news. It's totally free.