@Moanalua why does one need to disprove something of which there is no evidence? There literally is no evidence of Akerson, or anyone at the current GM, saying anything regarding Pontiac, positive, negative, or otherwise. I find it ludicrous that one needs to “disprove” something that doesn’t exist in the first place.
The fact that Pontiac is not around means that it isn’t viable. I hope you understand that it wasn’t discontinued due to some deep-rooted hatred… instead, it was dropped because it didn’t make business sense to keep it, large following or not.
As for your example of a hard market reality… reality is reality. If you’re going to purchase a non-GM vehicle, that’s your prerogative. GM’s is to build the world’s best vehicles at a profit. So you may not be able to resist the “switch” for long, especially when the next-gen Chevys are unleashed.
