@Brian_E: Again, as a consumer, I believe that the fact that hundreds–if not thousands–of Pontiac loyalists have made it clear to GM that they want Pontiac back, is all the action that I deem necessary. I’m the customer. GM knows what I want. It’s now up to GM to act. If it doesn’t, then I defect to a non-GM automaker. I don’t see why that’s so difficult for you to comprehend. I don’t intend to take any additional action.
I’ve been thinking back to your earlier posts, and if I’m not mistaken, I think I once posted that I don’t mind having conversation with you because you carry yourself decorously in your posts. I regret that that decorum seems to have diminished. In particular, it’s rather indecorous of you to imply that I’m a man of words rather than deeds. My words ARE my deeds. Your last post was something of an improvement, but then you made that snide comment near the end.
I’m a musclecar guy, but I never built-up my cars. I ran them stock. I did find your father’s project cars interesting. I hope that your project car will be successful, too.
@Grawdaddy: I’m glad you like the Fiero. Some people chided it because of the engine-fire problem some of the early models had, but my understanding is that Pontiac fixed that problem. Therefore, the later models shouldn’t be a problem. The ’88 was the last year, right? I hope you find one eventually. I’m OK with the Fiero myself. I’ve never owned one, but I’m OK with the Fiero. I like all Pontiacs. I guess that’s how it is when one is a Pontiac loyalist.
