@ Moanalau
First off. Name calling is a sign of a losing argument. I am not a ‘shill’ for GM. I’m not attacking you, so don’t attack me. I have friends and family who are current and former employees of GM. My support for GM is also support for my friends and family. I also believe GM has the best products on the market.
Second. You didn’t refute or address anything in my previous two comments or provide anything to further the discussion. The only point you tried to make was that Pontiac could still be viable. You didn’t go into ANY detail about HOW it could be viable. You are the one who is an Economics major, as you said so yourself. Still, in 26 pages you haven’t provided a single economically viable solution for a financially solvent GM with Pontiac. Saying it’s better for GM to decide that is not an answer. If you have any profitable ideas, let’s hear them.
Third. You have not tried in good faith to see both sides of the issue. Throughout many of my previous comments, I have shared my sorrow at the loss of Pontiac. It should be clear that I am sad there are no more new Pontiacs. I have also gone to great lengths to explain the reasoning, history, and support for GM’s decision. I have even gone to considerable length to see your view and provide you with possible avenues to advance your cause of ressurrecting Pontiac. (Pages 7 through 13) You either didn’t comment on them or otherwise disregarded them as actions you were unwilling to do. Instead you repeat the same tired arguments that suggest an unwillingness to be objective or to even consider any viewpoint that differs from your own.
Fourth. The poll indicates that twice as many people want Pontiac back as those who do NOT want it back. These results are consistent with an either/or poll. You’re either for Pontiac or against. No mention is made or choice is given to those who would pick the third option of “Don’t Care”. 250 people is hardly a majority of the site traffic for GMAuthority.
I have tried earnestly to be respectful of your position, and to explain the facts and circumstances as I see them. At least I have seriously considered your claims. None of your comments lately give me any reason to believe you would show me the same consideration and respect. If you’re going to resort to namecalling and refuse to acknowledge any merit to any opposing viewpoint, then our conversation is over.
