The 2026 GMC Terrain drops in as the second year for the third-generation compact crossover, ushering in relatively minimal updates over the fully redesigned 2025 model. While the bulk of the crossover carries over unchanged, the new model year does introduce a fresh paint option and a new trailering package, as GM Authority covered previously. Now, customers can explore their preferred configuration and pricing via the official online configurator at GMC’s website.
Customers have a total of three trims to choose from, including Elevation, AT4, and Denali. The base Elevation trim is available with both front-wheel- all-wheel drivetrains, starting at $31,295 and $33,295, respectively. The off-road-flavored AT4 and upscale Denali are both available exclusively with all-wheel drive, starting at $39,995 and $42,495, respectively.
For Elevation buyers, the Elevation Premium Package (RPO code GHI) presents a significant upgrade. Priced at $2,850, or $2,250 when bundled with the Black Edition Package, this package adds an eight-way power driver seat, dual-zone climate control, wireless device charging, and 19-inch Technical Gray Machined-face aluminum wheels.
Other notable options include the Technology Package II (RPO code CWN), which bundles together the HD Surround Vision system, a Rear Camera Mirror, fog lamps, and Traffic Sign Recognition. Pricing is set at $845 on the AT4 and $945 on the Elevation. There’s also the Convenience Package III (RPO code ZL4), which adds features like ventilated front seats, heated rear outboard seats, and the Memory Package. The Convenience Package III is available on both Elevation and AT4 trims for $950.
Make sure to check out our previous coverage for a full breakdown on 2026 GMC Terrain pricing, including all of the options and packages on offer.
Under the hood, all 2026 GMC Terrain model variants are powered by the turbocharged 1.5L I4 LSD engine, which is rated at a maximum of 175 horsepower and 184 pound-feet of torque in FWD applications, while AWD variants see torque increased to 203 pound-feet. Production of the 2026 GMC Terrain is currently underway at the GM San Luis Potosí plant in Mexico.
Comments
Denali Ultimate
With a twin turbo 3.6L
Chrome 22 inch wheels
White in color
Black interior with light gray accents (my 15 terrain had it. Was great combo)
Dual chrome tiped exhaust with paddle shifters
Adaptive Ride
Panoramic sunroof
Molded running boards
Oh wait……….a 4 cylinder is only offered even on highest trim…….ugh….I’ll pass
And if they’d offer that, you’d complain about the price tag, especially if they have to make it in the US. $90k for you.
Reality is, you’re never satisfied regardless of what they offer.
It’s ridiculous a mid 40s Denali (after options) has a 0-60 time of almost 10 seconds. It’s not too much to ask that a 2.0T be tossed in the mix.
Especially considering the envision is either gonna go up dramatically in price, or more likely, just gets canned. GMC/Buick dealers are gonna want a performance trim for this segment.
8 seconds is almost 10? In that case it is almost 6 seconds which that is pretty quick (6.2 Silverado quick).
AWD models are slower than the CVT fwd, even with the extra torque. You’re close to 10 in AWD.
Interesting, you were bragging that the new turbo 4 would be better in every way over the V6. Yet it doesn’t get any better mpgs, and is slower 0 to 60. Every test review done on these new turbo 4s have them .2 to .4 slower to 60. Looks like gm missed the ball on this one. They had a fantastic reliable motor, along with one that was already tein turbo charged and decided to downgrade. A huge failure
@gmc fan
I possibly would because GM would be greedy and charge $90k for like you said which is ridiculous especially when that engine has been out for YEARS!!! It’s not new tech. Wake up…….you seem like a very impulsive person who doesn’t think through things. Like many others in this country who have gotten themselves in DEEP debt over their heads.
Let’s see here. It matches or exceeds the previous gen with the low torque high rpm car based V6 motor in mpg (and real world combined, not just highway). It did so while weighing a few hundred pounds heavier than the old one and being less aerodynamic. It matches it in 0-60 (the one fwd version spun and was only 0.2 tenths off a previous gen), what does spinning tell you about power? The only thing the turbo four has against it compared to the old V6 is noise, that is it…
Otherwise driving experience is a ton better. No downshifts on the highway when the wind blows or you get a 1% grade. No revving to 3k+ rpm just to keep up with traffic. I really do not see the appeal of that V6, especially in heavier vehicles. We have a canyon with it, it is NOT a good motor for it. Same with the Traverse which we have spent a lot of time traveling in our friends on road trips. That 3.6 was originally in the CTS and Lacross, not exactly heavy un-aerodynamic vehicles which they did alright in with 1k lbs less weight to move.
Yes, reviews are showing how great that turbo four is in just regular driving. It can accelerate at just above idle shifting at 2k rpms with all that flat torque curve. When a hill comes it doesn’t need a downshift. It matches the 0-60 time of the old motor and it matches the highway mpg while doing better in the city. Really, you are beating a dead horse here. The V6 was not a gem of an engine with no problems, it had plenty over the years and its driving dynamics left a bunch to be desired. On a flat highway it did well and was quiet and smooth, this new 2.5 is smooth as well, it just gets noise when revved which it doesn’t need to do nearly as much as the old torqueless V6.
I doubt they could package the twin turbo 3.6 into it, they have fit the naturally aspirated 3.6 into it in the past though
Until they redo the options packaging, I wouldn’t.
Looking to get either a 2026 Terrain or an Equinox, but with the orange idiot’s 25% tariffs, will not buying until he takes the tariffs off, or might be considering a different company, but in my area choices are not the greatest. Even if GM would move the manufacturing of both models it will be years before they can be produced in the U.S.
So you are good with the US just getting rail roaded by unfair trade? How he is going about it is rough and should be taken with more finesse, but outside of China seems to be working pretty well in getting the job done. Can’t take anyone seriously with any credible knowledge or research when they start off with a liberal left insult, just shows the lack of education.
Totally agree with you on this. So many gripe on here about the U.S. and tariffs, yet they don’t understand that other countries have HUGE tariffs on the U.S.
Ignorance runs so deep with some people. I see it all the time in my profession. I try to help the sick and uneducated. You just can’t fix stupid. Not even with ducktape
Tariffs don’t affect pricing on dealer lot inventory and so far GM has not announced any price increases for the Nox and Terrain. But let’s keep the TDS going. Its comical to see the left self-destructing over an issue that hasn’t even happened yet!
The thing I noticed on the configurator, other than the wimpy engine, is no upgraded stereo on the Denali, even as an option! When I bought mine this was packaged with the sunroof as a “sun and sound package”. That’s just disgraceful that they want you to pay $42,000+ on a “luxury” trim for a basic 6 speaker sound system. At least it’s supposed to have some sort of upgraded suspension.
Add the 2.0L and/or some kind of hybrid powertrain with more power and a freakin better stereo and I might buy one. Otherwise, I’m out.
Yeah the lack of any better audio is a hard pass for me. It’s odd that you can get a smaller and cheaper Chevrolet Trailblazer or Buick Encore GX with Bose audio and more everyday convenience features than you can on a “Professional Grade” midsize GMC. I’m willing to overlook the lack of optional powertrains but it just seems like this generation has been de-contented without any concession to price.
For the money they want for an optioned up Denali it should include a fold flat passenger seat, a 2.0T engine and the option of a better sound system. I also noticed these new replacements don’t have remote pulls for the rear seats to fold down. You have to open the rear doors or stretch way in to get at the seat release. Cost cutting at its finest!
How many 5-paseenger crossovers under $45k do you know of with power folding rear seats?
Read closer. I did not say power folding rear seat. I said remote manual pulls in the back cargo area. My 2023 Equinox has those and its a cheaper LT model. The new ones eliminated that.
Of course if money were no object the Denali would make sense, but since money is real and value matters I’d be looking at the AT4 or Elevation in AWD. Red is a must. It is tempting to remove the CoreTec seats. At $2,850 in savings I don’t think I would miss them, although I would miss the sunglasses holder (of all things), wireless charging, and dual-zone automatic climate control. To a lesser degree I’d miss the 8-way power seating, but if you’re the sole driver then you’d hardly change it.
It is embarrassing that it will have a difficult time doing better than 10 secs 0-60.
I looked for the configurator and I don’t see it. The link in your story takes me to a blank page.
The cost cutting runs high in this generation. Coming from someone who owned a 2019 Terrain SLT 2.0T the new models seem lacking features. No remote latch to fold the rear seats. No optional audio. No fold flat passenger seat. Less physical buttons/controls. One less gear in the transmission. It just seems to me like this new generation gives up a lot of things that made the last gen Terrain nice. And yet the price of the this new gen isn’t any cheaper. It’s a shame because the new exterior is pretty nice looking.