2025 Chevy Silverado EV WT Pricing Uncovered
18
Sponsored Links
The 2025 Chevy Silverado EV arrives as the second model year for the all-electric pickup, debuting a few key changes over the more limited 2024 model year. Customers will once again have a number of different trim levels and configurations to choose from, including with the fleet-oriented WT, or Work Truck. Now, GM Authority has uncovered pricing information for the 2025 Chevy Silverado EV WT.
The 2025 Chevy Silverado EV WT lineup starts with the 2WT Standard Range, equipped with four-wheel drive and a 14-module GM Ultium battery pack, which gets an MSRP of $58,995. GM Authority estimates the range-per-charge for this configuration to be 170 miles with a battery full of electrons. Critically, the price tag also places the 2WT Standard Range about $10,000 below that of the 2024 Silverado EV 3WT with the 1FL Fleet Package, which starts at $68,895.
Meanwhile, new 5WT Extended Range model offers four-wheel drive and a 20-module battery pack, starting at $71,395, or roughly $3,500 below the price tag of the 2024 3WT model. The 2025 8WT Max Range model with four-wheel drive and the 24-module battery starts at $79,695, a few hundred dollars less than the 2024-model-year 4WT trim with four-wheel drive and a 24-module battery.
Check out the table below for 2025 Chevy Silverado EV WT pricing. Note that prices listed here include a destination freight charge of $1,995:
| Trim Level | Drivetrain | Battery | 2025 MSRP + DFC | 2024 MSRP + DFC |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2WT Standard Range | 4WD | 14-Module | $58,995 | |
| 3WT with 1FL Fleet Package | 4WD | 20-Module | $68,895 | |
| 5WT Extended Range | 4WD | 20-Module | $71,395 | |
| 3WT | 4WD | 20-Module | $74,900 | |
| 8WT Max Range | 4WD | 24-Module | $79,695 | |
| 4WT | 4WD | 24-Module | $79,900 |
While range estimates for the new trim levels are currently unknown, it’s worth mentioning that the 2024-model-year 3WT trim has an estimated range of 393 miles, while the 4WT has an estimated range of 450 miles.
While the all-electric Silverado WT is offered as the fleet-oriented trim level, Chevy will also offer a few consumer-focused models, such as the new-for-2025 LT, which is expected to equip a nicer exterior and upgraded interior compared to the WT. The 2025 model year will also introduce the all-terrain Trail Boss model variant and non-First-Edition RST trim.
All Chevy Silverado EV variants ride on the GM BT1 platform, with production taking place at the GM Factory Zero plant in Michigan.
Subscribe to GM Authority for more Chevy Silverado EV news, Chevy Silverado news, Chevy news, GM electric vehicle news, and around-the-clock GM news coverage.
Sponsored Links
Your math is off on the 170 range for the 2WT. Using simple ratio comparisons the number should be around 270 range. Check your calculator!
Also 170 mile range would be (to use the word of the day) a weird offering in the EV world today!
Hmm, looks like a module costs around 2K then. 14module 59, 20 module 72, 12/6=2, 24 module 80, 8/4 = 2. So a 24 module has around 48 thou in batteries.
It wouldn’t all be battery cost.
That’s like looking at Apple cost differences for storage on their phones and computers and using it to estimate the cost to Apple of drives based on GB.
They know people are going to be willing to pay more for more range and power.
The 24 module packs are like 200kwh.
You can buy a Bolt EV pack for about $12,000 (and that’s gotta include a parts markup). Or about $185/kwh.
GM is producing way more Ultium cells and packs and with local US production are getting about $50/kwh in advanced mfg tax credits.
GM has also stated they would be at under $100/kwh by 2025.
So probably closer to $20k-$24k in battery costs.
Thanks for making my point. @200/kwh that is 40 grand. gm *thinks* they will be at under 100 by 2025. Operative word being thinks. Batteries cost is mainly stuff, and the assumption is the stuff will get cheaper. The stuff could just as well get more expensive. Depends on supply/demand, and the miners are going to get their cut just like the oil producers. And how long do you think the US can afford to throw 50 bucks at every kwh? Once everyone is driving an EV, then everyone will need to pay more tax to pay for the 50 credit. The thing that irritates me about the green crowd is they are just as delusional as the trump crowd. As just one example, please comment on the recent PJM auction. Juice costs were supposed to go down, and yet the PJM auction clearly indicates people are about to get sticker *shock*.
And using apple as an example, really, a biz that is all about status is not going to price based on costs. They are irrelevant.
So you didn’t follow the rest of my post?
$40k would mean $200/kwh. Industry average is already $138/kwh in 2023. And prices have continued to come down. And GM was already at that with the Bolt EV pack and Ultium is more cost effective and at volumes.
200kwh x $100/kwh is $20k
I know the maths are hard for some people.
I purchased my Chevy Silverado EV May 16th 2024 it it was only 1800 miles on it. It’s broke down July 3rd 2024 it’s been sitting Chevy dealer for over month general motor didn’t do anything for me I just want to return the car get my money back! They cannot even find the damage they said it could be router it could be solenoid!!
Check the fuel filter
Check the BS, I smell fish.
I like the Silverado EV/WT, but it won’t sell at these prices. It seems like the government has gotten automakers in a tough spot. There’s nowhere near enough infrastructure to charge EV’s. If bankrupting EV manufacturers was the goal, it looks like the politicians have succeeded. Fisker and Lucid can’t make it without risky bailouts. If VW didn’t invest billions into Rivian, it wouldn’t survive. Mandating EV production before there is enough demand to make it profitable to manufacture large numbers of EV’s. Pricing is crucial to affordable transportation, but low volumes can’t generate profits. Next the oil companies will be forced into more government regulations, making prices higher for consumers. The transition will take much longer, forcing consumers to switch from gas, by raising gas taxes it will destroy capitalism. Renewable energy can’t possibly replace oil, our economy will collapse if we have to depend on wind and solar. Our manufacturing will become like the steel industry, without a strong manufacturing base we can’t compete against our enemies, if we can’t build our own equipment. Transferring everything to Mexico is a mistake, we can’t control what goes on there. We don’t even have enough precious metal resources to supply our EV battery production. China controls most of that! Consumers don’t want to pay more for energy and more EV sales will increase electricity prices. We need diverse choices of vehicles to meet our needs. I personally like EV’s, I realize it doesn’t work for every situation. Airlines and sea transit use the most energy, unless they are held to the same standard, it’s a waste of time and money to make the change. Until China and India step up and do their part to help the environment we’re wasting our energy. Capitalism made this country the envy of the world, China copies us! Why are we trying to dismantle our economy? To help make us more dependent on everyone, including our enemies. We need to realize becoming dependent on electricity for everything is a slippery slope.
Thank you, Well said. Seeing both sides. Refreshing. I think Toyota may have hit the jackpot with their full plunge into hybrids. A friend was thinking about getting a camry and I think told me 50mpg.
My Model 3 get like 130mpge.
50mpg is just sad.
I have heard 80+mpg with the new D-cycle engine or the rotary valve model, also Toyota says hang on BIG changes are coming. And it can be filled up in under 5 minutes.
Overpriced!!! If gm made this under $40k. It would sell. Only fools would pay these prices for a toy car. I’ll keep my ICE 6.2L Denali.
No mention that these would qualify for the $7500 tax credit. Dropping those prices by quite a bit. Plus state and local incentives.
BTW, businesses and fleets get a clean commercial EV tax credit that doesn’t have the sourcing requirements and MSRP limits that the retail consumer tax credits have.
No mention that the tax credits, state and local incentives are paid by your generous Government using money taken from others.
I have seen a internal memo within GM upper management directing that all parts received from suppliers are not to be used for warranty work on ev or ice vehicles but only for production of new vehicles . Since supply chain issues from Covid they have increased profits by mandating this new practice. The reduction of warranty cost and forcing customers to trade in their vehicles when GM refuses to supply parts to repair new vehicles has increased GM profits by over sixty seven percent since 2022. Just follow the money and ask your local dealers service mgr how many customers have new vehicles waiting on parts from GM. The problem GM has is that customers see that the parts they need are available to GM to build more new vehicles but not available for GM to honor the warranty repairs on their vehicles , many that are only a few months old. GM customer service has been told to tell customers that it is a supply chain issue and recommend that they consider trading in their new vehicle that they can not drive. With dealers no longer offering loaner vehicles, it leaves customers very few options.
Former G M Employee Steven
When Chevy originally announce the EV WT they were saying it was going to cost in the low-mid 30k range. That’s where a Work truck EV should start, period. 58k for this is just absurd.
When placing deposits opened during CES it was $41k for base work truck, and TFL trucks had talking points that clearly indicated the range for even the base trucks would be over 400 miles. That was before the tax credit, which at the time I think was still being worked on to be reinstated for GM based on manufacturing location and hadn’t passed yet. So many paid $100 expecting to get a base work truck with 400-mile range for $33.5k plus tax, tag, title, and any options, accessories, etc. I figured if I could be $40k out the door for that I was all-in. I totally acknowledge that was an unreasonably low price, but it’s what was widely reported at the time. This will be a great truck eventually, bidirectional charging is huge, and I would be so happy to have a 200kWh backup battery for my home. During my heaviest use month that would power my house for 3 full days (75+ hours) without curbing any use, air conditioning and all. I can also charge for a crazy low rate super off peak. I would jump in about $50k if tax credits are still available and 400+ mile range. Maybe we get there by 2027-2028, in the meantime folks are right, hybrids are where it’s at. Honestly I think GM missed a huge opportunity with the Volt EREV system. I’d much rather have that platform in a pick-up truck, give me a 24-48 kWh battery pack and it could still be a great temporary back-up power option, awesome for camping, etc, but with gas or diesel backing it you could also drive across country without stopping to charge. M-F at home you’d never use gas though. $1B in development that could still be put to good use today in a pick-up. Batteries are heavy, which is why the payload isn’t great on the EVs. I think that’s why the EREV system to me just makes more sense, why lug around an extra 900+ pounds of batteries you’re only using during extended trips. I think GM would be selling EREV trucks at $60k where they would struggle to sell EV trucks at $60k. Should be doable when you’re shaving off at least $15k in battery cost to pay for the drivetrain. Still pretty beneficial from a maintenance perspective as well, you’ll still wear out brakes a lot less, and put a lot fewer hours on your engine, particularly city driving hours. Ugh, I wish we could have had it.