Study Finally Links Small Penises To Desire For Fast Cars
124
Sponsored Links
Men convinced their penises are smaller than average show more interest in fast, sporty rides, according to a recent University College London study. Entitled “Small Penises and Fast Cars: Evidence for a Psychological Link” and co-authored by Daniel Richardson, Joseph Devlin, and John Hogan, the inquiry manipulated male study subjects’ view of their genital size compared to other men using fake data, followed by asking them to rate the desirability of a sports car.
The experimenters concluded that the less men judged their own factory equipment as adequate for attracting mates or proving their manliness, the more they would want flashy sports cars. In short, attractiveness to females and improved self-esteem were assumed as primary motives pushing the less well-endowed to want fast cars.
The experimenters introduced several controls into their study in an effort to erect a framework of repeatable scientific results. Some of the 200 research participants were told average male penis length is 18 centimeters, or seven inches, while others were informed 10 centimeters, or four inches, is typical. Five inches is the actual average. The subjects then used a slider to rate how much they wanted fast cars. The participants were also presented with 11 other statistics, some correct and some incorrect, and other luxury goods, in order to conceal the true purpose of the study.
Young men under 29 apparently showed little statistical link between penis size and the hankering for fast cars. In the 30 years old or older group, however, “men who thought they had a relatively small penis rated the sports cars higher” according to page five of the study. Men led to believe they were unusually small rated sports cars highly even when quite elderly, while those convinced of being unusually well-endowed became less interested in fast cars the older they were.
Other luxury products besides fast cars didn’t measurably arouse the interest of participants convinced their natural specs fell short. The researchers noted further experiments could show if perceptions of wealth or intelligence are also linked to the “need for speed” among men. They also suggested that “perhaps there is just something specific linking cars and penises in the male psyche” (page seven).
Regardless of whether the study has or hasn’t proven decades of small penis jokes vis-a-vis sports cars, GM builds several models across its brands that could be described as “fast.” These include several Corvettes, including the Corvette C8 Stingray, Corvette C8 Z06, and the just-announced Corvette E-Ray. The Camaro range, including Camaro SS and Camaro ZL1, along with the Cadillac Blackwings – the CT4-V Blackwing and CT5-V Blackwing, plus the Escalade-V, would also qualify for the “fast” moniker.
Subscribing to GM Authority is the best way to keep up-to-date with the latest automotive developments, whether it’s offbeat studies or all the freshest and most interesting GM news.
- Sweepstakes Of The Month: Win a Corvette Z06 and 2024 Silverado. Details here.
Sponsored Links
Dude,I don’t understand.I love fast cars and I gotta Kong dong.The super duty truck thing,though,has definite links to being attracted to your sister.Id donate to prove that study for sure.
I think there is a bigger coralation with jacked up pickup trucks and small wieners.
High lift kit coal roller Dodge Ram 1500 pretty much says, “I’m compensating for something!”
21 Challenger 392 Skatpack. My wife bought it for me. Lol
As an SS owner with a ZLE allocation I broke my ankle running to the comments. Why did they have to show a Riverside Blue ZLE at the top? In the daily email it’s the only photo you see with the link. Couldn’t they of picked a more appropriate car like the Vette? SO let me just be honest. It’s indeed true. I have a small peni$. I willingly admit it. WHY? Because I’m a girl. But at least I have a huge set of balls. I call them chesticles.
l8ap3xracing
Ahahahahahaaaa
The flaw in this study is the generation in their twenties have no desire to own, or operate, a vehicle. This is the internet generation, and the internet said driving is dangerous. Most of this generation is still trying to convince everyone they know everything because they can use Google, and still can barely think for themselves. But, why would you need to think for yourself when there’s Google.
How is that a flaw with the study? It sounds like you think young people are flawed. Driving is objectively dangerous though.
Hmm…. Just wondering about the causal relationship. Could it be that that it is fast cars which actually cause penises? It might not be as ridiculous as that sounds? Say, for instance, that owning or driving fast cars satiates a psychological need which in turn alters brain chemistry and thus hormonal balance. The implication is that fast cars could affect penile characteristics of male youth who are still undergoing morphological development and might suffer from fast car induced microphalia. Further study is recommended to understand the developmental impact of fast cars on females.
Reading this I feel like Penny on the Big Bang Theory when the guys are talking science!!!
They are just trying to shame men all for liking nice cars most of the time it has nothing to do with whats between their legs but there are a few that compensate
Or they just did a study and these are the results, truth, to the best of our knowledge.
So the fact that nicer cars are called chick magnets 🧲 Because men get laid for owning them , never came to mind ? 🍆 leave this here for your next study🎓
This is by far the most stupid article to even put on the web.Ever heard of this saying “you’re talking but you’re not saying anything”. This article is b.s. because no matter how big or small, what it is made of or how it’s made, it boils down to these two word, Material Things. Something that you nor I can take with you when you are dead and gone. So what someone buys fancy cars or add parts to their vehicle, if it’s not your life or money, mind you business and shut up because you need to be worried about your life.
Hit a little close to home?
Literally the person who wrote this has a very small penis and is very jealous of those who own fast cars…..
stop making this bullsh!t up.
Why have you seen this person’s penis?
It’s not made up, it’s a detailed scientific study.
I remember when I was a kid, there some boys who like to play with toy cars and there were some boys who like to play with dolls. Those boys eventually grow up to be men. I have a feeling the guy who wrote this article was a boy who liked to play with dolls, which is okay, but don’t go around talking doodoo to those who like to play with fast cars just because you like playing with dolls 🤣
Oh, look who it is, the arbiter of who’s a man and who isn’t. You should know when not to listen to your feelings, “like a man”. There is no “doo doo” being talked.
In 2023, misogyny is not okay. But if it’s misandry, no problem. LOL oh yea I remember in 2023, if you’re a man you’re not included when they talk about human rights.
By the way what about the average peepee folks? Why is it always big peepee or little peepee? I’m assuming majority of men fall in the average category with outliers who are extremely large or extremely small… which is why an average exists?
This has nothing to do with misandry. Men are definitely included when talking about human rights.
You’re likely just experiencing “When you’re accustomed to privilege, equality feels like oppression”.
Average is addressed in the study, basically used as the control group.
Dude what are you even talking about?? This article objectifies men’s bodies and is trying to devalue men based on body parts. Now imagine if this article was the opposite: “Study links women with small ****** to driving fast cars”, society would be outraged. Personally I’m good, I drive a fast car and my ish is above average. I personally believe men and women should be treated equally, men and women should be held to the same standards.
I was very clear with what I said. This article does not do that. It’s not trying to do anything other than relay this scientific data.
Again, this has nothing to do with women, I don’t know why you keep bringing them up.
You’re just yelling at clouds.
How is this scientific data? How many men were part of this study? How many different countries and different races were involved in this study? Did they strip them men down and measure them? Did they measure them flaccid or erect?
This is not scientific data. This is clearly done out of disrespect.
To be honest this article told me I was above average, so I’m not mad personally. But I feel disrespected as a man and for other men. Men are not sexual objects.
Maybe read the study and find out.
This is what a post feminist soyciety looks like! Gents if she complains about your johnson tell her she needs to fix your wizard sleeve V.
This has nothing to do with feminism or women.
This is misandry. Men are not objects. We are human just like women are, men have feelings too. And this article was very disrespect towards men. This article is basically implying that a man’s value is based on their peepee. If this article linked women with small ****** to driving fast cars, we would be having protests and burning down local stores.
Reporting on a scientific study is not inherently misandry. It’s not basically saying that at all, it’s saying exactly what the results of the study were. I’m sorry you don’t like the truth.
Ok so show me the scientific data, where are the sources? There are plenty of men with small pepes who drive Corollas and plenty of men with large pepes who drive Ferraris. Were they selected in this scientific study?
In the study that you were too lazy to read. Knock yourself out.
What do you mean what was the study? The title of the study is literally in the second paragraph. This article tells you what it was and surprisingly does a good job explaining it. I’m beginning to think you didn’t even read the article.
Which university is standing by this “scientific data”? Lol just because a goofy in a lab coat says “studies show”, doesn’t mean it’s scientific data. What is the name of this PhD genius who made this experiment?
If you believe this you might as well believe Covid was caused by 5g internet and that magnets stick to the vaccine injection area. 🤣
You’re truly helpless. That’s answered in the first and second sentence of the article and obviously in the study, neither of which you’ve apparently read.
Pew pew
No, you’re the magnet, metals stick to you…lol
@Mckillio oh alright then that must be a fact. PSA: all men out there, sell your Ferrari and buy a Corolla. Your pepe will grow to 20” overnight. Mckillio said so. 🤣
I nor the article nor the study claim that. You’re ignorant, lazy, and lying.
@Mckillio I’m not just a piece of meat for people to use okay? Men have feelings too you know 😭
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha h ha ha ha ha sorry I’ve actually just read the article.
And it’s even more BS than I thought before.
So no “science” took place at all, some lazy troubled individual wrote this idea up.
The title doesn’t even match the subject correctly. Infact it’s so wrong that the margins were different in the figures. 😂😂😂😂😂😂 mental!!
Oh and it was conducted with 200 males 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 so that’s conclusive….
Take your click bait lies and F off. You sad sad sad individual.
🤣🤣🤣 of course it was pure nonsense. I’ve studied psychology in university for a couple years. They are so strict on what can even be called a theory. There is no possible way anyone can prove a concrete relationship for these things, because there are just too many outliers. And also different car enthusiasts like different cars. Just because I like Corvettes doesn’t necessarily mean I like Bugattis. There are just too many flaws for this to even be a theory. I bet you no professor would’ve passed this for a PhD paper, the research was probably done by a freshman noob writing his first paper.