Study Finally Links Small Penises To Desire For Fast Cars
129
Sponsored Links
Men convinced their penises are smaller than average show more interest in fast, sporty rides, according to a recent University College London study. Entitled “Small Penises and Fast Cars: Evidence for a Psychological Link” and co-authored by Daniel Richardson, Joseph Devlin, and John Hogan, the inquiry manipulated male study subjects’ view of their genital size compared to other men using fake data, followed by asking them to rate the desirability of a sports car.
The experimenters concluded that the less men judged their own factory equipment as adequate for attracting mates or proving their manliness, the more they would want flashy sports cars. In short, attractiveness to females and improved self-esteem were assumed as primary motives pushing the less well-endowed to want fast cars.
The experimenters introduced several controls into their study in an effort to erect a framework of repeatable scientific results. Some of the 200 research participants were told average male penis length is 18 centimeters, or seven inches, while others were informed 10 centimeters, or four inches, is typical. Five inches is the actual average. The subjects then used a slider to rate how much they wanted fast cars. The participants were also presented with 11 other statistics, some correct and some incorrect, and other luxury goods, in order to conceal the true purpose of the study.
Young men under 29 apparently showed little statistical link between penis size and the hankering for fast cars. In the 30 years old or older group, however, “men who thought they had a relatively small penis rated the sports cars higher” according to page five of the study. Men led to believe they were unusually small rated sports cars highly even when quite elderly, while those convinced of being unusually well-endowed became less interested in fast cars the older they were.
Other luxury products besides fast cars didn’t measurably arouse the interest of participants convinced their natural specs fell short. The researchers noted further experiments could show if perceptions of wealth or intelligence are also linked to the “need for speed” among men. They also suggested that “perhaps there is just something specific linking cars and penises in the male psyche” (page seven).
Regardless of whether the study has or hasn’t proven decades of small penis jokes vis-a-vis sports cars, GM builds several models across its brands that could be described as “fast.” These include several Corvettes, including the Corvette C8 Stingray, Corvette C8 Z06, and the just-announced Corvette E-Ray. The Camaro range, including Camaro SS and Camaro ZL1, along with the Cadillac Blackwings – the CT4-V Blackwing and CT5-V Blackwing, plus the Escalade-V, would also qualify for the “fast” moniker.
Subscribing to GM Authority is the best way to keep up-to-date with the latest automotive developments, whether it’s offbeat studies or all the freshest and most interesting GM news.
- Sweepstakes Of The Month: Win a 2023 Corvette Z06 Convertible. Details here.
Sponsored Links
Perverts in lab coats.
gm authority as pathetic as gm management.
How do they fit women in that drive sports cars. There’s a lot of us that I know/
I believe they surveyed for strap-ons, according to the foot notes.
Welp. As a female owner of multiple adult toys I now feel obligated to purchase a strap on so I can better fit the image.
Jacked up trucks with small wheels and tires or those wide stupid Wheels with low profile tires that study will say you have a small brain and I couldn’t agree more. Why would you put a tire on a truck that’s going to make it ride like a train wheel on it and have no weight capacity I see these guys all the time and they’re pulling usually a dump trailer no way that tire will support very much weight it’s not designed for it’s not a truck tire these people are just stupid
I don’t need to hear or see anything about articles as stupid as this one. I’ve been thinking about unsubscribing, now I know for sure that I will .
Sometimes the truth hurts. But that does not make it any less truthful. Just honest.
Very interesting article, will reference it in my new book.
This is the most ridiculous post I have ever read. What is more concerning is that GM Authority felt it important to post on their Blog. If this is the direction GM A is going in , I’m out. If you had posted this on April 1st, I would have found it amusing. Please adjust your posts or your small penis older generation is going to be off your site. just my small two cents worth
To reduce my reliance on judging other people, I had to ask myself what I was getting out of it. That was and remains the hard part.
It’s been said Ron Jeremy drove a Vett so I guess the study has some outliers.
So, what is the reasoning for women purchasing sports cars?
Also, surely this study doesn’t include Porsche owners? I’m being advised by a specialist (my wife) that this study is excluding me from the findings.
I drive an old Aveo. Just sayin’…..
The study should mention that men preoccupied with their penises and motivated to have sex 24/7 won’t be making enough money to afford a corvette or a “sports” car. While the “shriveled” will spend more time with his career and finances to afford that dream car. Of course, there are a few exceptions like me…🤣
Andrew Tate is not misogynistic… he thinks women should not be promiscuous and he values having a wife. I don’t see anything wrong with that.
Just search “Andrew Tate, misogyny” and get back to us. He’s clearly a misogynist.
He would never disrespect a real woman who respects herself. He was talking about the IG model bimbo types with Brazilian butt lifts who take naked pictures for the internet. Real women aren’t bimbos, and bimbos aren’t real women.
The irony…
I suggest you watch his interviews in full, from beginning to end. If you take 5 second clips from one hour conversations, you can be taken out of context. Andrew Tate is a woman respecting gentleman. Real women and bimbos are two very different things on opposite sides of the spectrum.
And the misogyny continues.
It’s not misogyny. It’s called having virtues. If you’re a man who takes naked pictures on the internet, you’re not a real man and I don’t respect you either. Does that mean I don’t respect all men? NO.
So if you’re a bimbo who takes naked pictures for the internet, you’re not a real woman and I don’t respect you either. Does that mean I don’t respect all women? NO.
It’s pretty simple, it has nothing to do with being a man or woman. If you don’t respect yourself, I don’t respect you either.
It’s absolutely misogyny and forcing your standards onto others. He and you are both POS.
You don’t get to be the arbiter of who is a “real man or woman”. Taking “photos for the internet” doesn’t inherently mean you don’t respect yourself.
But please go on and defend the guy that was on the run for rape and human trafficking.
THATS HARAM. NO.
I never said I was the arbiter, but multiple religions from around the world have similar values on how to be virtuous. And they would all frown upon people (both men and women) who act promiscuously. Being promiscuous is not respectable behavior.
Someone who does not respect promiscuous behavior does not mean they are misogynists. I would not respect a woman who sells her body on the internet. But I respect women who are educated and make an honest living. And to be honest, I think if you ask a real woman what she thinks of promiscuous women, she would probably say the same thing.
You didn’t say you were but you’re acting like one and that’s the point and what matters. So what that multiple religions that are patriarchal are that way? You say it like it’s a good thing. Andrew Tate is promiscuous, I guess you don’t respect him any more.
When they only focus on women doing it and ignore their own promiscuousness it means they are and a hypocrite. Of course you wouldn’t respect that, you made it very clear a long time ago. Women selling photos of themselves can have an education and it’s a very honest living. Cool, my wife has a PhD and isn’t promiscuous, she has no problem with a woman doing that even tho she wouldn’t do it herself.
Mckillio you are such a hypocrite. If you think promiscuity is such a wonderful respectful thing, why did you marry a woman with a PhD? Why don’t you get married to a stripper? Why would you tell your daughter to go to university? Why wouldn’t you tell you daughter to forget education and go be an Instagram model with an OnlyFans account? Strippers make WAY MORE MONEY than anyone with a PhD does. You SJW woke folks are all damned hypocrites. You talk a big talk, but you don’t walk the walk.
If Andrew Tate became a male stripper, I would lose all respect for him. I do not respect male strippers or female strippers, this is has nothing to do with being a man or woman.
I’m done talking to you. Keep acting like a SJW woke liar, we all know you don’t walk that talk.
Ok forget about me, forget about Andrew Tate, forget religion.
If your daughter is the type of woman who sells naked pictures of herself on the internet, would you be proud as her father? Is she representing your last name with respect and honor?
If your daughter went to university and is now the CEO of a big company, would you be proud as her father? Of course you would be.
It doesn’t mean she doesn’t respect herself. Holy sh!t, the patriarchy is strong with you. You keep showing us how misogynistic you are.
Nice extreme binary scenarios btw, shows integrity. /s
Stop talking to me, you SJW woke liar.
If you really walk that talk, why did you marry a woman with a PhD???
Why wouldn’t you marry a stripper???
I must definitely be in the small penis column, I have a 2013 Camaro rs2ss, with row your own, funnest car I’ve ever owned!!! I’ll keep my penis, and the car.
I was at a friends house after I got my newest C5. His sister was there and made the comment that, she had been on 3 dates with guys that had Vettes and they were the worst dates of her life. She wasn’t to happy when I said, lets look at the commonalities of that statement. Of the 3 dates, what were e the things in common? It was 3 seperate guys, so that wasn’t it. It was the same TYPE of car on all 3 dates, but how could a car be the problem. We’ll call that the “not likely coloum”. And then we have the only other (and most likely problem) HER! She was the only consistant on all 3 dates! She wasn’t to happy with me.🤣
Well yeah, it was a stupid, mean thing to say. If those were the only three dates she’d ever been on you might have had a point…
Same study can be said for those that feel they must have a diesel engine in their HD truck. Five of my friends have diesel trucks and none of them tow anything that requires a diesel. They have all paid excessively for a diesel (and diesel fuel) and every one of them has been in the shop multiple times in the first year of ownership for emissions crap and so appropriately called “limp mode”. They have the same warranty as the gas version for an engine that is promoted to be good to 500,000 miles. Perhaps this study should look at brain size relative to what people spend on their vehicles. Oh yeah, one of my diesel HD truck friends is a female. How does that factor into this study?
Great study. Makes me enjoy driving my 1973 VW Bug !
It’s not the size of the weapon that counts, it’s the fury of the attack!!!
I had a BMW convertible which turned out to be an uncanny chick magnet. I don’t believe you could exactly call the Bimmer, “fast,” so no I wasn’t compensating. The girls, on the other hand, may have been very curious to see… the size of my wallet.
Well, maybe someone should tell them about the (package) get it…. Ok let me finish: good things come in small packages… like Dynamite and it ( cums ) get it…out with a big boom!.