mobile-menu-icon
GM Authority

2024 Chevy Blazer EV SS Revealed With Up To 557 Horsepower

After some teasing and even a partial exterior reveal, GM has officially unveiled the 2024 Chevy Blazer EV SS, a performance crossover that the automaker proclaims has the “soul of a true sports car” and capabilities that “will surprise and delight” diehard Bow Tie brand fans.

Chevy says the Blazer EV SS has “design and engineering developed to live up to the legacy of the iconic Super Sport performance designation” that it wears on its exterior. A standard performance AWD propulsion configuration delivers up to 557 horsepower and 648 pound-feet of torque in the crossover, enabling a zero to 60 mph time of under four seconds in the Wide Open Watts (WOW) acceleration setting. The Blazer EV SS’ driving range is estimated at 290 miles, thanks to the largest available battery pack, while certain other Blazer EV configurations offer up to 320 miles of estimated range. Other performance-focused features include a specific sport-tuned chassis and Brembo front brakes.

Like the standard Blazer EV that will be offered in 1LT, 2LT and RS trim levels, in addition to a Police Pursuit Vehicle (PPV), the SS trim will feature 11.5 kW level 2 AC charging and standard DC public fast-charging capability of up to 190 kW, able to add approximately 78 miles of range in 10 minutes, according to GM estimates. The act of charging is made slightly easier by GM’s charging station locator, available via the MyChevy smartphone app, as well as its Ultium Charge 360 in-vehicle charging software.

The Chevy Blazer EV SS will be easy to identify thanks to its unique front grille, two-tone exterior color scheme with a black roof and A-pillars, and standard 22-inch wheels. Inside, the performance-focused SS will feature sueded microfiber seating with Adrenaline Red surfaces, or available Argon Orange interior upholstery accents. Heated and ventilated front seats, along with heated rear outboard rear seats and a flat-bottom steering wheel, are standard on the SS trim as well.

Interior features are similar to lesser Blazer EV trim levels and include a standard 17.7-inch diagonal color touchscreen and 11-inch digital driver information center, ambient lighting, a presence-based automatic liftgate and available hands-free Super Cruise. A wide variety of Chevy Safety Assist features come standard in this electric crossover, including Automatic Emergency Braking, Forward Collision Alert, Front Pedestrian Braking, Following Distance Indicator, Lane Keep Assist with Lane Departure Warning and IntelliBeam.

The Chevy Blazer EV SS will launch in late 2023 with prices starting at around $65,995 including the destination freight charge. Reservations are open now via Chevrolet.com, with additional details and ordering information available closer to the start of production next year, which will take place at the GM Ramos Arizpe plant in Mexico.

Subscribe to GM Authority for more Chevy Blazer EV news, Chevy news, GM electric vehicle news, GM business news, and around-the-clock GM news coverage.

[nggallery id=1214]

Sam loves to write and has a passion for auto racing, karting and performance driving of all types.

Subscribe to GM Authority

For around-the-clock GM news coverage

We'll send you one email per day with the latest GM news. It's totally free.

Comments

  1. Nice. Keep ’em coming.

    Reply
  2. Looks very nice and promising. Not sure about having a powered charge port door, but I guess people just have to have all the tech they can get.

    I’ll be waiting for the Chevy or Buick or Cadillac EV sedan with the fewest features I can get.

    Reply
  3. Base Cadillac Lyriq or Blazer SS…

    Reply
    1. In all honesty the base Lyriq sounds perfect for me. But the Blazer SS is hot and I bet is a LOT of fun to drive.

      Reply
      1. Can we get one with an ICE? Sign me up the!

        Reply
  4. I mean, this looks great with good power and stuff. But at $65k fully loaded, wouldn’t that be on the neck of the woods with the Lyriq?

    Reply
    1. Interior is nice enough with 260 more HP.

      Reply
    2. If anyone is a diehard GM enthusiasts but a performance bias person, the Blazer SS is a no brainer to them but if you have a taste for luxury bias, the LYRIQ would be their choice over the Blazer.

      Reply
      1. Personally I think this looks nicer inside than the Lyriq. I’m sure that uses better materials or perhaps some of the lyriq gets lost in pics.

        Reply
    3. Or a vette…. Or a camaro ZL1…. But if you just gotta have an EV….

      Reply
    4. The Chevy Blazer EV SS will launch in late 2023 with prices “starting” at around $65,995 … Ouch.

      Reply
      1. Ouch? That’s not even BAD for an EV, let alone a performance one! The Blazer can be configured as FWD. RWD, and AWD. Few cars in the market today can be configured with all 3 of those as options. A BMW M3 starts at ~63-65K. You’ll be stuck paying for oil changes, paying for fluctuating fuel prices, Water Pumps needing replaced, and possible transmission failure down the road….

        The Blazer EV SS, is at Price Parity with its ICE counterparts at time of Purchase! Even better Yet, It beats its ICE counterparts in Long Term Cost Savings, and Recharge costs compared to fueling it.

        Reply
        1. When the last time you had a water pump replaced or even a transmission- heck cars are going forever anymore – spark plugs 100k – this nonsense the liberals are spreading about repairs and maintenance is malarkey-

          Reply
          1. I’ve had both replaced in my 2014 Chevy Sonic 1.8L. Both went shortly after the warranty expired. Just because your ice cream hasn’t melted, doesn’t mean your neighbors hasn’t!

            Reply
            1. those two parts are worth more than the car…
              ouch!

              Reply
            2. Yeah ok! I’m really thinking there’s more to the story- however if it would have been a Bolt it may have burnt your home down- however seeing you owned a Sonic explains a lot about you. – you EV people are such sheep – climate change has been happening since the beginning of time-

              Reply
              1. McCurdy Tony –

                Yeah if you’re retired and only drive 3,000 miles per year, then gasoline expense is still low, and your water pump, engine and transmission might last quite a while…

                What is surprising to me is the UNRELIABILTY of several gasoline and Diesel powered vehicles these days… Obviously – serious business vehicles such as SEMI’s rarely have these reliability problems since their buyers are more insistant on a reliable product.

                The fact is – you are much more likely to be struck by lightning than having any trouble with a BOLT. And GM is in the process of replacing suspect batteries anyway free of charge to the owner.

                Tesla fires are much, much more catastrophic and common place yet somehow they always get a pass. Tesla has QUIETLY improved their batteries, however.

                Reply
          2. My 2020 truck has been at the shop waiting for a transmission part for over a month.

            Why do you have to be so basic to think you need to be a liberal to like EV’s. How about 0-60 in a SUV in less than 4 seconds. That’s faster than a Jeep SRT or Explorer ST.

            Reply
            1. Because some rightwing friend told him only liberals like EV’s.

              Reply
            2. Whatever, another person who’s impressed by 0-60 times when 99 % of the owners couldn’t and can’t handle an automobile at speed- as far as the trans issue- I really not believing this. I’m thinking there’s more to the story – have a nice day

              Reply
      2. The Exploder ST is almost $70K.

        Reply
    5. Thexprice of the 2024 Lyriq is bound to increase as more of the features and trim levels become available. (We know the 2023 Lyriq was rushed into the market and several features were left for the next model year.)

      Also they haven’t announced the Lyriq V yet, and we know that’s in development.

      Reply
  5. Looks much better than the Mustang EV. This thing is going to sell very well!

    Reply
    1. GM needs to get that factory up and running, then yea. Price is good also.

      Reply
    2. The Mustang Mach or whatever it’s called is frumpy looking on the road. I call it the Frumpstang. This car is much nicer even if it is overpriced.

      Reply
    3. I agree. I would pick the Blazer EV over a Mustang Mach E.
      It seems like this new Blazer EV SS is GM’s answer to the Mustang Mach E GT.

      This is making me very optimistic about the possibility of a 7th gen Camaro.
      The Blazer EV SS does 0-60mph in under 4s, for reference the 6th gen Camaro SS does 0-60 in 3.9s. Not too shabby for a heavy electric SUV. I could only imagine how much of a beast the 7th gen Camaro is going to be.

      Reply
      1. There is NO 7th Gen Camaro.
        Maybe an SUV with a Camaro badge like the Mach-E “Mustang”.

        Reply
        1. The design team has played around with a Chevy coupe with a modern interior and a manual trans. Unless a EV is getting that manual the door hasn’t been completely shut.

          Reply
        2. There is still a chance of us getting a 7th gen Camaro. Once the 7th gen Mustang comes out in 2023, I’m sure that’s when GM will announce whether there will or will not be a new Camaro. And no I don’t think they will make an SUV with a Camaro badge, they made the Blazer the “Camaro SUV”.

          Reply
  6. oh hell yeah, and the price is reasonable!. interior looks great, styling isn’t too bad, and some impressive performance numbers (so far). i’ll definitely buy one when i get money.

    Reply
  7. The video of the Blazer SS looks fantastic.

    I’m glad that the interior did not one-up on the LYRIQ. Don’t get me wrong that the interior design and fit-n-finish looks great and excellent for the Blazer and it would be enough to meet potential buyers’ expectation of look, feel and quality. Looks like a complete home run all around.

    Reply
  8. The green house looks like a Dodge Magnum.

    Nice looking. This is why I said GM was about getting it right not first like Ford.

    Reply
  9. How do you keep your ev charged while there are rolling black-outs. The electric grid in Texas can’t handle it..

    Reply
    1. Move out of Texas

      Reply
    2. Move to a state that has competent power management and isn’t in the thicket of political mismanagement of the gird.

      Reply
      1. You mean like CA? Go away,the entire US electrical grid cannot handle a mass amount of EV vehicles, let alone every American who has a vehicle to have 1, 2,+.

        Reply
        1. Again, new homes are built everyday that use more electricity than an EV.

          Reply
    3. A question few people ask about EV’s. There are rolling blackouts in CA as well. As more EV’s get on the road you can expect an increased demand from the grid.

      Also, I wonder if EV buyers understand that they will be buying their EV fuel from the state, since electricity production is a utility and state regulated. What happens when more than 50% of the cars on the road are EV’s?

      The state that wants to control you will tax your energy consumption from the charger and now have complete control over pricing. Dem lawmakers don’t have control over gasoline or oil companies and this now gives them more power over your freedom. You think that’s crazy do you?

      Reply
    4. How do you get gas when there is a shortage? Like that’s never happened before?

      If you’re that worried about rolling blackouts get solar. Sun is pretty bright down there. It will pay for itself.

      Reply
      1. There is no shortage when you have the largest reserves in the world. The current admin will not allow more drilling and canceled Keystone which helps mitigate rising fuel prices.

        Buying solar for your home doesn’t prevent rolling blackouts or give you a source of energy for your car. Here is the solar scam. Solar companies charge you 20k to put their eyesore junk on your roof. Then they use your house to make money by selling it back to the utility and giving you a small cut, which offsets your bill. It takes 20 years to recover paying them so they can make money off you. Get it?

        “Hi Mr. Company. Oh, you want to use my house so you can sell electricity back to the utility to make money? Sure, how much can I pay you to put your stuff on my house so you can make money?”

        You are paying them their profits up front and then they make their residuals in perpetuity. What an awesome business model.

        Reply
        1. What would the Keystone pipeline have done for the US?

          Reply
          1. Anytime you increase access more economically and increase supply to the world market, prices always decrease. XL would have lowered costs (and will when it’s done) and it will get done after Biden is gone.

            Reply
          2. Made gasoline a little bit more expensive in the Midwest?

            Reply
      2. Never have experienced any gas shortage in the 35 years I have been driving. Power outages have been numerous in comparison and the last one went on for 14 hours with zero power!

        Reply
    5. Get a natural gas generator. LOL

      Reply
  10. And where is all this electricity coming from? I’ll bet all the mining is done with diesel dozers in other countries and shipped on giant ships which also happen to be diesel powered.

    Reply
    1. Same for your Gas powered V8s. If you are going to include the mining for raw materials for EVs you have to do the same for your precious gas.

      Also 95% of batteries is recyclable unlike your gas, that’s poof gone as soon as you use it.

      Reply
      1. People on here LOVE to hate on EV’s. All this misinformation is ridiculous!

        Reply
        1. Because they are just dumb! If I want a boring, silent vehicle, I hop in my electric golf cart and take a spin! Hate to tell you but electric is not the entire future of automobiles.

          Reply
    2. You realize that they are building new houses every day and people use electricity in those houses?

      Reply
      1. What rather pisses me off is that all the wokey ‘State Mandated Green House Gas programs’ – namely providing $thousand$ to homeowners to convince them to convert to All Electric heat, cooking and hot water – all of which use much more power than just 1 ev. Besides raising taxes, they also put an item on the electric bill of ‘System Benefits Charge’ so that they get all other utility customers to pay for it.

        So namely I get to pay for that nonsense 2 ways – taxes and my utility bills.

        Reply
      2. Yes and it is mandated in NY and CA that they have all electric heat and stoves and no more gas.

        They will use more electric vs cars.

        Reply
        1. C8.R –

          Yeah – the EV haters are right about one thing – This ‘Transition’ will proceed much more slowly than most EV enthusiasts think it will, since the banning of gas, oil, and wood heat, as well as the ban of sale of anything but totally electric appliances will tie up all the electricians for years.

          Having ONE ev per household on average will not be ANY issue at all.

          ( I have 3 plug-ins), but have not upgraded the home’s 63 year old ‘100 amp’ electric service, even though I also have an electric sauna, very large hot tub, and central air conditioning. Along with a small work shop, 220 volt home made snow blower and a 5 hp electric (equivalent to 11 hp gasoline engine) pressure washer.

          The energy savings the average homeowner have already accrued due to CFLs, and LED lighting, energy efficient refrigerators and central airconditioners that use HALF the juice that they did 50 years ago is more than the added usage for 1 ev per household.

          Each EV uses the same amount as one small plug-in room heater that many use to take the chill off certain rooms in the winter time. That’s effectively almost nothing.

          Self-Appointed big experts here have said an EV uses the same amount as Clothes dryers and electric ovens running all day. That’s only for traveling salesmen or technicians driving 150,000 miles per year. But even those people would see such stupendous savings in fuel costs that it would be worth it FOR THOSE TINY NUMBERS OF PEOPLE to spend a bit more to upgrade their electrics.

          Reply
      3. Are you a broken record? Of course houses use electricity, just as they have for over 100 years! What is your point?

        Reply
    3. Rome wasn’t built in a day and the transition to EVs will take time. A new car purchased today will be around for at least a decade.

      Reply
  11. This all looks impressive, but it is also giant piece of overkill. It is also very entertaining for the EV crowd.

    Reply
    1. The base 1LT is 44K, GM will also have a base Equinox at 30K, and the Bolt lower than that.

      GM has several options at multiple price points.

      Reply
  12. A nyone get the nagging suspicion that all of GM’s cars are going to be the SAME?

    or $62,990 (only option I ordered was blue paint for another $700). So cheaper than the Blazer.

    I’m peeved that Chinese Versions of the 2wd Lyriq get a Frunk but I can’t get one since the one I ordered 5/19/22 has a 19 kw (to me useless) charger which is taking up all the room, per REDLINE reports.

    Supposedly the Equinox EV is going to be $30,000. Looks like another Chevy-Lyriq like this one. With a 50 mile battery no doubt. But then again, I always wanted a more ‘Decontented’ EV

    Reply
    1. The Lyriq is going to have an options shakeup for the 24 model year, you will likely see the Frunk return then.

      Reply
      1. Unless something changes, there will be no frunk. The hood is use for the AWD motor for the front for future versions. Also the charging components is taking up part of the space as well.

        So, I’m not understanding where the Hummer and Silverado RST is getting a frunk while the LYRIQ doesn’t. I don’t understand the engineering of all the models as EVs that are out currently but the LYRIQ has hidden storage compartment underneath the cargo area so same difference.

        Reply
        1. Trucks have a lot more room for packaging upfront. Also trucks normally don’t have lockable storage outside of the cabin, so a frunk makes sense. For a sedan/SUV/CUV it isn’t as important because you already have a trunk. The Lyriq already provides a place to store you charge cables along with a deep well in the rear for other stuff.

          Yes, you don’t have the frunk the Mach-e has, but you have more leg room and trunk area. Which one is more important?

          Reply
    2. The Chinese Lyriq doesn’t have a frunk either.

      Reply
      1. So one professional reviewer says one thing, and another self-appointed big expert says another. Plus GM changes its corporate mind(s) all the time, like little kids.

        Excuse me If I’m not totally certain of YOUR supposed facts… Even if you quote someone from GM – that is this month – they’ve changed the content of LYRIQ about 3 or 4 times so far, and they’ve made what? 100 of them so far?

        Reply
      2. But it does… https://www.hummerchat.com/threads/chinese-lyriq-has-a-frunk.1553/

        Reply
      3. Dean, you best check your sources of info before making a comment. I’m referring to the Chinese part.

        Reply
  13. The new Blazer EV looks great, especially the SS. I would love to have seen GM build the SS as a GMC Typhoon. The sporting intentions, performance, and design fit very well with that historic nameplate.

    Reply
    1. Well, they are moving the Acadia back up in size to align once again with Traverse and Enclave. The way I see it, that leaves a gap in their lineup where a GMC based Blazer would fit into nicely.

      Reply
    2. Hmm we have not seen the GMC offering yet. With this platform many options are possible.

      Reply
      1. Bring out the GMC version to have less high speed performance and more off road performance. A great way to start to differentiate GMC going forward.

        Reply
  14. Anyone get the nagging suspicion that all of GM’s cars are going to be the SAME?

    I ordered a “Luxury” LYRIQ with an MSRP of $62,990 (only option I ordered was blue paint for another $700). So cheaper than the Blazer. But raising the price from the DEBUT version which only a handful got at $59,990 was dirty pool.

    I’m peeved that Chinese Versions of the 2wd Lyriq get a Frunk but I can’t get one since the one I ordered 5/19/22 has a 19 kw (to me useless) charger which is taking up all the room, per REDLINE reports.

    Supposedly the Equinox EV is going to be $30,000. Looks like another Chevy-Lyriq like this one. With a 50 mile battery no doubt. But then again, I always wanted a more ‘Decontented’ EV

    Reply
    1. I like it overall. Seems a bit over-stylized in some areas like the ground effects and fascia winglets. But adds to that sporty appeal, so it works well.

      I still can’t seem to wrap my head around the rear quarter window and why there is a break innit at the top roofline. It seems unnecessary and destroys the flow of the roofline. I had thought maybe it was to allow the third row window to roll down, but no mention of that and looking at a closeup, it doesn’t seem to fit either. Just odd to me.

      Reply
  15. Nice but expensive. Did they also reveal the Buick Electra EV? (If not, it’s another example of GM’s second-class treatment of Buick.)

    Reply
    1. Electra reveal is coming later, that isn’t expected to be in the US market for a few more years.

      Reply
    2. Expensive when compared to what?

      Reply
      1. Last time I saw, the average price of a new car was in the lower 40s.

        This starts at 47K and goes up to $65,000+ for the SS.

        Others have said it’s higher-priced than the Cadillac Lyriq.

        Reply
        1. I’m not sure what point you’re making. A Camaro ZR1 costs more than a base Corvette. Doesn’t mean the Camaro is any better or worse.

          With the Blazer EV SS, you are paying for the performance vs. the base model Lyriq. The Blazer EV SS has almost 240 more power than the Lyriq.

          Reply
          1. What do you need that horsepower for?

            Reply
            1. Christopher…. No need to worry about that car. Word is it is far from ready. That fancy one off example is just a brochure to maybe drum up some interest or pre sales.

              Reply
  16. The SS pricing starts at $65k?

    I love what I am seeing here, but with some options, a Chevy Blazer could hit you for $80-90k? Geesh.

    Reply
    1. I thought the SS is pretty much fully loaded. Supercruise might be an option.

      Reply
      1. I have no interest in Supercruise or the huge sunroof, so i’m thinking it’s otherwise loaded.

        Comments like “80k, for BLAZER???” when the Blazer is obviously becoming something it never was are just….silly. This blows away what Ford is offering with the Mach E GT and the Model Y.

        Reply
  17. Interesting that GM seems to have chosen $60k as a price point to introduce the first of an eventual range of models within a particular nameplate. I wonder if they have Tesla Models 3 and Y in mind – hitting them from above with a base model Cadillac Lyriq, while poking at them from below with a maxed-out top model Chevy Blazer.

    Reply
    1. It seems like some sort of strategy on the EV front. At least they did the same with the Hummer, highest trim came first on that one too.

      Reply
  18. I will repeat what .70% of this nation is saying and Pete Buttigieg has been told: “GET OFF THE ELECTRIC CAR JAG”. Joe Biden is telling us we will just have to suffer through this transition. I don’t think the public is going to lie down and take this sick, woke idea of environmental protection at any cost. No matter who gets hurt. I for one refuse to be part of Uncle Joes collateral damage. I will never, Ever drive an EV.

    Reply
    1. I gave you a plus on this but the reality is this deal is far past Joe and But gig.

      The companies had to make a decision to commit or fail as they could not keep changing back a fourth on future plans. Every 4 years the rules changed and the left made them more difficult to remove.

      Automakers had to plan for more than the next administration. Also once these vehicles are in place I think there are some advantages we may see.

      I am not a tree hugger and I don’t buy global warming but with these cars built on platforms engineered just a little different we can see the return of vehicles that they will not build today.

      We could see low volume coupes and sedans. We can see more niche products as they will be cheaper to build in low numbers. We will see like in the Blazer better and more advanced interiors and areas they could not spend money on before while trying to meet emissions numbers.

      A large chunk of money every year goes to ICE development to meet emissions numbers. With the EV platform it will free up that money for the areas where they have been cutting back.

      It could be interesting with what we will see coming.

      I am optimistic things may not be the same but not all bad.

      Reply
    2. What is happening with the transition to EVs is global. With many markets setting end dates for ICE sales (Canada, EU, UK, Japan) it makes no difference who is in charge in the US and what laws they make or repeal. The ball is already in motion, and global companies are using economies of scale to produce product that can be sold in all markets. GM has already declared that they’re all in, and while they might pretend it’s for the environment, it’s for $$$… they’re chasing Teslas stock prices. The recent interview with Mary Barra indicated that GM has some interest in returning to Europe too. No company is going to spend R&D to keep developing ICE powertrain specific to the US market for the fraction of the people that demand it. You can either embrace it, or dig your heels in kicking and screaming, but it’s 100% happening either way. You probably have another 10-15 years of being able to buy new ICE product, and nobody in Washington is going to change that.

      Reply
      1. Spot on Avenir, add in the giant EV push by the Chinese government. No automaker wants to be left out of that market.

        Reply
  19. It looks so cookie cutter just like the current Blazer.
    GM still can’t build SUVs worth a penny. The Bronco looks so much better and more appealing.

    Reply
    1. One opinion, I think the Bronco is a ugly, top heavy, overpriced box.

      Reply
  20. It’s such a cookie cutter SUV look (just like the current model). I mean beauty is in the eye of the beholder, but, this looks just boring. The Bronco is still better looking in my opinion. Coming from someone that has been a Chevrolet fan for decades.

    Reply
    1. The Bronco is a Chick-Truck.
      My sister loves hers.

      Reply
      1. The Bronco Sport definitely is. The real Bronco is badass though!

        Reply
  21. Borrowed a design elements from Buick (including the sweep spear), Cadillac (tail lights) and Corvette ( position 9f side air vent) yet is a nice overall vehicle. Chevrolet design language keeps pace with Japanese brands and VW which is a positive for sales. I know some people think Ford is having a design renaissance but I don’t see it compared to GM and Stellantis.

    Reply
  22. My Blazer Premier has a factory trailer hitch rated to tow 4500 lbs. Will this Blazer EV be of any use to me?

    Reply
    1. For about 50 miles.

      Reply
  23. This might be the best overall design inside and out of any Chevrolet CUV.
    I think GM nailed it with the new Blazer BEV.

    Just a couple of minor issues in my personal opinion. I find it somewhat weird that the Blzer can be had with a FWD, RWD, or AWD configuration. Why would anyone chose a FWD? I might be missing something and open to suggestions as to why this would make any sense. I do like that you can get whatever you prefer kind of I guess. Just makes it more difficult and therefore more costly to manufacture all the different Configurations I would assume.

    Second issues is that 190kW Charging speed might be ok for right now but it will quickly become obsolete.
    Tesla supposedly is doing an update on their Version Three Superchargers to go from 250kW to 325kW and at least three Chinese BEV makers have promised 500kW ones by 2023.

    But if those are the only two things I can think of then GM nailed it.

    Reply
    1. Why would people in non snow states want AWD or 4WD

      Reply
      1. Agreed. I can imagine anyone in Florida, California, etc. could really care less about AWD except for performance reasons. And if you’re trying to save money FWD is cheaper because it’s easier to assembly.

        Reply
        1. You do realize a large portion of CA does get significant snow, don’t you?

          Reply
      2. @McCurdy Tony
        For Performance….have you ever heard of Lamborghini, Audi, and Porsche?
        They All offer AWD Sports Cars.

        Reply
        1. They do now, however, the comment was about the EV Blazer and if you don’t reside in snow country and don’t travel there, why have AWD or 4WD – apparently you assume your smarter then everyone else, but you over reacted to the comment- have a swell day

          Reply
  24. Tried to place a reservation for the Blazer EV today but the when I click on complete reservation I get an error. Called the number on the error screen and she said that it was that I used a card type that the local dealer did not accept. I used a Master card the first time then I used a Visa card the second time but still no reservation. Anyone having a problem with a reservation? She later told me that she would escalate my call and give me a call back, still waiting for a call back so I can place a reservation, 🙁

    Reply
    1. Used my GM Card, no problem.

      Reply
    2. They run the card for $69,999.

      Reply
  25. Think the SS looks real nice, inside and out…but no gas engine, no thanks! I will probably end up boosting my ’21RS with the 3.6L.

    Reply
  26. GMA is basically EVA…
    Love them or hate them… EV articles are the only ones people get fired up over.
    expect more…. many.

    Reply
  27. SCREW the HP! Damned thing needs more range, regardless of which drive configuration it may come in. WTF is GM thinking, or aren’t they?!

    Reply
  28. Does anyone know from experience if I reserved one model, If I can change that to another once it comes time to order? I assume that will be early next year. Reserved a RS but may want a SS depending on specs/prices etc.

    Reply

Leave a comment

Cancel