mobile-menu-icon
GM Authority

Fifth-Gen Camaro Pickup / El Camino Build Complete: Exclusive

Back in April, GM Authority covered a custom fifth-gen Chevy Camaro set to receive a full pickup / ute conversion from Casados Design in Birmingham, Alabama. When we left off, the Camaro was coming together nicely, with a new rear bed section that gave the muscle car some distinct El Camino vibes. Now, GM Authority has an exclusive update on this “El Camaro” build.

In an recent interview with GM Authority Executive Editor Alex Luft, Casados Design boss Adrian Casados outlined some of the details of the El Camaro build, as well as the shop itself.

Casados Design specializes in one-off high-end coachwork and custom metal shaping, exclusively serving customers looking for top-shelf builds. Think a quarter million dollars and above. In addition to body work, the shop also works on engines and drivetrains, with interior work being the only facet left out of the Casados Design wheelhouse.

This particular Chevy Camaro build is based on a fifth-gen model from the 2010 model year. The customer approached Casados looking for a tough, muscle-car aesthetic, but with a Holden-esque ute body in back. The customer also insisted on creating something GM might build today, rather than settle for something that “looked” like a custom build.

Although Casados suggested that the customer go with something else for the platform, such as a Dodge Charger, the customer insisted that the build be based on the Chevy Camaro, while also stating that the wheelbase should remain unaltered. As such, turning the coupe into a ute would result in significant rear overhang, challenging Casados to make the final product look cohesive.

To that end, the build incorporates traditional metal-shaping techniques using an English wheel. As it just so happens, Casados previously apprenticed for Aston Martin, and incorporated the same techniques in creating the new El Camaro.

The starter car was an SS model with the LS3 V8 engine and manual transmission. The fuel tank was left in the factory position, while the bed is a relatively short 4-feet by 5-feet. The trunk and backseat of the Chevy Camaro were tied into the new bed substructure. The bed itself extends past the original crash bumper by about 18 inches.

The tailgate is also completely functional. Casados sourced components from the 2007 and 2008 Chevy Silverado, including the handle, latch assembly, and hinges.

The quarter panels were all built by hand using an English wheel without a buck, extending out 8 feet and keeping the shape of the factory originals (albeit extended).

Now, the El Camaro is set for painting, slated to receive a shade of factory silver, while riding on the factory wheels. We can’t wait to see it when it’s all done.

Subscribe to GM Authority for more Chevy Camaro news, Chevy El Camino news, Chevy news, and around-the-clock GM news coverage.

 

Jonathan is an automotive journalist based out of Southern California. He loves anything and everything on four wheels.

Subscribe to GM Authority

For around-the-clock GM news coverage

We'll send you one email per day with the latest GM news. It's totally free.

Comments

  1. The cost of a project at GM would be very expensive.

    You think coupe sales are low try a 2 seat truck.

    As a former owner of a GMC Sprint SP I can say that I loved my car and wish they were around but the realities of the market are here. There are just not enough sales to justify the car and to so so few the cost would be as much as a full size crew.

    Reply
    1. Good idea. Bad execution. Our of proportion.

      Reply
      1. They could have squared it up at least

        Reply
    2. Change the grille more car/trucking with off road lights. Stretch wb to 115.0. Offer 4cyl, efi and v6 efi. Vinyl base model, cloth mid-range, leather premium models, all wheel is the only trans. With 1.5in lift, bed incorporated to interior for 5 inch length. 4 cyl comes with a 5/6 manual trans,
      Bedbox electric with battery upgrade on v6. Should be a 30k up.

      Reply
  2. 🤮
    No thank you!

    Reply
  3. The 1971 El Camino was better looking.

    Reply
    1. But sill not as good as the 1970, subjective I know.

      Reply
  4. My friend built a nice car-truck conversion starting with a 2007 Charger. Much better proportion than this Camaro build. It looks factory. Too bad that I don’t have a way to post a picture here.

    I wanted to make a show board for him that says: This was originally a design concept car put together at the Chrysler Engineering Center in Rochester Hills, MI. It instantly wow’d Chrysler management. Lee Iacoca was brought in from retirement to get his impressions. He said: “We HAVE to build this”! Production was scheduled, but unfortunately the economy collapsed in 2008 and Chrysler had to cancel all new product plans. This car-truck concept was then put on display in the Walter P. Chrysler museum – also in Rochester Hills. When the museum was closed by Fiat, it came into possession by Jay Leno. Jay drove it for a while, but ended up selling the car to my friend for a ridiculous amount of money.

    (note the above narrative is all FAKE NEWS – but the vehicle my friend built really exists! It has appeared in at least one kit car magazine)

    Reply
  5. One man’s stupid idea is another man’s fortune! I can’t blame Casados whatsoever, they tried to talk him out of butchering a nice Camaro, but alas, what can you do, a fool and his money are soon parted. I have an idea, how about importing a real ute from down under or better yet find an el Camino and restore it to better than new, just a thought!

    Reply
  6. Note to Mary Barra – “If you build it, they will come.”

    Reply
  7. as the owner of a ’67 and ’86 El Camino no thanks….now maybe a Malibu based one as the Caminos from ’64 to ’87 were based on the Chevelle/Malibu platforms. If Pontiac had not been killed I was all set to buy the G8 Sport Truck. Oh well.

    Reply
  8. YES build it I need something to through farm stuff in when I go to town for supplies.. Yes count me in Forget about the HATTERS.. they don’t haul stuff beside their dumb butts…

    Reply
  9. Oh wow….a Holden, but uglier.

    Reply
  10. That thing is beyond hideous! It looks like something a redneck family built! I’m certain I hear Johnny Cash singing about this design school dropout.

    Reply
  11. Wasted effort–exercise should have raised the roof a couple of inches for better visibility and let Camaro fans see what this car could have been—already has great engine and chassis—-come on customizers someone attack the visibility problem.

    Reply
  12. If Chevrolet was smart the return of a RWD platform that Impala and El Camino could share with 4 trim levels – Base, Luxury LT, Sport SS, ZL-E

    Reply
  13. The Impala would have been a better choice the lines the length are all there.

    Reply
  14. I’m not at all opposed to an El Camino based vehicle but this is a disaster. I understand that the customer made the request and the design team tried to oblige him but it simply doesn’t work asthetically. It looks cheap and amateurish at best and no color choice will change that. It just looks like a box attempting to be grafted to the back end of a car. I would be embarrassed to advertise my business using this as an example of my work and definitely wouldn’t drive it at all for fear of ridicule. Even an SSR would be a far better alternative as it would have similar performance and a convertible to boot but alas, even the SSR had a polarizing effect.

    Sometimes you just have to say no to customers. I get that money is very important for some folks and mouths need feeding but my reputation is much more important than any amount of money someone insists on paying for my services. At this point the ex – Aston Martin employee ( la dee da ) better show me what he can really do if he plans to ask me to trust a 5 or 6 figure project to his team. I’m sure he’s very good at what he does, but this isn’t doing him any favors.

    Reply
  15. Chevy re introduced the El Camino in 64 and through the G body El Camino sold a bazillion of them. Why would not a new re introduction now sell well? Wether it’s based on a Camaro or any other chassis, who cares.

    Reply
  16. I believe it is much overdue for a modern elcamino… However I believe that their is something just a Little off with this design.
    In my opinion; I believe that the flaw is in the rear axle position.
    If rear axle or the wheel base of the rear axle was back just a Little farther than you would have a top seller for sure… From the rear axle to back of bed is fine but from the rear axle to the door openings is too tight… If this area was more balanced like the elcamino’s of the past then you would have a best seller for sure…
    As of this picture it looks as such a bed stuck inside of a trunk.. More stretch is needed to be a true American elcamino… But that would sell big as is now oversees… But that’s one man’s opinion…. I’ve always loved. The elcamino and I’m hoping to see a rear wheel drive production model. At the dealership s soon… With any of the Ls powered options you so choose. I would buy that THAT’S for damn sure… Can’t wait…

    Reply
  17. Go back and research; 1. The 1970.
    2. The 1980.
    And. Finally the 1987.
    Find the balance between the car and the truck…
    Low and lean will sale…
    This pic has more car than truck…
    Stretch the frame and move. Rear axles back.
    It looks more like a add on instead of a car that flows into a truck..
    One more trick suggestion..
    Incorporating that lower solid chrome taillight bar between the tailgate and the rear defusser with the modern three round lights on each like the custom big rigs of today would really put some truck into it

    Reply
    1. You do realize this is on a stock chassis and stretching the wheelbase would require massive structural engineering to the build.

      Big rig? do you want huge big rig mud flaps also? 😄😆🤣

      Reply
  18. WTF??

    Reply
  19. Sorry, but that was a waste of a nice Camaro. The original El Caminos were works of art. That is a square box tacked onto a Camaro.

    Reply
  20. Don’t waste any more time building this ugly thing. This is far from an ElCamino. Leave the Camaro alone. These must be out of work GM designers, thus the out of work part.

    Reply
  21. I’m glad I’m not the only one who thought it’s bad.

    The one good thing that comes out of this is that we know what shop to NEVER visit if we want a custom car done.

    Reply
  22. Really looks bad they need to just build something that looks more like the 67 elcamino

    Reply
  23. The Dodge Magnum would have made a ģreat El Camino style truck/car, not the Camaro.

    Reply
  24. If they don’t offer 4×4 as an option, they’re making a big mistake.

    Reply
  25. Awesome bring the head lights and tail lights back with grill

    Reply
  26. Bring back front end head lights and tail light from the 72 . I think it’s a great idea to bring back older cars and trucks. But some things should stay the same in the remaking of these older styles of cars and trucks.

    Reply
  27. I have owned a 64 Elky, an 86 and presently owned a gorgeous 85 Conquista. Yes. It was restored but this one is a thousand percent better than my hot rod 64 which I owned at 18.

    I agree with the other comment to build it on the Malibu body. It is heresy on the Camaro chassis. I still own a 64 Chevelle but it is a much milder SS with 200R4 and a crate 350. The 64 Elky was a 283 Duntov cam and solid lifters and a 4 speed with a 3,000 lb clutch.

    Reply
  28. This project would have worked out much better starting with a CTS Sportwagon…same basic chassis as that Camaro but longer wheelbase, for better proportions.

    Reply
  29. I can see it painted candy apple red or tuxedo black with louvers on the hood and just behind the wheel wells on the sides of the front fenders for ventilation.
    Throw some old school turbo mags 50 series and a 24″ rim size low profile treads and a clean tonou cover over the bed…😎👍👊

    Reply
  30. Eewwww GM should look at hiring some new Engineers. Big let down for style.

    Reply
  31. Lots of creativity, labor, and skill went into this unique design. It’s certainly different and will turn heads. In 1983 I had made a scale model of what I then called an El Camaro. It included a functional tailgate which incorporated the Camaro’s taillights and spoiler. After having some fun with a local Chevrolet dealer, photos were sent to GM, and a polite letter received in return. The model also appeared in a couple of magazines. Throughout the ensuing years it has received many compliments.
    As unique as this modern Camaro conversion is, my personal opinion is that it is not particularly attractive. I trust that paint will enhance its appearance and that could certainly affect the overall effect. In full disclosure, I must admit that I’m not a great fan of the current generation Camaro’s styling to begin with, so my comments are not meant to disparage the obvious and apparent quality work performed in this conversion. Kudos to the designers and builders.

    Reply
  32. This is the ugliest conversion I think I’ve seen.

    Reply
  33. Nice thought, but get rid of the Camaro look. Put a 6.2 in it and make it a beast. El Camino still has a spot in the hears of Chevy owners…just make it look like one.

    Reply
  34. Somebody really has an out of focus imagination thats for sure. I wouldn’t be caught dead in that hideous looking thing! If GM built something like that it would be as famous as the spectrum they built in the late 80s. About as bad as a Yugo

    Reply
  35. Are you kidding me to each his own..that is one of the ugliest vehicles I have ever seen….so far. Please leave the classics alone.

    Reply
  36. Not what l’d hoped 4. Went all retro on the front and left the back looking like a box jammed up a camaro’s ass… And what was wrong with carrying the design front and back nobody gonna just sit there and stare at it from one angle and you 4got 2 build it at Lordstown with an E-frame and make it electric…???

    Reply
  37. Sorry, it’s ugly and out of proportion. The rear overhang is too far from the rear wheels. The wheelbase should have been lengthened. The taillights are ugly. The C-pillar going down to the pickup bed looks weird. The base car should have been something else, like a Dodge Charger or Challenger. What’s next, a Camaro limo?

    Reply
  38. John Monroe obviously does not know any rednecks. We run from these abortions. A true redneck drive an El Camino or a Ranchero and sees no need to ever use a car as ugly as the Camaro to meet our needs. So blame this monstrosity on a city dwelling.. Starbuck drinking.. hybrid driving.. knuckle dragging neophyte.

    Reply
  39. Horrible, has no flow. Looks like the trunk was deleted and a big ugly square box was welded on. Both the Holden and previous El Camino models look better.

    Reply
  40. Totally out of proportion

    Reply
  41. OMG I am a camaro owner and I am offended. This is a disgrace to the camaro owners. Why would you convert a muscle car to a truck. There are others enhancements to the original form that could be made, like more horsepower, unique colors. How about limited edition with 1967 body camaro. I am in tears with this suggestion of a truck.

    Reply
    1. The new Camaro sucks any way. I can’t imagine living with someone like you that gets offended about a car as ugly as a Camaro. Most of us El Camino owners really don’t want a new Camino.. especially if its based on the Camaro.. of any generation

      Reply
  42. Figures… after seeing how GM completely screwed the Blazer into the ground, this ElCamino doesn’t surprise me at all…

    Reply
  43. No man…….just no.

    Reply
  44. It sucks, totally out of proportion!

    Reply
  45. Saw this car out in the wild today. It’s a real head turner

    Reply

Leave a comment

Cancel