mobile-menu-icon
GM Authority

GM’s Next-Generation Chevy Montana Will Redefine The Nameplate

Last week, we reported that General Motors revealed the first teaser image for the next-generation Chevy Montana, confirming the name of the future Chevrolet compact pickup and the start of the preparation phase for its manufacturing at the São Caetano do Sul plant in Brazil. In addition, the automaker announced that the new Montana will redefine the nameplate’s legacy which, up until now, was exclusive to the South American market.

Next-Gen Chevrolet Montana teaser

The third-generation Chevy Montana will be a radically different product from the two previous ones, with which it will share only the name and the unibody architecture. In fact, GM claims the next Montana will debut an all-new pickup concept for the brand that will elevate the nameplate to another level from its previous positioning at the bottom of the subcompact segment.

2021 Chevrolet Montana

“The new Montana will unite an already established pickup truck name with a vehicle of unprecedented proportions,” said Marketing Executive Director at GM South America, Hermann Mahnke, in a press release. “The next-generation model will arrive with plenty of innovations, specially designed to meet current consumer preferences,” he added.

As previously anticipated by GM Authority, the next-generation Chevy Montana will be upgraded to become the first compact-sized unibody pickup in Chevrolet’s history. As such, the model is moving away from the traditional two-passenger single cab format for a larger four-door double cab body, which will be able to carry five people with greater cargo capacity.

Mechanically, the future Chevy Montana is based on an extended variant of recently launched GEM platform that will not only allow it to increase its dimensions, but also include state-of-the-art equipment, unlike the two previous models based on an updated 1990s platform. We can expect it to feature a turbocharged 1.2L three-cylinder engine with more than 133 horsepower as standard, as well as a possible more powerful option.

2005 Chevrolet Montana Sport

The next-generation Chevy Montana could debut later this year and go on sale in Brazil during the first half of 2022, as an indirect replacement for the second-gen model that ceased production at the end of last April. The vehicle will join the Bow Tie brand’s portfolio in international markets, below the Chevy S10/Colorado.

Subscribe to GM Authority as we bring you the latest Chevy Montana newsChevrolet news and ongoing GM news coverage.

[nggallery id=1059]

Deivis is an engineer with a passion for cars and the global auto business. He is constantly investigating about GM's future products.

Subscribe to GM Authority

For around-the-clock GM news coverage

We'll send you one email per day with the latest GM news. It's totally free.

Comments

  1. Hmm sound like it is moving in a direction that if they would need a small FWF based truck here this one could fill the slot if needed.

    It needed to carry 5 people and be a step up vs what it is now to have any chance here.

    Reply
  2. Ugly, looks like a shrunken avalanche yuck

    Reply
    1. They haven’t shown it yet.

      Reply
  3. Hope it comes to USA. Also would like to see a pickup based on the GMC savana platform. Would love the cab over design. Don’t know why they haven’t already built it

    Reply
    1. GM has to sell it in the U.S. to compete against the new Ford Maverick and all the imports.

      Reply
      1. I love my GMC Sierra, this I would not buy. Too ugly, what were they thinking. Sorry didn’t mean to be rude.

        Reply
        1. The pictured version was the old model, the new one will look completely different.

          Reply
      2. Exactly and despite the fact that both the Ford Maverick and the Hyundai Santa Cruz both have a unibody type of pickup, it makes sense for the Chevy Montana to compete with these models that were getting and they better start making a plan to bring it up to North America before it’s too late.

        Reply
        1. Bob, I totally agree but they better put something other then the 1.2L turbo 3 cylinder. The 1.4L used in the Cruze makes more sense. Even the 1.5L Turbo or 2.0L Turbo with the 9 Speed transmission as an option. In addition a hybrid would be nice option to get MPG up. I want something a little smaller then the Colorado or Canyon with better gas mileage but still have a towing capacity around 2,500 pounds. To compete with the Maverick and Santa Cruz it’s going to require four doors which I think is planned with the new design.

          Reply
  4. That is so Ugly!! What are you doing GM!?!? Make something Cool for cryin out loud!! Please!! I beg you!!!

    Reply
    1. You can tell just from that silhouette?

      Reply
      1. Chevy Montana is ugly and looks like a toy truck. I’m a GM Retiree and I would buy a Ford Maverick any day over the Chevy Montana.

        Reply
  5. GM has to do nothing yet and needs to see if there is any staying power to this line of truck.

    Honda only sells 2/3 what GM sells in the mid size with the FWD based truck. Also every FWD based truck before it has failed.

    Let’s see if the Maverick is a real deal or just a truck that fills a need then stagnates after the initial new vehicle surge.

    Even Ford at this point is not sure what the Maverick will do in the future.

    As for the ugly little thing here it is not coming. The truck in the shadow that you really can’t tell what it is will be the new truck.. let’s just see what it is before we get crazy,
    .

    Reply
  6. Most GM products are imported junk from China, Korea, etc. I would never consider them as an alternative.

    Reply
    1. An alternative to what? This Brazilian truck is a pretty similar idea to Ford’s Maverick, which will be built in Mexico.

      Reply
  7. Dear Chevy –
    I used to be a major devotee. Congrats on hiring some of the worst stylists in the automotive industry. It looks like you took base model Equinox and cut a pick up bed into it with an acetylene torch.

    Reply
  8. Notice every time GM comes out with a new vehicle they brag how well is built and how long it’s going to last bottom lines another piece of junk that won’t sell or nobody wants

    Reply
  9. Make a 2 door extended model or 4get it, just my opinion!

    Reply
  10. I guess I don’t really understand the purpose of this segment.. what does the maverick do better than the ranger? Why would you buy a Montana over a Colorado? Just seems like a redundant product line.

    Reply
    1. maverick does price better than the ranger.

      Reply
    2. Not only does the Maverick cost a lot less, it gets a lot better mileage. I guess you really don’t understand.

      Reply
    3. Don’t let them fool you as the Maverick will cost nearly as much aAs the ranger as options are applied. It all see about $35K. THE $20K MODEL like the $59K Vette. On paper it exist but not on dealer lots.

      Reply
      1. I priced the one I want at about $24500. I’m not interested in the leather seats.

        Reply
  11. Re name it cameo , any other names to reuse gm has used corsa

    Reply
    1. Pontiac isn’t around to use Montana anymore. I don’t see a problem.

      Reply
  12. I still see plenty of S-10s around-somebody likes this kind of truck.

    Reply
  13. GM must have made this for cool hip grandma’s and grandpa’s

    Reply
    1. As a cool hip grandpa…thanks. Yes to a 2 door even better if they call it El Camino. If its a 4 door with a 3 or 4 foot bed then pass. I don’t tow but, I need something to carry stuff back from Home Depot. We don’t all need trucks that can tow a mountain.

      Reply
  14. Get your techy nerds and your designers out of their bubble offices and get them out to real america and look at what trucks are mostly on the roads…they are not these types of trucks…people want muscle trucks that can haul their crap and pull their trailers…they want offroad tires on them to get out to the boonies..in other words they want tuff trucks that get the job done…

    Reply
    1. >> people want muscle trucks that can haul their crap and pull their trailers

      And then they drive them around with the bed permanently covered, to and from work at an office.
      Why is it so hard for you to imagine that there are a lot of other people who want a smaller truck, not for off-roading or hauling horse trailers?
      Look at how popular the small trucks were when they were actually available.

      Reply
  15. I have a ’98 S10 with V6 Vortex since 2002 .Love it. This looks similar to an El camino.It would be a good idea. It should come with a V6 option and Rwd,extended cab.

    Reply
  16. I’m a long time truck guy but age has taken over and I no longer go some of the places or do thi go I once did. Something smaller and parking lot friendly begins to make sense. Plan to check out the Maverik when it shows up.

    Reply
  17. So it’s a honda Ridgeline not a pickup

    Reply
    1. If it were a Honda Ridgeline it would cost as much as a full size 4×4 truck.
      No, it’s actually just a small truck.

      Reply
  18. Please GM!! DO NOT MAKE THIS!!! An Absolutely awful design. The Montana used to be a minivan, how is this a minivan.

    Reply
    1. Please Jamie!! Read the article and you’ll realize that they haven’t even shown off the design yet.

      Reply
      1. Nate, you are wasting your breath. Its a horridly composed article that confuses from the get go. The writer should just start over leaving the legacy Brazilian truck out of the article.

        Reply
  19. Bring back the El Camino. I owned 3 of them and loved them. They had style and utility. The “Colorado” style should be discontinued.

    Reply
    1. They can call this El Camino if they want, but a car/truck has never been successful. It has to at least look like a truck, not a car with a bed on it.

      Reply
      1. Yea, Honda already tried that with the Ridgeline…

        Reply
    2. Cow Boy Cadilac! Yes lets hope. But keep the faith 2 doors only.

      Reply
  20. Looks like We’re back to the first Toyota’s that entered the U S. In the 70’s! GM! Please get serious!

    Reply
    1. Chevy has literally gone from top to flop in my opinion. Been a die-hard Chevy man all my life, mainly dealing with Chevy 4x4s, and not none of the new garbage they have out today I’m talking 1970s and ’80s. This little Montana three-cylinder has got to be the biggest joke Chevy has ever put out right next to the Colorado with the cat eyes, Dodge is the only one that nailed the cat eyes. So those of you die hard Chevy lovers might as well give up on it, because Chevy don’t love us back. I have seen the inside picture of this Montana and it is extremely disappointing and I only Wonder what the ridiculous price tag would be on this little three cylinder. Because truth be told I can spend $5,000 and build something 10 times the worth of this little Montana. CEO of Chevy should tighten up, sales have not been as good for Chevy as they have for everyone else, but that is also because everyone else puts out horsepower and extremely eye-catching designs at reasonable prices. I think Chevy is just throwing anything out there just to see how many “idiots” who will actually buy it.

      Reply
      1. Naming this atrocity Montana. Have you ever been to Montana? We (Montana Natives) drive real trucks with full size beds. Montana is a population of farmers, ranchers, loggers and outdoor enthusiasts. You should call it the California Metro. Besides ugly, it is only good for high dollar coffee shop drive ups and grocery getting.

        Reply
  21. Well if they want any new truck to fit in with Montana. especially Rural Montana, think about power tool hookups (power plugs), bale bed, water tanks. Ready for a farm.. otherwise they got no buisness calling it Montana.

    Reply
  22. The teaser shot looks to be a crew cab now. I wonder if they are toying with US sales for this because Maverick and Santa Cruz.

    Reply
  23. Chevy has been making very cheap looking and cheap material in their small colorado for years. This is just cheap plastic interior.

    Reply
    1. Probably, but there is no way for you to know that.

      Reply
  24. Fell out of ugly tree and hit every branch on the way down

    Reply
    1. It hasn’t been shown yet.

      Reply
  25. #1 the Maverick is not going to be that cheap once you add options,

    #2 The Colorado, Canyon or Ranger are not that much larger than my S10 and Canyon

    #3 most people want crew cabs today so that’s is where much of the size was added.

    #4 The El Camino is not coming back. 2-3 seater cars as trucks are just not working, I loved mine too but the trucks like the S10 killed it,

    There will be a rush on the Maverick much like the Ridgeline in the first year but sales will decline soon after. Will these FWD trucks fight over the same small market, Likely,

    I have owned a S10, Sonoma, El Camino and now Canyon. The size that the Canyon is is great, Not too big or small. If it were smaller the bed would pay the price. As for cost even the Denali is about the average price of a vehicle today, The average cost of a new car is $41,000 today so nothing is cheap.

    The reason these models exist is that Honda and Hyundai have no other RWD vehicle to base it on, Ford is basing it on an Escape platform to save money and make them more profitable,

    Reply
  26. How about Ford Chevy make a car or Truck with out a computer chip. They used to do it in the 70ties? Instead they would rather hold and wait so they drive up the demand and price. They have technology to do great things they choose greed.

    Reply
    1. How about you write them a letter, send it in the mail, and wait a few weeks for a reply? They used to do it in the 70ties?

      Reply
    2. Well, that isn’t actually possible. And none of us want a carburetor, choke, or vacuum advance.

      Reply
  27. Looks to me like GM is looking to appeal to the World Market with this new truck.

    Reply
    1. The ones in the pictures are made in Brazil. The new one hasn’t been shown, but will probably also be only for Brazil.
      You, like half the people on here, didn’t read the article.

      Reply
  28. Looks like GM Authority needs to caption the photos with “THIS IS NOT THE NEW MONTANA. IT IS THE OLD MONTANA.” to keep people who skim the article from jumping to conclusions.

    Reply
    1. I’m pretty sure they do this on purpose. Look at how many responses they get from morons that don’t have any common sense and didn’t read the article.
      It was probably by design.

      Reply
  29. The Montana is butt ugly! Compare the Montana to the Ford Maverick & Kia Santa Fe…. both to be big hits. Not the Montana, guaranteed.

    Reply
  30. That is possibly the ugliest vehicle I have ever seen.

    Reply
  31. Just awful,plain ugly vehicle.man I hate GM style they need a revamp! I’m a chevy guy but their ridiculous pricing and ugly vehicles,…,I’m about to trade in my wife’s 16 equinox for a Mazda!

    Reply
  32. Looks like trash & will probably have that junk error code filled 4 cylinder eco.
    Yuck

    Reply
  33. I am a Chevy person, but I have to say,… this is very embarrassing for GM. The truck is very ugly and Tiny. When I think of Montana, I think of something rugged and strong, something that can take on the mountains.

    Reply
  34. Looks like an el camino rip off

    Reply
  35. let me just say this what in God’s creation is this that a f-150 shell in a chevy form that is by far the ugliest vehicle I have ever seen in my lifefor truck wise the silverado they need to go back to the 2016 -2018 style like now

    Reply
  36. Looks like something my 65 yrs. old mom would be driving. I hate just about as bad as chevy moving from 5.3 v8 to 2.7 4cylinder in there Silverados.

    Reply
  37. I love my GMC Sierra, this I would not buy. Too ugly, what were they thinking. Sorry didn’t mean to be rude.

    Reply
  38. They did show a picture of the 2021 model Montana…looks like the front end of a 2008-2012 Chevy malibu! And the Maverick is smaller than the Ranger, just sayin’

    Reply
  39. First a minivan, and then a goofy little pickup truck. The Montana name will be as stigmatized as Aztek.

    Reply
  40. Should be called the Chevrolet Oregon. Montana should sue for the horrible and minimal representative of their name.

    Reply
  41. Looks like they cut the Aveo and put a bed, looks cheap.

    Reply
  42. Auto Tech for 15 years. Mechanic for 30. Another failure being put out by the big 3. 3 year 36 thousand then to to recycling plant.

    Reply
  43. I tell you this is some ugly it even looks ugly sorry to be rude but listen GM you just don’t get it your designers are just wrong I just don’t know how to say it but what you guys are doing even with the combustion engines cars sticking with the same designs too long I don’t know what you guys going to do or have to do to turn it around with your designs especially on your luxury cars and SUVs Toyota has overtook you ,you couldn’t making your midsize cars your nice, small cars either, you guys just gave up luxury cars mid-side cars and small , now look at the cars that the the Koreans and the Japanese are making you guys just gave that segment to the Koreans and the Japanese , look at the cruze the Chevrolet Cruze good car good small car the Malibu was competing with the Toyota Camry and what you do go put up 1.5 l engine in it discontinue the V6 and then discontinue to car , let’s see what you do with the electric vehicles I hope they compete with Camry because that camera ain’t going anywhere the Camry or Corolla you and Ford need to join and compete against the Koreans and Japanese because that’s what the Japanese did all their cars are the same cars with a different design in the front and back design but they basically the same car you and Ford need to do it and get it right but now look what you do you go and give Honda your electronic design stupid hope you get it right goodbye

    Reply
  44. Go back to the drawing board literally

    Reply
  45. It’s a Subaru brat

    Reply
  46. You people are commenting on the old Montana pickup/Ute from the South American market. The subject of the article is the next-gen 4-door pickup, the only picture of which is the poorly-lit teaser near the top of the article. It remains to be seen if that will be a product worthy of praise.

    Reply

Leave a comment

Cancel