GM planned to give the Chevy Bolt EV all-electric subcompact hatchback a mid-cycle enhancement (MCE) for the 2021 model year, but due to complications arising from the COVID-19 pandemic, the updated model was delayed by one model year. The updated version will instead go on sale this summer, at the same time as an all-new, larger relative built on the same GM BEV2 platform, the Chevy Bolt EUV.
2022 Chevy Bolt EV
2022 Chevy Bolt EUV
At that point, customers will therefore have two Chevrolet EVs to choose from. It therefore seems appropriate to explain exactly what the difference between the two small electric models, which were announced earlier today.
Exterior Dimensions
In most exterior dimensions, the 2022 Bolt EUV is exactly the same size as, or within fractions of an inch of, the 2022 Bolt EV. However, it is significantly longer, by 6.3 inches, and also has a greater wheelbase, by 2.9 inches. As we will soon see, this has a direct effect on interior dimensions.
2022 Chevy Bolt EV
2022 Chevy Bolt EUV
Despite its greater size, the Bolt EUV is only 90 pounds heavier, with a curb weight of 3,679 pounds to the 3,589 pounds of the Bolt EV. This represents an increase of 2.5 percent – a small difference, but a noticeable one in terms of range and perhaps performance.
| Bolt EV | Bolt EUV | |
|---|---|---|
| Wheelbase (in. / mm) | 102.4 / 2,600 | 105.3 / 2,675 |
| Length (in. / mm) | 163.2 / 4,145 | 169.5 / 4,306 |
| Width (in. / mm) | 69.5 / 1,765 | 69.7 / 1,770 |
| Height (in. / mm) | 63.4 / 1,611 | 63.6 / 1,616 |
| Front track (in. / mm) | 59.1 / 1,501 | 59.5 / 1,511 |
| Rear track (in. / mm) | 59.1 / 1,501 | 59.5 / 1,511 |
| Curb weight (lbs. / kg) | 3,589 / 1,628 | 3,679 / 1,669 |
Interior Dimensions
Since the exterior dimensions are so similar, it should come as no surprise that the Bolt EUV has almost exactly the same amount of passenger and cargo room as the Bolt EV. In some respects, the larger vehicle is in fact slightly less spacious, though never by more than an inch. Surprisingly, the Bolt EUV’s cargo volume is marginally reduced compared to that of the Bolt EV.
2022 Chevy Bolt EV
2022 Chevy Bolt EUV
Where the Bolt EUV scores in this comparison is in its rear legroom, which is 3.1 inches greater than that of the Bolt EV. This almost entirely explains the 2.6 cubic foot increase in passenger volume.
| Bolt EV | Bolt EUV | |
|---|---|---|
| Front headroom (in. / mm) | 40.1 / 1,018 | 40.0 / 1,016 |
| Front headroom with sunroof (in. / mm) | - | 39.1 / 992 |
| Rear headroom (in. / mm) | 37.9 / 962 | 37.8 / 960 |
| Front legroom (in. / mm) | 44.3 / 1,124 | 44.3 / 1,124 |
| Rear legroom (in. / mm) | 36.0 / 915 | 39.1 / 993 |
| Front shoulder room (in. / mm) | 54.6 / 1,388 | 54.6 / 1,387 |
| Rear shoulder room (in. / mm) | 52.8 / 1,340 | 52.0 / 1,320 |
| Front hip room (in. / mm) | 51.3 / 1,303 | 51.4 / 1,305 |
| Rear hip room (in. / mm) | 50.6 / 1,286 | 50.2 / 1,275 |
| Passenger volume (cu. ft. / L) | 93.9 / 2,659 | 96.5 / 2,734 |
| Cargo volume, rear seats up (cu. ft. / L) | 16.6 / 470 | 16.3 / 462 |
| Cargo volume, rear seats down (cu. ft. / L) | 57.0 / 1,614 | 56.9 / 1,611 |
Powertrain
Both vehicles use the same electric motor, rated at 200 horsepower and 266 pound-feet of torque, and have the same 288-cell lithium-ion battery pack. The extra weight of the Bolt EUV means that its range is nine miles lower, at 250 miles, while its longer wheelbase explains a turning circle of 38.3 feet compared to the Bolt EV’s 34.8 feet.
2022 Chevy Bolt EV
2022 Chevy Bolt EUV
DC fast charging should give Bolt EUV owners up to 95 miles per half-hour, or five miles less than Bolt EV customers will enjoy. There is no reason to believe that there is any technical difference in the fast charging systems of the two vehicles. Once again, the discrepancy is likely caused by the Bolt EUV’s slightly greater curb weight.
| Bolt EV | Bolt EUV | |
|---|---|---|
| Drive type | Single motor and gearset | Single motor and gearset |
| Motor | Permanent magnetic drive motor | Permanent magnetic drive motor |
| Power (hp / kW) | 200 / 150 | 200 / 150 |
| Torque (lb.-ft. / Nm) | 266 / 360 | 266 / 360 |
| Final drive ratio | 7.05:1 | 7.05:1 |
| Battery energy | 65 kWh | 65 kWh |
| Battery chemistry | Lithium-ion | Lithium-ion |
| Battery cells | 288 | 288 |
| Battery mass (lbs. / kg) | 947 / 430 | 947 / 430 |
| Turning circle (ft. / m) | 34.8 / 10.6 | 38.3 / 11.7 |
| GM-estimated range on full charge (mi / km) | 259 / 416 | 250 / 402 |
| Charge time 120 V (mi / km per hour) | Approx. 4 / 6.5 | Approx. 4 / 6.5 |
| Full charge time 240 V (hours) | Approx. 7 | Approx. 7 |
| DC fast charge (mi / km per half-hour) | Up to 100 / 160 | Up to 95 / 152 |
The Bolt EUV will have slightly less range and it might be just a little slower. Its most obvious advantage is greater space for rear seat passengers, which will be significant for buyers who intend to use the vehicle regularly as transport for more than two adults.
Subscribe to GM Authority for more Chevy Bolt EV news, Chevy Bolt EUV news, Chevrolet news and around-the-clock GM news coverage.
Comments
What are your thoughts on both? i have a 2017 (one of the first in canada) deciding on my next EV now
I hear that the EUV will have assisted driving beyond that and the size and slightly different looks almost the same right
The EUV will have Super Cruise and a few other Standard features the normal Bolt will not have.
The charge times are disappointing and there is no available awd. The infotainment is already 3 years old. I was hoping for something special. I’m sure they’ll out sell Tesla.
Wow. I’ve now read the three articles on here about the EUV, then the new Bolt and now this side by side comparison. Maybe I’m just getting too old and need glasses, but I’m having a terrible time telling the difference. So my understanding is that they are nearly identical other than the longer wheelbase and thus more rear seat leg room?
Call me stupid, but I’m hugely disappointed in all this. First, I’m not sure I like the new Bolt better than the old one. Second, I can barely see any real difference. Lastly, why spend so much time and money/resources on the EUV for such a small difference? This is one of those times I just look at this and question GM’s decisions. Heck, they should have taken the EUV, made it more Buick looking and given the stupid thing to them.
Yeah… lowercase gm has been making some very questionable financial decisions lately imo. Mary Barra and the board should probably be held accountable, but they won’t be… Why offer this AND the bolt under the Bowtie? Why don’t they offer a rwd biased BEV or an awd BEV? With all the focus on BEVs in lowercase gm’s portfolio, you’d think they’d make a competitive one?… Just really disappointed with these marketing blunders under Mary’s lead.
Anyways, I totally agree that this could have been badged a Buick…lowercase gm is definitely trying to use the reputation of their most popular brand to hype this subpar offering… I highly doubt the new Bolt will sell more than 30k units a year… Disappointed. Pretty soon Mary is gonna try to change the Bowtie after she sullies the reputation of the brand 🙁
I guarantee that Buick will end up with a version of this or at least something similar.
Oh no doubt… It’s gonna be a sales dud and they’ll pawn it off on Buick with some swanky interior.
Agreed. Well, if they do push it off onto Buick, let’s just hope they really do make a lot of changes. I’ll wait to make a final call once I see them in person, but from here and on the Chevy site, I’m totally no impressed so far.
On the Bolt, it just looks funny outside. Like they shaved a few inches off the front and back, but left the rest the same. This gives it a stubby (or stubbier) look that is not well proportioned. The EUV does look better proportioned because it’s longer. However, the two just look to similar. On top of that, I don’t care for the interior at all. There’s something very Toyota-like going on there and that’s not good.
They need to kick Buick to the curb and put all current “Grandmother “ Buick products under the flagship GMC brand immediately! Redesign front of some current Buick products slowly or quickly, keep the model name the same so not to put current Buick owners into mental shock. They’re doing it with an already dead brand (Hummer), do it ASAP with an almost dead brand. My guess it’ll work. Because current Buick owners will feel like they’re getting attention and be pleased. But they’ll be motivated to go get a new Enclave because it’ll look more modern and they want the latest and greatest Enclave!
Greetings Robert,
I say bring back the Roadmaster with all the latest technology, plush interiors, cutting edge drivetrains and attempt to recapture the elegance of a Buick Roadmaster as a powerful highway cruiser. My last one was a 1996 Roadmaster with the Corvette motor, 25mpg and an interior that felt like top grade living room furniture.—Blessings
The GMC brand is exclusively trucks. Why should the Bolt go to the GMC brand when it doesn’t fit at all by any stretch of the imagination?
Even back in February of 2021, everyone knew that the Bolt platform would be done by 2024 with the new Ultium platform…
David Finlay: The top photo you show of the EV is actually the EUV. Goes to show how close the design is if even you miss it!
David auch: Is this the same David who brokers cars in LA? Hello my friend if it is.
SEEMS TO BE A CHANGE WITH NO DIFFERENCE.
Apologies for the late reply. If you look closer, you’ll see that the panel immediately below the headlights in that picture is not full-width, the lower side window line is at a different angle and the C pillar treatment is quite different from that of the Bolt EUV. The photo caption is correct – it’s a Bolt EV.
What are you talking about? The top photo has two cars in it. It has an EUV AND and EV. The car on the left side of the photo is the EUV.
If you mean the next row with 2 photos, then they are correctly captioned. There are many very clear differences between the two.
Ha, I thought GM/Chevy was going to have something to compete with the Mustang-E, Model Y and the ID.4. Is the EUV the “limo” version of the EV due to its increased rear seat room? Very disappointed in the EUV….. the ID.4 will be my EV since I need the greater cargo capacity of a wagon shape like the VW.
A little disappointed, I want a EV but I need AWD. I was hoping that would be a option. Come on GM.
I wonder what the range on a Bolt battery pack would be while it’s actively using awd in a cold winter storm… I’d be very surprised if it was over 200 miles. That’s a non-starter for me.
Will the EUV get All wheel drive ? What’s the point of paying extra for a crossover rather than a hatchback without AWD ? Also, GM should re-enter Europe with the Bolt. Would sell well there.
No AWD, at least on initial 2022 models. The point of the EUV is legroom, as far as I can tell. And it admittedly looks ever so slightly less like a tall hatchback than the regular EV.
So I just went to Chevrolet’s site and they have both of these up now. Can’t build one, but there are a lot of pics and some videos. I’ve come to the conclusion that if I were looking for an EV from Chevrolet now, I would absolutely go find a 2020 or 2021 Bolt. It’s proportions are better and the overall look is much better. What I noticed and alarms me even more than the exterior is that the interior now has a very Toyota-ish look to it. That is NOT a good thing! Something about the steering wheel and dash that faintly screams Toyota. Too bad. I think Chevy missed the mark on this “new” Bolt and Bolt EUV big time.
I agree on the exterior. I do not like what they have done to the front end at all.
I disagree on the interior. The new model looks much better to me. I will take Toyota look over Fisher Price any day. I want to take advantage of the great current model discounts but every time I go sit in one I just can’t do it. I can’t get past the seats, steering wheel control buttons and white trim on the dash…UGGGGG.
Love the Fischer-Price comment!!!
Funny, but true..
Hard to spot for sure, but this article posted pics of the EUV twice at the top and called one of them the EV. Easiest ways to tell are the black line that goes over the top of the charge port on the EV, the shape of the rear window (straight line on the bottom of the glass on the EV), and finally the shape of the taillights with the side marker extension on the EV.
Looks a lot better than the outgoing model, in my opinion. Not sure if it’s enough to pull my wife away from getting a Model 3 or a Y though.
Feel even better about my recent purchase of a highly discounted 2020 Bolt. I reasoned that it would be the perfect transitional EV, while waiting for the rapid improvement that’s bound to come in this category. With only a few negatives and great range —– for way under $30K. The Bolt is great fun to drive, and fit and finish exceeds the much vaunted Model 3. Now to wait about 3 years for some real improvements in all BEV’s.
Please enlighten us with what these real improvements will be in three years… So far it’s been a whole bunch of empty promises about better range from battery manufacturers.
I was going to consider the EUV to replace my 2020 Premier but I’ll pass. What a waste. I was hoping for a jump in cargo room not a decrease.
Bolt/Bolt EUV Like Encore/Encore GX Like Trax/Trailblazer . Groundbreaking? Mach-E competitor? I’ll take the 2020 Bolt with $14k off sticker if I want an EV.
I’d love to find out if these 2022s both have the same jarring compound crank rear suspension setup as my 2019 Premier. On the upside, they both appear to have better seats, with optional leather. I wonder if the electric driver’s seat with heat and cooling is available on both the EV and EUV. And am I correct in reading that both models have push-button shifting including a full-time one-pedal button, eliminating that wonky shifter on Bolts to date? As for the SuperCruise option, seems a little goofy to offer it on these short-haulers. No way I’d pay extra for that in a sub-300-mile vehicle, especially without automatic lane-change assist. What’s more, it’s apparently like an OnStar scheme — you have to start paying to continue using it after three years. As for the sun/moon roof, they’re often trouble-prone, especially for those of us who don’t have covered parking. And living in the sunny South, I’m not interested in the extra heat build-up on the interior. I would, however, love to be able to pay a bit extra to get a hands-free power trunk lift.
How can the stretched one be 6″ longer and have less cargo room with the back seats folded down?
My guess is these two cars are so similar even Chevy gets them mixed up, and the specs got transposed.
Seems like they couldn’t decide which length was the right idea, so the committee decided to tool up and make two separate but near-identical vehicles. Weird.
More passenger volume for the EUV.
LOL. Centerpunch, I totally agree!
Remember. this was a mid-cycle enhancement planned for the 2021 Bolt. But the Covid-19 delayed it’s introduction. Being an MCE the cost to do this needed update is relatively low, but needed. The Ultium based vehicles are initially slated for the more expensive ends of the market. Next generation Bolt will probably get the updates platform but that could be the next generation Ultium where the cost of production on this new system gets reduced.
yup!
The Equinox EV will replace the Bolt. They have a very similar look, but the Equinox will be a bit bigger (and I expect a bit smaller than the ICE Equinox).
I am a person of very moderate means. I have had a love affair with automobiles for more than half a century. I looked at a 2021 Bolt Premier and decided to wait until we have a wider selection of all electric vehicles. I have an idea for GM. When they get the new Bolts at dealerships all across America, how about importing the E300PLUS electric car which is a joint venture between GM and and a Chinese manufacturer? GM could place an E300PLUS next to a Bolt in every showroom in America. The E300PLUS is mainly a city/urban commuter vehicle with close to a 200 mile range and would be an entry level all electric car. The average distance traveled around town is 30 to 40 miles a day and you can charge from a regular electric home outlet. This would give the consumer an entry level option offered by GM. The car is very popular in China and since GM is involved, let’s offer it at Chevy dealerships in America?
Because in America the E300PLUS has been reclassified as an electric insect.
As a senior citizen living in a small town I would love to have the E300PLUS to get groceries, go to the hardware store, pray in church for better days and be able to charge the car from regular 110 outlet and never see a gas station again! I hope your comment was intended to be funny. My reply is quite serious.
May you have blessings that will guide you in a productive direction, Freddie
Yes Freddie, it was my misguided, unproductive attempt at humor. I gather you live in the States (gas station), you would have a better chance of picking up a monster 3 tonne dual cab pickup that appears to dominate the US market, than a sensible run-a-about. Add least you will be able to admire the new GM Bolt EV and EUV, not here in Australia. GM have pulled out of making left hand drive vehicles. For us seniors, transport may end up being an electric mobility scooter.
Thanks Mike, It is good to know that Aussies still have a sense of humor! I enjoy my little 1992 GEO convertible, 3 cylinder, 40 to 50 MPG but I’m thinking an electric may be the wave of the future, just ask China!———Freddie
Dear Freddie, (just ask China) the only original thing that has come out of China is gun power. Besides, where do you think China and Xi Jinping government got their future economic plan from. Xi read Jeremy Rivkins book “The Third Industrial Revolution”. Rivkin is American, one of your mob, he’s an economist and futurist. He advises 100s of governments all over the world. You can watch is videos on “YouTube”, that’s if you are interested in the social and economic direction of the world. Or you can buy his books, I’m currently reading for the second time “The Zero Marginal Cost Society”. Your country puts out some very bright boys and girls.
Thanks Mike,
The problem here in the USA is that corporate America is sending all of their intellectual property and manufacturing capability to offshore locations with the lowest labor costs and guess where that might be?
Remember DETROIT, Michigan, the motor capital of the world? There are now over 900 manufacturing plants that are vacant in Detroit. Blue collar workers used to make a decent living where they could take pride in supporting their family, provide health care and live in a decent neighborhood. Ask the wealthy CEOs of the major Corporations what happened to those blue collar workers? The United States has the wealthiest CEOs in the world. I wonder how they feel about the current income disparity in the USA? At any rate Mike take a look at the APTERA out of California and yes, I am still looking for my affordable electric insect for doing business around town. Freddie
Good to here from you Freddie, all I can say to my American friends is, buy cars if possible manufactured in the States, including insects. The same is happening here in Australia but I doubt anyone will be happy as car manufacturing as well as so many other goods are more and more manufactured by robots than humans. As robotics take over there will be less of a reason to send manufacturing overseas. Another thing that is set to take off is 3D Printing, think Star Trek replicator. It’s not tomorrow, it’s happening now, granted, in a small way. Look at it this way, the Wright brothers first flew in 1903 only 55 years later the first Boeing 747 hit the skies. If you were there, when the Wright Brothers first flew and someone said to you, in 50 or so years from now, you will be flying in a metal plane at 500kms per hour at 30000 feet not stop from London to New York you would have said to them “your mad”. They can even 3D print food, you won’t need a car in the future Freddie, just send your hologram out in stead.
You should have bought the SparkEV. It would have suited your needs perfectly AND cleared DOT standards.The E300p would need A LOT of work to pass US DOT standards for safety.
Does the EUV have a compact spare?
It must be a threat because all the Tesla fans are mad about it. IMO it could look more engaging but the 1st generation sold solidly, I don’t see Ford and VW making much ground because they don’t have the head start like GM and Tesla buyers are…Tesla buyers.
The first generation Bolt sold solidly, really? Compared to what? The Bolt has sold less than 80k units in the U.S. in 4 years… Those are straight up abysmal numbers. Even with massive discounts from lowercase gm financial no one wants to buy one. People just short term lease them because they are expendable vehicles with terrible resale value.
Hacksaw totally ignores that the Volt and Bolt are very well engineered, and are not simply compliance vehicles. Tesla, like Apple, was able to develop a fanboy cult, which tends to deify anything those companies do. The cyber truck is an example. The Supercharger network and super fast 0-60 times are really all that’s noteworthy from Tesla. Certainly not build quality or interior aesthetics; the tablet in the center is almost homemade looking.
I never said the Bolt wasn’t well made… People just don’t want it. And the few people who would want to buy it already are committed buying the Ponzi scheme Tesla, as you pointed out. If people wanted to buy the Bolt it would sell better, right? Supply and Demand are pretty straight forward concepts.
Compared to Tesla, all other manufacturers were a distant 3rd from GM, don’t act like Tesla didn’t receive the same federal discounts like GM. Not many is looking for much sex appeal from their vehicles in general otherwise more V8 Chargers would be on the road, same for E/Vs and Ford is about to find out hard.
One of the reasons for the low number of Bolts sold is that the sales people don’t want to bother trying to sell an EV because they have to spend too much time explaining how to operate it, which keeps them from selling other cars. Also, if you watch the ads for the Chevy line of cars, GM mentions the Equinox, etc., but doesn’t even mention the Bolt. How can GM expect to have good sales numbers for the Bolt if they, themselves, don’t mention it in their ads, and if the sales people don’t want to even bother with it. Worse yet, some dealerships don’t even carry it in their inventory!
I’ve seen the Bolt mentioned in plenty of ads recently and it has been enjoying quite a bit of an uptick of sales this quarter.
My local Dealership has 20+ bolts on the lot and they are selling well.
I had a similar experience at a Chevy dealership and was redirected to internal combustion cars at much lower prices.
The Bolt is what it is, a really neat commuter car or grocery getter. It isn’t a road car, cruiser or family car. That said, a second car that has the range to get around locally, and/or short trips on the weekend is not a bad concept, especially if it need little or no routine trips to the dealer for “service.” A modern time “Corolla?”
Only people actually want to buy Corollas… Sales of the Corolla despite the “death or sedans” and “BEV revolution” are still well above 200k units a year in the U.S. That’s close to triple the volume the Bolt has sold in it’s entire existence, to put perspective on the numbers.
Back when gm was still uppercase they had a car that actually nearly matched Corolla sales for a few years. It was called the Cruze and widely considered to be a fantastic daily driver. Seems like a foolish segment to completely abandoned, but they did it…
I just hope gm announces an ICE product with Honda soon or a better vss-f offering because they’re going to continue to hemorrhage b/c market share until they make some type of improvement.
The Cruze was horrid. Drove them, hated them. Was happy to get back to my high-mileage ex-cop car 1994 Caprice – that’s how bad the Cruze was. The Malibu was a SIGNIFICANTLY superior car to the Cruze, for a small amount more cost.
I’m old enough to remember when VW came ashore, I even talked dad into buying a 1956 VW. They took the nation by storm, because so many began to realize the Detroit cars of the period were getting ridiculous in size, looks, and mpg. Fast forward to now, and we have the same phenomenon with gigantic pick-ups, most of which run around empty. Will the public suddenly do what they did in the late fifties? Detroit is hedging its bets with huge electric pick-ups in the works. (There has to be some irony in an electric Hummer.) Perhaps the era of huge, macho, coal-throwing, lifted diesel pick-ups is about to run its course. Saner heads may yet prevail.
Thank you Jim. I am with you 100%!!!
The best way to dissuade people from buying and driving trucks that you don’t like is not to try to force them to think the same way as you… The best way to get them out of gas pickups is to hit them in the wallet with carbon tax.
I really don’t think small, modern passenger ICE vehicles are any worse for the environment or have a substantially larger carbon footprint than BEVs. You’re picking the wrong battle.
G0 drive a Chevy Bolt Premier and consider it for a city/urban experience. Granted there are reasons to drive a Diesel pickup truck, belching black smoke, including carbon, out of the 5 inch exhaust pipe, but, we have our free will to exercise in the USA. My preference, rather than another punitive tax like the carbon tax, how about continuing tax incentives for those who purchase an all electric vehicle?
If I pick the right battle does that mean we can be friends?
l
Just because we have different opinions doesn’t mean we can’t be friends. I have test driven a Bolt when they first came out and it drives quite similar to my Sonic, albeit quieter and quicker. Marketing to an urban experience does have gaps imo because most people who live in urban settings rent and don’t have an ideal charging situation. Charging a BEV would prove to be wildly inconvenient for the overwhelming majority, which is clearly reflected in the consumer interest in them.
I think incentivizing BEVs has already proven to be a very ineffective way to get buyers interested. Also, incentives aren’t really sustainable for the government or the manufacturers. At some point BEVs just need to sell because they are a competitive option and I don’t think they are there yet. The Bolt is still overpriced for what it is, and the Bolt EUV is the same thing, just arguably less practical because of reduced range and longer charging times, literally stepped backwards.
The way that’s financially sustainable to “incentivize” BEVs is to make gas vehicles more expensive by cranking up carbon taxes. Probably not the answer you wanna hear, but you can’t just print off money, it’s gotta come from somewhere.
I respect your opinions hacksaw! Please take a look at a “start up” called APTERA and please react to some of their amazing claims. I wonder if GM would be interested in partnering with a small “start up” company in California like APTERA?—-Freddie
It’s cool engineering, but you’d only getting what 20-40 miles of range daily out of solar charging. I think the most immediate answer for BEVs is better infrastructure, probably not solar panel body components.
I’m also going to sound like my dad saying this, but that thing looks like a death trap, highways safety would be a concern for me. They claim it’s safe, but let’s see what the NHTSA has to say about that. The Aptera looks more like a recreational vehicle than a daily to me.
Also carbon and kevlar are great materials, but isn’t it difficult to mass produce since body parts can’t be stamped or cast. I don’t think Mary or GM would be wise to invest in such a venture, but you never know with the rapid rate of their investments lately…
Remember the APTERA is a 3 wheeler and is referred to as an auto-cycle and will be required to meet the safety requirements of a motorcycle. I suspect it would be as safe as any motorcycle, perhaps more so, but certainly cannot compare to a four wheeler GM automobile. I guess GM would need to be willing to go into the motorcycle business if they partnered with APTERA. Thanks for your perspective. I just wish GM would bring the E300PLUS over to America and offer us an entry level, purpose built, city/urban vehicle for around town. Blessings!
You must live in Vermont… What do pickups have to do with this story?, plus not everyone wants to drive what you want either.
I think the Bolt EV looks fantastic, not interested in the EUV. GM have addressed all the problems of the original EV. This car will be very popular to those young people dipping their toes for the first time into electric vehicles especially the girls, families who need a second car and elderly. There is not much out there at the moment to compete with it, the ID3 comes close but its more expensive and still isn’t available in the states. I intend to trade up as quick as possible, while my ICE vehicle is still worth more than a boat anchor.
Rear legroom in my Bolt EV is in fact adequate for the average person. I previously had a Volt, and while a larger car, its rear seat comfort was inferior.
To me, turning radius is the one statistic where the Bolt EV shines brightest over the EUV. Many streets are 36′ wide curb to curb, at least in my town…. and the EUV would not be able to crank an U-turn, while the EV would have over a foot to spare.
My 2020 Bolt reminds me of the 1956 VW I once owned. Quaint looking but very practical. The bug took America by storm, while being the antithesis of what we were used to. A Tesla is more remindful of the advanced but ill-fated 1948 Tucker. Will the legacy companies overtake and perhaps do to Tesla what they did to Tucker?