mobile-menu-icon
GM Authority

GM Cruise Receives Approval To Test Driverless Vehicles On Public Roads

General Motors subsidiary Cruise has received approval to begin operating its self-driving prototype vehicles on public roads without a safety operator behind the wheel.

In a Medium post published this week, Cruise CEO Dan Ammann revealed the company has received a permit from the California Department of Motor Vehicles to remove the human backup drivers from its fleet of self-driving Chevrolet Bolt EV vehicles. He also said the company plans to begin operating the robocars on public roads in San Francisco before the end of the year.

“Today, Cruise received a permit from the California DMV to remove the human backup drivers from our self-driving cars,” Ammann said in the post. “We’re not the first company to receive this permit, but we’re going to be the first to put it to use on the streets of a major U.S. city.”

“Before the end of the year, we’ll be sending cars out onto the streets of SF — without gasoline and without anyone at the wheel,” he added. “Because safely removing the driver is the true benchmark of a self-driving car, and because burning fossil fuels is no way to build the future of transportation.”

Cruise prototypes

While Cruise has been testing its Chevrolet Bolt EV prototypes on San Francisco streets for years now, this will mark the first time that it will send completely unmanned vehicles out on the road. Rival company Waymo has a similar permit to test its driverless prototypes on Arizona streets, although Cruise believes that its efforts are more significant due to the chaotic nature of San Francisco streets.

“(San Francisco) is where years of blood, sweat, and tears have been poured out by everyone on the Cruise mission,” Ammann also said. “And it’s where over two million miles of city testing will truly hit the road for the first time: an electric car, driving by itself, navigating one of the most difficult driving cities in the world. And while it would be easier to do this in the suburbs, where driving is 30–40 times less complex, our cities are ground zero for the world’s transportation crisis. This is where accidents, pollution, congestion, and lack of accessibility collide. Often quite literally.”

The data obtained through Cruise’s fleet of Chevy Bolt EVs is being used to develop the driverless Cruise Origin robotaxi. The Origin is slated to enter production in the coming years at the GM Detroit-Hamtramck Assembly plant in Michigan.

Subscribe to GM Authority for more Cruise news, GM engineering and technology news and around-the-clock GM news coverage.

Sam loves to write and has a passion for auto racing, karting and performance driving of all types.

Comments

  1. omegatalon

    These systems are performing better; but one has to wonder what the insurance bill will be like to own a car with a Cruise automation system built in as it’s supposed to function without a driver meaning if it runs over a pedestrian, General Motors would pay the hefty insurance claim because these systems still act like teenagers that just got their drivers license and look confused at a 4-way stop or in heavy traffic.

    Reply
    1. theflew

      Have you watched any of the video with the Cruise Bolt’s? Cruise does pretty good, but they move very carefully. They can see things our eyes don’t see and can take in a complete picture not just what a human would be focused on. Computers don’t have to look at their phones or the person walking down the street.

      Reply
      1. Tigger

        Computers also crash and electrical systems fail. It would be fun to be a passenger in one of those drones when it happens especially considering the geniuses at Cruze want to equip these without a steering wheel or brake pedal.

        Reply
        1. meh

          This is why there are redundant computers on the cars. So if one fails the other instantly takes over.
          Once that’s done it stops in a safe location.

          Reply
          1. Barney

            Like when it’s tipped on its side by a peace loving demonstrator

            Reply
        2. Raymond Ramirez

          In fifty two years as a driver I have never seen any accident caused by equipment failure in any cars, but I did see more human caused accidents. I bet Tigger that he will see thousands of human caused accidents before any autonomous vehicle fails.

          Reply
          1. Tigger

            Kind of an unfair assertion. The only way we will know if AVs are safer than traditional vehicles is when there is an equal mix of AVs and non-AVs on the road. By the time that happens I will probably be pushing up daisies.

            Reply
  2. steve

    how come tesla’s autopilot isn’t doing driverless testing right now? i don’t think they even have a permit at this point.

    Reply

Leave a comment

Cancel