Chevy Trailblazer Sales Begin To Climb The Ranks In Q3 2020

Comments

1. 

   Waiting for the ” it needs a 2.7″ or “Kia is better”……
   Reply
   1. 

      Exactly Guestt. Waiting for the comments from hacksaw about how the teeb needs a larger/more powerful engine and that it’s outclassed by some Kia or Hyundai lemmings.
      Reply
      1. 

         It is outclassed by Hyundai, Kia and nearly every other brand though, and the sales figures reflect that. The platform is decent but clearly some manufacturers are offering certain things that GM isn’t, like a more powerful base engine and more powerful optional engine, also a DCT. Simply put GM’s product, for the price, is inferior.

         I would surmise that many people want a motor and transmission combination that can successfully climb a hill on the highway without endlessly searching for power that just isn’t going to be there.
         Reply
         1. 

            And here he is!
            Reply
            1. 

               h4cksaw is trying so, so hard to push his obviously biased agenda that the Trailblazer is underpowered. But reality is quite different, isn’t it?

               People have voted with their wallets and the Trailblazer is the fastest-selling vehicle not only in its segment, but in the industry as a whole! Production and supply can’t keep up with demand.

               With over 15K+ people taking a Trailblazer home in Q3 in North America alone, it’s very clear that your ill-conceived opinion does not represent reality.
               Reply
               1. 

                  fastest selling doesn’t quite mean best selling, no matter how you want to spin it.
                  Reply
                  1. 

                     Hacksaw – You’ve gotta be a complete dunce not to understand that “fastest-turning” is an indicator of all kinds of good things.

                     By the way, You’re the only one here trying to spin things. You’ve been trying ever since the trailblazer came out. It’s obvious you have an agenda all because the product doesn’t meet your asinine horsepower metrics. Glad Alex had been setting you straight.
                     Reply
                  2. 

                     Yeah especially when the dealer around doesn’t ever have any because they don’t get them in.
                     Reply
   2. 

      Ya, for a few posters here, unless the vehicle meets their specs, then it’s “Insert gripe about GM here”, because those posters’ views represent all of those who are actually buying GM products. Barra is doing a great job running GM, not wasting money, like Ford on vehicles that consumers collectively don’t want.
      Reply
2. 

   The 2021 Chevrolet Trailblazer CUV is gender neutral, meaning it’s appealing to both men and women; but to attract more customers, Chevrolet needs to consider a TrailBlazer RS featuring GM’s EcoTec LWC 1.6L DOHC-4v Turbo that makes 200 hp.
   Reply
   1. 

      The 1.6L was in one American product, which is now dead. It’s never coming back over here. It’s an old design compared to the LE2/L3A and three cylinder models.

      The only thing that may end up in a sportier version of this would probably be hybird/electric based. The 1.5L puts out almost the same power as the 1.3L T3 so I don’t think any four cylinder would end up in these CUVs. The 2.0L also will never be found in this segment.
      Reply
   2. 

      Yep. RS with same motor/tranny is sad
      Reply
   3. 

      It would be nice if that 2.0L LTG was offered in these SUVs. In my Camaro, I get 31 MPg highway and 25 city… while being able to accelerate to 60mph in 5.4s if I floor the gas pedal. That power train wouldve made these SUV’s a lot more attractive. 275hp 295ftlbs torque….
      Reply
      1. 

         GMC is going to get this platform for something, too. I’m hoping they use a 2.0t probably the LSY, the LTG isn’t going to go into any newer cars. It would be awesome if Chevy got an TBSS version because I’m a bowtie baby, but I’d consider a GMC with a 2.0t. I’m due for a new car by 2023 so hopefully GM can figure out how to make a decent b/c segment vehicle by then.
         Reply
3. 

   Man o man some one tell me why do people in the North American market like crossover so much ???? Sedans Are so much better and they always will be
   Reply
   1. 

      Because when there were just sedans, folding yourself in 4 different contorted positions to get in the door was the only choice. No headroom to speak of was the only choice.

      Crossovers, for all of their sameness, offer headroom, easier entry in most cases, easier access to the groceries most owners carry home, and with the folding 2nd and sometimes third row seats, more practical for bringing home things like garden supplies.
      Reply
      1. 

         Grizzly:

         Many of these SUV’s like the Trailblazer and Encore GX also offer the convenience of a power liftgate. That GM option also offers the ability to open/close the liftgate from the driver’s seat.
         Reply
4. 

   That is handy.

   I drive a Chrysler Pacifica van. One of the things it has that I take advantage of is the in-floor stowable seat. I reside where it rains a good deal, so, when I shop, I put the groceries or other things behind me on the flat floor. I pull into the garage, open the (power) side door, and retrieve my stuff, in out of the rain. There is no lift-over height to deal with, like I would have with a trunk or cargo well.

   I know vans are unfashionable, but, I am at an age where image goes only so far. It is practical for my needs, and as I have it made nice, with the “S” package (blackout trim, dark wheels), and have tinted windows and some mild stripe-work, it is “Not Your Mom’s Minivan”. In short, a van or crossover need not be boring.
   Reply
5. 

   GM is doing really good in this segment, regardless of what the haters think. A 3cyl turbo has a great amount of power in these smaller vehicles.
   Reply
   1. 

      Fake news.
      Reply
      1. 

         The fact that GM is outselling all other manufacturers in this segment is somehow “fake news” to you? Look at the charts above… numbers don’t lie.
         Reply
         1. 

            If that’s how you interpret the data that’s fine. I analyze those sales differently, seeing the Trax losing a lot market share to the Koreans and Japanese vehicles. And the Trailblazer doesn’t look like it’s on pace to gain it back anytime soon.
            Reply
            1. 

               I was surprised at how much Buick sells in this segment. Chevrolet and Buick have a one two punch going here with good products.
               Reply
            2. 

               Gm is my favourite automotive company, but majority of GM cars have no appeal to me, except for Camaro, Corvette and a couple Cadillacs. They scrapped the Cruze and Impala but kept that garbage Malibu. They could’ve made the Trail Blazer cool, but instead it’s just a cheaper alternative for people who can’t afford the Blazer. They scrapped a 2.0L Turbo LTG for a weaker 2.0T LSY which barely gets any better mpg. Gm is just so disappointing recently. Ford is coming out with the Bronco, Bronco Sport and Mustang Mach E… while GM has nothing to show except a teaser of an EV Hummer. Nobody wants a damn hummer that can’t even fit into a normal parking space.
               Reply
6. 

   Not sure about the CVT tranny? Long term reliability scares me… should I be worried?
   Reply
   1. 

      Get AWD version, it’ll come with the 1.3L and 9-speed.
      Reply
      1. 

         I’m all set with the 1.3t that was designed in communist China and is made in Mexico. Hard pass. Also Hyundai and Kia offer a warranty that’s nearly twice as long as GM is offering on this unproven engine. If GM is hoping to compete with the Korean and Japanese manufacturers in this segment they are going to need to do better. The Germans will be competing in this segment soon with the VW Taos coming in 2022. The Trax is a great little vehicle at a competitive price, but is showing its age. The Trailblazer, for what it offers, is wildly overpriced right now and thoroughly underwhelming, imho.
         Reply
         1. 

            yea man, they completely dropped the ball on this car. Imagine if the Trail Blazer was made to be the off-road version of the Blazer? But instead we get a cheap piece of junk that’s basically a Corolla SUV. But less reliable than a Corolla.
            Reply
   2. 

      ewww it has a CVT??????????? Disgusting.
      Reply
      1. 

         GM is pretending like the 9spd will make up for putting a 3 pot Chinese motor. News flash, it doesn’t. The 2wd Trax with the 4 banger and 6spd offers a better driving experience than the AWD 9spd Trailblazer. This thing isn’t going to sell in volume until GM equips it with a proper drivetrain or drops the price to 20k and just get rid of the base CVT all together… this vehicles release has been handled pretty terribly.
         Reply
         1. 

            I agree.
            I think if GM marketed and designed their cars for enthusiasts rather than people who dont care about cars, it would give them a better reputation. Ford is doing exactly that, and watch them sweep the market with that Bronco, Bronco Sport and Mustang Mach E. They played into the trend of SUV’s but they did it in a way that attracts car enthusiasts.

            0-60mph in 9.4s…………. a Corolla can do it in 8.5s WITHOUT A TURBO. Cmon. Why even make a car like this and spoil your reputation? I’m a Chevy guy, but I have to say Ford’s marketing and design team is doing what GM should be doing.
            Reply
7. 

   Can we PLEASE get rid of that R/C toy car looking antenna??? That looks so cheap and ugly. That ONE THING will deter me from buying a Trail Blazer. That Antenna is so hideous.
   Reply
8. 

   For those who are concerned about the 1.3L engine; this is the comment from Consumer Reports road test on the Encore GX:

   ” The 1.3-liter turbocharged three-cylinder provides a healthy pull—particularly at the low- to mid-range of the rev spectrum. The power is especially noticeable in common driving situations, such as accelerating onto a highway on-ramp or passing another vehicle, and it’s more impressive than the GX’s outright acceleration result of 9.4 seconds in the official 0-60 mph dash. “
   Reply
   1. 

      We are talking about the Trailblazer, not the Encore GX, right? The Trailblazer is notably larger than the GX. Similar vehicles, but different.

      I would say that the vast majority of Trailblazer reviews are quite critical of the 1.3t being the top option. Motortrend has the most recent article pertaining to the Trailblazer and they seemed quite underwhelmed with the overall value at the price point.

      “the Trailblazer was a nonstarter for our editors, who were quick to point out you could have better competitors for thousands less—or even a larger, better-performing compact SUV for the same price”

      It’s been pretty much the same old story in reviews since the release of the Trailblazer.

      Here’s another unfortunate, cheap quirk “We were less than impressed by the AWD system… which must be manually activated by a button on the center console rather than engaging automatically when needed”

      Imagine spending 30k+ on an AWD car and having to remember to manually engage your AWD in adverse weather conditions… unacceptable.
      Reply
      1. 

         Wrong again.

         The Trailblazer is slightly larger, but it weighs almost the same as the Encore GX.

         An apples-to-apples comparison, with both models equipped with the 1.3L turbo and 9-speed auto:
         – Heaviest Trailblazer configuration: 3289 pounds.
         – Heaviest Encore GX configuration: 3273 pounds.
         = 16 pound difference.

         When one publication finds that the Encore GX delivers a healthy pull, yet another publication thinks that the Trailblazer (which weighs only 16 pounds more) is a non-starter, you have to seriously question the criteria used by the second publication.

         I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again: your opinions do not jive with reality. The horsepower and torque wars in this segment make sense only in your head.

         Sources for my weight info:
         https://gmauthority.com/blog/2020/04/2021-trailblazer-weight-detailed-by-model-trim-level/

         https://gmauthority.com/blog/2020/04/2020-buick-encore-gx-vs-2020-buick-encore-weight-comparison/
         Reply
         1. 

            Lol ok. Let’s only question the criteria of trustworthy organizations that are critical of GM. I wonder if GMA gets any cash flow from GM? That would really ensure your articles unbiased right?
            Reply
            1. 

               If you’re suggesting that GM Authority somehow receives compensation from GM, then I will have you know that you’re gravely mistaken. GM Authority receives zero compensation from GM. Nada. Zilch. Zero.

               It’s sad that you would stoop to such low levels so as to attempt to smear the reputation of a reputable organization like GM Authority.

               Now, let’s return to your logic that Consumer Reports and MotorTrend are “trustworthy organizations.” Given just how different CR’s take is from MT’s, it’s clear that one of them (Motortrend) is woefully out of touch with reality and what actual consumers (rather than horsepower-hungry gearheads) are looking for in a vehicle like the Trailblazer. Keep in mind that MT is the same publication that recently proclaimed in a report that the Corvette C8 Z06 will have a twin-turbo 5.5L V8 engine only to back-track on it a few days later. Trustworthy? Reputable? Not when it comes to these two topics… and I can present a few more, too.

               Keep trying to spin things. I’ll keep telling it like it is.
               Reply
               1. 

                  I guess we’ll see. Currently the Trailblazer is pretty close to last in the segment. The Trax is doing very well, but losing market share. Honestly the Trax and Trailblazer are very different vehicle. I didn’t attempt to smear your publication, just asked a question. A question that seemed like a pretty legitimate one given your unwaivering stance of a subpar product, backed by a subpar warranty.
                  Reply
                  1. 

                     Oh please. I have a new Trailblazer RS and I love it. Bought it after reading the pieces here and then shopping it against 7 other comparable models. If you think Trailblazer is in any way subpar, you are gravely misinformed. Speak to actual buyers like myself if you want the truth. I feel completely with my purchase… not satisfied, but actually delighted. I love this little car-SUV and its light years ahead of the RAV4 I traded that was just mediocre.

                     You bring up Alex’s “unwavering stance” on the fact that the Trailblazer is a great product. Well I’ll tell you that his stance is actually spot on. The Trailblazer is awesome and he is giving credit where credit is due.

                     Alex is a leading journalist who knows what he’s talking about. You are a sad little troll with little common sense and a distorted reality. You only have one argument that the Trailblazer is allegedly underpowered and you have been shut down time and time again by those better informed than you, including Alex. I’m actually surprised you haven’t been banned already.
                     Reply
                     1. 

                        Censoring someone with a different opinion is an absolutely ridiculous proposition, last time I checked we don’t live in China. I’m glad you like you Chevy and I’m sure it will be a reliable vehicle for many miles. However, I am entitled to my opinion after test driving an AWD TB, just as you are entitled to yours after purchasing one.
                        Reply
      2. 

         Hey H4cksaw, I drove a 2011 Suzuki SX4 Manual (In Northern Canada Winters) with a button for AWD engagement and loved it. More control is great as a consumer who doesn’t really need any AWD in the summer.
         PS-GM and Suzuki please find a way to bring the Jimny to North America.
         Reply
         1. 

            I see what your getting at, but Modern awd systems disengage in dry conditions and engage awd in adverse conditions. They have sensors that can engage the awd only when needed. I just think that real time awd is kind of an industry standard in this segment. No offense to the SX-4 but that tech is way outdated.
            Reply
            1. 

               hacksaw – Alex said it best: “your opinions do not jive with reality.”

               From your comments, its obvious you are a disgruntled individual with very little common sense. You disagree with all logic and common sense because you have some twisted anti-Trailblazer agenda. If you don’t like the Trailblazer, that’s fine… go ahead and buy what you think better suits your needs, wants and desires. I’ll stay with my Trailblazer RS, which I love.
               Reply
               1. 

                  H4cksaw’s opinion may be controversial but I agree with him 90% of the time. I’m a Chevy guy, but when I see bull$hit I’m gonna call it out. This Trailblazer is bull$hit. First of all why does a car in 2020 still have an antenna??? Also 9.4s 0-60 is slow as shit, most cross over suvs can do it in 7s. Be honest, if you bought the Trailblazer, it’s mostly because you couldn’t afford the Blazer which is really what you wanted, or you saw a trailblazer with dirt cheap discounts. I doubt any sensible human would buy a Trailblazer at MSRP. People who are car enthusiasts wouldn’t even look twice at this car. But people who don’t really care about cars, and to them a car is just transportation from A to B, then yea those are the people who buy this car.
                  Reply
                  1. 

                     H4cksaw’s opinion is not only controversial. More importantly, his opinion is also severely out of touch with reality. I would describe your opinion as being maligned by the same issues – it does not accurately represent the events of the marketplace.

                     You want to talk about something as frivolous as an antenna? I think it gives the Tb character. Meanwhile, every single full-size pickup truck has a whip antenna, even the all-new F-150. Over 15,000 people in North America and over 10,000 people in China bought the Trailblazer in Q3 2020. Obviously, they’re not bothered by it.

                     Want to talk about 0-60 times? Sure, let’s do that. Why is it so difficult to understand what this car is, who it’s for, and what the deliverables are for the customer? Is that car fast? No. Does the engine do a good job propelling the vehicle? Absolutely, to the point that it feels adequate.

                     To demonstrate how out of touch you are with reality, think about this: Trailblazer is quicker than Trax, which has been the best-selling or second best-selling model in this segment. Clearly, buyer priorities in this space are way different than what you think they are.

                     Your “out of touch” opinion is further exposed when you start talking about why *you* think people would buy the Trailblazer. No, people don’t buy the Trailblazer just because they couldn’t step up to a Blazer. Believe it or not, the Trailblazer is enough car for the vast majority of those looking for transportation. Good, solid, comfortable, safe, and tech-laden transportation that’s also fuel efficient and works with their life style. That’s exactly what the Trailblazer delivers, and that’s exactly what the customer subset wants. Not everyone wants or needs a bigger car, which is why this space is the fastest-growing segment in the world right now.

                     And that brings me to the final point: the Trailblazer is for those who are looking for solid transportation. That’s exactly who this product is for.

                     You mention enthusiasts. Who ever said anything about enthusiasts? Do realize that non-enthusiast exponentially outnumber the enthusiast. If that weren’t the case, then everyone would be driving super truck and super cars. Yes, the Trailblazer is a mainstream product that appeals to the masses – and it does a dang good job of exactly that.
                     Reply
               2. 

                  No real car enthusiast would buy this car. This car was clearly made for people who don’t care about cars, and only buy cars because they need a form of transportation.
                  Reply
                  1. 

                     Those who simply need a solid form of transportation represent 90 percent of new vehicle sales today. That’s precisely who the Trailblazer is for. By comparison, enthusiasts (unfortunately) make up only a small percentage of aggregate new vehicle sales.

                     I’m an enthusiast, and I fully recognize that just because my car has nearly 465 horsepower and a manual transmission makes me a minority in the grand scheme of things.
                     Reply
                     1. 

                        Ok I see your point. If you’re saying this car was designed to be an appliance, something you use to get from A to B, then fine it is exactly that. But personally I think using the trailblazer name for such a boring car is wasted opportunity. Blazer and Trailblazer name has history, it’s iconic. They could’ve made this car cool, but it’s just an appliance. And if that’s what trailblazer buyers want, an appliance, then fine I agree with you it is just that.
                        Reply
                        1. 

                           I should add that, historically, the Trailblazer name was never used on any products that could be described as “exciting”. One could potentially make an argument that this was different for the Blazer, but there is just as much counter arguments to that point of view.

                           Ultimately, neither the Blazer nor Trailblazer names are legendary. In the past, both names were used to name mainstream SUV models (appliances) that got people from A to B. The TB never had an enthusiast following, while the Blazer had some, but it was quite limited compared to competing vehicles like Bronco and Jeep (Wrangler or Cherokee/Grand Cherokee).

                           As Caroll Shelby once said, the name doesn’t define a model – the model defines the name (paraphrasing).
                           Reply
                     2. 

                        You don’t need 400+ hp and a manual transmission to attract enthusiasts. There are many low powered sports cars with automatic transmissions that enthusiasts love. Such as 2.0T Supra, Ecoboost Mustang, 2.0T Camaro, Civic Type R, Golf R, BRZ, Veloster N, Elantra N Line, BMW 228, etc, etc.

                        CUVs such as Benz GLA, Toyota RAV4, Honda CRV, all capable of 7-8s 0-60… and looks so much better.
                        Reply
                        1. 

                           Agreed in that a high power rating isn’t required for a car to be fun or to “attract enthusiasts.” However, how important is it to attract enthusiasts in the grand scheme of things? As I mentioned above, enthusiasts represent a very small part of the new car buying public these days. It’s a rather unfortunate state of events, but it’s reality.

                           To that end, these models “2.0T Supra, Ecoboost Mustang, 2.0T Camaro, Civic Type R, Golf R, BRZ, Veloster N, Elantra N Line, BMW 228” only make up a small amount of overall sales. They make up just about 2 percent of the market. Chevrolet’s offering to this subset of customers is the Camaro, which covers a significant amount of price points and power levels.

                           Meanwhile, the RAV4 and CR-V are all a class above the Trailblazer. The Chevy Equinox has that the performance levels covered with the optional 2.0L turbo engine (temporarily discontinued for the 2021 MY). The models from Toyota and Honda that compete with the Trailblazer are C-HR and HR-V, respectively, and I must say that the Trailblazer is a significantly better vehicle all-around than both of those models. It also helps that it’s the newest of the bunch.

                           But again, we should examine how important 0-60 times are for buyers of these vehicles. Overall, performance metrics typically rank at the bottom of the list of priorities for shoppers in these segments. There are some exceptions, but they are few and far between.

                           PS: if 0-60 times is what one is really after, I must point out the Chevy Bolt EV, which is a rather quick and entertaining vehicle thanks to its battery electric powertrain. It also handles pretty well and can be very fun at an autocross event.
                           Reply
   2. 

      3 cylinder turbo in a SUV is not appealing in any way. SUVs are heavy, a bigger engine doesnt have to struggle as hard or go to high rpms to get up to traffic speed. 9.4s IS REALLY SLOW. And them rating the MAX 0-60mph as 9.4, means that the engine is going at 100% to do 9.4s. I want GM to win so badly, I am a Chevy guy. But this Trail Blazer was a missed opportunity. Ford was smart in using the iconic Bronco name, but keeping their power trains and transmission options attractive.
      Reply
      1. 

         1. Trailblazer is not an SUV. It’s a crossover. A small and light crossover. The 3-cylinder does just fine in the vehicle. Thousands of buyers agree. Look at buyer priorities and follow that trail… and you’ll find the truth.
         2. How is the Bronco relevant in this segment? If you want to talk about Ford, its offering in this space is the EcoSport. You can see how it’s selling in the chart above.

         You want GM to win? It is already winning in this space with the best-selling portfolio in the segment. If that’s not winning, I don’t know what is.
         Reply
9. 

   The operating period is essential to discover a superb Toto site because the safer Toto site, the more
   time that the operation period is. a href=”https://toto-naver.com/bbs/board.php?bo_table=new”>토토네이버
   Reply
10. 

    Can someone recommend Sleep Eye Masks? Cheers xxx
    Reply
11. 

    An fascinating discussion is price comment. I believe that you must write extra on this matter, it might not be a taboo subject but usually people are not enough to talk on such topics. To the next. Cheers
    Reply