mobile-menu-icon
GM Authority

GM Shows All-New China-Spec Buick Enclave Avenir

After revealing the Chinese-market Buick Enclave crossover at the end of October, General Motors is now showing off the ritzier Buick Enclave Avenir. In addition to releasing the first official images, the automaker announced that the range-topping Avenir will make its debut on November 20th during a special event in China.

As we previously reported, this new “midsize-plus” Buick Enclave is the nameplate’s second body style, as it’s shorter than the full-size, North American version. For now, it’s unclear whether this Enclave, which rides on the regular-wheelbase, wide-track and long-rear overhang version of the GM C1 platform, will end up being sold on our continent or reserved for select markets like China.

Following the brand’s usual strategy, the Buick Enclave Avenir retains the regular Enclave’s overall design, but adds exclusive styling touches for a more upscale and refined look. As such, the Avenir features a diamond-pattern grille, a Wine Merlot paint job and specific 21-inch alloy wheels. In addition, it wears Avenir logos on the front doors and also displays it on the ground at the rear of vehicle, indicating where to swing our foot to activate the hands-free power tailgate.

The Buick Enclave Avenir receives an exclusive Ivory White interior, with diamond-quilted leather to accentuate its more luxurious accommodations. As with most premium SUVs, the Avenir boasts second-row captain’s chairs for six-passenger seating, while the regular Enclave gets a three-passenger bench seat in the middle row.

As for available features, the Buick Enclave Avenir is equipped with heated, ventilated and massaging seats in the first two rows, along with with six-way adjustable headrests and second-row four-way adjustable armrests. A 14-speaker, Bose Centerpoint sound system, the GM Rear Camera Mirror and the latest generation of Buick’s infotainment system are also thrown in for good measure.

Mechanically, the Chinese-market Avenir is motivated by the same powertrain found in the regular Buick Enclave, namely the turbocharged 2.0L LSY four-cylinder engine that develops 237 horsepower and 258 pound-feet of torque. The powertrain also includes the GM 9-speed automatic transmission.

The all-new Buick Enclave Avenir is expected to go on sale in China shortly after its official launch on November 20th. The vehicle will become Buick’s flagship SUV for the Chinese market, joining the GL8 Avenir multipurpose vehicle and the LaCrosse Avenir sedan as representatives of Buick’s upscale sub-brand in the country.

Subscribe to GM Authority as we bring you the latest Buick Enclave newsBuick news and ongoing GM news coverage.

Deivis is an engineer with a passion for cars and the global auto business. He is constantly investigating about GM's future products.

Subscribe to GM Authority

For around-the-clock GM news coverage

We'll send you one email per day with the latest GM news. It's totally free.

Comments

  1. ENOUGH with the China stories already…

    Reply
  2. If this previews the new updated Enclave in any way…

    Reply
    1. Buick needs to take the exterior styling a bit farther than this. They are competing with Volvo and Lexus….not Ford and VW.

      The interior, on the other hand, is much closer to the mark. They seem to have done a very nice job there.

      Reply
      1. @member12:

        I sell Volvo for a living. This is hands down better looking than anything Volvo has, and I do think Volvo looks nice. This is just way better on the outside. Volvo is really nice interior wise, but from the pics above, this still wins.

        Reply
  3. It looks really nice in that Wine Merlot exterior color. I hope that GM brings it to the USA (as Envoy?) and updates our Enclave similarly.

    Reply
    1. Spot on!!

      Reply
  4. Every time a new Enclave interior comes out I find it to be impressive. This one is no different. Very nice.

    Reply
    1. I saw the current Avenir model on the showroom floor last month and was very impressed!

      Reply
  5. What a fantastic looking vehicle both out and in. The exterior color is very attractive on that car and the interior is fantastic. For anyone who wants to see how a center touch screen should be done, please take a closer look at these pics!! That alone speaks class all over the tacked-on look of so many others (MB, BMW, Toyota, Mazda, etc).

    Reply
    1. I agree. Just wish the center screen were a little bigger.

      Reply
  6. The Buick Enclave Avenir looks like another potential winner; but not if it’s assembled in China because if it is, I want Trump to slap a 30-percent tariff on it.

    Reply
    1. You realize that tariffs are actually paid and passed on to the consumer, not the manufacturer? It just makes the goods that you buy, more expensive…

      Reply
      1. @jonnyd84… uh that was the old talking point BEFORE we actually imposed tariffs and it didn’t pan out the way you say. Huge tariffs have been in place for months now. Have you seen any price increases on any products? I haven’t. The Chinese government has been forced to absorb the difference by devaluing their currency (again!)… meaning THEY are paying for it, not us. Meanwhile the U.S. is raking in that dough. Moreover it is now the Chinese that are anxious to make a trade deal because they are in a world of financial hurt.

        Reply
        1. @Ford Guy:
          You are very wrong in what you just said. Take a look at the lost income at GM and other companies. The prices have not gone up (you are correct in that) because the companies have been eating those costs in order to keep the prices in line. But they can’t keep that up for long and this has been done in hopes that this trade war would not last. But that’s just on the bigger ticket items like cars. Why do you think so much else has gone up? Groceries? Some electronics? General household items? I could go on, but you get what I’m saying. And for good measure, just ask any farmer from the USA (especially from the mid-west where I grew up and still have many farmers in my family). The state of Wisconsin has lost a record number of farms/farmers this year and the outlook for many farmers is not good.

          Reply
          1. @Dan Berning You seem to conflate their tariffs with our tariffs. What price increases and company loses are you referring to? I have not seen ANY increases, nor seen any reports any of supposed massive business… the Chinease barely bought anything from us to begin with. The only exception is produce/meat; however, farms and ranches have been the recipients of a major portion of the billions upon billions the US has collected in tariffs (in the form of subsidies). It was announced in advance farms would likely be targeted because it was one of the few things they buy from us.

            Yeah they buy our cars but do you forget in order to sell American cars there we have to form a Chinese partnership and share the profits (in addition to intellectual property)? It’s so much more complex than you present.

            Besides all that could you not see the death spiral we were in with regard to trade? You cannot be blind to the fact it was crushing us and was unsustainable. Trillions of dollars gone in addition to all the other ways they take advantage of us. After decades of being raped by the Chinese (and others) we have the upper hand, the leverage is all ours. Haven’t you seen how feeble their retaliatory tariffs were? That’s because they ALREADY tariffed us massively on almost everything… but we started from zero and still have much much more we can apply to them. They fear it and that is why they’ve asked (begged) repeatedly for delays uponn delays on new and increased tariffs. That is why they are the ones desperately seekign a trade deal. Have you not read how their manufacturing and supply chains are failing? Their unemployment is way up. We have all time lowest unemployment. Our economy is on fire and theirs has been reduced to a smolder. It IS a game of chicken but the wind is at OUR backs.

            Reply
            1. So Ford Guy, this seems to be just one more case of a supporter of a certain person/administration looking only to certain information which backs the thinking they like. I’m no a conspirator theory person. I’m not a protectionist. I’m not someone who listens only to certain broadcasters and news channels.

              What you said above does not at all fall in line with what I’m seeing, reading, listening to and hearing. I’ve spoken with family members (yes, some who do actually support Trump) and who have told me how badly the tariff’s have been. I’ve spoken to another family member who is a feed and seed salesperson to farmers all over northern IL and southern Wisconsin. He has not spoken with any farmers that seem to feel what you are trying to say above. He has in fact lost numerous farmers who have had to close down the family farm and go to work at a job (not farming) for the first time in their lives.

              Above you say that I seem to conflate the tariffs. Yet I was responding to your post in which you clearly stated: ” BEFORE we actually imposed tariffs”. So were you not speaking about the tariffs that our country has imposed? Those same tariffs that our country imposed has costs GM (and others) millions if not now billions of dollars because they are holding the prices on certain vehicles instead of passing those costs on to the buyers. This is not sustainable for long. In terms of what I pay now for groceries vs. what I paid pre-tariffs? Yes, this has certainly affected me as I now pay more for the same products than I paid before these tariffs were in place. I just don’t see in any form how you can look at what had taken place and not see the same results. That is unless you tend to make Fox News your main or only source of information.

              Reply
              1. @Dan Berning I was speaking objectively but you couldn’t contain yourself and thusly revealed your motives. I didn’t mention politics, you did. I didn’t mention a political party, you did. I didn’t mention any particular news outlet, you did. All while ironically accusing me of the same. Thank you. You’ve willingly confirmed what was suspected: you are a partisan and your emotions and ideology permeate and dictate your reasoning and conclusions.

                Your attempt to make this personal leaves little reason for me to continue this discourse with you in hopes of arriving at truth or even agreeing to disagree. My statements remain above for anyone to verify. Your emotions remain above for all to see what motivated you. Good day to you.

                Reply
                1. Tell yourself whatever makes you feel better. You didn’t have to “mention” any news outlet or party or politics. There is only one party (not even all of them by the way, so really just a person with a few hard-liners) who enacted the tariffs and created this mess. Your MO here is quite similar to how most like you do this, so I take zero offense to what you say or how you pretend to know what you are really talking about. I fully understand that there is zero argument with someone like you because is’t like arguing with a drunk. You just don’t do it.

                  Everything I said is there for you and others to find and be open to, but it seems as though you are happier with your head in the sand. I may not always agree with the opinion of others, but I can respect it as an opinion. What I won’t sit back (and not comment on) is when someone spews trash as if it’s fact. You have done just that and now (twice) have dismissed what you actually said above. Typical.

                  Reply
  7. The Cadillac (XT-6) is supposed to be premium over this?

    The lines are blurring.

    Remember when Cadillac used to be considered, “Standard of the world”?

    Now, Buick is stepping up on most of its platform offerings.

    GM- more separation needed. No more 4 cylinder chevy truck engines.
    Better interiors. Styling as close to the show cars as possible.

    Bob Lutz once said, “ it doesn’t take anymore money to design a great looking car.” Of course it doesn’t. But the quality of materials and attention to details, needs to also follow suit.
    Caddy? Step it up. Buick is closing in, and your sibling is gaining fast.

    Reply
    1. @Zcat
      I was thinking the same thing exactly. This interior is superior to Cadillac interiors.
      GM is destroying Cadillac. The last chance they have is the Escala inspired interior on the Escalade coming out soon. Every Cadillac should have had that interior but we all know who really runs GM.

      Reply
      1. @Momolos
        I sure hope so. But the ball was already dropped with the XT4, XT6, CT4, and, CT-5.

        Four, -FOUR- new models that look like “ the GM cheap way out.”

        Chevy platforms. Underpowered propulsion. Styling that, although is not offensive, it’s a 3/4 effort. And GM knows it.

        I don’t get it? They the have the ability to design, and knock the ball out of the park. Which in my opinion, would lead to less profit initially ( bc they are actually kicking it) but, would quickly and swiftly make them top tier contenders.

        GM. Listen. Lose a few bucks initially, by holding nothing back, but build your reputation as a beautiful-must have design and quality ridden, “ Standard of The World” again.

        DO I HAVE TO TYPE IN ALL CAPS?

        Reply
        1. Maybe the V-series- Blackwing cars, and the new SLADE will restore faith?

          Reply
        2. @Zcat
          I love what you are saying. I have been saying the same thing for years concerning Cadillac.
          The current new Cadillacs are just not Good Enough. Not for a True Luxury Maker.
          I mean they are still using the Corporate 3.6 HFV6 in their cars in favor of the so called “Cadillac Specific” 3.0TT V6. They are using a Four Cylinder Pickup Truck engine as a Higher Performance upgrade on the MCE ATS ooooooops I meant CT4-V. That is comical to me.
          And if rumors are to be believed in the upcoming XT4-V as well.
          Bean-counters running the Show recently and it shows in all of their Brands but especially with Cadillac.

          Reply
          1. Agree. And, it’s a sad state of affairs.

            You know it’s bad when Hyundai and Kia are getting rave reviews, and they aren’t even considered luxury and are priced much more modestly. And in some cases, exceeding a Caddy that’s priced $20-30k more.

            I’m not sure why GM is letting Cadillac wither on the vine?

            Like I’ve said before, the vehicles aren’t bad, but, “not bad” is not what aspiring to be a luxury brand is all about.

            I am a designer/artist/ musician and book author/illustrator. I am not an engineer. But if me and some smart car guys could run Cadillac and kick the beancounters to the curb, I have no doubts Cadillac would return to, “Standard of The World”. With Show-car designs and the ability/freedom to go balls to the wall, It would be awesome. They already have the engineering-when allowed to use it to it’s full potential. They did it in the past, and then squandered it away.

            Shame. You MUST spend money to make money. Long term vision and dedication is needed.
            Look at Mercedes. They kept moving forward and upwards because they have the drive to be the best. And, guess what? It’s working.

            GM, let Cadillac reach for the stars. I promise, it will only reap long term rewards and marketplace respect. Make people drool over the designs and back it up with high-end materials and proper, class-leading propulsion.

            Time to build a new and better legacy.

            *end of rant!

            Reply
            1. @Zcast
              I couldn’t have said it better myself. GM lacks the discipline to spend what it will take to make Cadillac a Top Tier Luxury Maker.
              Look at Audi. They spent and spent and spent and now they are on the same level as Mercedes and BMW.
              It is so crazy how amazing Cadillac can truly become. They have so much potential.

              Reply
              1. We, know.
                Why don’t the “Pros”( getting paid Bucko-Bucks running ( ruining) GM) not know?

                GM has their core strengths.

                The trucks. Although, they almost ( and might still) have lowered the bar in hopes of false profits. You can’t fool loyal consumers. They do their research.

                The Chevy , GMC, and Buick SUVS. And,… Cadillac.

                The one brand in GM’s portfolio that seems to be treated like a stepchild.
                Ford did that with Lincoln for years. It almost put Lincoln out of business. I know they’ve had their issues with /first generation Bugs. But, the potential and styling and quality was finally given the green light to move the brand forward.

                Cadillac, was given the green light to do just enough to fill the voids.

                Why? Not sure.

                Today, I saw the first XT-6 I’ve seen in the wild. It was parked on the street near the gas station.

                Other than the front design, it looked very generic.

                Very disappointing.

                Reply
  8. Interior is 9/10 – not a full digital cluster And the center screen is too small. Otherwise very nice.

    Exterior is 6/10 – Handsome but not great – Having incandescent bulbs and fairly generic lines is not good enough in that class.

    Much prefer the original Enclave or the previous generation LaCrosse for the “wow” factor. Buick doesn’t have it anymore. Instead of a Lexus competitor, we have bland, cheap garbage like the Envision. The Regal isn’t much better unfortunately.

    Reply
    1. I believe at the very least they are halogen lights but likely LED for the US. Have you seen a Regal or Envision in person?

      Reply
  9. 237hp 4 cylinder.

    gawd. This thing is too big for that. The 3.6 is marginal. A tip trim like the Avenir needs a turbo 6. GM continues to bore me.

    Reply
  10. don’t care about China’s Buick this is the USA if GM want all its Buicks in China then do so its an insult to the Americans

    Reply
    1. I agree Tom, and understand your point of view. But, the world changes.

      GM MUST consider all profitable markets in order to survive.

      China, is the new stew in the pot. Everyone is chasing that market.
      It’s business. My hope is that more money made in upcoming markets, will lead to better home-grown products.

      Now, if they only concentrate on the “shiny” new thing, and neglect their origin, than I agree.

      Besides. Nothing lasts forever. Smart to NEVER send your eggs into one basket.

      And, yes. It hurts to see your family neglecting you.

      Here’s hoping for a positive, revolving resolve?

      Reply
      1. Yes, and if you look back at history it basically started when the Japanese brands were allowed to build in this country. Without going into all the politics of this agreement, the American auto manufactures were forced to outsource their parts first from Japan and then from China. Obviously, staying somewhat price competitive with the foreign competition was necessary for survival.

        Reply
        1. @David … The American auto manufacturers started outsourced sub-assemblies primarily from Mexico, not Japan. This started in the mid 1990s when NAFTA came into effect and GM’s internal parts operations were spun off to become Delphi (and similarly, Ford’s internal parts operations became Visteon). Disclosure: I worked for a Tier 1 automotive supplier when all of this happened.

          Reply
          1. I was referring to wiring and other small components that used to be manufactured by American contractors. It is not uncommon for a wiring harness brand overseas to supply both domestic and foreign auto makers.

            Reply
        2. Agree. A no- brainer ( and reality) for almost almost all products here, and in most countries.

          The days of, MADE IN AMERICA, is, and has been fleeting for some time.

          Why pay an American worker $12-$18 an hour, when you can have 14 year old- or younger- Chinese workers willing to do it for next to nothing in order to survive?

          Not cool. But if that helps them eat, have shelter, and survive another day, I guess that’s a better alternative.

          Fair and just? I don’t think so. But, sometimes reality stinks. It’s part of the IS that controls destiny and is infinite in the nature of our universe.

          Back on topic: sorry, I have a book available on Amazon and Barnes an Noble, called, Sugar& Sh$*^t. I tend to think a bit differently.

          I’m not sure the UWA is relevant in this time period. The foreign auto manufactures that have set up shop here, are not under that dark umbrella that the domestics are. That’s an advantage. HUGE, relating to profits. And, I’m sure their US workers are paid fairly well, and are happy to have a job.

          The union is like having to feed a family of 7, as opposed to a family of 2. And, who is eating the fat Steak?
          Not the workers.

          But, yes. Being competitive is essential in survival.

          I’m done?

          Reply
  11. GM Authority.
    don’t moderate or delete my comment because of the title of my book.

    We are all grownups. It’s going to be ok.

    Of course, I do realize it’s all automated. ?

    Reply
  12. Agree. A no- brainer ( and reality) for almost almost all products here, and in most countries.
    The days of, MADE IN AMERICA, is, and has been fleeting for some time.
    Why pay an American worker $12-$18 an hour, when you can have 14 year old- or younger- Chinese workers willing to do it for next to nothing in order to survive?
    Not cool. But if that helps them eat, have shelter, and survive another day, I guess that’s a better alternative.
    Fair and just? I don’t think so. But, sometimes reality stinks. It’s part of the IS that controls destiny and is infinite in the nature of our universe.
    Back on topic: sorry, I have a book available on Amazon and Barnes an Noble, called, Sugar& Sh$*^t. I tend to think a bit differently.
    I’m not sure the UWA is relevant in this time period. The foreign auto manufactures that have set up shop here, are not under that dark umbrella that the domestics are. That’s an advantage. HUGE, relating to profits. And, I’m sure their US workers are paid fairly well, and are happy to have a job.
    The union is like having to feed a family of 7, as opposed to a family of 2. And, who is eating the fat Steak?
    Not the workers.
    But, yes. Being competitive is essential in survival.
    I’m done?

    Reply

Leave a comment

Cancel