mobile-menu-icon
GM Authority

FCA’s Ram Trucks Can’t Even Make A Tailgate That Works Properly

Despite GM trucks gaining 3 percent in retail market share during the second quarter of 2019, the clamoring from the FCA camp about the Ram Pickup outselling the Chevrolet Silverado seems to have no bounds. However, it appears that the increase in Ram Trucks sales volume, itself a thing of smoke and mirrors, is built on a shaky foundation as quality-related issues are continuing to surface.

In August of last year, FCA recalled 1.4 million Ram 1500, Ram 2500 and Ram 3500 pickup trucks due to registered customer complaints about tailgate failures. Initially, the brand claimed that trucks from the 2015-2017 model years were the only ones affected. But now, one year later, the recall has been expanded to cover trucks from 2013-2018, which includes another 690,000 vehicles. Tally all that up, and FCA is looking at a grand total of over 2 million Ram Pickups impacted by the action.

The issue arises from the power tailgate – an oft-advertised feature of Ram Trucks. As it stands, the power lock actuator control assembly, which acts similarly to a power window regulator, has a physical “limiter tab” installed within it that controls how far the tailgate is allowed to lower.

Over time, these tabs will fracture, due in part to the weight and leverage of the tailgate, and ultimately fail. When the assembly fails, the tailgate no longer latches securely and will fall, often while driving – not a desired or safe condition.

2019 GMC Sierra 1500 with MultiPro Tailgate

In fact, a falling tailgate could result in catastrophic damage, especially to other vehicles in traffic, if the Ram pickup in question is transporting anything in the bed and the tailgate failure occurred. For the time being, FCA and the National Highway Traffic Safety Association (NHTSA) say that no crashes or injuries have been reported as a result of this condition.

2019-2020 Chevrolet Silverado 1500

For prospective buyers and current owners of Ram trucks, there is an easy solution should one not wish to deal with the inconvenience or potential safety hazards associated with the recall. That solution is called the Chevrolet Silverado and GMC Sierra. Both GM trucks feature a traditional tailgate, while the Sierra offers the optional MultiPro tailgate that features six positions for various use-cases.

Subscribe to GM Authority for more Chevrolet Silverado news, Chevrolet news and around-the-clock GM news coverage.

Source: CarComplaints.com

Jake is a Los Angeles-based car enthusiast with a background in track day driving and drifting.

Subscribe to GM Authority

For around-the-clock GM news coverage

We'll send you one email per day with the latest GM news. It's totally free.

Comments

  1. Just wait for the problems and recalls on the GMC MultiPro tailgate in a couple years

    Reply
    1. I feel that the new GM tailgates will last longer than the older ones.

      I love mine on my 2020 HD Denali !!

      If I had a dollar for every plastic retainer I installed in the tailgate of the older GM trucks, I could ——-

      OK I couldn’t even buy the floor liners for the new one.

      But I feel the new electric release will be like electric windows and electric door locks, better in the long haul.

      But like I always say ?

      We will see, we always do !!!!

      Reply
    2. Ironic as the next day GM recalls 6x the number of trucks for brake issues…………..personally I’d much rather have my tailgate randomly open then my brakes randomly fail.

      Reply
  2. “For prospective buyers and current owners of Ram trucks, there is an easy solution should one not wish to deal with the inconvenience or potential safety hazards associated with the recall. That solution is called the Chevrolet Silverado and GMC Sierra.” ?

    No lifelongRAMowner would ever consider betraying their own loyalty, would they?

    Reply
    1. I bet not many will fastyle,

      Also remember what I say about recalls,

      I like recalls when a vehicle manufacturer knows they have ” faulty parts ” !!!

      I would prefer GM never used ” faulty parts in the first place, but.

      Unlike GM, RAM realizes they have a faulty part and are replacing it, so ——

      ——- anyone ——– and ——– everyone —- ALL ——

      The owners of the ” faulty parts ” get them replaced !!!!

      Not like GM who picks and choses who gets parts replaced with extended coverage letters, etc !!

      Of course until eventually the GOV finds out and forces them to, of course after many lawsuits or human loss !!

      But that’s just my opinion !!!!

      And I love this, but why do you start ?

      Its fun right !!!

      Reply
      1. You got me fired up. Pun intended!

        Do You mean like the Cherokee’s and Liberties that had fuel tanks that would rupture during an accident they refused to replace even under government pressure? Many burned many were hurt many were killed over a long period of time yet they kept fighting it.

        The ended up putting a trailer hitch on only after a lot of fighting the NHTSA about it.

        https://www.productliabilitylawyerblog.com/jeep-grand-cherokee-defective-fuel-tanks-owners-not-told-dangers/

        Where do you want to start as the list is long at all MFG’s. We could next go to the Crown Vic and fuel tank fires they refused to recall. Many officers were burned as well families.

        Reply
        1. “During an Accident” is a vague and broad statement. Need to speak in specifics when you reference something. I think you are talking about an incident when a Stopped Cherokee was rear-ended by a Tractor trailer moving at 60 mph causing the fuel take to rupture. It wasn’t a defective fuel tank. ANY vehicle being hit with such force is going to have some sort of damage.

          The issue you are referencing is the NHSTA trying to force a car company to update much older vehicles to NEW safety standards, standards that didn’t exist until long after that model ended production.

          https://www.autonews.com/article/20130605/BLOG06/130609949/why-chrysler-decided-to-fight-nhtsa#axzz2VMIwoxwM

          Food for Thought.

          Reply
          1. The problem was the location of the tank and it was plastic and rupturing upon being rear ended by any vehicle not just a Semi.

            Ford has a similar issue with tank location and rupture.

            While it met the test at the time a larger number of vehicles were having issues and fires and the govemrent wanted it addressed.

            Like the GM brake issue today. It worked fined when it was tested and when it left the factory but now the oil is being blocked and it is making the vaccume assitst less. it is being fixed as there is a problem now.

            it also did not help with the rust many of these Jeeps suffered.

            Reply
      2. GM is above the industry average when it comes to voluntary vs forced recalls. Ford is dead last when it comes to voluntary recalls.

        10) GM
        16) FCA
        18) Ford

        Reply
        1. CobraNut,

          I don’t get your numbers ?

          If you say Ford is dead last on voluntary recalls why is the number you listed more than GM ?

          And to me, I want the higher voluntary recalls over the forced ones !!

          When a auto company does a voluntary recall, said company realizes they have a ” known faulty part ” and chooses to fix all of the ” known faulty parts “.
          When this happens you don’t end up with all the vehicles on the road with ” known faulty parts ”

          But in the world today, and for sure at GM, the large corporations only care about the money for the share holders, and squeeze every dime out of the customer !!!

          They just want the customer to ” pay again ” you might say, for the same ” known faulty part “.

          Any way I just don’t get how this is still allowed to go on !!!

          When you purchase any other ” thing ” in the US, and say the remote quits working on most if not all of the X TV devices.
          X knows this happens, just like GM knows of their ” faulty parts ” ( you receive a letter from GM in some cases )
          When you call X you get a new remote yet GM says only if you are this, or that , and qualify for this or that, and most are just sitting around the country not working, or you , the customer, just pay for another after being treated like garbage by GMs horrible customer support !!!!

          So just like Boeing, how is this allowed to continue to go on ?

          I guess most customers just don’t have the time to voice their concern, and our government just can’t do anything worth while, so here we sit, bent over, just letting the auto industry sell us ” known faulty parts “, or junk.

          We are sold junk, and are sitting here arguing over who sells the worst junk !!!!

          Remember when you used to argue over whether a Ford was better than a Chevy, and a Dodge was a pile.

          Now we are arguing over witch is the biggest pile !!!!

          Most recalls are done if only safety is involved, although EPA reg. recalls are also done, I suppose do to loss of all human life on the planet !!

          Just my opinion !!

          Reply
          1. Rank, not number of recalls.

            Reply
            1. lifelongGMowner must think the highest scorer in golf is the winner.

              Reply
              1. I don’t golf either but I know how to keep score !

                Thanks for explaining the ranking numbers, and sorry I didn’t pick up they were rankings form the comment !!!

                Reply
  3. And we all know that GM has NEVER made a major Faux Pas in manufacturing a POS have they? Vega engines? Diesels V8’s? 4 speed automatics? The infamous V8-6-4-2 from Cadillac? Cheap steel in the trucks that rusted through within 2-3 years? The list is endless.

    And they love to crack at Fiat besides~

    Reply
    1. The difference being in that GM learned from their mistakes and Fiat hasn’t. Even after the 1970’s, the Americans make more reliable cars than the present day Italian cars.

      Bluntly, the Italians just don’t know how to make reliable cars, and when they do, it’s because the Germans bought them out and used their own parts (chiefly, Lamborghini and VWG).

      Reply
      1. Gm has never learned from thier mistakes. Lol

        Reply
    2. Well FCA’s brands have consistently lined the bottom of every quality or reliability survey….and many of the issues you cite are common issies affecting even recent Ram trucks. Hilariously you mention rust. You mean like the rotted out rockers, fenders, and hoods on 4th gen Rams? The infamous Hemi 5.7’s and 6.4’s with cam lobes groumd down to nothing. The 5.7’s Hemi’s with valve seats falling out. The 5.7 Hemis with exhaust bolts snapping off like clockwork. Junk 4 speeds, junk 5-speeds, junk 6-speeds, and now new issues with the 8HP thanks to them playing with the desogn for 2019.

      Reply
  4. Better a possible falling tailgate than gas tanks outside the frame rails guaranteed to incinerate the occupants installed on the 74-86 Chevy/GMC junk.

    Reply
    1. Bratkid you really dont know what you are talking about what you are talking about was proven false an then those trucks are still running while fords an pos dodges are in the junk yard where they belong

      Reply
    2. Reply
      1. You are spot on.

        We can cover the Crown Vic fires too.

        I did not mean to copy you above but we were thinking the same thing before I read your post. This is like shooting fish in a barrel.

        Reply
    3. The same era as the Pinto? Classic!
      Guaranteed to incinerate occupants? My my! What a selling point. I better call my buddy, he’s been driving his truck for 30 years and hasn’t been incinerated. I believe GM owes him his money back.

      Reply
  5. At least Ram’s tailgate doesnt hit the trailer hitch! GM couldn’t design a solution so they just added a sticker? Wow!

    Reply
    1. Bill,
      GM could use the rear camera to fix this and just over the air update their module they just cant do anything fast it will take a couple years !!

      The camera could just tell the first button not to activate, and you would have the same thing as the RAM only it won’t fall open !!

      Reply
      1. No camera needed, just a small switch in the receiver that tells the gate switch something is in the receiver, therefore don’t engage the release.

        Reply
        1. Yeah AZKev but then the wiring, and switch failures, but all the trucks with this tailgate already have the camera, and software unless GM was cheap again and the software is not capable of this.

          When I did production automation the camera software was easily programed just for this kind of stuff.

          But I guess we are talking GM so I would bet the system is so cheap it isn’t possible for even this one simple thing.

          Reply
  6. Just like Chevy (and Ford) you can get a traditional tailgate on a Ram too. I don’t want one, just trying to be fair.

    Reply
  7. Ram is the awesome truck to have. GM can goto hell with thier lies and bogus bs. Considering that GM never admits to thier own faults. This being a GM site, I will tell the real truth, GM has never learned from thier mistakes. GM has never paid back thier full debt to the U.S. tax payers. And GM is backed by China, prove me wrong GM. And GM have lots me recalls then any auto maker. Again, prove me wrong GM.

    Reply
    1. “GM has never paid back thier full debt to the U.S. tax payers. And GM is backed by China, prove me wrong GM. And GM have lots me recalls then any auto maker. Again, prove me wrong GM.”

      What can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.

      Reply
    2. I have a 18 GMC and a buddy of mine has a 18 F-150, no recalls for me and up to 5 for Ford now . Toyota has more recalls than GM ,Ford or Dodge.

      Reply
      1. I just traded my 2017 Denali HD and it had 2 recalls and 2 customer satisfaction ” faulty parts ” replacements.

        Just saying, it was at the dealership more in 3 years and 15,000 miles than my 2007 classic HD with 140,000 miles !!!

        I wouldn’t brag up the GMs to high !!

        Reply
    3. Suggest you look-up “Debt for Equity”.

      Reply
  8. My daddy helped me pick out my first car. It was a Chevy. I have always appreciated his wisdom.
    I learned how to work on cars…
    I have since had them all, and there is about a 5% difference between them. I prefer the Ram.

    Reply
    1. Ram’s aren’t even worth fixing. They sell them dirt cheap to subprime borrowers, who then trade them off at a massive loss after the bumper to bumper warranty is up.

      Reply
  9. The multipro looks very desperate to me… Who would that sway to come to gm?!?

    Reply
  10. Reading these comments it’s a lot of pos ram people on a gm website what does that tell you??

    Reply
    1. It tells us that GM are whiny asses. Us Ram folks just like a good laugh once in awhile. So we come here and listen to you whine and lie.

      Reply
      1. I get a good laugh every time I see a guy try to use their Ram 1500 like its a real truck. Those mattress springs out back can’t handle real truck work. Sad when most Chevy Colorados have a higher payload than a “half-ton” Ram 1500.

        Reply
    2. Its an article about ram trucks, hence ram people responding. Dummy.

      Reply
      1. Kyle kay your a dumb ass just because it’s an article about a pos ram you come to a gm site you probably can’t even afford one ?

        Reply
  11. Sales do the talking, I own a silverado and just purchased a rebel. I bought a ram after a huge amount of research. I test drove both and dollar for dollar it was the ram that I went with. Loyalty is great and all but when it’s my hard earned money I decide what quality is. Things change. If more people test drove a ram instead of worrying about loyalty, we would see less ford and chevys on the roads.

    Reply
  12. FCA has huge turnover and a unhappy work force. Also the worst supplier relations of any automaker. Poor quality is the result.

    Reply
    1. Lmao, why did Lordstown plant shut down???? Why are GM sales going down?? Come on “Dude” explain.

      Reply
      1. Lordstown shut down (unallocated is the proper word) because there was greater business opportunity to make a different product at a different plant.

        FCA did exactly the same thing with the Dodge Dart, Dodge Avenger, and Chrysler 300. Hey, you tried… here’s a participation trophy, champ.

        Reply
        1. FCA didn’t shut down any plants–it converted car production to truck to utilize the former 200/Dart production capacity better. 300 is still in production. GM shut down several assembly plants in the United States meanwhile shifting production to Mexico at the expense of American jobs.

          FCA now has a larger American workforce than General Motors. And it even opened a new plant in Detroit.

          Shame the Silverado didn’t win any trophies, not even a participation trophy. Meanwhile Ram is MT TOTY, North American Truck of the Year, Truck of Texas, Wards 10Best Interiors, and the list goes on…

          Reply
          1. “FCA didn’t shut down any plants–it converted car production to truck to utilize the former 200/Dart production capacity better. 300 is still in production.”

            I was hoping I wouldn’t have to explain it to you, yet here we are.

            GM sells and makes more product than FCA in North America. GM did not need nor want the additional capacity, and unallocating plants – like Lordstown – was the result. It’s business 101.

            “GM shut down several assembly plants in the United States meanwhile shifting production to Mexico at the expense of American jobs.”

            This is called capitalism. GM isn’t owned by the U.S. government and its direct responsibility is to itself (to stay in business) and to its shareholders (to generate a return on their investment).

            “Shame the Silverado didn’t win any trophies, not even a participation trophy. Meanwhile Ram is MT TOTY, North American Truck of the Year, Truck of Texas, Wards 10Best Interiors, and the list goes on…”

            Winning trophies is nice, but selling trucks is even better. GM still sells significantly more trucks than Ram. Those trophies sure went a long way, didn’t they?

            Reply
            1. Wait which company did the American tax payer bail out due to its inability to understand business 101? While i supported the governments decision and still own a 2018 GMC it will be my last GM purchase if they continue to outsource their production. Its really sad to see a company like Toyota have a more American made full size pickup than GM considering what the American public has done for the company.

              Reply
              1. Each of the Big Three took a bailout. Ford’s came from a bank, but they still took it. A bankruptcy for either company would have allowed them to shirk they’re responsibilities to their retirees and forego all the pension payments they had promised. Voters would pressure the government into picking up the tab, meanwhile shareholders, now alleviated of their burden, would post record profits. The bailout was the lesser of evils, and a resounding success in hindsight.
                GM also paid they’re bailout back to Uncle Sam.
                GM also was forced to restructure considerably, “trimming the proverbial fat” in terms of badge engineering. That’s why you can’t buy a Pontiac brand new anymore.
                Also, the subprime lending crisis has MUCH more to do with the bailout(s) than quantity or quality of cars sold. Bring financing in-house via GM Financial, Ford Motor Credit, and whatever Chrysler calls their program meant that the companies shouldered the burden of uncollected debt, rather than getting paid in full and letting the (real) banks bear the burden of bad loans.
                You don’t have to be a fan, but you should at least be impartial and evaluate some factual statements.

                Reply
                1. Actually the money Ford took from the goverment was from the Department of Energy. The loans came from them to keep them quiet when the other two got their money.

                  GM needed to trim much as that was how they got to where they are. Pontiac was a division with lots of potential but GM never knew what to do with them. They were a mear shadow of what they once were.

                  If you can not dominate with Chevy then you can not sominate with 6 divisions.

                  Note i am still a Pontiac owner and fan but I fully understand why they are gone. Rebadging Chevys and Holdens does not make a car a Pontiac.

                  Reply
                2. The debt was only part of the automaker bailout package. As for Treasury’s equity stake, worth $40 billion-plus, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office has said the Treasury won’t fully recoup that money. The total automaker bailout, including TARP money given to Chrysler, CBO estimates, will cost taxpayers about $34 billion. US government owns 61% of GM and 9% of Chrysler so its fair to say GM was bulk of the TARP bailout.

                  All the other auto manufactures seemed to manage through the subprime crisis except GM & Chrysler. Its all opinion if it was the product or management at this point. (IMO i’d say both)

                  Ford had restructured years prior so it used no government money and there is nothing wrong with a company needing a loan but when a company is so pilled up in liabilities and debts no bank would provide a loan big enough to save you is a problem!

                  Reply
                  1. Reply
            2. Might also want to add to this Alex that FCM for years relied on other MFGs to make cars for them such as Renault and Mitsubishi. When they killed these cars they just stopped purchasing them from the other MFGs that closed plants.

              Reply
            3. FCA produces more vehicles and employs more people in the United States than General Motors, which has shifted product away to be built in Mexico (see: Blazer). General Motors doesn’t care about American workers, choosing to shut down a plant and leave people without jobs. FCA, meanwhile, has efficiently used all existing production capacity and is even building a new plant in Detroit and not another country. Fact: General Motors has even started importing cars from China instead of building them here (see: Envision, CT6 Plug-In). Trophies are nice yes, as the experts in the field chose the best new truck on the market. And so have consumers: Ram has for the first time ever outsold Silverado for the first two quarters of the year.

              AND WOW, JUST ANNOUNCED TODAY! 3.4 MILLION GENERAL MOTORS TRUCKS RECALLED FOR FAILING BRAKES. SAME OLD GM BUILD QUALITY. No wonder the Silverado has fallen to a distant 3rd place in sales.

              Reply
  13. Fix It Again Tailgate?.

    Defective On Delivery Gate Electronics?…..

    Remain At Mechanics?…..

    Reply
  14. Hey GM….General Motors LLC (GM) is recalling certain 2019 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 Crew Cab and GMC Sierra 1500 Crew Cab vehicles. The passenger-side frontal air bag module may have been damaged during assembly, possibly resulting in the air bag not inflating properly in the event of a crash.

    Reply
    1. You mean like the 2019 Rams recalled for loss of power steering and brake/accelerator pedals that fall off.

      Reply
  15. Have 2002 GMC since new with 200k miles…great truck.
    Needed a beater, bought an old dakota 1998 dakota.
    When that died, bought 05 ram laramie in 2010
    Now have 2015 Laramie, looking forward to my 2020 laramie. The company i work for lets you pick your work truck. GM Ford loyalist always surprised when they ride in my truck.
    Former GM loyalist

    Reply
    1. Reply
  16. This is a whole GM blog post dedicated to ripping Dodge to shreds over a malfunctioning tailgate recall although do we not remember that GM had a faulty ignition scandal that killed many people. And instead of issuing a recall they tried to cover up the issues because it cost them less to pay out the death settlements than replace the faulty part. Any company that takes dollars over their customers lives is one I will NEVER support ?

    Reply
  17. You may want to fact check almost everything in this article. And no, it’s not “almost like a window regulator” nor does it in any way control how far the tailgate goes down. Have you ever seen how a power locking latch works, besides sitting behind a computer googling pictures of car parts? Hilarious read though, thanks!

    Reply
    1. We can argue about whether or not it works in a similar fashion to a window regulator. Remove that piece, and the content of the article stands strong: over two million Ram trucks recalled due to issues with the tailgate. There are your facts and checks. 😉

      Reply
      1. Reply
  18. Too bad the Silverado 1500 looks like trash. And I’m a Chevy guy. Ram has by far the best looking truck on the market!

    Reply
  19. Recalls? Ram?? Subpar quality??? Haha, why am I not surprised. Let’s face it, the quality of Ram and friends has really gone down the drain. They’re garbage. The only thing they have going for them is the gimmicky iPad stuck on the dash and the broke back mountain cowboy leather interior ?. The rest of the truck, is just trash.

    But then again, don’t mind me. I’m just here to read the comments of butthurt ram girls. I need a good laugh ?

    Reply
    1. U guys make of ram when GM just announced their own recall on bad break problems ?

      Reply
  20. Talk about click-bate. That photo is of the new tailgate that is just now coming out on the late 2019 and 2020 models. The recall is from 2018 and older vehicles. All manufactures have many recalls out and not all of them are serious. Most of the FCA recalls are software updates.

    Reply
  21. And I find it just hilarious, outright hilarious !!

    All the ” brand people ” say their brand is the best !!!

    When they all just point out each others recalls and faults !!!

    Like I have been saying here on this site for a while now.

    I have driven GM for 39 years and the last three GM vehicles have been horrible vehicles !!!

    And the horrible GM customer support well its horrible, actually there is no GM customer support !!!

    So buy what you like to drive, from someone who will take care of you, GM has sunk to the lowest point in my ownership of 39 years !!

    So far my 2020 HD is great, but that’s a week and 1000 miles so ——

    But all this ” faulty parts ” talk, can’t anyone engineer anything correctly these days !!!

    Any way who ever takes better care of the customer will win this battle not the number of faulty parts.

    And in my opinion GM is horribly behind on customer satisfaction or customer support !!

    I am driving two GM vehicles with ” known faulty parts ” on them as we speak,

    How do I know they are ” known faulty parts “, you ask ?

    Because I have the letters, get that letters, more than one per two vehicles, from GM !!!

    And they do nothing but push it out of the warranty period on to the next owner to deal with the junk !

    What has happened to GM !!!

    Reply
  22. This is on the previous gen RAM 1500. Why is this even newsworthy and spun as if it’s a 19?

    Reply
    1. I wouldn’t be surprised if the same mechanism is used on the 2019’s. They just didn’t recall them yet since there might not be enough evidence for the feds to push for a recall. Much like Ford didn’t recall 2015+ F-150’s that ised the identical master cylinder known to have a high rate of sudden failure on pre-2015 F-150’s.

      Reply
  23. The multi use tailgate isn’t even the one being recalled.

    Reply
  24. “For prospective buyers and current owners of Ram trucks, there is an easy solution should one not wish to deal with the inconvenience or potential safety hazards associated with the recall. That solution is called the Chevrolet Silverado and GMC Sierra. Both GM trucks feature a traditional tailgate”

    Really? Please just stick to reporting the facts and leave the bashing for the comments. The facts are that Ram does offer a traditional tailgates, which the majority of their trucks are equipped with. And to be fair, If I’m not mistaken they were the first ones to offer an electric tailgate, so it should be expected that there would be some issues.

    Lets hope GM’s new electric tailgates are flawless, or else this article will come back to bite you guys. And lets not forget GM is pretty notorious for having poorly built tailgate mechanisms.

    Reply
  25. I would rather a tailgate malfunction than the reported power assist brake failures being reported by new 2019 Sierra and Silverado owners on the GM Trucks Forum! Failing Brakes?!?!?! That’s not even funny!! Come on GM!?!?!

    Reply
  26. Ridiculous how so many “writers” and “automotive journalists” dont know a thing! You people are whats wrong with society today, half told facts, your opinions and personal biases. Do some fact checking, over 60% of the GM and Ram trucks have shared components from same suppliers. So, its a SUPPLIER problem, not a GM or Ram one. Not a single truck is BUILT by anymore, the stcker says ASSEMBLED IN….so stop attacking this company or that one…though funny how Tesla is GOD but kills and causes fires…..one little plastic part breaks on a Ram tailgate and FCA is crucified…hmmmm

    Reply
  27. Ram makes a good truck.

    Let’s not pretend that Ford and General Motors don’t have the occasional quality problem with their cash cows.

    Ford’s 10 speed auto is an absolute disaster. Their buyers are pissed.

    Reply
    1. Well said !!

      I approve, and agree !

      Reply
  28. I have a 2016 RAM on the 12 recall. Issue after issue. The worst is the DragLink problem.the want to weld my front end parts. Once done
    alignment can no longer be done. I have waited over 10 months for a permanent fix.

    I would NOT buy another RAM.

    Reply
  29. Reply
    1. For prospective buyers and current owners of GM trucks, there is an easy solution should one not wish to deal with the inconvenience or potential safety hazards associated with the recall. That solution is called RAM. Fixed it for ya.

      Reply
      1. Now that’s funny !!!!!!!!

        Reply
  30. Reply
  31. Isn’t the title a bit of a low blow? I know this is a GM forum, but that doesn’t mean the moderators have to put down others. Every manufacture has their highs and their lows. Everyone is entitled to their opinion and can spend their money on whatever truck they want, but it seems like everyone is just too quick to put GM on a pedestal. Sometimes its warranted, sometimes it’s not. I’m pretty sure as I write this, I got a notification to my phone about a brake recall to K2 based GM vehicles.

    Personally, I want Ram and Ford to build the best truck possible because that also forces GM to step up their game and follow suit. Competition helps the consumer.

    Just disappointing that the title gives off so much arrogance as if their incompetent when it just as easily could have been any manufacture. People in glass houses shouldn’t throw stones.

    Reply
  32. And GM can’t make a Yukon Denali sunroof that doesn’t fail to close. They still cannot figure out why it will not close when it is hot outside. Also, the trim on the passenger door next to the window has flown off the truck twice and the service department can’t figure out why. Every truck had problems, but at least my Ram comes with a lifetime, unlimited mileage warranty. GM should put their money where their mouth is and up their warranty, otherwise this article is just blowing smoke.

    Reply
  33. Reply
  34. Kids that’s all they are my dad’s better then your dad blah blah, all the cars and trucks now are crap not designed to last doesn’t matter who made them. The auto companies dont care as long as we keep keep buying them that’s all they care about.

    Reply
    1. Yep !!!

      The trouble is, its a necessity, not a want.

      Vehicles have become a need not a want, like electricity.
      Nobody is sitting around ” remember when we didn’t have electricity ” because if we didn’t have it, the US would stop. So electricity is regulated by public utilities for that reason.
      Like public transportation, regulated.
      Yet the auto industry is still left to ” screw ” the customer relatively un regulated, but in most of the US needed just as much as electricity or public transportation !!

      Sure we will hear WHAT the auto industry is heavily regulated, is it ?
      Sure for emissions and safety, of safety, but not for selling, price gouging, ” known faulty parts “, or junk.

      Maybe the auto manufactures should start over, and make what the know how to make, when that isn’t junk, add to it, with more options, not junk, and in the end we might be able to purchase a vehicle that all works, and not half junk !!!

      And look at the big picture !!!

      What are the recalls over ! a tail gate !!! we have been making tailgates that worked for over 100 years, now we cant make a tailgate !

      Brakes we have been making brakes for well, well over 100 years, now we cant make brakes !!!!!

      Automatic transmissions, we have been making automatic transmissions well over 50 years, 50 years, now we cant make an automatic transmission !!!

      The Chinese, Japanese, and Germans are laughing uncontrollably about now !!!

      In my opinion !

      Reply
  35. Agree with those who think this is just fanboy finger-pointing. The often mentioned brake recall for GM shows how silly this is. It’s become a sad trend in politically focused stories that now seems to permeate many other things we read online: Some writer tries to pretend that a competitor is flawed but their “brand” is not. The reaction to this article brings comfort as it shows people still recognize something that is nothing more than personal bias. Sorry GMA, most people aren’t fooled by your silly GM ad. Try not being such a tool.

    Reply
  36. This is nothing more than a promo piece for GM.

    Note to self, ignore links to GM Authority, it’s just another ad.

    Reply
  37. Reply
  38. I’d rather have a tailgate that doesn’t work than brakes that don’t work. I love the timing of this story and the recall on 3.5M GM trucks for braking issues, amazing!

    Reply
  39. Reply
  40. This article is poorly timed and clearly written as a show piece for GM, boo! Both brands have had their fair share of recalls and GM has undoubtedly had more over it’s combined brands…some that led to loss of life.

    Now let me say I’ve got one of each truck in my driveway. RAM 3500 and GM 1500 with both having some issues.

    RAM- Two recalls over the years. Steering link and tailgate stop tab. Both fixed and no other issues. Zero warranty work.

    GM-Two recalls and now a third on the way. Warranty work: replaced entire exhaust, re-program ecm and trans due to poor shifting and heavy pinging under light load, some what fixed the noisey and leaking wind shield, fixed drivers side power window and unresolved was the front end sqeek. Truck still shifts rough under some conditions and pings when cylinder de-activation is operating.

    Neither has left me stranded or in need of a tow. But it’s clear to me the GM might be more needy as it ages.

    Reply
  41. I’d assume the GM fan boys don’t want to talk about the 3.5 million GM trucks that just got recalled for brake issues, or the 4 million Diesels from 2010-2016 that weren’t designed for American fuel and the Bosch pump destroys itself, sending metal shavings into the fuel system and engine. Yeah, I’ll take a tailgate that might open on it’s own.

    Reply
  42. Reply
  43. …and yet today, 9/11/2019, GM recalled 3.4 million pickups for faulty BRAKES.

    Reply
  44. Reply
  45. This is such a minor issue. There’s 3 screws on the tailgate to take a cover plate off and the mechanism is right there for easy replacement in about 5 minutes. What’s that about GM brakes being recalled? LOL

    Reply
  46. Recalls are, get this, a GOOD thing.
    It means that manufacturers are taking responsibilities for feedback issues related to their products.

    I own a Jetta, there is a recall for trunk lid springs. There is a physical detent that you must overcome to get the lid to stay up, but people don’t want to do that, and the lid comes down and hits them in the head (seriously). So VW, after saying, “push harder idiots,” just decided to put weaker springs in so the trunk wouldn’t close on people.
    Who is wrong, VW for caving or lazy customers for spreading bad press about “dangerous” trunks? Doesn’t matter, customer feedback said, “we don’t like this,” and VW responded to satisfy their buyers. That’s what recalls are for.

    Reply
  47. Reply
  48. Easy GM, at least Fiat is fixing their screw ups…….unlike the billion of GM trucks on the road with their tailgate release handle and bezel broke off from the dumbest design ever.

    I had two over the years and both of them broke with GM giving me the middle finger on the repair.

    The multi-pro tailgate is just a sales gimmick and at $4K cost a incredibly stupid one.

    Reply
    1. Yep been there on my last 4 GM trucks with the plastic retainers on the tailgate handle !!

      I see people here with vise grips clamped to the rods hanging out the tailgate to open their GM tailgates.

      But it was another reason I got my GM 2020 HD. I think this tailgate will work better than my last do to the electric release, as long as GM didn’t use the cheapest release money could buy.

      Reply
  49. Reply
  50. Before you get too Grand and Mighty: General Motors is recalling more than 3.4 million big pickup trucks and SUVs in the U.S to fix a brake problem.

    Reply
  51. Reply
  52. Fact is FCA is low man on the totem pole. All thier vehicles have serious quality issues.

    Reply
  53. GM can not make a ignition switch that works…actually that killed people. I am not aware of anyone killed by RAM’s tailgate.

    Reply
  54. I wonder if when all the automotive engineers working in the industry read there articles, if they still sit around saying, ” well we can design a X that works but the money people say it costs to much ”

    And if it will ever end with, ” well money person, it just cant be done that cheap ”

    Or is there always some engineer that will try it and fail at the expense of the customer and their own reputation !!

    It gets pretty sickening, that’s why I no longer do it, some things just cant be done ” with quality ” that cheap !!!

    Nobody ever consistently said, the cheapest one is always the best !!!

    But that’s where we have driven the US to be !!!!

    Remember when auto manufacturers tried to out do each other on who could make the best !!!!

    Now the US automakers are trying to out do each other on who can make the cheapest junk !!!!

    Reply
  55. And I still love Chevy but fair is fair.

    Reply
  56. Bahahaahhaha!

    I guess a little godsmack was due you for just being a homer and saying the Silverado is better because there isn’t 2 million GMs being recalled for the tailgate. And we all know that a faulty tailgate latch is a deal breaker!

    So today I see that 3.4 million GMs, including lots of 2014-2018 Silverados and Sierras, are being recalled because the brakes can fail. Since your logic is that the amount of recalls dictates which vehicle is better, I’ll expect your article on why the Ram is the answer to the Silverado’s problems!

    Reply
  57. Looks like GM can’t get brakes right. Since GM just announced a recall of 3.5M trucks and SUV’s for a brake booster issue.

    Those who live in glass houses should not throw stones.

    Reply
  58. Very poorly written article. The recall doesn’t even apply to the tailgate you’re showing. GM is far from immune to recalls, let’s be clear about that.

    Reply
  59. And all the pictures are of an unaffected tailgate. Now I have to clean my laptop after such furious clickerbation.

    Reply
  60. At least the brakes work.

    Reply
  61. Reply
  62. So you are throwing rocks because they have a tailgate issue? Let’s talk about how GM just cut the plug off my block heater of a 19 2500 Duramax. No fix. Just cut it off… He who is without sin right….

    Reply
  63. All I can say is open wide, then insert foot. How sweet is it that you write this article right before a recall that darkens the doorstep of the truck you praise as superior… The Ram recall has no reported injuries, but can GM say the same for their brake recall? NOPE. NEXT!

    Reply
  64. GM’s SUVs and trucks can’t even make brakes that works properly.

    Reply
  65. Reply
    1. Getting all bent out shape doesn’t help your cause, whatever that may be.

      You might want to look up what clickbait actually means. You’re not using the term properly.

      Reply
  66. Reply
  67. I believe I’d rather a faulty tailgate than not have brakes. So if you’re gonna bash ram make sure you dont ha e problems with the truck you’re supporting

    Reply
  68. Classic #fakenews … Look over here at the tailgate of the Ram which does not lock properly, but don’t look and the Chevrolet slamming into a school bus because faulty brakes

    Reply
  69. Reply

Leave a comment

Cancel