mobile-menu-icon
GM Authority

2020 Camaro To Bring Back Redline Edition

The 2020 Camaro has been announced, and it’s bringing new styling changes to the iconic Bow Tie brand sports car. This latest update follows on the heels of a refresh that dropped for the 2019 Camaro, making the 2020 Camaro essentially a “refresh of a refresh.” And now, customers can opt in to a little extra aesthetic zest thanks to the reintroduction of the Redline Edition package.

The sixth-generation Camaro previously introduced the Redline Edition package for the 2018 model year, which was introduced at the 2017 Chicago Auto Show alongside a slew of additional Chevy Redline Edition vehicles.

The 2020 Camaro SS sports an updated new front fascia derived from the beloved 2019 SEMA concept car.

Standard 2020 Chevrolet Camaro SS

This time around, the package adds the following equipment:

Exterior:

  • 20-inch black aluminum wheels with red accents
  • Black Camaro badges with a red outline on fenders
  • Redline Edition stripes

Interior:

  • Red seat belts
  • Red knee pads
  • Premium carpeted floor mats

Interested customers can add the Redline Package to the majority of trim levels on offer, including 1LT, 2LT, 3LT, 1SS, and 2SS. Note that the Redline package is not available on the base 1LS, the new LT1 trim level, or the Camaro 1LE.

Redline Package Availability On 2020 Camaro Coupe
1LS* 1LT 2LT 3LT LT1 1SS 2SS ZL1 (1SE)
Not Available Available1 Available1 Available1 Not Available Available2 Available2 Not Available
  • * 1LS trim level available on Camaro Coupe only.
  • 1 – Requires RS Package, Jet Black interior and exterior color Satin Steel Metallic, Summit White or Black.
  • 2 – Requires Jet Black interior and exterior color Satin Steel Metallic, Summit White or Black.
2018 Chevrolet Camaro Redline Edition exterior 005 front three quarters view

Pre-facelift 2018 Chevrolet Camaro Redline Edition

To note, the Redline Edition package will not be available at the start of production, but will instead join the lineup later on for the 2020 model year.

Previously, the 2018 Chevrolet Camaro Redline Edition offered the package for the LT and SS trim levels, including both the hardtop coupe and convertible body styles. Those 2018 model year Redline Edition Camaros came equipped with 20-inch wheels with a red hash mark, a black hash mark graphic on the front fenders, blacked-out trim in back, darker taillamp covers, and new carpets to match the red stitching.

2018 Chevrolet Camaro Redline Edition exterior 008 Camaro logo

The Redline Edition package was discontinued with the 2019 model year changeover. However, it’s now back for the 2020 Camaro – as it should be. If ever there was a nameplate deserving of a package named “Redline,” it’s the Camaro.

That said, the future of the Camaro might be in jeopardy, as rumors continue to swirl that the current, sixth-generation model will not get a successor after it runs its course around the 2023 calendar year. However, we have full faith that Chevrolet will continue to offer a sporty and affordable two-door vehicle along the lines of the Camaro.

Subscribe to GM Authority for more Camaro news, Chevrolet news, and 24/7 GM news coverage.

[nggallery id=1049]

Jonathan is an automotive journalist based out of Southern California. He loves anything and everything on four wheels.

Subscribe to GM Authority

For around-the-clock GM news coverage

We'll send you one email per day with the latest GM news. It's totally free.

Comments

  1. Another overpriced sticker package from GM with absolutely no hint of performance add-ons? This is terrific news!!!

    Ugh…

    Reply
    1. Since when does the sixth-gen Camaro, already the best-performing car in its segment by a wide margin, need more performance?

      Redline is personalization package, whose introduction is supported by market demand. You do realize that half of Camaro sales are to those who do not care about this thing we enthusiasts call “performance,” right? They just want a good-looking car that’s “cool” and sufficiently different than the econoboxes out there. They’re not tracking it… and aren’t sprinting from light to light.

      You probably ought to rethink your position on the matter.

      Reply
      1. Don’t get your panties in a twist, bud. It is a sticker package. It’s an overpriced joke. Look at all of the performance variations of the Challenger that FCA has put out. That is part of the reason GM is getting beat out in the segment by Dodge. As an owner of a highly modified ’11 Camaro SS and a modified ’17 Grand Sport, I’d never pay $1,500-2,000 for a sticker package, but if there are people out there that will…more power to them.

        Reply
        1. The Camaro already has a significant amount of relevant performance variants… it doesn’t need any more, though it just got another one – the LT1 – for 2020. You are the one complaining here, home slice, so it’s your panties that need checking.

          Oh no, you are bringing up the sales thing again. Selling the Challenger with sky high incentives and to rental fleets isn’t exactly winning… but hey, you’ll use anything to create worthless arguments… am I right?

          Reply
          1. Home slice? LOL! Grow up, old man. Again, if people want to pay $1,500-2,000 for STICKERS, so be it. If all you want is stickers, they can be made by a graphics shop for a fraction of GM’s prices. And BTW, this adds nothing of value to the car, so don’t try to claim that it’s some kind of special edition that will be worth something down the road. Again, it is stickers. Nothing more, nothing less.

            Reply
            1. Infamous _ Apparently you are ignorant of the meaning of the slang term… ‘Homeslice’.

              And, your repeating yourself. We get it, you don’t like the Redline pkg. Probably don’t like much of anything.

              Cheers!

              Reply
              1. *you’re

                Yes, I do like a lot of things to do with cars and motorcycles. That is why I collect them. ~$1,500-2,000 for stickers. Just allow that to sink into your brain! A few thousand dollars for vinyl that is cut into shapes for GM?

                I come on here all of the time and post friendly comments. I enjoy the discussions and the like, but I’ve never been attacked like this by so many GM nut-swingers. My family is GM through and through, but holy f*ck, you guys pounced on me like I had just killed a family member. Relax.

                Reply
                1. *you’re _ Is a ‘contraction’ of ‘you are’.

                  And calling people “Old Man” is pretty juvenile, not too mention unsophisticated, and really poor behavior.

                  As you might find out, if your lucky, an ‘old man’ is 16-year old in a well used body with, usually, a depth of experience well earned. I hope you get there and look back at your comments.

                  It’s the baseless tenor of your comments that we are commenting on, though, you are entitled to an opinion, and will be measured by them.

                  Reply
                  1. Yes, YOU’RE correct. You’re is a contraction for “you are”, which you apparently hadn’t learned to utilize properly in grade school. You just incorrectly used “your” in place of “you’re” again (your lucky). Spelling, grammar and syntax is paramount when YOU’RE attempting to have an intelligent conversation. And no “homeslice” is bush league, as is “homes/holmes”. What, in everyday life he is a 50 year old white male with gray hair, but when challenged on an internet forum, he turns into Eazy E? LOL! Please. Do me a favor, when you two go out for dinner tonight, tell him to accept my apologies.

                    Reply
              2. And, INFAMOUS, since you apparently didn’t understand why Alex used the slang term Homeslice, it is because you two are probably neighbors, or live in the same area. See, Alex knows where your ringing in from.

                INFAMOUS for a day on GMA

                Reply
            2. I see that “home slice” got your panties into an even bigger bunch! Just don’t hurt yourself, alright 🙂

              With your “graphics shop” comment, you are showing that you are delusional about the automotive business… but follow the money, and you might get it in due time.

              Heck, I’ll even go so far so as to give you a hint: if GM can satisfy demand for an appearance package itself, then why would it leave money on the table for a “graphics shop” to fulfill that need? That is especially true if GM can meet said demand easily, effortlessly and at a higher quality.

              So, nobody is being confused about what the Redline edition is. What is it that you’re arguing here, exactly? Do you even know yourself, homes?

              Reply
              1. Hey Old man, it is Holmes…not Homes.

                Calling names as an editor (or whatever the Hell you are on here)? Truly classless on your behalf. Joke. Good day.

                Reply
                1. Oh the irony. The guy who started the name calling doesn’t like being called names. Go figure! If you can’t take the heat, stay outta the kitchen… HOLMES.

                  Let me clear things up for you. My comments are my own, and have nothing to do with my work. I’m not afraid to express them, despite your feeble attempts to shame.

                  Separately, nobody is pouncing on you. You posted comments that do not make sense or correlate with reality, so I tried explaining how things are. From there, you felt the need to start talking about panties and going after personal attacks. Had you not done either one of those two things, we’d be having a nice, civil discussion. But hey, I get it… it’s not every day that you see a representative of a publication who isn’t afraid to express their opinions and call you out.

                  And what’s up with this old man bull? I’m probably younger than you are, and am far from being “old.” And even if I were old, what does it matter to you? Are you agist? Are you into age shaming? If you are, then shame on you.

                  Reply
                  1. Ladies, Ladies! Please…

                    You’re both pretty, ok?

                    Reply
                    1. You’re making me blush ?

                      Reply
          2. The new camaro is not appealing to me, I want to purchase one but they need to hire either the mustang or challenger design engineer. I have a 67 camaro convertible and a 69 camaro coupe. If they would make the a 69 camaro with the engine and handling package they have today I would buy one in a second.

            Reply
          3. What a rediculous argument… FCA uses incentives to move the metal and you cry foul? Mfrs have been doing it for decades and GM has been the absolute leaders in incentives. Even the brand new XT4 has incentives. GM wouldn’t sell nearly what they do without them because they’re cheap and build ehhh products. GM should build products people “gotta have” without incentives, but they don’t and they won’t…

            Reply
          4. The Challenger isn’t selling because of incentives and fleets. It’s selling because it’s actually got room inside the cabin and is the last true “muscle car” while the Camaro and mustang have evolved into something a bit different.

            However, I do agree with you that the Camaro has plenty of performance variations. The LT1 was also just introduced for 2020.

            Reply
          5. “home slice” haha welcome to 1993!

            Reply
        2. Actually Motortrend and Car and Driver do not even test the Challenger against the Mustang or the Camaro any more. IT is always 3rd and has not evolved as a vehicle since the 70’s, No matter how many ways FCA makes it, it always ends up 3rd. FCA can make a thousand variants and the Camaro and Mustang will beat them all. So while the “segment” includes the Dodge in sales , it is no longer in the same class as the Mustang or Camaro in performance and is no longer relevant to either Motortrend or Car and Driver when testing the “segment”

          Reply
          1. Direct quote from Car and Driver 7/3/19 Camaro SS 1LE vs. Mustang PPL2 article …….

            “Speaking of direct competitors, the meaty, beaty, big and bouncy Dodge Challenger is not one of them. ”

            This month Car and Driver only tested the Camaro and Mustang, none of the many versions of the Challenger was good enough to compete.

            Reply
        3. Infamous getting all butthurt and then telling someone else not to get their panties in a twist? Priceless.

          There are so many performance-oriented options for the Camaro it’s mind-boggling. up until this year they had more options than the Mustang which is the best selling car in its class. Not every package has to increase performance or horsepower.

          Reply
      2. Alex is right. People like us, who are interested in cars and in the automobile industry, often mistakenly project our desires onto the average consumer, who doesn’t care about the same things we do.

        Reply
      3. Showing your obvious low IQ,not everything is about performance,Lucille. Now hurry back before you’re late for your middle school summer school class.

        Reply
        1. You’re right, not everything has to be about performance, but for $2,000, I’d think they’d throw in a suspension or braking upgrade as part of the package. Again…$2,000 for stickers??? Now please, try to wrap your head around it.

          Reply
    2. Infamous, The Package isn’t for everyone and obviously not for you. So why bother with a comment.

      As Alex stated, all Gen-6 Camaro’s are ‘Performance’ packaged. And as you stated that you have a modified SS, you know how to add the enhanced performance that you desire. Do so.

      And as Alex stated, it’s an option some want. And some won’t for various reasons.

      There seems to be a lot of confusion, misunderstanding about what the Camaro is.

      I don’t do ‘Thumbs Down’ if I can help it. This site should be about considered discussion.

      Reply
      1. I fully understand what the package entails. GM has decided to do this cheap and embarrassing sticker package on many of it’s models. You pay ~$1,500-2,000 and GM loads up your car with some “Fast and the Furious” stickers. As I previously stated, to each his/her own.

        Reply
    3. “No hint of performance” What, 20″ Wheels & Tires are not a performance upgrade. And that is where most of the cost of the ‘Redline’ pkg. is.

      Reply
      1. If you knew anything about performance, you’d realize that these wheels have nothing to do with performance. They are all about aesthetics. They are the same GM factory wheels, only painted black with red stripes.

        Reply
  2. It’s an appearance package. Not everything has to be about performance. If customers are willing to pay the upcharge for it, that’s a win for GM.

    Reply
  3. HOW ABOUT SOME QUALITY SEATS?? THE SEATS ARE CRAP IN THE STANDARD CAMARO.

    Reply
  4. As in “Saturn Redline”?

    Reply
  5. I don’t get it. If a company that builds cars like the SS 1LE and ZL1 1LE decides to sell a “sticker package” to people who want it what difference does it make? Car companies have been doing it for decades. The name of the game is selling cars. At least for now no one is forcing someone to buy a car they don’t like. And you can call me old man, Holmes. It won’t bother me.

    Reply
  6. 20 or 22 wheels bc 21’s are expensive and hard to find.

    Reply
  7. How about we start doing some performance upgrades. It’s a no brainer when Dodge and Ford are still outselling Chevrolet.

    Reply
  8. Well reading this was a waste of time.

    Reply
  9. Smart move.

    The Camaro falls short on appealing to the multitudes that want a cool looking car but aren’t worried about performance. Mustang sells more than Camaro to these people now.

    Chevrolet needs more editions/trim levels under $40K for the Camaro. Camaros that cost that much need to be as appealing as possible.

    Reply
  10. GM drops the ball again. I have owned over 20 Camaros. Make us a car that isn’t so friggin hideous. It looks like the rest of their ugly sh#t boxes (Impala,Cruze,Malibu…..etc). Fire the style team and find someone who can actually make a good looking car. The Camaro isn’t selling for a number of reasons…..being ugly isn’t helping. Not to mention that Ford and Fiat-Chrysler have made faster, better looking cars. I hate Ford and like F-C even less. WTF GM?!

    Reply
    1. Yes, the 2019 refresh looks like a Silverado. The corporate/pickup truck front end is awful. At least they made it a bit better for 2020 with the bowtie moved from the truck-like location on the bumper to the upper grille.

      Reply
  11. Ok. Design engineers pay attn. You brought back the Camaro in which it lamely represents the ’69’ model. A bar of soap or loaf of bread design with a sunken roof. At least when the Challenger came back, it looked like they missed a cpl years from my ’73 R/T. Mustang also kept true to design of the past pretty well. Camaro has a lot to be desired. THAT SAID, rather than discontinuing the Camaro, get back to the drawing board and make it look as if the Camaro missed a cpl yrs and design it modeled after the ’70 Z-28 Rally Sport. From the split bumper open grill to the larger rear spoiler they had back then. The ‘wide’ body Camaro Z-28 of ’70 I had was awesome straight line dragging with my ‘L60’ Cragar mag’d rears, as well as when I put on the G60s all around to dust the Porsche 911s thru New Englands 2 lane twisted scenic roads. Do NOT give up the Camaro just yet! You can stay in the game. Again, ONLY if it looks like the ’70 Z28, not just a cpl borrowed things from it. Now get to the drawing boards!

    Reply
  12. I oversee a vape shop web directory and we have had a listing from a vape store in the United States that likewise markets CBD products. A Calendar month later, PayPal has contacted use to say that our account has been limited and have asked us to take away PayPal as a payment solution from our vape shop directory. We do not offer CBD products like CBD oil. We simply offer online marketing solutions to CBD firms. I have taken a look at Holland & Barrett– the UK’s Reputable Health and wellness Retail store and if you take a good look, you will see that they offer for sale a comparatively wide-ranging range of CBD product lines, specifically CBD oil and they also happen to take PayPal as a payment method. It seems that PayPal is employing twos sets of rules to different companies. As a result of this constraint, I can no longer take PayPal on my CBD-related internet site. This has constricted my payment possibilities and right now, I am seriously contingent on Cryptocurrency payments and direct bank transfers. I have spoken with a lawyer from a Magic Circle law firm in London and they said that what PayPal is doing is entirely not legal and inequitable as it ought to be applying a systematic criterion to all companies. I am still to consult another lawyer from a US law practice in The city of london to see what PayPal’s legal position is in the United States. Meanwhile, I would be extremely appreciative if anyone here at targetdomain could provide me with substitute payment processors/merchants that deal with CBD firms.

    Reply

Leave a comment

Cancel