Tax season is upon us and while individuals celebrate refunds or scowl at amounts owed to local, state, and federal governments, General Motors will receive a healthy refund in the amount of $104 million from the United States. In fact, GM hasn’t paid any federal income taxes in over a decade.
How can an automaker that makes billions of profits each year not pay a cent to the federal government? Charles Ballard, an economics professor at Michigan State University, sat down with The Detroit Free Press to hash out the facts. While some have jumped on big corporations for not paying their fair share, there is a logical reason why GM is owed money after making billions of dollars.
Ballard explained personal income taxes and corporate income taxes are very different. While individuals file based on what happened in the past year, corporations can calculate events that happened years ago that affect the final outcome. In this case, it’s GM’s spiraling downfall at the end of last decade that led to its bankruptcy and restructuring. Other factors include a shift in tax policy to benefit larger corporations. For example, the corporate income tax rate was 53 percent in the 1940s through the 1960s. Beginning in the 1970s, that began to shift largely through the 1980s and today. The most recent tax law overhaul further cut the corporate rate from 35 percent to 21 percent. Income generated outside the U.S. is also no longer taxed.
The biggest reason why GM is owed money from the federal government rather than paying taxes back is due to one thing: net operating loss carryforwards. As mentioned, and as we all recall, GM was in bad shape last decade. The automaker lost $86 billion between 2005 and 2009. Since 2009, its pretax profits have been around $69 billion, thus, GM hasn’t earned as much as it had lost in the past.
GM can, therefore, carry forward those losses into the future and cause the federal government to owe the automaker money. Eventually, the profits will catch up with the previous losses, however, and GM will have to pay federal taxes. Former GM Chief Financial Officer, Chuck Stevens, said he didn’t know when that would happen but estimated GM won’t pay any federal taxes for the next several years.
The tax code also rewards companies like GM for investing in research and development, infrastructure, and employee pensions. About $7.5 billion goes to R&D per year at GM. The government looks at the investments as credits for companies investing and potentially creating new jobs to stimulate the economy.
Yet, none of this applies to local and state taxes. GM is responsible for paying those taxes, but the big bills owed to the feds won’t arrive for years to come.
Comments
Who cares…. I say eliminate the business tax entirely and you’ll hear a massive sucking sound as corporations all over the world move here for the 0% corporate tax. Revenue from corporate taxes is 7% of the total and the income taxes paid by the employed would more than make up for it. The more companies that employ citizens the better and the more revenue that is generated… now if we could just get spending reduced. It’s not the lack of revenue its the addiction to spending…
another trickle down/race to the bottom acolyte.
instead of 0, how about we go negative tax rates instead??? pure genuis!!!!
GM, through bankruptcy, left their old entity behind and became a new one. Through bankruptcy protection they should also leave their net losses behind and not be eligible to carry them forward. Big corporations, while yes benefit by being big employers, need to pay their share to create a better country with which they operate in. Especially in the US where social divide is growing worse and worse; infrastructure is crumbling; health care is a mess; etc.
The welfare queen by a new name gets more money for ineptitude, present and past. Disgusting.
Why doesn’t GM play the lawsuit lottery while they are at it, maybe somehow sue other manufacturers for building better products in the US.
No wonder they think they can get away with anything; it’s because they can.
Interesting that there was no mention of how many smaller companies and individuals that got burnt by the banko so yes it seems criminal that they get to carry over pre BK losses.
Boy is this isnt backwards ass thinking, i dont know what is.