mobile-menu-icon
GM Authority

2020 Chevrolet Silverado HD: A Seismic Entry Into The Fray

We were lucky enough to see the 2020 Chevrolet Silverado HD in person. It dwarfs what we have so far conceived to be an HD truck. It’s so massive, that it made the 2019 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 – which has the same hood height as the outgoing Silverado HD – appear as it if were just a Colorado midsize truck. It’s a whole segment, maybe two segments bigger than it was before.

The 2020 Chevrolet Silverado HD so massive, that it makes the outgoing Silverado HD look like a dime-a-dozen half-ton. It’s so big that now there’s an assist step (branded “BedStep”) so as to actually be able to physically access things in the box from the side of the truck. It’s so massive that Chevrolet could not physically raise the bed any higher because it then wouldn’t properly accommodate a gooseneck trailer.

Gargantuan. Titanic. Colossal.

2020 Chevrolet Silverado 2500 HD LT Crew Cab 03

What will power the elephantic 2020 Chevrolet Silverado HD hood is a choice of two new engines: an all-new gasoline engine with direct injection mated to a six-speed transmission, which we were first to report on last month. While Chevrolet hasn’t made things official on this gasoline V8 engine just yet, it will likely come in at 6.6L in displacement. We’ve reported that the engine has been validated by Navistar as well as GM, since it will likely find itself as the heart of the Class 4,5, and 6 commercial duty 2019 Silverado 4500, 5500 and 6500HD trucks that were co-developed with Navistar.

The second engine will be a new Duramax Turbo-Diesel V8, delivering 910 pound-feet of torque through an all-new, Allison 10-speed transmission. Sounds robust.

2020 Chevrolet Silverado 2500 HD LT Crew Cab 02

While no interior shots were provided just yet, expect the interior of the 2020 Chevrolet Silverado HD to mimic that of the 2019 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 half-ton. We saw that much in spy photos. This means an additional three inches of legroom on Crew Cab models, and a taller seating position for the retired NFL linemen that will drive them. Pictured is a 2020 Chevrolet Silverado 2500HD Crew Cab in LT trim, for reference.

2020 Chevrolet Silverado 2500 HD LT Crew Cab 04

Like the 2019 Silverado 1500, the 2020 Silverado HD also will offer new trailering technology, along with significant (yet unspecified) increases in towing and payload capabilities. Chevrolet also talks of “a host” of new technologies and features designed “specifically for heavy-duty truck customers.”

2020 Chevrolet Silverado 2500 HD LT Crew Cab 05

The 2020 Silverado HD will be built at the GM Flint Assembly plant in Flint, Michigan and be available in North American markets, including the United States, Canada and Mexico.

We hope to have more 2020 Chevrolet Silverado HD news to share as we get closer to the 2019 Chicago Auto Show in February, where it will likely be on a rotating display next to a mid-engine Corvette.

[nggallery id=957]

Former staff.

Subscribe to GM Authority

For around-the-clock GM news coverage

We'll send you one email per day with the latest GM news. It's totally free.

Comments

  1. Man that’s almost as ugly as the Ford Super Duty.

    Reply
    1. It would appear you have to look as ugly as your competition or almost.

      Reply
  2. My goodness that is one ugly truck! Let’s hope the Sierra HD looks better.

    Reply
  3. It’s not so bad if you don’t look at the front end.

    It’s got plenty of clearance, looks demented, and has plenty of power. They didn’t hang the DEF tank too low – either that or it’s on the passenger side.

    There are positives here. Just don’t look at the front end.

    Reply
    1. The Front-End isn’t too bad, it clearly makes a statement that it’s not trying to be on the “Pretty Boy” team, and that’s something that I can go for in a truck of this caliber, I’d love to see this thing in Black paint.

      Reply
  4. I like it!

    Reply
  5. I like from the grille back.
    WTH??? Can GM not design a handsome truck anymore? That headlights and markers are awful looking! Look’s like a Dodge from the 50’s (I’m sorry Dodge to compare this ugly thing to your classics but you know….)
    Grille is fine, front bumper finally looks nice but come on! Who at GM thought that was a good idea? Oh wait….never mind.

    Reply
  6. It’s ugly ,but I just want to know if it will out hustle,out muscle,out tow and out haul the Competition? If not unless you are a die hard Chevy fan it will not be your first choice. If you are not going to be the best looking you should at least be the best at everything else. It seems that GM have a hard time understanding this.

    Reply
    1. We’ll know soon enough once those numbers come in for the refined 6.6 Liter Diesel and the new 6.6 Gas. When this truck is just 90 shy of producing 1,000 lbs of torque, that’s fairly impressive, for the most part, the design will grow on me overtime and even at this point, I can sustain a Higher Prospective based on judgement of this truck holding up pretty well in the market once it arrives, especially with Fleet Sales.

      Reply
      1. You say refined 6.6 diesel. Did the upgrade the Duramax? According to the article the rateing are the same as the present Duramax. Also according to the article the new gas engine comes with a six speed. If this is correct I wonder why they didn’t put their new ten speed with the new engine. True about seeing it in person it might grow on me.

        Reply
        1. After retiring 30 years at GM as a toolmaker/machinist and working at an assembly plant in the drivetrains department I constant had many conversations with Engineers. I believe in my seventy-one years I’ve learned a lot about GM trucks (my dad sold new Chevrolet for twenty-five years). As far as the Duramax diesel goes you have to remember diesels make mountain of torque and don’t rev. very high RPM’s. I believe the ten speed transmission will not hold up behind 910 ft. Pounds of torque. The six speed is a Allison design used behind Diesel engines and much more beefier than the GM standard six speed automatic. Maybe I’m all wrong but that’s my take.

          Reply
          1. That so-called Allison 10-speed is actually a GM transmission. I work at Allison and we’re just licensing the Allison name—unlike the Allison 6-speed 1000/2000 series being manufactured in Indianapolis for GM’s class 4/5/6 Silverado medium duty trucks to launch in January. If GM’s 10 speed can’t handle the torque Allison’s reputation for superior quality will take a hit—risky move.

            Reply
          2. I was referring to the new 6.6 gasoline Engine when I asked about the 10 speed that they offer in the 2019 6.2 Silverado. They also offer it in the Camaro ZL1 that has a lot mor Horsepower and torque than the New 6.6 gas truck engine has. They also mention a 10 speed Allison to be used with the Duramax. I was wondering about that. This is the first I have heard about a 10 speed Allison.

            Reply
  7. Have a little from first gen Colorado. I like it.

    Reply
    1. Exactly what I was thinking Rosado!

      Reply
  8. Not that bad, but the current gen HD looks better. Evolutionary is better than revolutionary when it comes to design changes, and the K2 is still distinctly a GM truck, this less so. Jeep does this well with the Wrangler, tasteful updates make it modern, but they don’t mess with the proven durable appearance everyone recognizes.

    And I still think the GMC wheel wells suit these new trucks better than the Chevy ones, more angular, the half ton Silverado bed with those wheel wells look lifted from a Tundra. Lead, don’t follow.

    Reply
    1. Reply
  9. This has been a long time coming. I would rather see a gold Bow Tie vs. Chevrolet on the grill. GM has needed to make a significantly different HD version the way Ford has been doing for so long with their HD options.

    I’m not sure about the exterior styling upfront but the side shot doesn’t look that bad. I just hope the power matches or beats out the competition since we all know Ram will coming out swinging with their new HD version.

    Reply
    1. There may be different grille combinations available too.

      Reply
  10. I’m guessing the GMC front will be easier on the eyes like the 1500. But lets remember looks are in the eye of the beholder. The rest of the truck looks great to me. However the interior is still the interior, O well, GM could shock us with a different interior. Wouldn’t that be great. But when is the last time GM shocked anyone with a new products interior.

    Reply
  11. I actually laughed out loud when I saw its face for the first time. My god it’s unattractive! I might be able to tolerate it with a paper bag over its head…

    Reply
  12. I said this some time back.
    Class leading is having something that everyone can find something they like about it. Polarizing is not how you grow market share. I’m sure as far as performance this will be a stellar truck, GM trucks are, but style attracts new buyers, quality keeps them. I’m not sure this look will do it, in fact, right now, the new generation GM design seems to be pushing loyalist away.

    Reply
  13. I always hated the 03-07 ‘angry china man’ front end. After seeing this, it makes that look like an old classic. This is hands down the Ugliest front end I’ve ever seen on a truck manufactured by anyone. And honestly I think the square wheel wells look wrong on this. If they’re going to pick a wheel well shape they need to stick with it. Dodge does and so does Ford. The entire body here is the 1500 body and it just looks wrong with squares. It’s like they’re taking the modern truck with curves and trying to make it a Square body AGAIN. Chevy nailed the wheel well shape on the 1500’s, why change it back? It makes the truck look old and dated right out of the gate.

    Being a heavy duty aside, the 2 positives I see compared to the 1500 are this has a full front bumper without the mutton chops front fenders (which could have easily been fixed on the 1500). There are plenty of photo shop fixes to this on gm-trucks and elsewhere.. The other being that this has the plastic wheel opening protection (which could also easily be offered on the 1500).

    I’m sorry, this truck is just all wrong. I’m baffled as to how Chevy continues to drop the ball on these new trucks.

    Reply
    1. Agreed on the 03 – 07 front end. They exchanged the clean and sleek 99-02 headlights, hood, fenders for a horrendous grimace, something that clashed with the rest of the truck. Unimaginable that someone with eyes would approve such a thing.

      GM has a history of ruining front ends at the mid cycle update:

      93-96 Camaro – cool
      97-02 Camaro – fugly

      14-16 Silverado – cool
      17-19 Silverado – not so much

      Sierra notably is spared from the uglification each time no matter the generation, and gets to keep the face it was meant to have.

      Reply
      1. How can you forget:

        15-19 Camaro: Great!
        19′ Camaro: Dog Sh!t.

        It seems to me like all of the design talent is going straight into Cadillac/GMC. Chevy is stuck with designers straight from school who are clearly not wearing a strong enough prescription.

        Reply
        1. If only Edward Welburn and Bob Lutz stuck around for another decade or two. But just like the polarizing look of the Ford Super Duty, this truck will hold up well for the most part once it comes into the market.

          Reply
  14. Are people expecting a HD truck to look good? It really ain’t a car that we’re talking about guys

    Reply
    1. Yes but, did you know that ford sells heck of a lot more super duties then f150’s? I’m sure that looks have a lot to do with that. and SEMA proves that.

      Reply
  15. The people who design these vehicles are all artists in their own way. Artists also see things differently from other people. artists also make things some people don’t like all the time, but it takes time to grow on some as well.

    Personally, I think the 3/4 view of the vehicle makes the vehicle look tall, elegant, and intimidating. I think they are on to something. The vehicles don’t look nowhere near as good as they do in person, so personally I wouldn’t go as far to judge the vehicle quite yet. So yes, I like the vehicle.

    Also, It looks like the Z71 model doesn’t have the lights seen in some of the recent spy shots. So there is still more to come. Don’t be too judgmental so quickly.

    Reply
    1. Good comment!

      Reply
    2. If this was a drawn picture that will find that one owner who loves it, I’d agree with you. Even though the designers are like artists, but this is meant for other people to like, and to be sold in large quantities. and if majority don’t then that artists didn’t succeed.

      Reply
  16. 10-Speed Allison!!!!!

    Reply
  17. I actually really like it. For all of you that are jumping on the bandwagon that it’s hideous, just wait until we see some real world photos. Aside from styling, let’s talk about the 10 speed Allison. The 10 speed transmission is a class exclusive feature, and having the Allison name on it is going to really ease the minds of people who might be worried about the reliability of a brand new transmission with 10 speeds. And then there’s the bed steps, which will be very appreciated by the fleet customers that are constantly reaching into the bed. And finally, the new gas engine should be a huge improvement. The old 6.0 vortec is probably one of the most reliable and durable gas engines in any vehicle on the market currently, but it’s thirsty and just doesn’t have the power of Ford’s 6.2 or the 6.4 hemi. It would be cool if GM kept the 6.0 around as a base engine, mostly for fleet customers and then the new engine could be optional, like what Ram does with the 5.7 and 6.4.

    Reply
    1. Everyone here is going to hate it, whatever it looks like, this site and the other GM”news” crap site are the same thing, wailing walls for crybabies that buy nothing and complain about everything………..

      Reply
      1. Mr,

        You know NOTHING about the average “GM news site” contributor. EVERYONE is entitled to write WHATEVER there opinion is. And how do you know we buy nothing. I own a 2017 Denali HD Duramax, 2015 Canyon All Terrain, and a 2014 Cadillac ATS 2.0T. All fairly new vehicles. If I don’t like the Grill of this particular truck I will say it. Like you said there are surely more options to come. But it is MY opinion. It is also MY opinion that if GM would READ MORE of the ” GM news site comments” and frankly ALL ” vehicle news site comments” they could figure out truly what MOST AVERAGE people want in a vehicle. Look at the 1500 Silverado, it was outsold by RAM. Sure not total GM trucks but Silverado was. AND, AND, AND MOST, MOST, MOST, average comments on ” vehicle news sites” told us that BEFORE it happened. Just because YOU don’t want to understand the POWER of average conversation doesn’t mean it is not right from time to time. LOOK at Cadillac, MOST, MOST, MOST average comments told us what was going to happen WELL before it did.

        I WILL BUY A 2020 GMC HD Duramax as soon as it is made available as I’m sure you will join me with your purchase. Because if there is anything you don’t like its people commenting on things they don’t buy.

        Reply
      2. MrR you are right ! All the guys here making those hate remarks come from trolls from the pickcuptrucks.com site and the tfltruck.com site

        Reply
  18. The bed step looks fine in a dark color and actually pretty cool in the close up. Not sure that it won’t stick out or that I would want a truck with them in a lighter color, though, at least when taking looks into consideration.

    They just need to give it a rest on increasing the frontal area and overall mass of these trucks.

    Based on the photos, I think it’s an improvement with the exception of the front, but I might change my feelings on that given some time.

    Reply
  19. The front end on this model reminds me of a cheese grater. There will probably be several variations of styling.

    Reply
    1. A face only its mother could love…

      Reply
  20. Guess you find inside? The same 1500 awful interior. It´s looks like design nightmare monster.

    Reply
  21. I like the front end. Good-looking truck

    Reply
  22. I like it. Good-looking truck

    Reply
  23. I’d swear that grill looks like it’s upside down and it’s apparent the designers forgot the KISS principle. Sad….

    Reply
  24. I like it.

    Reply
  25. 10 speed Allison? The only current 10 speed Allison has is the TC10, a massive heavy transmission for class 8 highway stuff.
    I’d like to know more about a major mechanical driveline piece before I worry about whether or not I think a grille is ugly.

    Reply
  26. Looks like it needs a front view camera to be able to see closer than 5 ft out front! The “mine’s bigger than yours” contest between truck owners goes on… between this and the Toyota Avalon, I think we’ve reached peak grille.

    Reply
  27. So ugly I like it, have that 60s/70s truck ugliness to it..

    Reply
  28. I for one like the looks.I also like the grill with the Chevrolet lettering as it is different. Good job Chevy, now let’s work on the interior!

    Reply
  29. 1.) i have a feeling there will be different front ends just like there are on the 1500 Silverado.
    2.)That thing is HUGE!!! It rivals Godzilla in sheer presence.
    Chevy guy said something above that i’m sure most of us agree with when he touched base on style. Right now and this is my honest opinion, as far as looks go
    1. Ram Trucks
    2. GMC Trucks
    3. Toyota Trucks
    4. Chevy trucks
    5. Nissan Trucks
    6. Ford Trucks
    Now my basis is (IMO) for the overall truck, not just the exterior. Chevy builds one heck of a truck but the interiors are so boring and not truly up to par. I feel like Chevrolet holds back alot though and doesn’t really do what needs to be done all the way across the board (I actually feel that way about general motors as a whole) but that’s because I hold Chevy to a high standard (the way i slightly feel about Ford) also the way i feel about what Dodge Should be. I grew up around Chevy’s and Fords mostly, ’89 Chevy Mark-3 Van, two ’77 Caprice Classics (1 coupe 1 Sedan), a few 94-96 Impala Super Sports, an S10 blazer Xtreme, two LT1 F-Bodies (Camaro and Trans Am) and an ’85 Monte Carlo SS plus my own personal ’85 Firebird. Not to mention a few Ford’s (my 2 mustangs) a plethora of ’60’s mustang and fox bodies. For me, when I look at Chevy, i feel a loss because Chevy lost alot of what it had. I don’t expect for Chevy to go back to making the old vehicles again, but it would be nice if they could capture alot of what was and bring it to what is. They say people don’t buy coupes and sedans anymore, maybe its because car companies don’t make good coupes and sedans and more (oh and try telling that to the Dodge boys and they’ll laugh at you because Challengers and Chargers are still in demand) America wants American cars again. Not everything has to be a fuel sipping, eco-friendly, rainbow loving, prius topping, tesla chasing, salad eating star bucks approved boring mundane soul draining vehicle. There are alot of us out here who still love tire burning, V8 having, gas guzzling (okay it doesn’t have to get 8mpg but you get the idea), leather jacket jeans and boots wearing, McDonalds drive-Thru, back roads, two lane black top, stop light stare-down, bad@$$ cars. We’re still out here despite what top notch corporate America wants everyone to think. We don’t want front wheel drive Opels (RWD Holden HSV vehicles would be nice though). We want Camaros with 5 different V8 options (4.6 RS, 5.0 Z28, 5.7 SS, 6.6 SS-396, & 7.0 ZL1 and don’t say it’s too much because Dodge has a 3.6L GT, 5.7L R/T, 5.7L T/A, the T/A 392, SRT-392, 392 R/T Scat pack and now the Hellcat, hellcat Redeye and the 1-year only Demon which was never a challenger in the first place) and a 3.8L base v6, we want rear wheel drive Monte Carlos( BMW just came out with a full size 8-series coupe and MB has a S-Class coupe and both sell), rear wheel drive Impala Super Sport (Charger is still going strong), add the K5 Blazer back into the Tahoe lineup as a 2-door4x4 “Trail Boss” variant, good looking silverados (admittedly i kinda like the current silverado, still kinda wish for a ZR2, an SS, and a Cheyenne luxury performance model like what the F150 Harley davidson edition was to Ford, and a 2-tone Silverado Classic-10) the S10 pickup and S10 blazer (Change the Colorado name, make it look more like a silverado but smaller) and the Trailblazer SS (Durango SRT-392, Jeep Grand Cherokee SRT and Jeep Trackhawk, plus the Range Rover lineup and New Maserati Levante Trofeo). Get rid of Buick and Bring Holden up here under the GMC umbrella as The GMC car lineup, give us the Monaro, the Commodore, the Club Sport and the Maloo as the Car lineup, Take the give the Canyon a 3.6L twin turbo option and name it the Syclone, make the Acadia a rear wheel drive based AWD SUV and give it a twin turbo 3.6L option and Call it the Typhoon, Give us a GMC Hummer (complete with Denali) and lastly a Yukon GT. Cadillac should adopt the corvette and give it an ultra high performance hybrid blackwing motor and turn it loose on Ferrari, Lamborghini, Bugatti and the rest of them. I’m sorry but Cadillac needs to go back to its old names such as Fleetwood brougham, Eldorado and Seville along with the Escalade. All that other crap is unnecessary and dumb. People are so upset about the fate of the CT6. People don’t even realize that CT stood for Catera Touring hence the CTS (Catera Touring Sedan) and the Catera was a midsize vehicle. Also the fact that the CT6 stood on a platform by itself which is no longer relevant no matter how good it was. Caddy needs 3 cars the Eldorado coupe, the Seville midsize sedan and the Fleetwood brougham full size sedan. While obvious it would share the new VSS-R platform with the rest of GM’s new lineup, they would all differ from anything else GM has in the drivetrain with DOHC twin turbo V8 engines and DCT 10-speed transmissions and AWD. The Escalade would be the same as it will share the VSS-T platform but a different drivetrain, suspension and setup to better match vehicles like the Mercedes Benz G-Glass and other large European SUV competitors. Obviously with Cadillac being on the level with luxury competitors from Europe, it needs other SUVs and Crossovers as well. Just remember though, most of them are rear-wheel drive based vehicles. Of course a lot of this is just my opinion but being a fan of American vehicles, (Chevy, Ford and Dodge) I figured I’d throw my 2-cents in.

    Reply
  30. I really like the way it looks. One question I have is why the emphasis on the 4 door, will there be a 2 door HD work oriented version?

    Reply
  31. OMG I DIDN’T BELIEVE THIS WAS TRUE UNTIL I LOOK AT THE WEBSITE I WONDER WHY ITS HAS TO BE THE TRUCK THAT I LOVE SO MUCH HAVING people going THROUGH A MID LIFE CRISIS DESIGN IT

    Reply
  32. Wow . . . these 1978-ish Headlamps really have to go! I can see them for the WT version only, but not anything else. Guess this just adds to the GM Disappointing News this past week. What is going on at GM?!? (smdgh) Not only have we built up anticipation all year with these hidden design panels, etc. but to have a fugly HD truck design is really not inspiring. The morale must be really low at GM for them to do this. Get some ADRENALINE into these designs. This is more like an episode of “Married At First Sight” -or- “90-Day Fiance” with an unpleasant ending . . . perhaps I’m being too critical, but perhaps not.

    Reply
  33. Reply
    1. I think I like your version but still not quite sold on lighter one.

      Reply
  34. I bet this truck will look better live ,,, this is a real man truck ,,this will be my next pickup :))

    Reply
  35. I see on Facebook the front is being compared to the North American Family Truckster from the Vacation movie.

    Reply
  36. F’ugly front end. You’ll need a 16 foot ladder to wash it. Where does the pricing begin? $60K? Trucks have become absolutely ridiculous, on so many levels. Do the yuppies that can afford these types of rigs really need 910 lb-ft of torque to haul 10 bags of mulch from the Home Depot?

    Reply
    1. Do the Hollywood actors/musician/sports athlets need 700+ horsepower just to sit in traffic?

      Reply
  37. This has been a difficult few months for GM fans. It seems like there’s one self inflicted wound after another. A weak interior in GM’s most important vehicle – full size trucks, poorly communicated downsizing plans, poorly communicated future vehicle plans and now an ugly mug on their new heavy duty truck. It’s a damn shame that GM sweats the details on other aspects of their trucks like suspensions, powertrains but fails in the areas that people see first – the front end and the dashboard. Whoever is responsible for this needs to be demoted or worse. Come on GM, give us something to be proud of!

    Reply
    1. Guess someone forgot to tell them it’s the whole package that make or break you. In this competitive market you need to sweat the detail inside and out, capability and performance, safety and quality, value and desirability. In other words you need to be the best across the board to maintain your current fans and gain new fans. That way you sell more vehicles, make more money and lay off less people.

      Reply
  38. Such an ugly front end. How could GM release such a design? You would think they solicited truck buyers input on the design yet I have hardly seen a positive comment yet on the web. Really missed the mark. Pontiac Aztec take 2.

    Reply
    1. Reply

Leave a comment

Cancel