mobile-menu-icon
GM Authority

Apple Files Patent To Replace Car Keys With An iPhone Or Apple Watch

A new patent application filed by Apple for “enhanced automotive passive entry” explores the idea behind using an iPhone to replace a vehicle’s key fob.

The ability to lock, unlock, and even start your vehicle with using smartphone isn’t a new. Owners of the 2011 and newer GM vehicles can already do this using one of the myBrand apps on their smartphone, such as myChevrolet, myCadillac, myBuick, and myGMC (previously called OnStar RemoteLink). GM’s apps, however, work in a very different way from what Apple is proposing.

2016 myChevrolet Mobile App 01

GM’s myBrand mobile apps allow users to remotely lock/unlock the doors to their vehicle, start the engine and sound the horn and lights; myChevrolet app pictured

Since key fobs already function based on the concept of proximity rather than direct contact, Apple suggests this same method can be applied to an iPhone or even an Apple Watch. The rationale behind Apple’s patent is that key fobs can be “bulky and be an additional item that a user must carry.

How It Would Work

The patent suggests that the technology used to determine the range and position of key fobs can be improved upon, as the “magnetic signals emitted from magnetic antennas” are of a short range. In addition, current proximity technology is susceptible to hacking, and a key fob running on an iPhone or Apple Watch would surely be more secure. We should note that yet another approach to the security concern is the use of blockchain technology, which Porsche has already successfully tested in its own vehicles… but that’s a discussion for another time.

Apple iPhone as car key patent illustration

 

In technical terms, Apple has proposed the use of both magnetic antennas and radio frequency (RF) antennas as means to determine the range, signal strength, and other data pertinent to the functionality of such technology. In turn, these processes would enable the system to detect at a far greater range than the systems currently in place.

Additional Benefits

In addition to the security benefits as well as having one less item to carry, the proposed system could also be used to increase safety measures. Since the technology would be able to determine where the phone is located inside the vehicle, it could potentially prevent the engine from starting if the phone is not located in a designated area.

It could also prevent users from locking their phones inside of the vehicle. Notably, GM’s keyless entry and keyless start feature also prevent one from locking their key fob inside the vehicle.

A Key Difference

There’s also a key difference between GM’s current implementation of the functionality included in the myBrand apps and what Apple is proposing in its patent. GM’s solution never talks to the vehicle directly, instead using GM’s OnStar subsidiary as an intermediary of sorts. In this use case, the phone technically never contacts the vehicle directly, but instead sends a command (such as to unlock a door) securely via the internet to OnStar, which then processes the command and sends it back out securely via the internet to the vehicle. The process is repeated in reverse to give the user a message of success or failure on their smartphone. In that regard, the smartphone and app serves as a useful companion to the vehicle’s actual key/key fob.

2016 myGMC Mobile App 01

By comparison, Apple’s patent involves the phone having direct contact with the vehicle, thereby circumventing the internet, which might slow things down. However, we do have to wonder what would happen in case a user lost or severely damaged their iPhone.

At this time, Apple has not yet confirmed concrete plans to implement the technology in question. But if or when it were to be brought to market, would you use it instead of your car’s keyfob? Let us know in the comments.

A car-loving millennial. We Are!

Subscribe to GM Authority

For around-the-clock GM news coverage

We'll send you one email per day with the latest GM news. It's totally free.

Comments

  1. No thanks, I’ll keep my keys. I don’t leave Bluetooth or NFC on, to conserve battery life.

    Reply
  2. ” The rationale behind Apple’s patent is that key fobs can be “bulky and be an additional item that a user must carry.”
    That is a big LIE! Show me an iPhone that is smaller and less bulkier than a key fob!! I can drive without any phone!
    And what about the people who lose or drop their phones into water or in unrecoverable places? How can they drive back?

    Reply
    1. The rationale is actually that you don’t have to carry the fob, and 99% of people who drive also carry a mobile device so you are eliminating one more thing to carry. Yes you can drive without a phone but most people dont. In your case you can carry a fob, this technology allows you not to have to carry the fob if you dont want too. BTW, dropping your phone into water or unrecoverable places is no different than dropping your keys or your fob in those same places.

      Reply
  3. Sign me up. This would work much better than waiting for the app and not everywhere can get a satellite signal. My Apple watch is perfect for this. Might need some sort of backup like the app, but get me out of carrying that monstrous key! Then I’ll hook up the house entry door too.

    Reply
  4. If GM uses onstar I’ll be ticked. That would mean you have to pay a monthly fee to use Apple CarKey, where everyone else would just use the iPhone as intended.
    Sounds like the bailed out GM is all about lining their pockets than bettering the modern car. Hope I’m wrong.

    Reply
  5. is there an update to this Aug 2018 article? Definitely interested and would use iphone with my Silverado

    Reply

Leave a comment

Cancel