mobile-menu-icon
GM Authority

Quick-Drive Review: 2018 Buick LaCrosse eAssist

It’s unfortunate the Buick LaCrosse finds itself lost in a maze-like market thrilled with crossovers and utility vehicles. From my first drive of the 2017 Buick LaCrosse, I felt Buick had a serious contender on its hands. However, the LaCrosse has languished on dealership lots—not because it’s a poorly executed sedan, but because that’s simply not the market’s taste right now.

Buick will try to reinvigorate the LaCrosse for 2018 with a new entry-level model: the 2018 Buick LaCrosse eAssist, which utilizes a 2.5-liter four-cylinder engine and GM’s mild-hybrid system. GM Authority had the opportunity to drive the 2018 LaCrosse eAssist at the Midwest Automotive Media Association’s fall rally, which attracts a flock of media professionals from across the region for a day of driving the industry’s newest cars.

After spending two days with the 2017 LaCrosse last year, I hopped into well-equipped LaCrosse eAssist this past week for a brief stint behind the wheel. Time was limited, so these are merely first impressions, rather than a full-fledged review.

Those smitten with the 2017 LaCrosse’s interior will likely find much to adore in the 2018 LaCrosse eAssist. It still boasts the same well-laid-out interior, quality materials and quiet operation we come to expect from Buick—and the seats are still stupid comfy. We still wish the plastic material surrounding the gear selector and center stack looked a smidge more high quality, but the interior is still pleasant overall.

2018 Buick LaCrosse eAssist interior

Driving the 2018 LaCrosse eAssist is a much different experience from the 3.6-liter LGX V6-equipped LaCrosse, however. Immediately, the 2.5-liter four-cylinder engine lets itself be known. The 2.5L is hardly our favorite engine in GM’s powertrain staple, but it gets the job done here.

The eAsssist’s mild-hybrid system uses a compact lithium-ion battery pack to provide additional torque, regenerative braking and an enhanced stop/start system. Like the V6-equipped LaCrosse, the stop/start system is still relatively smooth in operation, though we’d have to drive both back-to-back to qualify that claim. The 2017 LaCrosse’s system was quite impressive, and the LaCrosse eAssist’s might be just a tad more intrusive.

Even with the light electrification, which provides 9 percent more torque compared to GM’s previous generation eAssist system, power and torque are down substantially compared to the 3.6-liter V6. The 2.5-liter hybrid powertrain makes 194 horsepower and 187 pound-feet of torque compared to the 3.6-liter V6’s 310 hp and 268 lb-ft of torque. Punching the accelerator doesn’t reveal much authority; where the 3.6-liter V6 moves the LaCrosse with confidence, the 2.5-liter mild-hybrid powertrain is merely adequate.

However, fuel economy improvements are notable. The 2018 LaCrosse eAssist returns an EPA-estimated 25 mpg city and 35 mpg highway for a combined total of 29 mpg—four mpg better in the city, five mpg better on the highway and five mpg greater in combined ratings.

In the design department, nothing gives away the LaCrosse’s hybrid system. The only difference we noted in our drive time is the addition of a regenerative braking dial in the LaCrosse’s gauge cluster. Otherwise, it looks like any other LaCrosse on the road.

2018 Buick LaCrosse eAssist 002

After our drive, we didn’t walk away disappointed with the 2018 LaCrosse eAssist, but we’d certainly pick the V6-power over the mild-hybrid system. However, for most, the eAssist powertrain will likely tick all requirements with greater fuel economy to boot. Plus, the 2018 LaCrosse eAssist lowers the point of entry, too. The LaCrosse eAssist commands $30,490 compared to the 2017 LaCrosse’s $32,990 starting price. However, the least expensive way to add the 3.6-liter V6 now is by selecting the “Preferred” trim, which starts at $37,090 with V6 power.

We previously said the 2017 LaCrosse was a tale of two Buicks, with two specific setups engineered: one to cater to comfort and the other for greater driving dynamics. Now, with the 2018 LaCrosse eAssist, Buick added a third choice: one for the frugal-minded luxury consumer. For the sake of a very solid sedan, hopefully, consumers respond.

Former GM Authority staff writer.

Subscribe to GM Authority

For around-the-clock GM news coverage

We'll send you one email per day with the latest GM news. It's totally free.

Comments

  1. It is a nice vehicle lacking the sexiness of Avenir, Avista or even Regal. It needs the updated Encore (Opel style) front facada which wouldn’t cost GM a fortune.

    Reply
  2. I haven’t had a chance to look into Buick yet in my search for a new sedan, but intend to do so before making a decision. Ive read about the new 2018 Regal GS…and am interested in it as well. However, I assume there are no plans to offer a Turbo charge engine in either the Lacrosse or the Regal. To me, that is a disappointment.

    Reply
    1. Reply
  3. It is a shame these are not selling as well as they could be.

    Yet we have many complaining for an Impala AWD and yet we have this better cars here and they don’t pick up on it.

    Reply
  4. Does the battery take up trunk space like the older versions?

    Reply
  5. The biggest issue is a lousy rebate structure.

    Reply
  6. No, the battery is more compact. You can get golf clubs in the trunk.

    Reply
  7. Disappointing. For all their efforts they can only get 25/35 MPG out of the latest eAssist drivetrain. The previous generation LaCrosse with the old 2.4 eAssist setup was rated 25/36. Note too that the 3.6 with the new 9 speed also drops MPG down to 21/30 24 combined compared to last years 21/31 25 combined figure. Really odd how the mileage seems to keep dropping on many GM products as time goes by. The Chevy Cruze is another example. Currently the volume LS and LT versions are only rated for 29/40 for 2018. For 2016 that number was 30/42.

    Reply
    1. They may have changed their testing method, otherwise I suspect efficiency is unchanged or improved. Other carmakers have gotten in trouble by overstating MPG figures, so its best to be accurate.

      Reply
  8. Different EPA standers

    Reply
    1. It changed in 2008 and was revised a little for 2017. Why do they keep changing it to lower mileage figures? Sounds like some conspiracy or game to get people into electric or hybrids to me. So far every rental I have had has exceeded its highway mileage figure by up to 4-5 MPG easily and that was going 75-78 MPH!

      Reply

Leave a comment

Cancel