mobile-menu-icon
GM Authority

General Motors U.S. Sales Down 0.6 Percent To 249,795 Units In September 2016

Chevrolet, Buick, GMC, and Cadillac dealers in the United States delivered 249,795 new vehicles in September 2016, a slight 0.6 percent decrease compared to September 2015. Cumulative sales of the Chevrolet and GMC brands decreased, while those of Cadillac and Buick increased on a year-over-year basis.

“GM again outperformed the retail industry and gained profitable market share. We continue to lead the retail truck industry and gained share in the two largest car segments,” said Kurt McNeil, GM’s vice president of U.S. sales operations. “We are achieving these results while maintaining disciplined incentive spending and commanding the industry’s best average transaction prices for any full-line manufacturer.”

In addition, GM continues to benefit from a strong U.S. economy.

“Key economic fundamentals like a strong jobs market, rising personal incomes, low fuel prices and low interest rates continue to point toward strong industry performance,” said Mustafa Mohatarem, GM’s chief economist. “We think the industry is well positioned for a continued high level of customer demand into the foreseeable future.”

Sales Summary - September 2016 - General Motors - USA

SalesSales Mix
Total249,795251,310-0.6%-1,515100.0%100.0%0%
Sale TypeSeptember 2016September 2015September 2016 / September 2015September 2016 - September 2015September 2016September 2015September 2016 - September 2015
Retail204,449203,895+0.3%+55481.8%81.1%+0.7%
Fleet45,34647,415-4.4%-2,06918.2%18.9%-0.7%

September 2016 sales notes and items of interest (vs. September 2015, except as noted):

General Motors sales overview:

Sale types:

  • Retail sales increased 0.3 percent to 204,449 units, accounting for 81.8 percent of total sales:
    • Chevrolet retail sales were up 0.9 percent to 135,448 units. The brand gained 0.3 percentage points of retail share in September to 11 percent and has gained retail market share in 8 out of 9 months so far in 2016, remaining the industry’s fastest-growing full-line brand.
    • GMC retail sales were down 5.6 percent to 38,695 units. The brand’s sales gained momentum through the month and the brand posted its second-highest monthly average transaction price (ATP) in its history at $44,144.
    • Buick retail sales were up 6.7 percent to 17,199 units, gaining 0.1 percentage points of retail share.
    • Cadillac retail sales were up 4.7 percent to 13,107 units, with retail share up 0.1 percentage points driven largely by the success of the all-new XT5.
  • Based on initial estimates, GM’s retail market share rose 0.3 percentage points in September to 16.6 percent, the largest retail share gain of any full-line manufacturer. GM has gained retail market share in 15 of the past 18 months, dating to April 2015.
  • Fleet sales decreased 4.4 percent to 45,346 units, accounting for 18.2 percent of total sales, well below the company’s full-year guidance of 20 percent.
    • Per GM’s plan, daily rental sales were about 12 percent of GM’s total sales in September and are less than 10 percent year-to-date.

Average Transaction Prices (ATPs):

  • ATPs based on J.D. Power PIN estimates:
    • GM’s ATPs, which reflect retail transaction prices after sales incentives, were $35,804 in September, nearly $5,000 above the industry average and approximately $1,000 above last September’s performance.
    • GM’s incentive spending as a percentage of ATP was 13.1 percent, above the industry average of 12.6 percent, but well below other domestic and select Asian competitors who are spending near or above 15 percent of ATP.

Inventory:

  • September month-end inventory was 785,514 units for a 79 days supply, an increase of 42,699 units and 5 days from the 728,213 units and 74 days supply at the end of August 2016

SAAR:

  • GM estimates that the seasonally adjusted annual selling rate (SAAR) for light vehicles in September was approximately 17.8 million units. On a calendar-year-to-date basis, GM estimates the light vehicle SAAR was 17.4 million units.

Chevrolet sales decreased 0.3 percent to 170,237 units:

Cadillac sales increased 3.1 percent to 15,368 units:

Buick sales increased 14.1 percent to 20,922 units:

GMC sales decreased 8.7 percent to 43,268 units:

  • GMC Acadia sales increased 2.23 percent to 6,795 units
  • GMC Canyon sales increased 26.46 percent to 2,949 units for its best September ever
  • GMC Savana sales increased 37.91 percent to 1,004 units
  • GMC Sierra sales decreased 8.53 percent to 18,068 units
  • GMC Terrain sales decreased 48.28 percent to 5,656 units
  • The GMC Yukon family had its best September ever:
  • Denali penetration during the month was over 28 percent
  • Average transaction prices were 45 percent higher than industry average

Sales Results - September 2016 - USA - Chevrolet

MODELSEP 2016 / SEP 2015SEPTEMBER 2016SEPTEMBER 2015YTD 2016 / YTD 2015 YTD 2016YTD 2015
CAMARO+25.37% 6,5775,246-11.39%54,535 61,544
CAPRICE-94.84% 8155-56.04%560 1,274
COLORADO+41.57% 10,3837,334+26.59%80,047 63,232
COMMERCIAL TRUCK* 296**5,750 *
CORVETTE+9.99% 2,8292,572-13.94%22,719 26,398
CRUZE+8.44% 15,21614,032-22.45%138,012 177,970
EQUINOX-29.14% 15,26121,537-18.83%173,736 214,042
EXPRESS-15.05% 5,6636,666+12.54%49,751 44,208
IMPALA-26.07% 6,9199,359-13.37%74,038 85,466
MALIBU+26.10% 21,52117,066+15.78%170,389 147,161
SILVERADO-15.53% 45,38053,725-3.48%425,556 440,904
SONIC+1.88% 3,8513,780-18.65%41,109 50,535
SPARK-6.24% 2,2232,371-0.57%27,681 27,839
SS-97.75% 5222-11.07%2,153 2,421
SUBURBAN+58.34% 5,5753,521+9.99%39,282 35,715
TAHOE+64.26% 10,0516,119+8.14%70,000 64,728
TRAVERSE-10.56% 7,9228,857-7.34%86,142 92,963
TRAX+38.86% 8,5266,140+25.72%54,124 43,051
VOLT+114.01% 2,031949+76.23%16,326 9,264
CHEVROLET TOTAL-0.26% 170,237170,675-4.03%1,531,912 1,596,182

Sales Results - September 2016 - USA - Cadillac

MODELSEP 2016 / SEP 2015SEPTEMBER 2016SEPTEMBER 2015YTD 2016 / YTD 2015 YTD 2016YTD 2015
ATS-22.88% 1,7702,295-14.38%16,130 18,839
CT6* 1,343**5,391 *
CTS+13.95% 1,5031,319-14.77%12,148 14,253
ELR-83.33% 636-29.32%523 740
ESCALADE+28.81% 2,0971,628+7.71%16,131 14,977
ESCALADE ESV+39.97% 1,6531,181+3.97%10,556 10,153
SRX-93.58% 4406,849-57.04%21,786 50,712
XT5* 4,608**21,696 *
XTS+21.75% 1,9481,600-6.85%14,925 16,023
CADILLAC TOTAL+3.09% 15,36814,908-5.10%119,286 125,699

Sales Results - September 2016 - USA - Buick

MODELSEP 2016 / SEP 2015SEPTEMBER 2016SEPTEMBER 2015YTD 2016 / YTD 2015 YTD 2016YTD 2015
CASCADA* 470**5,796 *
ENCLAVE-16.04% 3,9734,732-13.00%40,703 46,785
ENCORE+29.75% 7,2975,624+14.61%56,484 49,285
ENVISION* 1,648**6,126 *
LACROSSE-50.80% 1,9093,880-39.08%19,829 32,549
REGAL-1.85% 1,6961,728+9.61%15,461 14,106
VERANO+65.29% 3,9292,377+1.46%25,368 25,002
BUICK TOTAL+14.07% 20,92218,341+1.22%169,767 167,727

Sales Results - September 2016 - USA - GMC

MODELSEP 2016 / SEP 2015SEPTEMBER 2016SEPTEMBER 2015YTD 2016 / YTD 2015 YTD 2016YTD 2015
ACADIA+2.23% 6,7956,647-22.38%58,540 75,423
CANYON+26.46% 2,9492,332+21.31%27,206 22,426
SAVANA+37.91% 1,004728-15.23%13,896 16,392
SIERRA-8.53% 18,06819,754+1.72%164,440 161,653
TERRAIN-48.28% 5,65610,935-18.57%67,912 83,395
YUKON+33.64% 5,2963,963+17.71%35,325 30,011
YUKON XL+15.63% 3,5003,027+15.16%24,113 20,939
GMC TOTAL-8.69% 43,26847,386-4.58%391,432 410,239

Sales Results - September 2016 - USA - GM Totals

BRANDSEP 2016 / SEP 2015SEPTEMBER 2016SEPTEMBER 2015YTD 2016 / YTD 2015 YTD 2016YTD 2015
CHEVROLET TOTAL-0.26% 170,237170,675-4.03%1,531,912 1,596,182
CADILLAC TOTAL+3.09% 15,36814,908-5.10%119,286 125,699
BUICK TOTAL+14.07% 20,92218,341+1.22%169,767 167,727
GMC TOTAL-8.69% 43,26847,386-4.58%391,432 410,239
GM USA TOTAL-0.60% 249,795251,310-3.80%2,212,397 2,299,847

About The Numbers

  • There were 25 selling days in September 2016 and 25 selling days in September 2015
  • Chevrolet totals include discontinued Captiva Sport
  • Starting in September 2016, GM began reporting sales of the Chevrolet City Express and Low Cab Forward on a single line entitled Commercial Truck

Further Reading & Sales Reporting

The GM Authority staff is comprised of columnists, interns, and other reporters who provide coverage of the latest General Motors news.

Subscribe to GM Authority

For around-the-clock GM news coverage

We'll send you one email per day with the latest GM news. It's totally free.

Comments

  1. Probably a wise decision to continue the XTS–top selling Cadillac auto.

    Reply
    1. If we think about the timing of events, it would probably be a wise conclusion that JdN is actually behind the decision to continue the XTS, with the plan to discontinue it being made prior to his arrival.

      Reply
  2. ya people are still buying FWD sedans.

    Reply
    1. To clarify: in the luxury space, significantly more sales go to RWD sedans than FWD sedans.

      Reply
    2. About 95% here are AWD just like 95% of ATS and CTS!

      Reply
      1. I should clarify my earlier comment:

        In the luxury space, significantly more sales go to RWD-based sedans than FWD-based sedans.

        Keyword: based 🙂

        Reply
      2. Where do you live Martin, Colorado? I know that’s probably the AWD capital of the USA, due to the freak snowstorms and delayed/non-existent plowing. But I doubt the total AWD equipped XTS percentage is anywhere near 95% throughout the USA.

        Currently listed on CarMax there are 91 used XTS vehicles, 50 of which are FWD, 41 AWD. So that’s 55% FWD, 45% RWD based on that sampling of XTS inventory. When also looking at their inventory of ATS and CTS, I found:

        XTS: 55% FWD, 45% AWD
        ATS: 78% RWD, 22% AWD
        CTS: 66% RWD, 34% AWD

        This is surprising to me, because I would assume there are more gains (in terms of traction in snow) to be made in going from RWD to AWD, than FWD to AWD.

        I prefer FWD but it’s possible that the XTS sells well not because of FWD as a feature, but because some people like the softer ride or larger size that it has vs. the ATS and CTS. Or for some other reason. And the ATS and CTS are somewhat similar, so one could add up those 2 and still say they have the XTS beat in terms of sales.

        Reply
        1. North of Pittsburgh. Out of total inventory of non-V ATSs and CTSs usually no more than 1 rwd in inventory. Usually 2-3 fwd XTSs in stock. This is the dealer inventory where I purchase.

          Reply
          1. Interesting that AWD is so popular north of Pittsburgh. I can certainly see a use for it though, with that area. Pittsburgh is cool the way it borders the mountains and flatter lands, and especially with the mountains and snow AWD would be useful. I live north of Chicago where navigating snow is necessary, but no mountains to deal with, so I think AWD is not as in-demand here. However I’ll stick with FWD over RWD any day (yes I know RWD has some advantages on dry pavement, I don’t care because I don’t drive like I’m a NASCAR guy, and the roads here are very straight and flat for the most part).

            Reply
  3. Sorta a mixed bag of results. But its somewhat to be expected since September is a crossover month of new models slowly trickleing in. To my eyes deceive me or do I see a actual increase next to the CTS lol.

    Reply
    1. Yup, a nice increase in CTS deliveries, but the ATS was down. Would be nice to see a month where both are up.

      Reply
      1. Alex… I don’t think U are going to see a huge up ATS month without some fleet dumping til the car changes names. The car is absolutely gorgeous in my opinion.. driving dynamics are magnificent, but its time to re-introduce it with a new look and a proper marketing scheme.

        Reply
        1. I don’t think we’ll see a “huge” sales volume boost on any of the current vehicles, despite their positive qualities. The good news, though, is that the Cadillac team is taking the right steps that enable structural changes that positively impact brand and retail experience, enabling the “proper” sale of the next-gen vehicles — which definitely must be even more “world-class” than the current ATS, CTS, CT6 trio.

          Reply
  4. the luxury space can shift to sleek utility vehicles…sedans are a declining segment.

    Reply
  5. Camaro beat Mustangs US sales first time this year! Not bad numbers.

    Reply
    1. I noticed that also. I wonder if that was incentive driven.

      Anyone else concerned that the SRX/XT5 combined sales for 2016 are less than SRX for 2015 YTD?
      I wonder if inventory levels have not normalized yet although local dealer has about 20 or so on the lot.

      Reply
      1. Could be a mix of things,

        -Camaros success in the lighting lap
        -50th anniversary hype
        -Incentives
        -Dealers could be offering a little more off the top
        -lots of inventory to choose from
        -Ford is cutting fleet sales
        -Mustang is 2 years old now and is losing the new must have hype.

        Possibly a few more fleet sales of Camaro this month?…..maybe

        Reply
  6. The numbers for the Silverado and Sierra were down , but the Tahoe and Suburban are up as is the Yukon and the
    Yukon XL . And Escalade sales are back up . So on the large SUV market GM is doing fairly well and these sales help the bottom line . The consumer must feel good about their finances and are buying high end SUV’s , with gas prices low and decent financing rates it’s driving sales .
    Glad to see GMC Acadia sales up , the pipeline is starting to fill and that means a greater variety of models on dealership lots .
    Agree with a previous post about the ATS , it’s a great car but it seems know one knows it . Time to throw some
    ” Dare Greatly ” ads featuring it until it gets a major refresh . With the XTS I don’t think it’s going to take alot of
    money to update the IP and a redesigned front end , a cheaper CT6 in a way .
    The numbers for the Impala are dissapointing though , it’s so much better than the old one and you get alot for not alot of money .
    GM is in good shape going into the slower winter months .

    Reply
    1. I agree with your comment on the Impala – a fantastic car. It’s easy to see the Malibu continuing but the Impala going away at some point unless demand changes in the future.
      Who would have thought there might come a day when Chevy doesn’t offer a full size sedan? It just seems to be the reality of the new marketplace.

      Reply
  7. FWD sedans are still selling…..it hasn’t changed much since the mid-1980s and I feel that it’s getting old …..I feel more emotional towards utility vehicles and with sedans they doent interest me anymore… I feel that coupes & sedans will be the thing of the past 5-10 years from now.

    Reply
    1. Not everyone wants or needs a goofy looking soccer mommy CUV or SUV. So no, the sedan market will not be dead in 10 years. To be honest we have already seen slight fluctuations in sales of SUVs from most of the car company’s wher there is a trend that shows that this could slow down.

      Sure sedans are not the sellers they used to be but if company’s were to eliminate them altogether would be a grave mistake, especially if gas prices start spiking again.

      Reply
      1. In reality Rye, it will continue being a healthy mix of everything, dominated by sedans and crossovers, with coupes, convertibles, sports cars, and wagons in the minority. This will be the case today, and it will continue to be the case well into the future.

        The crossover craze has balanced itself out… it’s not like CUVs will continue at a linear growth rate.

        So to say things like “coupes and sedans will be the (a?) thing of the past 5-10 years from now” is a gigantic and inaccurate exaggeration and mis-interpretation.

        Reply
  8. Wow Ram outsold Silverado!

    Reply
  9. Watching MNF.
    GMC’s commercials are weak sauce.

    That’s not gonna get GMC out of the red. If they’re professional grade, that should permeate everything from engineering, to design, to dealer experience, to marketing. A big margin product deserves more.

    No wonder the account’s up for review. But the client team – they’re not free of blame. Sad to see how GMC has regressed.

    Reply
  10. Alex, any idea, to what degree, fleet sales affected these numbers?

    Mostly Buick, I guess – Verano and Regal. Just asking …,

    Reply
    1. We have somewhat of an idea, as per the very first table in the article above.

      For GM as a whole, September fleet sales were down 2,069 units (4.4%) while retail sales were up 554 units (0.3%), both on a YOY basis.

      We will be reporting individual the retail/fleet break-outs on an individual brand level today 🙂

      Reply
      1. Thank you, sir!

        Reply
        1. Sure thing. To follow up — the end of the article above now contains links to individual brand sales results, including retail/fleet break-outs. Buick was fleet-heavy in September, as you predicted.

          Reply
  11. Colorado and Canyon did very well this month with over 13000 units combined.
    Ford confirmed today that they are bringing the Ranger (and Bronco) back to NA. I guess they couldn’t keep letting the GM mid-sized truck success go unchecked. FCA will follow suit soon I am sure.

    Chevrolet needs to bring back the Blazer and a performance version of the Malibu and Cruze.

    Reply
  12. Not surprised with the Escalade models but good to see the CT6 gain traction and popularity. Excellent sales volume from the CTS and XTS as well. A little shock about the XT5 somewhat but anyway, go showing none the less.

    Reply
    1. Agree about Escalades, CT6, CTS and XTS but am a little concerned about the XT5. Combined of it and the SRX for YTD 2016 are below what the SRX was by itself and that was with a 6 year old model.
      I am hoping it is just an inventory issue.

      Reply
  13. utility vehicles have…

    better interior and cargo space…plus more fixable cargo space.

    better visibility all round.

    utility vehicles don’t have to be fat, stubby, gas pigs and if they build a Utility vehicle that has all the abilities and driving dynamics that a sedan has….they will chose the utility vehicle over a sedan.

    Reply
    1. Don’t ride as well, don’t handle as well, don’t stop as well, use more gas are generally noisier.

      If they make a utility that isn’t fat, stubby and tall, the top reasons why folks buy have just disappeared. To ride and handle as well, height would have to be reduced dramatically reducing cargo space and giving a lower driver position when most cuv owners appreciate the higher driving position.

      Reply
    2. Rye, you are answering a question nobody asked. Ever.

      Reading your comments, one would be led to believe that there is an ongoing battle between sedans and crossovers. In reality, there is no such battle.

      Instead, here is the reality: roughly 40% of the market will buy sedans and roughly another 40% will buy crossovers. Both will remain key to an automaker’s sales volume, revenue and profits. Roughly 10-20% will buy coupes and convertibles, which are more profitable but sell in smaller volumes.

      Again, this is not about sedans vs. coupes. It never has been and never will be. It’s about offering a healthy mix of both.

      Reply
  14. the sedans in the 1970s-1980s handles vary poorly and they were gas pigs…but sedans of today now handles well and is better on gas….the same thing can happen the utility vehicles and I bet the new CUVs rides and handles and much more fuel efficient than the 1970s-1990s sedans….a new 2016 CUV is as fuel efficient as a 10 year old 2006 sedan and probably rides and handles better.

    Reply
    1. How many versions are there of you on here? This comment make absouluty no sense at all. In one breath your talking about sedans from the 70s and 80s which do not pertain to anything going on now, then you bring up the fact that the new CUV are more fuel efficient then cars from the 70s to 90s… Well I certainly hope they get better then 12 mpg which were average ratings from the 70s era.

      And then bringing up a new CUV against an 06 sedan is also a head scratching comparison. How or why would you compare sedans from 10 to 50 years ago to sedans of today and why is that realavint to the discussion of suv vs sedan of 2016..

      Reply
    2. Rye, as Martin pointed out there are features of SUV/CUV that give them negatives vs. sedans that seemingly can’t be overcome. People like the tall driving position, but that leads to worse handling and poorer gas milage vs. a typical sedan. That’s why true “sports” cars like a Corvette or Ferrari are so low to the ground, because handling (tight steering) is best from that position. Aerodynamics also mean better gas milage for the sedan vs. the -UV. I’ve driven the Honda Accord and Honda Crosstour, basically the same car but the Crosstour is higher and tries to be a true crossover – with a more aerodynamic shape than most -UVs. The ride quality (smoothness, comfort) is actually quite good on the Crosstour, as good as the Accord, and it’s also fairly quiet (I think they use noise-canceling, like in the Buick Encore). But the handling is not as good with the Crosstour vs. Accord, and the milage is 5 mpg worse vs. the Accord. And the storage space is compromised by the aerodynamic shape, I think milage would be even worse if they gave it a more typical -UV shape (like a Jeep SUV). As far as ride quality in most -UVs though, if they are designed to carry heavy cargo they tend to have a more truck-like ride. And “riding like a truck” is the opposite of a smooth, soft ride; believe me I know, having ridden in a truck cab recently.

      I don’t think these engineering challenges can be overcome by time. Just as a low-to-the-ground car like the Corvette will always have advantages over other cars, the -UVs will have disadvantages vs. other cars. Now you could design a perfectly good sedan and give it a liftgate, like the proposed design for the Escala. A liftgate would give the sedan some of the advantages of an SUV, while keeping the sedan dynamics. I had a 1987 Chrysler GTS (turbo, digital dash, leather) that looked like a sedan and had the driving dynamics of a sedan, but the utility of a liftgate (the Dodge Lancer of that era was essentially the same design, though less “luxury”). That’s one way to get a “crossover”, but it doesn’t give the high driving position of today’s -UVs or the large/heavy carrying capacity.

      Unfortunately in the US there is a bias against mid/large cars with liftgates, as people associate these with cheap hatchbacks. Even though they will pay huge prices for SUVs. The Tesla Model S, Audi A7, etc. liftgates might slowly be getting Americans to accept this type of design, and the Escala (if built as in the concept) might continue the acceptance. A liftgate combined with flip-down rear seats gives the “sedan” a wide opening for large cargo with a decent amount of cargo volume compared with a typical sedan trunk. That’s about as far as you can go to combine a little of the utility of a -UV with sedan styling and driving dynamics. But to have the high riding position and heavy/large load capacity of a true -UV, you will get trade-offs in other areas such as handling, miles/gallon, ride quality, and “stubbiness” look.

      Reply
      1. Drew very well put you covered all the points! My response was just a rebuttal to Ryes initial post. Both are relevant and meet the public needs.

        Reply
  15. Everyone was down this month. GM did ok with continued cuts in fleet sales.

    This report means little the real report will be the quarterly earnings and from hints it should be very good.

    Making money and the market in decline is a sign of a company in decent shape and next to see if they can continue that.

    Reply
  16. I feel more love for utility vehicles than sedans….and sedans have gone small and unattractive….sedans arnt as what they used to be, big and stylsh and the auto industry seems to be stuck in the past with there sedans and not trying something toltly new and Revolotionary.

    Reply
  17. As for the piss and moan about SUV models.

    There is a wide variety of SUV models today that go from very truck like to very car like.

    The undisputed fact is this is the fastest growing segment in the market. Automakers need to mine the money here to survive and it has driven even companies like Porsche and Bentley to move into the segment with great profitable results.

    Now I am all for the cars and making them better but the market is buying more and more SUV models and that is where it is all going at least in America and even now it is growing in Europe.

    The smaller vehicles benefit with the packaging as the taller two box design makes the interior more roomy and vestal than most smaller cars.

    My wife converted to a CUV because she likes the ability to be able to haul things she never could in her GTP or SSEI.

    Right now most companies are looking for the true Hybrid of a car and SUV that would fit either segment. Some have done ok and others have failed as they were never enough car or SUV to make either party happy.

    We will see more come and many will fail but someone will hit the right combo and take this to the next level.

    Cadillac and GM will see many profits and increase in volume with the added SUV and CUV models.

    Note these models will pay for the cars we do get.

    Reply
    1. The piss and moan comments are in response to the constant pissing and moaning from Rye that sedans will be and should be gone in the near future becuase everyone and their brother will want a SUV or CUV. We all know suvs and crossovers are selling good and are a fast growing segment. This also could be a temporary fad as no one for sure knows what gas prices will be like and if they hike up again peoples lifestyles will be altered and that will also alter sales of utility vehicles in general.

      Reply

Leave a comment

Cancel