mobile-menu-icon
GM Authority

2016 Cadillac CT6 2.0T: First Drive

After multiple concept cars from Cadillac that absolutely blew my mind with such style, elegance and presence, it became hard for me to accept the 2016 CT6. That’s it?, I once pondered to myself on a 2015 New York Auto Show floor, eyeing its lines with a cocked eyebrow. I felt more than a little cheated – knowing and seeing full well that Cadillac designers have the talent to absolutely out-class just about everybody in the luxury game when they’re unleashed. And nobody was shy of giving these fully-portioned vehicles a proper name. Ciel, Elmiraj… Escala. Swoon. Developing this pre-annotated notion about what the CT6 would be like to drive was not painting a pretty picture for myself. It was the embodiment of overhype. It was going to take some work to melt this ice.

The CT6, being a machine, didn’t know how I felt about it, but it didn’t fail to greet me on approach, illuminating its sleek LEDs integrated in the doorhandles, and even unlocking itself for me without so much as laying a finger on the softly-textured, keyless fob. Hello, back, I suppose, as I opened the driver’s door and had a seat and oh my word this is nice leather. Ah, okay, CT6. I’ll give you a chance.

Just about everything inside the cabin of the 2016 Cadillac CT6 felt indulgent. The steering wheel felt like the best from Cadillac yet, and the seemingly infinitely adjustable seats set the car up to be a great touring car. The 34-speaker Bose Panaray sound system was also a giant leap for Cadillac, as was the new, less radical CUE infotainment system. Because buttons and knobs are always going to be the ergonomic answer for cars.

The Bose Panaray system, while easily the best audio system ever found in a Cadillac product, still isn’t the Bermester from the Mercedes, or the Bang and Olufsen from the Audi – they just seem to have more range. And where some areas were plastic in the cabin of the CT6, they would have been singular pieces of brushed metal in a Mercedes – like the seat adjusters, for example. And nobody is getting much engine for the money with a 2.0L four pot as the starting point. Then again, a Cadillac CT6 starts at $53,495 ($66,310 as tested). A base S-Class is nearly double that. A base 7 Series is over $81,000, and the base A8 is over $82,000. With that in mind, the CT6 is still worth more than just a look, despite the little qualms here and there. While it starts around the price of some cars a full size below it, it simply doesn’t feel that way. It’s strikes as an overly modest pricing strategy that’s perhaps a result of being snake-bitten by the blowback reaction to the prices of the current CTS, which’s isn’t even $10,000 less than the CT6, and far greater than the previous generation model. In size and in content, the CT6 just doesn’t feel like another “tweener” car, despite what the price suggests. Looking at it from the perspective of how much it weighs, though, might be the biggest tell that the greatest parts about the CT6 is what people won’t see.

2016 Cadillac CT6 Exterior 024

With a base curb weight of 3,647 lbs, the Cadillac CT6 2.0T is lighter than the lightest vehicle in the segment below it – which is the Cadillac CTS. Luxury vehicle buyers tend not to care about things such as weight in the grand scheme of things (their loss), but the structure of the CT6 is grade-A engineering porn, thanks to the latest in manufacturing techniques, such as GM’s proprietary aluminum spot welding process. All of this weight savings, and the 50/50 weight distribution of the 2.0T-powered CT6 Luxury RWD model I was testing, makes for an unprecedented driving experience compared to the orca whales that make up the rest of the class. If The Transporter drove a Cadillac, it would be this one. Abundant room in the back seat and a tomb-quiet interior makes the back a great chauffeur’s car. A chauffeur that has an SCCA competition license, that is. The base CT6 is also the only model with a RWD configuration. The 3.6L V6 and 404-hp 3.0L twin-turbo V6 model come in AWD flavors only. With the 264 hp, 284 lb-ft 2.0T LTG engine, the 2016 CT6 is EPA-rated at 22 mpg city, and 30 mpg highway for a 25 mpg combined rating that requires premium fuel. The only blemishes when it comes to driving the CT6 is the square-peg-versus-round-hole 8-speed automatic – this is a segment where smoothness is a necessity and the 8L-series of transmissions are only at their best when being thrashed, and could use some refinement in traffic. The second blemish is that the start/stop system doesn’t play too nicely with the 2.0T engine. Thankfully, it’s entirely defeatable.

In leu of it all, Cadillac has finally given the world a modern take on a big, rear-wheel-drive luxury car. Whether it likes to be admitted or not, this will be the metric that the brand will always be measured on. Don’t think that people want big, opulent vehicles from Cadillac? Look at the Escalade. Look at its most iconic vehicles in its 110+ year history. Cadillac is big cars. Cadillac is opulent cars. Everything else is mere garnishing. So when it comes to Cadillac, the world expects full-size vehicles like the CT6 to be a core competency of the brand. Happily, the CT6 is a major step in the right direction. Yet it still teases the imagination of where Cadillac will go from here with full-size luxury vehicles, as do the amazing concept cars. The 2016 Cadillac CT6 2.0T is a great appetizer, but we’re anxiously awaiting the main course.

Former staff.

Subscribe to GM Authority

For around-the-clock GM news coverage

We'll send you one email per day with the latest GM news. It's totally free.

Comments

  1. Rye Shelton

    it just looks like a block on wheels….just looks like another boring Cadillac.

    Reply
    1. Glenn

      I really need to see it in person but I think it’s a pretty nice looking ride

      Reply
    2. jamdown

      In person it is much more striking. It has a presence to it.
      Very nice vehicle.

      Reply
  2. J

    Manoli, you summed it up perfectly: the CT6 is a nice appetizer, but we’re ready for the main course! Good looks, great value, impressive weight reduction, and an improved CUE interface are all steps in the right direction! Too bad there are other comparably priced luxury sedans offering better packages to boot! I’m dying to see a no-holds-barred, technologically-advanced super super sedan to grace Caddy’s showroom floor! The CT6 is good, but it leaves a lot to be desired! The new E-Class and the newly-revealed 5 Series blow this thing away in terms of luxury and technology, but Cadillac still has at least the E-Class beat in terms of weight reduction and performance. I can’t wait to see what the comprehensive changes Johan de Nysschen spoke of that await this car will be!

    Reply
    1. jamdown

      I agree with most of your comment except that there is nothing comparably priced that is similar size, content and performance,

      Reply
      1. J

        In terms of performance, you’re right. As there are virtually no other large luxury sedans capable of what the CT6 can do. But in regards to content, interior refinement and value, I would submit to you the new Genesis G90 as being a viable alternative to the CT6. It’s silky smooth ride and world-class interior are more than enough to rival the CT6! The Lincoln Continental also offers comparable levels of luxury while being several thousands of dollars less!

        Reply
  3. Rye Shelton

    Cadillac really needs to set the bar higher and stop the tweener nonsense.

    Reply
  4. LFX323HP

    Regardless of the technology, power and refinement in modern turbo I4’s, $60K+ full size luxury cars should have 6 cylinders minimum. At some point, maybe sooner rather than later, it will be more accepted, but we’re not there yet.

    One thing Cadillac could do right away is simply eliminate the “2.0T” badging on the back of the CTS and CT6. No badging is needed for the base engine.

    Reply
  5. Rye Shelton

    maybe the CT6 will get rid of all the plastic and cheap materials when it gets a refreshing for 2020 MY.

    Reply
  6. johnls_39

    The only things that is holding me back of me liking the CT6 more is its interior finish while it has most plastic in its cabin and some cost cutting technology on the car. This car would be so much better if this car has high quality materials without hardly any evidence of plastics and had technology and features very close to the flagship competitors at $30K cheaper.

    But other than that, in some ways, it is better than the S-Class and 7 Series though. Understandably, this car will get a comprehensive improvement during its life cycle.

    Reply
  7. Rye Shelton

    the things that holds me back from likening the CT6…is the exterior design…it just looks like a bigger CTS and it’s hard to see the CT6 at $90.000. plus the interior looks like it belongs in a Chevy.

    Reply
    1. DMD

      All of these new Caddys look identical to one another–they are all much too dull with none of the flash, dash, and individuality of decades past–and that stupid new naming system–who can even figure it out or remember it without a cue card!!! DMD

      Reply
  8. Jake snake

    Why does Cadillac continues to keep the boring fuggly rear style. The rear light is to plain and boring to compete with top tier luxuries.

    Reply
  9. OMEGATALON

    Cadillac’s CT6 is a 21st century car in every respect ajd in it’s base trim with a 265 horsepower LTG 2.0L DOHC-4v 4-cyl turbo, it’s over 1,000 lbs lighter than competitors like the Lexus LS sedan; the 2016 Cadillac CT6 matches the performance of it’s competitors and does so while getting better gas mileage as it has forced BMW to use carbon fiber in it’s 7 series as an attempt to lose weight.

    Reply
  10. Rye Shelton

    I believe A&S is getting a bit long in the tooth and Cadillacs need to look like Cadillacs again…..but that won’t happen overnight.

    Reply

Leave a comment

Cancel