Chevrolet, Buick, GMC, and Cadillac dealers in the United States delivered 267,258 new vehicles in July 2016, a 1.9 percent decrease compared to July 2015. Sales of the Cadillac, GMC, and Buick brands increased, while those of Chevrolet decreased on a year-over-year basis.
Accounting for the decrease in overall volume is GM’s strategy to reduce sales to rental fleets while increasing more profitable retail sales. In July, less profitable daily rental sales were down 10,160 vehicles, or 42 percent, as planned. In the first seven months of 2016, GM’s daily rental fleet deliveries are down 38 percent year-over-year.
“Our retail-focused plan is working and as availability of our new cars, trucks and crossovers continues to grow, we expect to keep our retail sales momentum going and our strong margins intact,” said Kurt McNeil, U.S. vice president of Sales Operations. “We are growing our retail business while keeping inventories lean, incentive spend disciplined and growing our transaction prices faster than the industry average.”
In addition, GM continues to take advantage of a strong, stable U.S. economy to grow its retail business.
“Low interest rates, full employment, stable fuel prices and increasing wages remain in place and these positive factors continue to point toward a strong second half of the year and another potential record year for the industry,” said Mustafa Mohatarem, GM’s chief economist.
July 2016 notes (vs. July 2016, except as noted):
General Motors sales overview:
- Sales types:
- Retail sales increased 5 percent to 236,235 units, accounting for 88 percent of total sales. Collectively, GM brands had their best July retail sales performance since 2007.
- Chevrolet gained 0.4 percentage points in retail market share in July
- GMC gained 0.3 percentage points in retail market share in July
- Buick gained 0.2 percentage points in retail market share in July
- Fleet sales decreased 34 percent to 31,023 units, accounting for 11.6 percent of total sales. This is well below the company’s full-year guidance of 20 percent.
- Commercial and government deliveries are up 1 percent year-to-date
- Small business sales are up 4 percent year-to-date
- Based on initial estimates, GM’s retail market share rose 1 percentage point in July to 17.9 percent, representing GM’s highest monthly retail market share since December 2011. In addition, GM has gained retail market share in 14 of the past 15 months, a streak that started in April 2015.
- Through the first seven months of the year, GM’s retail sales are up 2 percent and retail share is up 0.6 percentage points — the largest retail share gain of any full-line automaker. On a brand basis:
- Chevrolet retail sales have grown 3 percent, and the brand’s retail share has grown 0.5 percentage points in the first seven months of 2016, enabling the brand to be the fastest-growing full-line brand in the industry
- Buick retail sales have grown 6 percent and Buick has gained 0.1 percentage points of retail shareGMC retail sales have grown slightly by 0.1 percentage points
- Retail sales increased 5 percent to 236,235 units, accounting for 88 percent of total sales. Collectively, GM brands had their best July retail sales performance since 2007.
- Sales of GM’s full-size pickup trucks continue to do well in the retail space. According to JD Power PIN estimates, combined retail sales of the Chevrolet Silverado and GMC Sierra grew to more than 43 percent of the full-size pickup segment in July.
- Average Transaction Prices (ATPs) based on J.D. Power PIN estimates:
- GM’s ATPs, which reflect retail transaction prices after sales incentives, were $34,887, more than $4,100 above the industry average and more than $1,100 above the ATPs posted in July 2015
- GM’s incentive spending thru July 24th was 14.2 percent. Final July incentive spend is expected to be in line with domestic competitors.
- GM had a temporary spike in incentive spending as a result of an eight-day sale in early July to begin the sell-down of several 2016 model year vehicles. GM’s incentive spending average for the year is 11.4 percent, compared to an industry average of 11.0 percent and well below other domestic and select Asian competitors.
- Over the course of the year, GM is launching or planning to launch the following new vehicles:
- 2016 Chevrolet Cruze compact sedan (launch in progress)
- 2017 Chevrolet Volt compact plug-in extended-range electric vehicle (launch in progress)
- 2016 Chevrolet Camaro sports car (launch in progress)
- 2016 Chevrolet Malibu midsize sedan (launch in progress)
- 2017 Chevrolet Camaro ZL1 and 2017 Chevrolet Camaro 1LE package
- 2017 Chevrolet Trax subcompact crossover
- 2016 Buick Cascada compact convertible (launch in progress)
- 2016 Buick Envision compact crossover (launch in progress)
- 2017 Buick LaCrosse full-size luxury sedan
- 2017 GMC Acadia midsize crossover (launch in progress)
- 2016 Cadillac CT6 full-size prestige luxury sedan (launch in progress)
- 2017 Cadillac XT5 crossover (launch in progress)
- 2017 Chevrolet Sonic subcompact hatchback and sedan
- Inventory: July month-end inventory was 682,170 units for a 66 days supply, a decrease of 24,388 units and 6 days from the 706,558 units and 72 days supply at the end of June 2016
- SAAR: GM estimates that the seasonally adjusted annual selling rate (SAAR) for light vehicles in July was 17.9 million units. On a calendar-year-to-date basis, GM estimates the light vehicle SAAR was 17.3 million units.
- Industry sales: year-to-date, industry sales are up roughly 1 percent compared to the first seven months of 2015
Chevrolet sales decreased 5.3 percent to 178,820 units:
- Chevrolet Camaro sales decreased 26.09 percent to 5,520 units
- Chevrolet Caprice sales decreased 58.57 percent to 58 units
- Chevrolet City Express sales decreased 70.42 percent to 297 units
- Chevrolet Colorado sales increased 27.55 percent to 9,195 units
- Chevrolet Corvette sales decreased 22.73 percent to 2,159 units
- Chevrolet Cruze sales decreased 35.69 percent to 13,723 units
- Chevrolet Equinox sales increased 1.26 percent to 21,882 units
- Chevrolet Express sales decreased 8.32 percent to 4,880 units
- Chevrolet Impala sales decreased 38.14 percent to 5,045 units
- Chevrolet Malibu sales decreased 26.23 percent to 11,820 units
- Chevrolet SS sales increased 62.31 percent to 521 units
- Chevrolet Silverado sales decreased 4.02 percent to 54,116 units
- Chevrolet Sonic sales decreased 5.06 percent to 4,844 units
- Chevrolet Spark sales increased 28.66 percent to 4,229 units
- Chevrolet Suburban sales increased 17.31 percent to 5,055 units
- Chevrolet Tahoe sales increased 1.62 percent to 8,431 units
- Chevrolet Traverse sales increased 20.38 percent to 15,173 units
- Chevrolet Trax sales increased 54.9 percent to 9,466 units
- Chevrolet Volt sales increased 83.24 percent to 2,406 units
Cadillac sales increased 1.3 percent to 14,341 units:
- Cadillac ATS sales increased 33.44 percent to 2,119 units
- Cadillac CT6 sales totaled 827 units
- Cadillac CTS sales decreased 13.33 percent to 1,313 units
- Cadillac ELR sales decreased 77.27 percent to 15 units
- Cadillac Escalade sales increased 2.04 percent to 1,703 units
- Cadillac Escalade ESV sales decreased 6.42 percent to 1,180 units
- Cadillac SRX sales decreased 80.65 percent to 1,307 units
- Cadillac XT5 sales totaled 4,951 units
- Cadillac XTS sales decreased 28.88 percent to 926 units
Buick sales increased 10.4 percent to 22,960 units:
- Buick Cascada sales totaled 633 units
- Buick Enclave sales increased 9.93 percent to 7,249 units
- Buick Encore sales increased 1.42 percent to 6,923 units
- Buick Envision sales totaled 1,421 units
- Buick LaCrosse sales decreased 31.64 percent to 2,359 units
- Buick Regal sales increased 49.71 percent to 2,307 units
- Buick Verano sales decreased 13.07 percent to 2,068 units
GMC sales decreased 4.8 percent to 51,137 units:
- GMC Acadia sales decreased 30.07 percent to 7,462 units
- GMC Canyon sales increased 33.08 percent to 3,532 units
- GMC Savana sales decreased 25.99 percent to 726 units
- GMC Sierra sales increased 13.23 percent to 22,428 units
- GMC Terrain sales increased 6.38 percent to 9,375 units
- GMC Yukon sales increased 31.71 percent to 4,677 units
- GMC Yukon XL sales increased 27.75 percent to 2,937 units
Sales Results - July 2016 - USA - Chevrolet
MODEL | JUL 2016 / JUL 2015 | JULY 2016 | JULY 2015 | YTD 2016 / YTD 2015 | YTD 2016 | YTD 2015 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAMARO | -26.09% | 5,520 | 7,469 | -15.40% | 42,354 | 50,062 |
CAPRICE | -58.57% | 58 | 140 | -42.21% | 545 | 943 |
CITY EXPRESS | -70.42% | 297 | 1,004 | -3.65% | 5,095 | 5,288 |
COLORADO | +27.55% | 9,195 | 7,209 | +23.86% | 60,422 | 48,784 |
CORVETTE | -22.73% | 2,159 | 2,794 | -20.25% | 16,827 | 21,101 |
CRUZE | -35.69% | 13,723 | 21,339 | -32.71% | 100,454 | 149,277 |
EQUINOX | +1.26% | 21,882 | 21,609 | -14.40% | 143,202 | 167,294 |
EXPRESS | -8.32% | 4,880 | 5,323 | +16.89% | 37,429 | 32,020 |
IMPALA | -38.14% | 5,045 | 8,156 | -7.24% | 61,435 | 66,227 |
MALIBU | -26.23% | 11,820 | 16,022 | +17.42% | 132,145 | 112,542 |
SILVERADO | -4.02% | 54,116 | 56,380 | -1.33% | 327,768 | 332,202 |
SONIC | -5.06% | 4,844 | 5,102 | -21.25% | 33,136 | 42,078 |
SPARK | +28.66% | 4,229 | 3,287 | -0.78% | 22,520 | 22,696 |
SS | +62.31% | 521 | 321 | +15.04% | 2,134 | 1,855 |
SUBURBAN | +17.31% | 5,055 | 4,309 | +0.99% | 27,970 | 27,695 |
TAHOE | +1.62% | 8,431 | 8,297 | +2.51% | 51,652 | 50,388 |
TRAVERSE | +20.38% | 15,173 | 12,604 | -5.71% | 69,805 | 74,034 |
TRAX | +54.90% | 9,466 | 6,111 | +24.82% | 38,601 | 30,926 |
VOLT | +83.24% | 2,406 | 1,313 | +76.12% | 12,214 | 6,935 |
CHEVROLET TOTAL | -5.28% | 178,820 | 188,790 | -4.56% | 1,185,710 | 1,242,409 |
Sales Results - July 2016 - USA - Cadillac
MODEL | JUL 2016 / JUL 2015 | JULY 2016 | JULY 2015 | YTD 2016 / YTD 2015 | YTD 2016 | YTD 2015 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATS | +33.44% | 2,119 | 1,588 | -15.69% | 11,883 | 14,095 |
CT6 | * | 827 | * | * | 2,806 | * |
CTS | -13.33% | 1,313 | 1,515 | -17.72% | 9,219 | 11,204 |
ELR | -77.27% | 15 | 66 | -22.46% | 511 | 659 |
ESCALADE | +2.04% | 1,703 | 1,669 | +5.08% | 12,167 | 11,579 |
ESCALADE ESV | -6.42% | 1,180 | 1,261 | +0.93% | 7,733 | 7,662 |
SRX | -80.65% | 1,307 | 6,753 | -44.86% | 20,381 | 36,960 |
XT5 | * | 4,951 | * | * | 12,159 | * |
XTS | -28.88% | 926 | 1,302 | -16.90% | 10,713 | 12,892 |
CADILLAC TOTAL | +1.32% | 14,341 | 14,154 | -7.87% | 87,572 | 95,053 |
Sales Results - July 2016 - USA - Buick
MODEL | JUL 2016 / JUL 2015 | JULY 2016 | JULY 2015 | YTD 2016 / YTD 2015 | YTD 2016 | YTD 2015 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CASCADA | * | 633 | * | * | 4,704 | * |
ENCLAVE | +9.93% | 7,249 | 6,594 | -9.12% | 31,503 | 34,664 |
ENCORE | +1.42% | 6,923 | 6,826 | +15.97% | 43,344 | 37,375 |
ENVISION | * | 1,421 | * | * | 2,947 | * |
LACROSSE | -31.64% | 2,359 | 3,451 | -32.44% | 16,322 | 24,161 |
REGAL | +49.71% | 2,307 | 1,541 | +5.78% | 11,560 | 10,928 |
VERANO | -13.07% | 2,068 | 2,379 | -15.97% | 16,787 | 19,977 |
BUICK TOTAL | +10.43% | 22,960 | 20,791 | +0.05% | 127,167 | 127,105 |
Sales Results - July 2016 - USA - GMC
MODEL | JUL 2016 / JUL 2015 | JULY 2016 | JULY 2015 | YTD 2016 / YTD 2015 | YTD 2016 | YTD 2015 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACADIA | -30.07% | 7,462 | 10,671 | -23.58% | 45,644 | 59,726 |
CANYON | +33.08% | 3,532 | 2,654 | +18.24% | 20,894 | 17,671 |
SAVANA | -25.99% | 726 | 981 | -18.23% | 12,200 | 14,920 |
SIERRA | +13.23% | 22,428 | 19,808 | +6.83% | 128,894 | 120,658 |
TERRAIN | +6.38% | 9,375 | 8,813 | -11.03% | 56,252 | 63,223 |
YUKON | +31.71% | 4,677 | 3,551 | +14.61% | 24,705 | 21,555 |
YUKON XL | +27.75% | 2,937 | 2,299 | +8.88% | 17,135 | 15,737 |
GMC TOTAL | +4.84% | 51,137 | 48,777 | -2.48% | 305,724 | 313,490 |
Sales Results - July 2016 - USA - GM Totals
BRAND | JUL 2016 / JUL 2015 | JULY 2016 | JULY 2015 | YTD 2016 / YTD 2015 | YTD 2016 | YTD 2015 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHEVROLET TOTAL | -5.28% | 178,820 | 188,790 | -4.56% | 1,185,710 | 1,242,409 |
CADILLAC TOTAL | +1.32% | 14,341 | 14,154 | -7.87% | 87,572 | 95,053 |
BUICK TOTAL | +10.43% | 22,960 | 20,791 | +0.05% | 127,167 | 127,105 |
GMC TOTAL | +4.84% | 51,137 | 48,777 | -2.48% | 305,724 | 313,490 |
GM USA TOTAL | -1.93% | 267,258 | 272,512 | -4.04% | 1,706,173 | 1,778,057 |
About The Numbers
- There were 26 selling days in July 2016 and 26 selling days in July 2015
- Chevrolet totals include discontinued Captiva Sport
Further Reading
- July 2016 GM U.S. sales results
- July 2016 Chevrolet sales results
- July 2016 Buick sales results
- July 2016 GMC sales results
- July 2016 Cadillac sales results
- July 2016 GM Canada sales results
- July 2016 GM China sales results
- Global July 2016 Cadillac sales results
Comments
These seem like great results and in line with GM’s overall strategy of reducing fleet and increasing retail. Wall st seems to lazy to do their research on this one..
Correct that stock prices are still not reflecting a strong financial outlook for GM and other car companies.
Good result for Cadillac considering they are sill so sedan heavy. Surprising result for ATS being up 33% from July 2015.
Good prognosis for Buick for the rest of the year since they will have wider availability of the Envision in the fall plus the new Lacrosse being rolled out also in the fall.
What the heck is going on with Camaro? Are they starting to panic yet?
The overall number I was told was minus fleet sales the heavily profit driven individual sales were up 5%.
Two issues on the Camaro are very clear.
#1 The selection and inventory at dealers are pretty slim. It is like production is still slow like they were on the Colorado trucks. This leaves many dealers with 3 to no cars in stock.
#2 Because there are no cars in stock or few to choose from they are not coming off the price much if at all. This leave buyers waiting for higher inventories and better deals when they have more cars to choose from. My large dealer here has only 2-3 odd cars but no SS models the most popular. When they come in they are sold as soon as they hit the lot.
GM is on the right path and we will continue to see a drop in sales for the rest of the year with the cutting of fleet sales. It has to cycle out for a year before this will go away.
As long as profits and customer sales continue to rise there is no issue here.
What is note worthy is GM was shown to be much more profitable than Ford and also has much fewer incentives that Ford is using to keep sales up.
Profits per unit will be very important if the predictions of a slow growth or no growth market is coming.
Was reading on camaro six today that dealers had 4 months of Camaros stocked. Not sure if true.
I agree with GMs on reducing fleet sales but I think the Camaro is running out of excuses. Great car without any buzz, the cars in my area just sit. The Challenger should not be outselling this thing at any point of time this year. It’s old, heavy and handle the worst and offers no turbo 4 or convertible… they pooched the styling.
The Camaro just doesn’t have that ‘wow’ factor IMO. It really does just look too much like the 5th gen MCE which I never cared for. I liked the first few years of the 5th gen better. It had that 60’s muscle car look. The squished front end/beady eye look of the MCE’d car lost that both front and back. I do like the 6th gen updates (albeit mild) much better but it still isn’t where a new generation car should have been. The Avista on the other hand is a show stopping WOW design. I so wish Chevrolet would have brought that out as the 6th gen Camaro… Every time I see a picture of the front end I imagine a color coded Bowtie in place of the Buick emblem. Chevrolet wouldn’t be able to build them fast enough if the Avista were the new Camaro. It’s like a modern split bumper Gen 2 but even better. I know I’d already have one.
Chevrolet in general (cars & trucks both) need a different design language. More clean, smooth, classy, sporty and classic looking. That’s what made their 50’s & 60’s cars absolutely timeless. Right now, the mojo just isn’t there… Buick and GMC seem to have it in spades though. That doesn’t help us Chevrolet buyers however.
I was thinking the same about the Avista what a wast of a good design, I think you’ll see some Avista inspiration on the next face lift of the 6th gen.
No, we won’t. Chevy and Buick are ccompletely different brands, cars, and design languages.
The Camaro will get up there in sales. Everyone is so quick to jump to conclusions, though it’s easy being sideline observers.
As for the Avista: if Buick wants a coupe like it, it needs to make a business case for the extremely low volume in such a car. And let’s keep in mind that the Avista is just a concept. The production version would be much less visually stunning.
Wow is subjective.
Now go to your dealer and just see what they have sitting around. Not much at most.
Also prices with no incentives are tempering sales too. A loaded V6 can be a great car but in a LT2 RS can be sticker ed at $40K and dealers are not dealing.
That is too much for a V6 and I would be like many others on this car waiting for better deals and negotiating dealers.
As for styling in the 50’s use care there. what is timeless today was not loved back then. The 55 Chevy went in for a fast restyling as many hated the new nose on the car. The 57 Chevy classic today was out sold by Ford as was the 58 Chevy.
We tend to look back with rose colored glasses and forget that what is treasured today was not always what launched with great love back then.. The new book on Harley Earl bears all this out and how these cars has issues then introduced and the styline was changed radically all these years looking for what the public wanted then. The love came later on.
As for the Avista I wish people would keep in mind that the one we saw was a show car pure and simple and the car would have to go through many changes they would not like if it went production. Smaller wheels, taller stance and B pillars are a given.
Even notice it was never shown driven? Well it was not a car you can take on the road. Also the interior was printed and not even close to production.
Even if it was approved In Detroit it would not arrive for a few years.
Not to be a bummer as I loved the car but you have to keep reality in this story.
In my area a small dealer has 16 new Camaro’s
medium sized dealer has 33
large dealer has 54
very large dealer has 120
In most places, if your local dealer does not have the car you want, they can trade for it.
IMO, This newest Camaro is another example of GM pricing a new Chevrolet beyond the reach of many of it’s target audience. $70K+ Suburban’s are another glaring example.
Name the dealers!
Tampa Florida area. Stingray Chevy has 120. 101 of which are 2016’s. Of those, 26 are SS, 47 V6 and 28 turbo 4. In addition they also have a handful of 2017’s on the ground. Another large Tampa dealer has 92 2016 & 17’s, including 29 SS. Another area dealer with 50+ has 19 SS, and the remaining divided among V6 and turbo 4.
As I stated, the cars are available, Turbo 4, V6, SS, coupe, convertible, etc….to continue to insist that the poor sales performance is because of low inventory is ridiculous.
Your 120 are an acceptation vs the rule.
In many other parts of the country there are many less available. It was posted here by someone that in Michigan just a month ago were less than 150 in all of Michigan available.
It is very likely the 17’s are just now arriving in large numbers and the 16 models will soon see discounts that most people wait for in August.
I expect to see more sales as the incentives arrive.
I posted some of my nearby dealers and 15 was the best I found.
Here is another one.
http://www.serpentinitallmadge.com/VehicleSearchResults?search=new&make=Chevrolet
10 only in stock.
I bet most of the country see many fewer than Stingray and other Florida dealers.
Note too ken the Challenger is dirt cheap because it is old and makes little money.
I visited one large dealer and one small dealer recently. The Large had one V6 and one SS the smaller dealer had no Camaro’s
Checked inventory at sister Chevy garage where I purchased my car and he currently has four 2017 Camaro SS in stock.
Somehow don’t believe the sales drop is attributable to availability. Price maybe.
surprising the ATS Seles are up….who is buy those boring and cramped cars.
You know not of what you speak you fool.
But hey, it’s your opinion and blablabla.
What car do you drive anyway?
put Silent Electrician on the ignore list.
And you have yet to tell us what you drive… Maybe you should put yourself on the list of those with poor taste. Nah, scratch that… You will feel right at home on the stupid list 🙂
Overall GM is actually doing fairly well . They have alot of new product coming for MY 17 and customers know its model change over so may be waiting for the newest models to show up . As long as TAP’s continue their in good shape . Wall Street has never rally reflected GM’s profits in stock prices which must infuriate the stockholders .
Camaro sales are down because there isn;t much to choose from on dealer lots . Production is running into parts that aren’t up to spec yet . GM doesn’t want to build the cars and have to recall them later . A smart move .
The mkt price is still the best barometer – $33 IPO, 32 and change five yrs later. Sideways —>
In general you are correct but Wallstreet generally undervalues auto industry stock and then in some cases grossly over values them like in the case of Tesla.
While others are just as stagnate or dropping. Ford stock has gone down of late even after reported record sales as profits were lower than GM and per unit sold.
The market expects that auto sales will stagnate in the next few years. This will stop stock prices from growing much. If GM can retain what they hold now that would be a win as most auto stocks will drop in the coming year or two for most.
Yes Jam you are correct on what you said!
I would be fine as a investor with a 15-16m market instead of the current 17m. Break even point is at 11m, and GM still has some cost inefficiencies it can clear out. Unsure what the net income would be at that point….6b a year instead of the current 9b? Still a great level…
OK, I get the undervalued part. And I’m astounded that people pay $3b to buy a tech company that hasn’t turned a profit.
But – why would a prudent investor buy GM or Ford? Unless you have a 20-year time frame, are extremely patient, and are a true believer? You’d have been better off (slightly) by putting your money in a money market fund for five years.
There are plenty of good things happening @ GM, along with the bad. But if the scoreboard says ‘tie game’ after five years, well, sorry, that wasn’t a great investment. If you were a psychic, and bought when GM dipped to 19, congratulations. And management doesn’t feel the pain that retail investors do, because they get options at artificially-depressed prices.
I remember a Barron’s cover story (pre-2009) that said ‘Buy GM’ – I think roundtable member John Neff was particularly hot on GM … so his call was off. The current P/E is 3.86% (!). The current S&P average is 25%, so I guess there’s plenty of room for growth. We’ll see what happens …
Just because a stock takes awhile to go up or down doesn’t mean the investors are wrong. At current profit levels in 3 years GM can buy back all of its shares or return all its cash to shareholders for a 33% return every year.
Unsure what tech you are referring to with the 3b comment.
Sadly as the market shrinks, incentives increase and profit margins will drop Just the way auto market is!
Not the best place to invest in the market.
As far as Tesla is concerned, I would not be investing my money there long term. If energy prices remain reasonable, how much of the auto market will pay the price premium and tolerate the inconvenience that comes with a plug in vehicle! At some point, they will have to generate a profit!
Oh, sorry – nothing specific – just that old trope about companies buying tech start-ups for silly amounts of money, when they’re unproven, or unprofitable.
And not trying to be unduly critical of GM – things are better than they were, it seems.
They future may indeed hold promise – but there are better investments you could have made over the past five years.
As of this time one of the largest dealers in this area has 3 Camaro’s No SS
http://www.chevyvandevere.com/VehicleSearchResults?search=new&make=Chevrolet
Found this one with 15 and 7 SS but they are not dealing much if at all on prices. 0-$1500 at best.
http://www.dougchevrolet.com/VehicleSearchResults?search=new&make=Chevrolet
This one has one SS and no deals.
http://www.danbuckchevy.com/VehicleSearchResults?pageContext=VehicleSearch&search=new&sort=price|asc
If I were shopping I would be waiting for better choices and better deals. We will see incentives soon that will set them in motion.
Still availability is not even and very sparse in some areas.