2016 Chevrolet Colorado Duramax: First Drive
14Sponsored Links
Diesel: it’s not the cleanest word in the automotive vernacular as of recent, but here we are in Solvang, California, just outside of Santa Barbara, where Chevrolet has invited us to drive the 2016 Colorado Duramax.
The 2.8-liter Duramax turbocharged four-cylinder diesel has been a long-awaited engine option for the Chevrolet Colorado since it resurfaced from the midsize pickup graveyard. And, we’re here to report it’s quite good.
The 2.8-liter Duramax tries extraordinarily hard to act like a regular petrol-powered Chevy Colorado. That’s for better, or for worse, depending on how thrashy one likes their diesel engines to be. Sure, there’s the diesel buyer who yearns for school bus like sounds at idle. That buyer most likely won’t be looking at the Colorado Duramax.
Those in search of a livable diesel application in a midsize package should take note, though. The 2016 Chevrolet Colorado Duramax is whisper quiet at cruise. And we mean whisper. Cruising down Highway 101 revealed more wind noise than engine noise to upset the silence of the cabin.
Stomp on the accelerator, and the truck’s low-end grunt of 369 lb-ft of torque has no problem uttering out a diesel-infused growl, however. This is about torque, not horsepower. And the 2016 Chevrolet Colorado Duramax never feels down on power.
The 2.8-liter Duramax also plays very well with the automatic transmission, never kicking down excessively in a search for the proper gear and optimum power. This became apparent as we headed into the local twisties and vineyards. Through steep slopes and long crests, the Duramax kept its cool, merely waiting until more torque was requested to drop a gear.
Chevrolet was keen to highlight the noise and vibration factors surrounding the 2016 Colorado Duramax, too. On paper, it sounds great. A Centrifugal Pendulum Vibration Absorber (CPVA) controls harsh vibrations and unpleasant noises, which the brand states is the first application in a General Motors vehicle, as well as in the midsize truck segment.
We’re not engineers, but this CPVA gadgetry seems to work like a charm upon first impression. Firing up the 2016 Colorado Duramax awakens a crisp grunt, much different from its gasoline-sipping cousins. It’s quiet, not harsh, but pleasant would be an overstatement for the noise coming from it. After all, this is still a diesel, not a small-block V8.
Vibrations are nearly inexistent. Putzing around the Dutch-infused scenery of Solvang meant for plenty of stopping, as tourists snapped stereotypical photos of the California landscape. Through the constant stop and go, the truck remained composed, never slipping into something to rattle one’s hands from the limb.
Official EPA estimates for 2016 Colorado Duramax have been pushed back in wake of the current Volkswagen diesel scandal, but we achieved a respectable 24 MPG in mixed driving conditions. Of course, that included plenty of controlled mashes of the accelerator, ensuring all 369 lb-ft of torque was still there. It was.
Inside, things are much the same when taking in the interior, except one major addition: Apple CarPlay.
CarPlay was up and running in the 2016 Colorado Duramax, and ran seamlessly through the “Projection” icon on the original infotainment screen. Siri was responsive, read text messages, made phone calls and had no trouble finding points of interest, either.
If there was one disappointment with Apple CarPlay, it would be the screen resolution. The OE graphics look great on the 2016 Colorado’s infotainment screen, but the large Apple icons look a tad pixelated at times. Picking nits, but something noticeable to the “technology and stuff” crowd.
It’s difficult to pin the 2016 Chevy Colorado Duramax’s competition. It’s the only midsize truck to offer such a powerplant. Without a note of comparison, it comes off as a formidable alternative to the LFX 3.6-liter V6. And, with 7,700-pounds of towing capacity, it’s sure to find more than a few lovers.
Enough to ensure Duramax is not a dirty word.
Been waiting for this baby duramax for too long.
Do we know when the order book will be opened?
Well if you need to tow, and you don’t want a massive full-size, and you’re willing to spend thousands more for an over-engineered diesel motor that will pass government scrutiny, this is a great choice.
Spoken like somebody who’s only diesel experience was driving a U-Haul.
If you prefer something that doesn’t “pass government scrutinity”, which be had for a good discount. I think there a few million options.
Driving diesel is a different experience than driving gas. It is a difference that I prefer and have no hesitation to pay for. The power of a larger engine with the fuel economy of a smaller one. The effortless torque. The incredible range between refuelling.
But it is only something that you can judge for yourself.
Still born this pricey midget, already eclipsed by Ram Ecodiesel, soon to be stomped into the ground by Titan Cummins V8. I predict zero real world fuel economy advantage against those half tons. Any bets?
I believe that the eco diesel is a great engine. But if you’re used to driving a smaller vehicle you don’t want a full-size pickup. Size doesn’t always matter.
As for the coming Titan Cummings I’m just a little put-off by its highly derivative styling.
This coming from magirus the basement dweller who said the Colorado/Canyon would flop from the beginning. Yeah, we’ll take your word for it.
I’m an Australian and I have a Holden colorado with the very same 2.8 you lot are just getting. They are alright by four pot diesel standards but we have probably ten comparable vehicles here. Petrol (gas) powered 4×4 utes (pickups) are virtually non existent here, only Toyota really still offers one. This 2.8 has one fatal flaw and that is the torque delivery is too high in the rev range for a lot of applications. Toyota, Mitsubishi and isuzu’s little four pots all deliver peak tourque well under 2k and some under 1500rpm, which is want you want if you’re trying to pull a few tonnes of firewood up a slope in the bush, or crawl up or out of rocky shit. These things you’re always picking up revs and slipping the clutch to try and take off without stalling. I think the auto would sort the problem a bit but I prefer to row my own cogs.
Brad,
You have trucks we can only dream of here. Diesels with manual transmissions. (Too cool for the U.S.)
The Colorado diesel is the first example of a small glimmer of hope.