Chevrolet, Buick, GMC and Cadillac dealers in the United States delivered 269,056 new vehicles in April 2015, up 6 percent year-over-year.
“At GM, truck and crossover sales have been strong all year, thanks to our increasingly deep and broad product portfolio,” said Kurt McNeil, General Motors’ U.S. vice president of Sales Operations.
“Consumer and commercial customer demand for pickups and utility vehicles has been building since last fall, and that’s a clear sign that the slowdown in GDP growth during the winter months was caused by factors that are mostly transitory in nature,” McNeil said. “The auto industry continues to be on track to have its best sales year since 2006.”
April 2015 highlights (vs. April 2014, except as noted):
General Motors:
Retail deliveries were up 5 percent
Fleet deliveries were up 8 percent
Commercial sales were the highest since March 2008, up 31 percent.
Through April, commercial deliveries have grown year over year for 18 consecutive months. Large vans were up 64 percent and full-size pickups were up 42 percent.
New products have put GM’s estimated share, according to J.D. Power PIN, of the retail market as follows:
Midsize pickups: 31 percent calendar year to date
Small crossovers: 55 percent
Large SUVs: 74 percent
Trucks and crossovers posted double-digit sales increases in April. Trucks were up 13 percent and crossovers were up 25 percent. April was GM’s best-ever month for crossover sales.
Combined van, SUV and pickup deliveries were up 13 percent, with pickup deliveries up 22 percent. Full-size pickups were up 7 percent and midsize pickup sales reached 9,442 units.
ATPs were approximately $34,750, up $880 per unit, according to PIN estimates. Calendar year to date, ATPs are up $1,580.
Incentive spending as a percentage of ATPs was 9.5 percent in April, according to PIN estimates. That is in line with March and down 0.6 percentage points year-over-year. Industry average spending was 9.2 percent of ATP.
GM estimates that the seasonally adjusted annual selling rate (SAAR) for light vehicles in April was 16.7 million units.
GM passenger car deliveries were down 12 percent in April, reflecting the segmentation shifts that began in the fall of 2014, as well as lower rental deliveries and incentive spending on an ATP basis that is considerably below the industry average. Chevrolet has the lowest passenger car incentives in the industry on an ATP basis compared to other full-line manufacturers.
Chevrolet sales grew 3.4 percent to 187,837 units:
Chevrolet crossover deliveries were up 51 percent (excluding the fleet-only Captiva, which has been discontinued). Equinox was up 42 percent for its best April ever, Traverse was up 28 percent (also) for its best April ever, and Trax reported 3,451 sales.
Chevrolet pickup sales totaled 52,988 units, up 24 percent. Silverado deliveries were up 7.5 percent to 45,978 units and the all-new Colorado midsize pickup had its best month since launch, reporting 7,010 deliveries. The Colorado has now been the industry’s fastest-selling truck for three months in a row, with a “days to turn” of only 15 days.
Spark EV sales were a record 920 units
Sonic was up 14 percent to 8,700 units
The SS was up 6 percent to 299 units
Corvette Z06 is one of the industry’s fastest-selling car, with a “days to turn” of only 17 days.
Chevrolet is the industry’s fastest-growing truck brand so far this year and Chevrolet passenger car volumes have increased sequentially each month this year.
All other Chevrolet models posted year-over-year sales drops
Cadillac sales grew 13.7 percent to 15,801 units:
The brand says that its calendar-year-to-date sales are in line with 2014
Escalade sales were up 144 percent, with the regular wheelbase Escalade up 121.8 percent to 1,945 units and the Escalade ESV up 188.4 percent to 1,292 units
SRX was up 40.5 percent to 6,390 units
XTS was up 13.6 percent to 2,225 units
ELR was up 70.5 percent to 104 units
All other Cadillac models posted year-over-year sales drops
GMC was up 20 percent to 47,194 units:
GMC pickup sales were up 19 percent, with Sierra up 5 percent to 18,082 units and Canyon deliveries totaling 2,432 units. The Sierra and Canyon have the highest average transaction prices (ATPs) in their respective segments, according to J.D. Power PIN.
Denali penetration is at record levels, surpassing 23 percent of retail sales.
GMC’s crossover sales were up 25 percent, with Terrain up 12.8 percent to 8,792 units and Acadia up 39.5 percent to 8,767 units. Both vehicles had their best-ever April sales.
Savana was up 95.9 percent to 3,438 units
The regular-wheelbases Yukon was down 15.4 percent to 3,158 units
The long-wheelbase Yukon XL was up a measly 0.8 percent to 2,525 units
Buick sales dropped 5.2 percent to 18,224 units:
Buick Encore deliveries were up 29 percent to 5,587 units; sales for the subcompact CUV have increased year over year for 16 consecutive months.
All other Buick models posted year-over-year sales drops
Buick is the only one that dropped in sales because Buicks are nothing but rebaged Opels….and all of todays Buicks are FWD….even though buick will get all-new bold styling Buick still doesn’t have much life in it unless Buick gets a proper RWD flagship and a Grand National….that would put way more life into Buick.
How do you explain the success of the Encore (up 29%), which is the most “rebadged Opel” currently in Buick’s lineup? The Enclave and Lacrosse don’t even have an Opel equivalent, and if anything the current Astra is a rebadged Verano. Besides, Opels aren’t even sold in North America, and most Americans don’t even know what one is unless they follow GM/the auto industry or have been to Europe.
Buick sales are down because cheap(er) gas is causing people to buy trucks and SUV’s instead of Buick’s sedan heavy lineup (we need the Envision ASAP) , and on top of that most of Buick’s current product is stale.
I’ll agree with you that Buick needs a flagship (Avenir), and if and when that happens it will be rear wheel drive, but it will not make up the bulk of the division’s sales. I do expect it to sell well if they can stay as true to the concept as possible, but that will be driven primarily by styling over the fact that it is rear drive. Buick hasn’t had a rear wheel drive car in nearly two decades since the Roadmaster was discontinued, so I highly doubt that front wheel drive is suddenly causing sales to drop. If you note, the ATS and CTS are both down again, so rear wheel drive is not the savior there.
I don’t understand why the Enclave isn’t selling, since SUVs/CUVs, along with pickups, are a bit of a gimme right now. Even Buick’s 16%-off during the NCAA sweet 16 didn’t stop the flow of blood.
Then again, even with down numbers, Buick still sells more than Cadillac. But ’15 isn’t a good year for 2/3rds of GM’s lineup.
How many models does Cadillac offer? How many does BMW and Mercedes?
Granted, Cadillac doesn’t sell as many models in the segments that it competes in as BMW or Mercedes… but that’s a by-product of the renaissance that the brand has been going through as a whole.
With time, product excellence, a rebuilt brand image (time), and a full-fledged product lineup, Cadillac has a very good chance of selling more cars than either one of those two.
Nice to see the full size GM trucks beat the F150 in April (not by much but a win is a win). Add in the Colorado/Canyon sales (which do take a way some full size truck sales) and GM had a great truck month.
They only beat the F150 this time because Ford was running production out of the one Dearborn F150 Red Rouge Plant, Kansas City F150 Plant was being re-tooled for the 15 F150. Now that both plants are running full capacity you will never see that again, EVER! The new F150 beats the competition with higher average transaction price and overall volume.
As for Buick, I drove a rental 14 Lacrosse and was shocked at how well built it was. Beautiful product but priced way too high.
what I noticed about the Lacrosse is that the A-pillars and windshield are too laid back witch resalts of poor visability ….I’m sure the next Lacrosse will just look like a stretched Chevy Malibu with Buick styling….the Lacrosse is a bit odd for a flagship…so a Grand Nationl probably won’t make it to production….but I’m pretty sure a RWD flagship will…and sit above the Lacrosse…that would probably happen in around 4 years.
Aside from being slightly stale, Buick has a handsome lineup with both Regal (Insignia) and Enclave being tops for design and performance in their class.
I agree that GM value brands (Chevrolet, Opel, Vauxhall, Holden) should have been rationalized into a global hyper brand mimicking One Ford in an effort to gain scale and maintain parity with Ford in NA. It isn’t as if a European specific Opel is harming Ford in the region.
This would have allowed Buick to share costs with Cadillac and the GM value brands. Buick had great potential but only when Cadillac can raise transaction prices.
Right now Aveair makes CT 6 look like a poor relation thus harming both brands.
Buick could have a proper flagship on a high-vol non FWD AWD only platform called O2XX and have the same features as the Omega platform like how the contental is without be RWD….O2XX could be a higher-end than the P2XX and E2XX…..E2XX=low-end……O2XX=top-end and could be priced $55.000—70.000.
Well outside of the Encore and Verano there is nothing new about Buick post Chapter 11 as all the cars are based on old Buick and Opel models. Now They are nice model but they are getting a little long in production cycle.
But that will change soon as we will get replacements for nearly all their models with new platforms and we also will get a few new models too.
There will be a lot happening between now and 2020.
I am not worried about Buick as they will be alright and China also will be continuing to pay the bills for them while they revamp with the new models.
GM is doing well considering that they have so many model that will be replaced soon. The Chevy Cruze, Sonic, Camaro, Malibu adding the Trax and new Nox will make a big difference as these cars are all in hot categories and in segments where they are the oldest in them but yet sales are better than they should expect at this time. The new platforms will usher these cars forward in a bigger leap than we are used too.
All things considered they are doing pretty well and with the new product it should only get better.
At least Mary Barra is not going around like the head of FCA begging for someone to dance with him to save his company. It is really going to get bad over there unless someone comes in and buys them out or at least buys in to give them money they really don’t have to fix their lines. The Hellcats effects on sales will be limited and will not pay to replace the lines that they have now. The last thing GM or Ford would want to do is get tied to them in anyway other than to buy Jeep.
Imagine what GM could do with Jeep in a GMC dealer. Dump the Compass and the fake jeeps and focus on real all terrain products.
So very true. There is a lot in the pipeline and it cant get here quick enough. I’m sure GM and Buick will be just fine, but us dyed in the wool fanatics get stressed over the gears seeming to change so slowly sometimes.
Brother that is why I preach big picture and it makes it easier to understand the whens and why things happen at specific times.
Too many people fail to understand all that is going on and what has to happen to bring out cars and how GM just can not do it all at once, no MFG can do it all at once.
Things like a Flagship will arrive after 2020 because when you start from nothing to a intro of a car it takes that long or in some cases longer. You have to consider how long it takes to put the design through the processes and the engineering in place.
Then you have to account for the man power to do all the work as no automaker could afford to pay to revamp all models at once nor do they have the man power to do it all at once not even GM.
But Cadillac will do some major upgrades to the CTS and ATS in the interim that will keep things interesting as well as releasing the SUV and CUV models they have yet to show.
The Thing is the change to take Cadillac to the place it needs to be was only done in August so 5 years is the normal trend today for an all new car and it will be after 2020 before we see it. If they wait for the new engines it may be just a little longer.
5 years is fast as years ago they worked nearly 10 years out on major changes.
If you cut the time too much then you end up with many issues and recalls for things that just did not get sorted out.
Sorry but you have mistaken a show car with reality. That car never was intended for production and would need many changes including the door for production.
thay said they are working on a Buick flagship…so I doen’t think it would be after 2020…if after 2020 it would be too fare apart from the CT6…I doen’t want to wait till the next decade.
I can see a RWD flagship in 2018 or 19 and base price could start in the high-$50.000 to top out at $70.000…..$20.000 dollars more than the new Lacrosse.
around 2020 MY the Cadillac CT6 could be upgraded and refreshed.. so it could jump to $75.000 base price and a CT6-V would probably debut and there would be a CT8 debuting too… witch would start at around $95.000 or $100.000 base price. so that would make room for a RWD Buick flagship. that prices high $50.000–$70.000.
Because they won’t offer cars that look like they came out of the 1970’s?
You’re out of step with reality by decades by continually demanding that GM make Buicks into something that nobody wants now and didn’t want then. Buick is changing to meet the demands of the world today, why can’t you accept that? Why can’t you change your expectations of Buick?
To me, the positioning of Buick as a brand is still not as clearly-defined as it should be.
The biggest problem is that Buick’s (and GMC’s) existence, as it is today, hamstrings Chevrolet in the upper end. Ford does not have this problem with the Ford brand; neither does Toyota nor Nissan.
Some prime examples:
1. AWD, a HUD, and other features available in the LaCrosse but not in the Impala: this hurts the perception of Chevrolet as solely being the purveyor of “cheap” mainstream cars. By contrast, Ford brings AWD to Taurus.
2. Magnetic Ride in the K2 trucks: should be across the board, and not limited to the Sierra Denali.
3. AWD in the Regal but not in the Malibu: again, Ford offers AWD on the Fusion.
There are more, but these are the ones that have come to mind right now.
If Buick were to have a more clear direction, positioning, and focus, then perhaps people like Rye should feel better about the brand. But as it stands now, all it does is get in the way of what could and should be high-end Chevrolet trim levels.
Buick should go away in the next 8-10 years…that way the chevy brand could add more cars to the lineup and give Buicks cars to the chevy brand so that way in the future chevy can be a much more flixable brand in prices and choices and the Impala could become a high-end car or add one.
at least build a RWD Omega platform for Buick…something more proper and real looking…Buick can have at least one real car in the lineup….I doen’t care about the other Buicks I only care about the flagship…I wish the Lacrosse is not the flagship of Buick…the Lacrosse is tarnished for a flagship…I’m not asking to have the Buick to be exactly like the 70s or 90s….Im asking for something that’s shaped more like the Cadillac CT6 than the Lacrosse….in the 70s and 90s Buick had real flagships….the Lacrosse not so much… I’m afraid the next Lacrosse is still going to be undersize because it wont grow that much in size…and the shape of the next Lacrosse is a nice new bold shape but doesn’t appear to be a top of the line Buick….as far as I know right now…Cadillac is getting the cool cars… like the CT6 and upcoming CT8…
I’m hoping the Cadillac CT8 looks and styling woen’t be as stale as the CT6….the CT6 is a good looking car but just looks OK and styling is stale. it doesn’t have the same looks as the concept coupe.
Call the styling of the CT6 what you want. But please know that for the target market (and for the target segment), the car’s design checks all the boxes, tickles all the spots, and does what it’s supposed to do.
Having said that… have you seen the CT6 in person?
Comments
Buick is the only one that dropped in sales because Buicks are nothing but rebaged Opels….and all of todays Buicks are FWD….even though buick will get all-new bold styling Buick still doesn’t have much life in it unless Buick gets a proper RWD flagship and a Grand National….that would put way more life into Buick.
How do you explain the success of the Encore (up 29%), which is the most “rebadged Opel” currently in Buick’s lineup? The Enclave and Lacrosse don’t even have an Opel equivalent, and if anything the current Astra is a rebadged Verano. Besides, Opels aren’t even sold in North America, and most Americans don’t even know what one is unless they follow GM/the auto industry or have been to Europe.
Buick sales are down because cheap(er) gas is causing people to buy trucks and SUV’s instead of Buick’s sedan heavy lineup (we need the Envision ASAP) , and on top of that most of Buick’s current product is stale.
I’ll agree with you that Buick needs a flagship (Avenir), and if and when that happens it will be rear wheel drive, but it will not make up the bulk of the division’s sales. I do expect it to sell well if they can stay as true to the concept as possible, but that will be driven primarily by styling over the fact that it is rear drive. Buick hasn’t had a rear wheel drive car in nearly two decades since the Roadmaster was discontinued, so I highly doubt that front wheel drive is suddenly causing sales to drop. If you note, the ATS and CTS are both down again, so rear wheel drive is not the savior there.
Your vision of Buick is weak, unrealistic, idealistic, and hangs on the believe of a large sedan as a panacea for a sales decline.
A large sedan with low volume and low margins will not save Buick.
Excepting the Encore, Buick’s tanking.
I don’t understand why the Enclave isn’t selling, since SUVs/CUVs, along with pickups, are a bit of a gimme right now. Even Buick’s 16%-off during the NCAA sweet 16 didn’t stop the flow of blood.
Then again, even with down numbers, Buick still sells more than Cadillac. But ’15 isn’t a good year for 2/3rds of GM’s lineup.
“Then again, even with down numbers, Buick still sells more than Cadillac”
You’re comparing a non-luxury brand with slightly higher than mainstream prices to a luxury brand with much higher luxury prices.
OK, then – let’s compare Cadillac to their direct luxury competition:
Cadillac has sold 52k this year.
BMW, 125k.
Mercedes, 150k.
Not a pretty picture.
How many models does Cadillac offer? How many does BMW and Mercedes?
Granted, Cadillac doesn’t sell as many models in the segments that it competes in as BMW or Mercedes… but that’s a by-product of the renaissance that the brand has been going through as a whole.
With time, product excellence, a rebuilt brand image (time), and a full-fledged product lineup, Cadillac has a very good chance of selling more cars than either one of those two.
Nice to see the full size GM trucks beat the F150 in April (not by much but a win is a win). Add in the Colorado/Canyon sales (which do take a way some full size truck sales) and GM had a great truck month.
They only beat the F150 this time because Ford was running production out of the one Dearborn F150 Red Rouge Plant, Kansas City F150 Plant was being re-tooled for the 15 F150. Now that both plants are running full capacity you will never see that again, EVER! The new F150 beats the competition with higher average transaction price and overall volume.
As for Buick, I drove a rental 14 Lacrosse and was shocked at how well built it was. Beautiful product but priced way too high.
what I noticed about the Lacrosse is that the A-pillars and windshield are too laid back witch resalts of poor visability ….I’m sure the next Lacrosse will just look like a stretched Chevy Malibu with Buick styling….the Lacrosse is a bit odd for a flagship…so a Grand Nationl probably won’t make it to production….but I’m pretty sure a RWD flagship will…and sit above the Lacrosse…that would probably happen in around 4 years.
whan will there be a RWD Buick flagship…I hope it will arrive before 2020.
Aside from being slightly stale, Buick has a handsome lineup with both Regal (Insignia) and Enclave being tops for design and performance in their class.
I agree that GM value brands (Chevrolet, Opel, Vauxhall, Holden) should have been rationalized into a global hyper brand mimicking One Ford in an effort to gain scale and maintain parity with Ford in NA. It isn’t as if a European specific Opel is harming Ford in the region.
This would have allowed Buick to share costs with Cadillac and the GM value brands. Buick had great potential but only when Cadillac can raise transaction prices.
Right now Aveair makes CT 6 look like a poor relation thus harming both brands.
Buick could have a proper flagship on a high-vol non FWD AWD only platform called O2XX and have the same features as the Omega platform like how the contental is without be RWD….O2XX could be a higher-end than the P2XX and E2XX…..E2XX=low-end……O2XX=top-end and could be priced $55.000—70.000.
the O2XX could be 204 inches long….,.,.Omega could be for Cadillac flagship and O2XX could for Bucik flagship….P2XX for chevy flagship.
Well outside of the Encore and Verano there is nothing new about Buick post Chapter 11 as all the cars are based on old Buick and Opel models. Now They are nice model but they are getting a little long in production cycle.
But that will change soon as we will get replacements for nearly all their models with new platforms and we also will get a few new models too.
There will be a lot happening between now and 2020.
I am not worried about Buick as they will be alright and China also will be continuing to pay the bills for them while they revamp with the new models.
GM is doing well considering that they have so many model that will be replaced soon. The Chevy Cruze, Sonic, Camaro, Malibu adding the Trax and new Nox will make a big difference as these cars are all in hot categories and in segments where they are the oldest in them but yet sales are better than they should expect at this time. The new platforms will usher these cars forward in a bigger leap than we are used too.
All things considered they are doing pretty well and with the new product it should only get better.
At least Mary Barra is not going around like the head of FCA begging for someone to dance with him to save his company. It is really going to get bad over there unless someone comes in and buys them out or at least buys in to give them money they really don’t have to fix their lines. The Hellcats effects on sales will be limited and will not pay to replace the lines that they have now. The last thing GM or Ford would want to do is get tied to them in anyway other than to buy Jeep.
Imagine what GM could do with Jeep in a GMC dealer. Dump the Compass and the fake jeeps and focus on real all terrain products.
So very true. There is a lot in the pipeline and it cant get here quick enough. I’m sure GM and Buick will be just fine, but us dyed in the wool fanatics get stressed over the gears seeming to change so slowly sometimes.
Brother that is why I preach big picture and it makes it easier to understand the whens and why things happen at specific times.
Too many people fail to understand all that is going on and what has to happen to bring out cars and how GM just can not do it all at once, no MFG can do it all at once.
Why is 2020 AD the magic number?
Cadillac, Buick – ‘just wait til 2020’…
Five years is a long time to wait for a turnaround, or upgrade. And who can tell whether pickups or CUVs will be the thing in 5 yrs?
Things like a Flagship will arrive after 2020 because when you start from nothing to a intro of a car it takes that long or in some cases longer. You have to consider how long it takes to put the design through the processes and the engineering in place.
Then you have to account for the man power to do all the work as no automaker could afford to pay to revamp all models at once nor do they have the man power to do it all at once not even GM.
But Cadillac will do some major upgrades to the CTS and ATS in the interim that will keep things interesting as well as releasing the SUV and CUV models they have yet to show.
The Thing is the change to take Cadillac to the place it needs to be was only done in August so 5 years is the normal trend today for an all new car and it will be after 2020 before we see it. If they wait for the new engines it may be just a little longer.
5 years is fast as years ago they worked nearly 10 years out on major changes.
If you cut the time too much then you end up with many issues and recalls for things that just did not get sorted out.
I remember seeing a gull-wing Riviera concept car five years ago – that thing was sweet.
Maybe should have been a Caddy, but it was pretty awesome.
But that was during the getting-through-bailout years … it’s a shame it never saw the light of day.
Sorry but you have mistaken a show car with reality. That car never was intended for production and would need many changes including the door for production.
thay said they are working on a Buick flagship…so I doen’t think it would be after 2020…if after 2020 it would be too fare apart from the CT6…I doen’t want to wait till the next decade.
I can see a RWD flagship in 2018 or 19 and base price could start in the high-$50.000 to top out at $70.000…..$20.000 dollars more than the new Lacrosse.
around 2020 MY the Cadillac CT6 could be upgraded and refreshed.. so it could jump to $75.000 base price and a CT6-V would probably debut and there would be a CT8 debuting too… witch would start at around $95.000 or $100.000 base price. so that would make room for a RWD Buick flagship. that prices high $50.000–$70.000.
in the 70s and 90s… Buicks ware looked like real Buick….and todays buick are just plain weird.
You’re living the past. You’re thinking in the past. You cannot give advice for Buicks future.
if that the case… Buick has no busniss to stay alive in the future
Because they won’t offer cars that look like they came out of the 1970’s?
You’re out of step with reality by decades by continually demanding that GM make Buicks into something that nobody wants now and didn’t want then. Buick is changing to meet the demands of the world today, why can’t you accept that? Why can’t you change your expectations of Buick?
To me, the positioning of Buick as a brand is still not as clearly-defined as it should be.
The biggest problem is that Buick’s (and GMC’s) existence, as it is today, hamstrings Chevrolet in the upper end. Ford does not have this problem with the Ford brand; neither does Toyota nor Nissan.
Some prime examples:
1. AWD, a HUD, and other features available in the LaCrosse but not in the Impala: this hurts the perception of Chevrolet as solely being the purveyor of “cheap” mainstream cars. By contrast, Ford brings AWD to Taurus.
2. Magnetic Ride in the K2 trucks: should be across the board, and not limited to the Sierra Denali.
3. AWD in the Regal but not in the Malibu: again, Ford offers AWD on the Fusion.
There are more, but these are the ones that have come to mind right now.
If Buick were to have a more clear direction, positioning, and focus, then perhaps people like Rye should feel better about the brand. But as it stands now, all it does is get in the way of what could and should be high-end Chevrolet trim levels.
Buick should go away in the next 8-10 years…that way the chevy brand could add more cars to the lineup and give Buicks cars to the chevy brand so that way in the future chevy can be a much more flixable brand in prices and choices and the Impala could become a high-end car or add one.
at least build a RWD Omega platform for Buick…something more proper and real looking…Buick can have at least one real car in the lineup….I doen’t care about the other Buicks I only care about the flagship…I wish the Lacrosse is not the flagship of Buick…the Lacrosse is tarnished for a flagship…I’m not asking to have the Buick to be exactly like the 70s or 90s….Im asking for something that’s shaped more like the Cadillac CT6 than the Lacrosse….in the 70s and 90s Buick had real flagships….the Lacrosse not so much… I’m afraid the next Lacrosse is still going to be undersize because it wont grow that much in size…and the shape of the next Lacrosse is a nice new bold shape but doesn’t appear to be a top of the line Buick….as far as I know right now…Cadillac is getting the cool cars… like the CT6 and upcoming CT8…
I’m hoping the Cadillac CT8 looks and styling woen’t be as stale as the CT6….the CT6 is a good looking car but just looks OK and styling is stale. it doesn’t have the same looks as the concept coupe.
Call the styling of the CT6 what you want. But please know that for the target market (and for the target segment), the car’s design checks all the boxes, tickles all the spots, and does what it’s supposed to do.
Having said that… have you seen the CT6 in person?
no I haven’t but in some photos it looks good and in some it looks bad…that’s just look at it in photos.