mobile-menu-icon
GM Authority

Hummer H2 Retains Its Value Better Than Any Other Vehicle

The Hummer brand fell victim to General Motor’s Chapter 11 reorganization in 2009, but there remains a strong market for the vehicles in the U.S. and worldwide. This point was proven just last week when the Hummer H2 was named as the vehicle with the best resale value in a ceremony before the Canadian International Auto Show in Toronto.

“I have to confess, we checked the numbers a few times on that one,” Josh Bailey, vice-president of research for Canadian Black Book told The Globe and Mail.

The H2 was Hummer’s best-selling vehicle, despite its outrageous size and infamous thirst for fuel. Bailey admits he was a little taken aback when he saw the H2 had retained 71.14 percent of its original MSRP over four years, in comparison to the 50 to 65 percent that the other 18 finalists of the Best Retained Value award achieved.

“I have some anecdotal info that a fair number of (H2 models) are being exported to other countries, where there’s more demand on it … (but) there are still people who want that type of image, even with a really butch reputation,” said Bailey.

Sam loves to write and has a passion for auto racing, karting and performance driving of all types.

Subscribe to GM Authority

For around-the-clock GM news coverage

We'll send you one email per day with the latest GM news. It's totally free.

Comments

  1. I would never imagine a Hummer with best resale value, though, I’m glad GM dropped it.
    I’m a huge fan of large cars (sedans and coupes) and SUVs, but this division had to go. GM can build much more intersting off-road vehicles for GMC, plus GMC has a far better image than Hummer could ever have.

    Reply
    1. @ william

      I think the H3 was a good suv and could have been kept to improve upon, it wasn’t too big. Personally I wanted to see the HUMMER HX go into production, it reminds me of the old K5 Blazer, but with the HUMMER look, I’m almost certain GM would not have been able to build them fast enough, if done right of course, but that’s just speculation on my part.

      Reply
    2. The hummer has been around before GM even made trucks. If AM General decides they want the H2 on the road again, they can just partner with someone else, or GM again. When GM dropped the brand, they only stopped marketing and building motors for them. That’s all the did. AM General still owns H2. My H2 SUT is listed as an AM General vehicle under my insurance policy. Not GM. Military grade vehicles have always had a better reputation than any brand like GMC or Ford. Even tho AM General needed GM to market the Hummer since they didn’t have dealerships, the Govt still regulated the builds of the H2 under military Standards at the AM General production facility. They have they highest quality parts available. Hence the reason for maintaining value!

      Reply
    3. HUMMM CANT AFFORD ONE HUH? STICK TO YOUR SUBURBAN

      Reply
  2. I think getting ride of hummer was wrong back then and I still do now! They sold like hot cakes, people loved them then and still do now! Hummer was the best off road vehicle on the road in Stock form!

    Gmc doesn’t need to build a off road vehicle they already had one that was the best on the planet!

    At least hummer was profitable!

    Reply
  3. There’s hardly any hummers for sale!! It’s kinda hard to find these especially the H2T or H3T…. I know my mom wants the H3 and it’s definitely hard to find those either with high or low mileage

    Reply
  4. It is all supply and demand. There is a low supply and still decent demand for them.

    GM would be good to do something similar like this for GMC and set them apart from Chevy. Lets face it these are just Tahoe’s and Trailblazers under the skin so you could rebody a GMC to do something similar and more off road like.

    Lutz laments now his one greatest mistake was not making Hummer part of GMC as if when changes needed to be made it would have easier to deal with. As it was they had to shut down an entire division vs just a product line.

    Reply
  5. I think Hummer should have become a model in GMC or chevy. They really never would have needed to change the design and they could have saved a strong selling vehicle that the public loved and was really an American icon.

    Reply
  6. I think getting rid of Hummer was the way to go. The 2016 CAFE Standards would make it nearly impossible for them to sell without a gas guzzler tax. GMC can make a truck or an offroad version of the Yukon as a replacement. I would also like to see a new Envoy on the Canyon platform. .

    Now, if only Pontiac and Saab could come back. I really miss them both. Pontiac especially.

    Reply
  7. Well at the time GM had no choice as Hummer was seen as evil excess in the media and was not pulling the with income needed to support it at the time.

    Now if it had been a model set with in GMC it could have been managed as a model not a division and changes and needs could be addressed easier and much cheaper.

    They could have killed the bigger models and just went with the smaller H4 and H5 models they were planning. These models were going to be Ecotec engine models and would have even helped GMC on their CAFE. They were their Jeep competitor models and would have help transform Hummer from excess to smaller and more practical for more buyers to buy and operate. Most large Hummer owners I know at work have gone back to the Yukon.

    Saab was dead before GM got them and they could not afford to fix them properly. Pontiac Died a long time ago and just never fell over. They became better looking Chevys for the most part and nothing more. There was a time even the shared Pontiac were truly different with engines and suspension that shared little to nothing with Chevy. As time went on there was nothing but styling left to make them different.

    Once they lost RWD it was over. By the time the G8 came and the Solstice had its run they were not going to save Pontiac.

    Reply
    1. GMC has already replaced Hummer. Saab and Pontiac were on their way back to the top. The new 9-4X and 9-5 looked extremely promising, but it just didn’t happen. A new 9-3 would have done wonders for Saab!

      I recently was looking in older magazines and found some 1993 and 1998 Pontiac ads of the Bonneville and Grand Prix. That was the Pontiac I have always loved! One of the sayings on the Bonny ads was “Why pay thousands more for a luxury import?” Pontiac did not die until they started re-badging vehicles. The Grand Am (G6), Grand Prix, Bonneville, GTO and Firebird were getting somewhere. It was just too little too late. I don’t know why people think Pontiac lost its “soul” when they lost their engine, because if that’s the case, Chevrolet, Buick, GMC and Cadillac have lost their souls too and deserve to get “phased-out”.

      I realize that a Pontiac brand wouldn’t really fit into GM’s current lineup without people cross-shopping. Perhaps GM should have just gotten rid of Buick (the brand for old people). A performance Buick is just not viable and only Pontiac can fill the spot of luxury with heart-stopping performance. .

      Reply
      1. You are just the kind of person GM fooled for year. I to a degree also was fooled but looking back hind site is 20/20.

        Pontiac back in the 60’s was a different car than even similar stable mates to GM. They had their own V8 and induction options, They had OHC engines, they had their own suspension set ups much different than a Chevy. Many of these things would have gone farther if GM had not held Delorean back. He wanted radial tires and rear disc brakes in 1965.

        Pontiac nearly became Oldsmobile in the early 80’s in the era where they made a Lemans into a Bonnie. Also they lost the V8 of their own. Around 1982 they were going down by the bow.

        The new Trans Am came and it helped and then the Fiero came and brought a lot of people into the show rooms. Many at Pontiac credit the Fiero getting people into the show room and helping sell the Grand Am of that era.

        But then things again became stagnate. the quality of the cars in the 90’s were so so and the lack of any real RWD performance other than the Bird was hurting. Many at Pontiac wanted to convert the SSEI to a RWD as there are still a couple prototypes still around. But it was to never be.

        The end of the Firebird was the final nail. How do you really have a performance division where your best car is a FWD SC V6 sedan? While not a bad car it was not a true sports sedan. And do not tell me I do not know what I am talking about as I owned a GTP Comp G and a Bonnie SSEI.

        The GTO was Lutz attempt to bring a real RWD performance car back but he never really had the time or the money to do it right.

        The G models did nothing for GM at all. None of them! The G8 was the only real model that reflected what Pontiac needed to be but it was too late. The Solstice was a help but it was never going to save Pontiac with out a proper line up for the entire division.

        Today I can see GM is now working to better their engine line up. Today GM is offering TT V6 engine in Cadillac that you can not get in any other GM car. I expect we may see new engines in the new Buicks when they arrive that may offer things that Chevy will not offer. It is not so much the base engine but the fact when you offer a Camaro and Trans Am with the same TPI or LT14 engine there is no real difference than the bumpers and dash trim.

        Even back in the day the Firebird had it’s own different engines but it also had suspensions that were lower and had different tunes on them than you could get in a Chevy. It was a better car and gave you more to justify the price over the Camaro unlike later years.

        Anyone who has only spent time in Pontiacs post 1979 really do not know what Pontiac used to be. Having grown up with many Pontiac people, collectors and past racers I have been lucky enough to drive all the great cars of the past. I know what the Trip Power 4 speed GTO is like as I have a lot of miles in many different ones. I also know what the feel of a Super Duty is as I have been privileged to hammer the gears in one. I know the feel of a 1969 GP with 390 HP 428 HO. Hell I even have hammered around in the old Slant 4 Tempest convertible and Sprint Firebird with the OHC 4 barrel HO engine. Having been in a Chevy family and having the ability to spend a lot of time in all types of Pontiacs over the years there really was a different feel and performance feel to the Pontiac line back them. Later on it all just became trim as Pontiac really was not what it used to be.

        At one time I never understood the old timers lament there was no Pontiac post 1979 but now looking back and after driving the cars they drove I under stand their disappointment in the Iron Duke Grand Am and the G6. Even the advertising was flawed with the “First G6”?

        GMC replace the others? Not sure where you get that.

        Also the 9-3 even done right would have been difficult to have saved Saab.

        Saab was a odd car it’s whole life and that is how their base buyers liked it. The ignition on the console and the window switched on the roof did not phase them. But in this ever competitive market Saabs base would have never grown if they remained odd and they would and did lose their base by becoming conventional. They are just the first of many more names that will vanish in the next 10 years.

        And again do not judge Buick till they get the new models out. At this point you really have not seen the future. Second the China sales would have prevented Pontiac from ever being saved. It is the only reason we have Buick here today. Those sales are helping pay for the many changes at GM.

        Reply
        1. The Bonneville, Firebird and Grand Prix were some of the best vehicles in the 90’s that GM was producing. They didn’t truly follow the “driving excitement” of the Pontiac brand (like you’ve stated), but they were still some great cars! The G-Series never caught on and I think they should have stuck with their original nameplates. My mom inherited her moms 1976 Firebird SD-455 with 50K original miles and it is a monster. Pontiac had their failures but so did other GM brands, so don’t give Pontiac crap for the Aztec, Grand Am, G3 and G5 as that was Old GM at its best. Many people see/saw potential in the Pontiac brand (including me). Go take a look at High Performance Pontiac or even Pontiac on FB! I am not hating on Buick as I love the new Regal, LaCrosse and Enclave. It’s time to face the facts, the average age of Buick customers is pretty high because Cadillac/Oldsmobile used to fill that spot and now Cadillac has become the young, sporty brand! Buick is just now starting to attract younger buyers with their hip new lineup (like Oldsmobile in its last 5 years). Like I have already said, I know Pontiac wouldn’t fit in very well with GM’s offerings anymore. .

          Reply
      2. Pontiac could never fill the luxury and performance!

        Performance yes luxury no!

        GM is where they need to be now!

        Of the 4 brands they got rid of the hummer was the only one that was very profitable!

        It would still be profitable today if it was still around!

        You Pontiac guys are just pissed that there is a camaro running around and there is no firebird along side!

        Reply
        1. They already have. Have you seen the 1993-2005 Bonneville? Now that was a luxurious car with great performance attributes! Hummer is gone just like Saturn, Oldsmobile and Pontiac. GMC has taken over and has a great new profitable lineup (with the exception of the Terrain which is pretty old). A new Envoy would fill the H3’s spot perfectly! The H2 was huge and an offroad Yukon could fill that spot (although most wouldn’t bother to buy it anyways). A Yukon XUV would be pretty cool too!

          Reply
  8. I’m not sure if I should give you a pat on the back or tell you big deal?

    So you drove a bunch of cars, hell we all have! If you think Pontiac build better performance cars in the 60’s then why didn’t they sell more of them?

    The fact is Chevy cars were more popular back then and are still today. Now a Pontiac may of fit your preferences better, but the vast majority of the people back then picked something different!

    I love Pontiac but it’s time has come and gone and GM is better off for it!

    Reply
    1. Brian you need to do your home work.

      Why did Chevy sell more cars? well let me give you a list.

      One twice as many dealers maybe three times as many back then.

      Chevys cost a lot less.

      Chevys were cheaper to modify

      Chevys often were much lower content cars as many wee gutted out just as my 68 Chevelle SS was.The only options it had were tinted glass, posi and an AM radio. No power steering no power brakes and it was even a 4 speed with a bench seat. These model were common with Chevy.

      At Pontiac the options Tri Powers were popular and it is common to find many with a lot of options in them including Power Windows.

      You could modify a Pontiac but it was not as easy or cheap. But with engine putting out over 400 FT LBS from the factory there was little need to do a lot.

      Or in the case of the 67 Camaro vs. the Firebird. It came with more standard features. The suspension was modifies with traction bars to stop the spring wrap of the single spring leaf Chevy engineered into the car that Pontiac could not change till the next year. They lowered the cars 1 inch from the factory an had better tires on it to better handle. Now the additions were not cheaper so they added to the price for a car.

      Back then even a high school kid could afford a car so often they would opt for the cheaper models like Chevy or Plymouth to be able to afford the car and made their own modifications.

      It was not so much the Chevy cars that sold more performance it was the fact the Chevy engine was so much cheaper and easier to modify.

      Delorean added as much as he could but Pontiac was held back. He even looked into DOHC for the V8 back in the early 60’s and one example is still running in a 63 GP today.

      After John left things were not the same and as time went on they lost a lot of swagger. The engineers he left behind did have a few high points like the 70’s 455 SD that Chevy had no answer for but GM stopped that too.

      On time a Pontiac official told me Chevy sells more cars so Chevy gets more say. That is how the power inside GM worked and it limited GM from having some really advanced cars back then. These same folks went to badge engineering and let the stylist separate the cars from what they really were under the skin. We all know how that turned out.

      Today GM still has to share to a point as that is how the economics work out anymore as development cost are off the chart. Bu they are trying to make Chevy , Buick and Cadillac all a much more different car than each other. Case in point the Chevy Impala and Cadillac XTS are the same car. Yet the Cadillac has so many things the Impala does not have or offer engine and driveline wise. The Lacrosse is also the same platform and I expect it will be replaced soon with a car that will bridge the gap between Chevy and Cadillac with things not offered on the other two at a price that will split in the middle.

      As of today I fully agree even as a Pontiac die hard fan that they needed to go. They were so damaged and needed so much work and investment GM would not see a return on it for years even if things went well.

      I just get tired of people who think things for Pontiac were all great in the 90’s and 2000’s when other than a few sparks of good there was a awful lot of bad at Pontiac. I too made that mistake but looking back I can see that it was a sorry state of compared to where it should have been.

      Flat out Pontiac was never really understood by the product people and the infighting at GM killed off many of the things Pontiac wanted and needed.

      I know first hand that Chevy killed the Fiero. Pontiac made a lot of mistakes there as they underfunded the car since they did not have enough money to do it right the first time 84-87. Also Pontiac over sold the cars hoping the GM 80 model would join it in plant in 2-3 years. Well it never did and Chevy was in fear a cheaper improved Fiero would cut into Corvette sales of a car already selling at a higher and higher price.

      I never bought this story but I was able to hold the paperwork from the meeting that killed the car and it was clear what people at GM told me was true.

      In the 80’s and 90’s GM’s greatest enemy was themselves. They did more damage to each other internally than Toyota or Ford ever did.

      Either way if you study the true history of the Fiero it is a classic case that shows many of the things that lead GM to fail. It truly was a dysfunctional family at GM.

      Not till Rick Wagoner and Bob Lutz arrival did any true direction to GM return. As Bob would say there were people there that were part of the problem and there were people who were part of the solution. They cleaned house of the problems and people that were at issue. Today you are seeing the results of the many changes they out in place. Rick may be the scape goat but things were pretty well done by the time he arrived. and wha he left was a path that has gotten us to where they are today and moving forward. Mary and Mark are part of his legacy even if he will never get the credit.

      As for driving the cars I was lucky as knowing collectors and growing up at a time these cars were still affordable to buy and drive I got to know the past and live with the present. It is a good perspective that many will never again get to live. Heck my daily driver was a GMC Sprint SP for years. It is the GMC El Camino SS in GMC trim. It had cowl induction and even a big block. I can say I was lucky to have had these cars available. I just wish I still owned some of them today as I would be rich.

      Reply
  9. Note too the Olds and Buicks were also popular but even more expensive to buy and modify so their numbers were even lower.

    Reply
  10. The fact of the matter is Pontiac would be no where without Chevy plain and simple!

    Chevy had more dealers because they sold more cars, they were cheaper to modify cuz there were more Chevy s made which allowed for more after market parts available equals lower cost!

    It’s pretty simple to understand!

    So the 70 Chevelle 454 ls6 wasn’t good enough to make Pontiac fans happy? Please now your just being foolish!

    Reply
    1. Now that is a bit foolish as GM in general would be no where with out Chevy. It is a volume brand and the foundation GM is built on. So What’s your point?

      To be honest if you put it in todays terms GM is built on the foundation of the Chevy truck and not even their cars anymore.

      For people who wanted a little bit more Pontiac was there for them. Keep in mind the LS6 and 7 were not all that common and expensive. Just as the L88, ZL1 and the original LT1.

      On the other hand the 389 and 400 Pontiac base engines were very common and much more torque than the run of the mill 327-350-396.

      Both Chevy and Pontiac were good but the Pontiac just had a little more to offer to the guy who had more money. If he had even more there was Olds 442 and Buick GS.

      Chevy was entry level and value leader just as they are today. You want better you move to Buick and Cadillac if you can afford to. While Buick has not a lot to offer yet you will see more very soon.

      My whole point is they took a basic platform and made it into their own cars without just using styling only. In the later years all the cars were just styled different and not much else. This is what GM is working to today as much as they can afford to do. Just because the CTS and ATS are on the Alpha the Camaro and Chevy SS sedan will move to it and host their own style and feel. They may share an engine here or there in a base model but must else will be tuned to their own standards. This is what they need to get back too. In other words look for the LT1 in a Chevy but do not expect a TT V6 in the Camaro for a while.

      Reply
  11. I think GM should use its best engines in every car it possibly can! Instead of worrying about exclusive engines for a brand!

    Chevy Buick Cadillac should not be competing against each other they should be killing the rest of the industry!

    It’s just plain dumb for there to be a Cadillac engine and a Chevy engine and a Buick engine in today’s world!

    The same goes for the platforms! Platforms should be use for as many cars and trucks as possible regardless of brand!

    Reply
    1. Wow you just took us back to the 1980’s and to what Bob Lutz has tried to deliver us from.

      What you say is fine if there is one division. But when you try to put the same engine in a Cadillac with not kind of upgrade or reason to pay the Cadillac price then you end up with a Chevy with a big chrome grill.

      Kind of like my HHR SS. I have the same steering wheel as the ZR1 Corvette. Nice for my HHR SS but kind of sucks for the guy that paid $120K for a car with a HHR steering wheel. Note the C7 now has it’s own wheel as it should.

      The fact is a Chevy SS based on a Alpha would do just fine with a LT1 and the CTS V Sport with he magnetic ride and Haldex AWD and TT V6 would be enough technology and performance to drive someone to a higher exchange price. Also this would prevent cross shopping at GM. You basically would buy the car you can afford.

      The fact is GM is going to have three lines of engines till the 3 cylinder arrives. The Eco 4, The HF V6 and the V8. I leave Diesels out as they have yet to establish a solid line up yet but may in time.

      GM will take these engines and tune them with different packages to set the engines apart from the others. No more LG4 350 V8 in all three platforms etc. We still may see a bit of cross over on the Eco level as we have not seen much movement there yet. But we have seen the V6 set for Cadillac and I expect that the LTS will get some sort of version of its own as will the CTSV.

      The engines are much like the platforms and GM will be forced to share them based on the economics of scale but they can put much more effort into them than in the past. No more days of like when the F body the only difference was a few body panels and interior trim.

      GM is in a place where they can afford the better refinement and really set these models more apart to appeal to different price segments in the market.

      Reply
      1. The High Feature V6 isn’t so high in features when the new 5.3L ECOTEC3 V8 gets the same exact mileage. The Ecotec’s and HF’s need VVT, SIDI and iVVL while the ECOTEC3’s need VVT, SIDI, AFM and iVVL. They all need 8-Speeds or 10-Speeds! GM is in need of a new Ecotec lineup badly! The 2.5L and 2.0t are a somewhat good start although I’d like to see a 1.6t to replace the 2.5L, a 1.2t to replace the 1.8L, a 1.0t to replace the 1.2L, a 1.8t to replace the current 2.0t, a more powerful 2.0t to replace the 3.6L in small vehicles and a more powerful 1.4t. V6’s and V8’s should only be available in performance cars, CUV’s, SUV’s and trucks. Who cares if it has 4 cylinders if it makes the same or more power than an old OHV V6 with 197HP. .

        Reply
        1. The HV can be built with a lot less things like cylinder deactivation etc. to make it meet MPG and even many EPA standards. The V8 has made these goals but they are running out of tricks in the bag. Even a Corvette engineer stated in a story they will stick with the V8 as long as they can but he relented that at some point change will have to come.

          The Eco as it is today is not the same engine it was. Even my 2.0 has different block, heads and other features. The Turbo today is even different from my 08. GM has taken steps to refine the engine more and more.

          They can make more power today if they like but it will require premium fuel like most other higher HP turbo engines. I expect we will see more power in time but it has to be in the right model. You do not want a Malibu that requires premium fuel. GM likes to stay with recommended ratings in average passenger sedans. It is not like the lack of power is an issue in the average sedan.

          Now if they do a performance model then we may see a required rating along with more power.

          As for buyers in what they want it all depends on what they are buying.

          A buyer of a Cruze is not too worried about the platform or engine. Now on the other hand a buyer of a Cadillac does not want a re bodied Chevy. We are already seeing this again with the ELR and it is not like they just rebadged the car as they did make a lot of changes to the car but still get hit with the unfair label.

          The Impala is repackaged from the XTS and not many people have issue with that. I think GM just needs to remember you can repackage down but repackaging up only hurts the more expensive cars. Of late other than the ELR most are starting high and moving to the lower models more.

          The majority want economy, affordability and reliability in the standard cars like a Chevy. As you move up they want more and more features and things that add status. These folks will pay for it too but you have to deliver.

          As for the steering wheel thing it is not a joke and it is has been a problem at GM for years. The 75 Vette is still suffering the stigma of being the Vega wheeled Vette and it is stuck with a column you can not easily replace the wheel.

          When most higher priced cars on the market offer higher grade wheels and better wheels even some that are from outside suppliers you need not offer a $100,000 with a wheel from a $19,000 car. To think this way is foolish. If you note GM is now able to fix this with the better funding hence we have new and better wheels in the Corvette.

          GM has learned and is not fixing the details that will set them apart that needed fixed.

          Reply
          1. If you think people buy cars based on what kind of steering wheel it has in it then we just disagree on that!

            So you think every car made needs to have a Different designed part on the car?

            What’s allowed to be shared with higher priced car’s?

            This is non sense!

            So if a shifter is used in different cars you would consider this a failure?

            If so that’s just plain sad!

            Reply
  12. Most buyers could care less where the engine came from or what platform it rides on!

    There are buyers like us who keep track of those things but we are the minority!

    People want the most car or truck for the buck plain and simple so sharing engines and platforms provides this, without sharing between brands cars and trucks will cost much much more and that will have more of a negative impact on sells then if each brand had it’s own set of engines and platforms!

    The steering wheel thing is a complete joke I must say, it’s a wheel used to drive the car it doesn’t need to be different just because it sits in a higher priced car!

    Reply
  13. I bought a 2006 white sut when they announced they were not going to make them. To this day I can’t believe the ride. It rides like my wife’s Cadillac. I would buy a new one in a heart beat and they will be back trust me. i paid 30k the year they ditched them and in 2014 I was offered 50,000 for mine with 90,000 miles on it. I love it more than any other vehicle I’ve ever owned for how it rides and my families safety. Screw the libs. Want a new one. It will happen trust me

    Reply
    1. I agree mine rides better than two Cadillacs Ive had. Mine ain’t going anywhere even if I have to steal parts to keep it running. They are nuts to not bring them back they would fly off the lots.

      Reply
    2. What a great post. I literally pumped my fist. You guys with your Hummers keep them nice and don’t sell them. I bought mine the day after it was announced they were dead. Paid 28,000 for a 2006 white sut luxury that was going for 52,000 THE DAY BEFORE. It was classic Chevy in dfw the dealership that sells more of just about everything Chevy in the country. Don’t believe me check it out. The GM told me that there is talk all the time with big wigs at corporate that if they are kept in good condition especially the White SUT could easily be going for 100,000 by 2025 if they don’t start building them again. DONT SELL YOUR HUMMER. It truly an investment that I’ve been told by people that had there own hummer dealership they are going straight up. If you can pick up a 2006 to 2008 for 25 to 35 and you got the cash by 25 of them. There gold just waiting to pay off. I buy old 1970 gto’s same reason. I have 8 of them in storage and they have outpaced even apple or google over time. Certain cars are no brainers. Maybe not as good as a really good rent house but damn close and no toilets to fix.

      Reply
  14. Just like the… Slogan say’s , “Hummer , Like Nothing Else”. Period, the (End). The last of its kind. And I’m definitly a Proud Owner of the” Alpha” First Editon 2003 Hummer H2 to come out of the assembly line of (AM General)…….. Either You Love’em or You Hate them…. No matter what you really can not take anything away from this Beast Of An Off Road SUV … This Veh. justs adds to the whole value of the bigger picture here. And that is … ( GM ) .!!!!! Once again ( GM )…. General Motors…… who we all knows makes all these Great other Veh.’s that are being mentioned here….. GMC, CHEVY, CADILLAC, HUMMER H2… ETC… ETC. Come on people we are one Big ( GM )….. Family , when it comes down to it. Thats all. Have a Great day. # PROUD OWNER OF MY ( GM ). VEH. HUMMER H2. Won’t & Will Not Bash others…

    Reply
  15. The day after they announced they were dropping them I picked up a 2006 white SUT luxury that went from 55,000 to 28,000 in one single day. To this day I can’t believe how the the beast rides better than two Cadillacs i have had. My favourite vehicle in 40 years and it will be sitting in my driveway if I make 100. God I wish they would bring them back.

    Reply
  16. And one other thing. Just for heck of it I took my 2006 white sut luxury package down and asked what’s trade in for it. I’m a mellow guy but I wanted punch guy n nose stinking thief. 18,000. I told him if I did it and you sell it for 50,000 im gonna trade a day in jail to see you with a black eye. They know guys trust me they know the future for this vehicle if things go the way it clearly looks it’s going. Keep your hummer. Your crazy to sell it unless someone gives you for example mine. I have been offered 40,000 and said no. That person didn’t offer that to lose money he knows where it’s going in ten years.

    Reply

Leave a comment

Cancel