Take a closer look. That’s not a GMC Sierra 1500 you’re looking at. But you could fool somebody into thinking that it is. And that’s how close in appearance the 2015 GMC Canyon is to the larger Sierra 1500. We would nickname it the Sierra 1000 if we knew the name would catch on, but it won’t. So, 2015 GMC Canyon it is.
Like the 2015 Chevrolet Colorado, the 2015 GMC Canyon features a North American-spec frame, sharing bits of the full-size K2XX architecture and the international GMI700 platform in its structural design. Unlike the 2015 Colorad0, however, the new Canyon adheres to the design of its full-sized brethren, unapologetically borrowing design cues from the GMC Sierra family, while the 2015 Colorado distances itself from the Silverado family. However, the Colorado and Canyon continue to share similar powertrains, just like the previous-generation models.
At launch, the 2015 GMC Canyon will feature a 2.5L four cylinder (good for 193 hp) as well as the 3.6L six cylinder (for 306 302 hp) LFX engine. By the 2016 model year, a 2.8L Duramax diesel engine will join the arsenal. All are expected to lead their classes in power and fuel efficiency. Granted, the midsized truck segment as it stands is more stale than a forgotten bag of open potato chips from Thanksgiving, which should give the Canyon (and Colorado) an advantage out of the gate.
The 2015 GMC Canyon also rejuvinates the midsized truck segement with active aero grille shutters, available OnStar 4G LTE connectivity with on-board Wi-Fi, as well as a forward collision alert system. For the off-the-beaten-path types, there’s an All-Terrain off-road package with a unique suspension setup and body work that also doubles as the range-topping model at launch. There’s no word on a Denali model yet, but considering every other GMC model has a Denali variant, it would be strange if the new Canyon didn’t have one.
Comments
I do like the design but a little more separation from the Sierra would have been better. Wish I could get one.
wait is the 3.6 303hp or 306hp?
I meant on the truck but thanks for clarifying dude!
Now this is how I reckon the Chevrolet version should look. the whole split grille and lights thing doesn’t really work!
I am impressed by the V-6, not the most powerful V-6 but possibly more reliable? I see a car here, I would like to see an off road version, I am a fan of the H-3T Alpha, two diff locks ,large tires, 285/75/16 stock! that is huge! The blind spots and poor visibility are not a good thing though, this little truck better be good at something if you can’t haul or tow anything with it, forme to want one I would want it to have an off road packsge like the H-3T Alpha.
The 3.6L needs AFM and iVVL for me to get one. 1623 is not good enough and isn’t worth 302HP. Make it 2027 and I will buy one. I bet this truck equipped with the V6 will not get over 25 mpg Hwy. .
We need fuel efficient vehicles these days and for me 16/23 doesn’t cut it. GM has the ability to put more efficiency into the 3.6L and it’s a fact!
Overall this looks to be a pretty good offering from GMC The only aspect I have a hard time with is the look of the headlights. Thanks for the gallery/slideshow at the end of the write-up. The final shots of all the trucks together puts this new one in a much better perspective size wise as it seems a lot of debate went on about this earlier. Too bad the diesel is as far away as it is though.
This may be my next vehicle.
I really like the styling and the look. The V6 is great.
What I do not like is the interior in these photo’s as it looks drab and the cheap plastic wood is horrible. I would love to see this in a two tone interior and the wood replaced with a silver or even other colored surface.
We will see many more versions of this as there will be a Off Road package coming along with a Denali and I hope a sport suspension ZQ8 for the 2WD.
Also do not get crazy wanting a V8 here as the V6 is here for a reason. This truck is targeted at people that want MPG and the V6 will do that with ease. 300 plus HP will do anything this truck can handle. GM made it clear already that they were out to win the MPG market with these trucks, Look for a major push on the 4 cylinders.
As for the Diesel it is coming and if it is not there at the intro so be it and the 12% that what one will just have to wait a little longer. GM would have it at intro if it were ready but Diesels take a lot more time and money to get into production than any of the gas motors anymore thanks to ever changing government regulations. The government wants more MPG and then they stick it to the MFG on Diesels that are already not easy to sell in the states driving up their cost. Go figure.
very handsome truck i could see me getting one of these, would like the diesel now.
I like the Canyon MUCH better appearance wise. I wish they had done this with the Colorado
I think the interior of the Canyon looks very busy… Like they tried to maybe put too much in a small place. But I will buy one of these trucks… as the Silverado is too big. Don’t need such towing and payload capacity. I hope the V6 is coupled with a good rearend and transmission because if done right it should be plenty.
Buying.
I thought the Colorado looked good, but this is just so much better (IMO). I’ve always been more a fan of the GMC front fascia on the Sierra vs Silverado and now this truck is a lot more ‘truck’ looking compared to the Colorado. It’s nice they they have finally changed the entire body paneling from the Chevy brother. Power dome hood and more pronounced wheel arches look so much better here. 2014 Sierra headlights on this I like better than the Equinox style on the Colorado, and the entire front end looks better here.
Not sure if I can wait 2 years for the diesel, so it’ll likely be the 3.6 crew cab 4×4 in my driveway this summer/fall.
Everyone is entitled to their opinion, but for me I like the Colorado over the Canyon for me on this one. I see more difference between the Silverado and Colorado than the Sierra and Canyon. The extended cab Canyon looks better to me than the crew cab. I love the full-size Sierra look over the Silverado, but the Colorado to me has a better look IMO. Just glad they have a truck for everyone though from HD trucks, to full-size, to mid-size..
I use trucks for work, mainly for traveling with my gear. I like the way GMC looks and prefer GMC over Chevy in looks department on all models except 2007-14 Tahoe, which looks better then 2007-14 Yukon (IMO). So I need a truck with great MPG, I will have to wait on MPG figures with this midsizers to make my decision vs Sierra1500. All though 3.6 is not a bad engine, I too would prefer 4.3 for the midsizers. Diesel sounds great, but I will have to see all the specs and prices first, because when you calculate diesel option, higher diesel (fuel) cost, and maintance, it might not be worth the hassle to get that option.
No six speed manual!! Part of what makes the Tacoma so much fun is its manual transmission. So maybe the average Sierra owner is fat and 60 years old, but the Canyon’s target group would like to do its own shifting. GM gets it wrong again.
I’m pretty sure you’re reading it wrong sir. There is a 6 speed manual
I like the mix of comments for the Chevy and GMC models. This is just what GM was targeting. If they do not get you with one they will get you with the other.
The reason so there are so few Manuals offered is so few people buy them in general anymore. Add in the extra difficulty of the emissions many of what is out now will vanish but for a few sports cars.
People in general just do not buy them much anymore and if you someone could get more to by them they would go the extra expense to build them.
The cry for Manuals are much like Diesels. You see all the cry for them on the web but often once delivered they sit on the dealer lots and have to be discounted.
I have nothing against standard shift as I have owned many but the issue is most people today can not even drive one. The last one I had the only think I hated about it was trying to sell it as so few people wanted it You have to find that one person to sell it where the Auto anyone can buy it.
.
I agree the fake wood is horrible. Otherwise I think the interior is pretty good for the segment. Looks like there’s a soft dash. The exterior is excellent.
when we see price differences between identically equipped Sierra vs. Canyon will determine what sells.
Looks great, I do think that they could have made it a little different then the Sierra. But still an amazing looking truck, much better then Colorado. Now where’s the Denali?
“but the Canyon’s target group would like to do its own shifting.”
Are you speaking for ALL of the Canyon’s potential buyers, or just yourself?
Nice job of making look not just like a baby Sierra, but a handsome younger brother. Whereas the Sierra took the square thing a little too far, the Canyon rounds the front end out nicely. Something seems a little out of proportion on the wheel flares, and how the side blends in with the doors, but maybe that’s something that works better in person. The design of the Colorado seems to blend better with the doors and the flares look like the fit into the whole design a little better. But overall, nice job of creating two trucks that look tough enough to keep that macho image truck buyers want, yet in an easier to park package with all the carrying and towing capabilities that most truck drivers will ever need. While there may be some stealing of Sierra and Silverado buyers, I think there will be a lot of conquest sales with trade ins of all brands. The only competition is Nissan and Toyota in this size, and both seem VERY dated and long overdue for major updates – and with their new competition, I doubt that they will stay stagnant.
I love it! It is way better than the previous generation and looks much more mature than the Colorado. I hope the Denali and ZQ8 come with a 3.6L Twin-Turbo VVT, SIDI, AFM, iVVL with 415HP430LB-FT.
grawdaddy,
the small GM truck is a “lifestyle” vehicle, that means young people carrying mountain bikes, skis, and gear to the trails. Yes, they do know how to work a clutch.
Again, people are making excuses for GM only worrying about the bottom line and not offering any choices to speak of. Toyota Tacoma succeeds in the same market – with a stick. There are too many manufacturers to list who sell only a small percentage compared to what GM sells annually in cars and trucks, yet somehow it makes sense for them to offer the manual.
What, GM customers don’t know how to drive??
It’s sounding like (most) everyone can get their wish ~~basic to loaded. Good move GM. Customers wanting a small truck ~~just like those wanting a full size truck~~ have different needs and wants. Those wanting a smaller truck don’t necessarily want smaller comfort or less options. Everyone wants a well built, durable (and yes, good looking) truck. I’m anxious for the auto mags take once they get behind the wheel. On paper, it would seem GM is truly listening to their customers (instead of their accountants) on what to build.
Here’s to hoping the folks in Missouri have the support, training and desire they need to build the very best truck possible. I’ll be holding out for a loaded GMC with four doors, a six foot bed and the Duramax Diesel engine.
The odds of this truck with the TT V6 or V8 are slim to none unless it is some special performance model. This truck is set for MPG.
300 HP will do just about anything you need to do in this size and if you need that much power you need the bigger truck. That was the point of the smaller truck is to keep the price down and the MPG up and the big power engines do neither.
As poorly as the last Colorado sold I do not see it coming anything soon unless they are desperate for attention like the last time.
As for the comment on equal equipt vehicles and selling there will be no equals as the Canyon will cost a little more because it will come with a few things the Chevy will not have. Case in point the projection headlamps will not be standard on the Chevy but they will be on the GMC. This is why the GMC Terrain is more expensive than the Nox as there are more standard options and even a Denali package that offers things Chevy never offered.
No manual with the 6 cyl, no manual with 4wd. They do offer a stick – but only with 4 cyl 2wd. GM comes close but still a half step short.
IDK why, but GM tries to stay away from manuals as much as possible. The Malibu, Encore, Equinox and Terrain should all have a six-speed option on all trims. . .
It is not just GM but all MFG are getting away from the manuals. Just a lot of expense for so many cars that they sell less than 5% of them in.
Corvettes and Camaro carry a large enough parentage but the rest just do not carry the volume.
Well, Honda has the Accord Sport which can come with a manual. I know what you are saying. It is expensive and a lot of people don’t buy them either. .
I still wish Chevrolet had a Malibu SS and Equinox SS. The Malibu with a 4.3L V6 VVT, SIDI, AFM and iVVL with 320HP and 310LB-FT with an 8-Speed Manumatic or 6-Speed Manual with Rev Matching. The Equinox with a 5.3L V8 VVT, SIDI, AFM and iVVL with 365HP and 390LB-FT with an 8-Speed Manumatic or 7-Speed Manual with Rev Matching.
HiPer Struts
Full Color HUD
UltraView Moonroof
MyLink w/ Navigation
Sport Gauge Cluster
Interior Ambient Lighting
Bilstein Sport Shock Absorbers
Sport Rims
Spoiler
Brembo Brakes
Borla Quad Exhaust
Front Recaro Sport Seats
Optional Rear Recaro Bucket Seats
Heated and Cooled Front/Rear Seats
Rear Audio Entertainment
Rear DVD System
Real Carbon Fiber Exterior/Interior Trim
Side Skirts
etc.
Unfortunately GM dropped the bomb again.. The 6 speed manual is only available with the base 4cyl and 2wd… The ultimate truck combination would have been a crew cab, short bed, 4cyl diesel, 4wd, and a manual transmission….