• News
  • Forum
  • Photos
  • Tip Us
  • Subscribe

GM Authority

  • Chevrolet
  • Buick
  • GMC
  • Cadillac
  • Opel
  • Holden
  • OnStar
  • Reviews
  • Rumors
  • Opinions
  • Dealer News
  • Racing
  • Video

Slip-Up Or Fiction: Dealer Pre-Announces Buick Ampere, Quickly Issues Retraction

21
  • by Alex Luft
  • — Aug 21, 2012
Buick Ampere Chevy Volt with Buick badge

Jim Ellis Chevrolet newsletter mentioning Buick Ampere

A Chevy, Buick, and GMC dealer in Georgia recently announced that it is installing a six-bay solar charging station, making it “the only one of its kind at a dealership” in the state. You know what else it announced? A Buick “version of the Volt” that will apparently be called Ampere.

“Jim Ellis Chevrolet customers will be able to “plug into the sun” and charge their Volts completely in three hours”, wrote Jim Ellis Chevrolet in its monthly newsletter. “Initially, charging is complementary for Jim Ellis Volt customers as it will be for Buick Ampere (Buick’s version of the Volt) when it arrives next year!”, concludes the dealer.

Since publishing the original newsletter, Jim Ellis Chevrolet has retracted its comments and InsideEVs contacted GM for comment; not surprisingly, General Motors responded with the standard “we do not comment on future product” reply.

The GM Authority Take

As loyal GM Authority reader James pointed out to us in an email (hat tip James!), a Buick variant of the Volt would make sense for several reasons. For starters, Volt sales in China are few and far between… but if the EREV were to suddenly obtain the much-coveted and respected Buick Tri-Shield on its grille, then it would likely have a much better chance of attaining a respectable sales volume. But what would a Buick-rebadged Volt — if that’s what the Ampere will end up being — do to the car’s overall reputation and image in the U.S.?

Furthermore, Ampere sounds very similar to Ampera, the slightly dressed-up Volt sold under the Opel/Vauxhall badges in Europe. Of note, however, is that General Motors — as of this writing — does not own the trademark for the word Ampere as far as the United States Patent and Trademark Office is concerned. And what hapenned to Electra?

We’re curious what you make of all this, and are eager to read your own take — in the comments section below.

Google+
Share

— Alex Luft

Alex is the Founder of GM Authority and focuses on covering GM's global business operations and strategy.

  • Previous story Ad Break: The GMC Jimmy Goes Bungee Jumping
  • Next story Cadillac To Debut New Escalade, CTS And ELR Next Year

You Might Also Like

  • OnStar EcoHub app OnStar’s EcoHub App Gives Volt Owners Ability To View Charging Cost
  • 2012 Buick Regal GS Nevada Video A Look At Buick’s Run Of The 2012 Nevada Open Road Challenge: Video
  • 2013 GMC Acadia Spied: Refreshed GMC Acadia And Buick Enclave Remain Shrouded In Mystery
  • Video: Chevrolet’s Department 180 Show Us The Climatic Wind Tunnels Video: Chevrolet’s Department 180 Show Us The Climatic Wind Tunnels

21 Comments

  1. James says:
    August 21, 2012 at 9:23 pm

    My thought was that “Electra” represents a larger sedan and not a 4 seat compact like Volt/Ampera. Traditionally Electras have been boats.

    Jim Ellis’ email response to it’s customers explained that an overzealous employee had seen the Ampere story online and added this information to the website without duly checking it out. They apologized for the confusion – ’nuff said…..uh….or is it?

    I think in the USA – the Voltec platform as is would benefit from a Buick version. Buick buyers seem in that price sweetspot just below Cadillac, and many are very eco-aware. What’s unknown is if Americans will get that old brand-engineering vibe if the bodystyles aren’t significantly different. I don’t think GM could just put a Buick logo on the front and rear and add the Euro Ampera’s trim pieces. My feeling is that they’d have to spend a considerable sum to cast dies with new forms for the Buick, which would cost a pretty penny.

    Final assessment: I don’t think it’s real. Especially after the astute journalistic detective work done by Alex and his staff displaying no “Ampere” trademark has been acquired.

    Reply
  2. andrew says:
    August 21, 2012 at 9:24 pm

    Chevy has the sedan with the Volt
    Cadillac will have the coupe with the ELR
    Buick needs, and would make sense for Buick to get, a small Voltec CUV

    As much as GMC is a truck brand and a CUV EREV could take on the rugged appearance brand home, I see a Buick CUV selling better.
    The Volt is already $40k, how much more would a Buick Ampere sedan sell for? The ELR will get the Voltec 2.0 tech, so better performance with longer range and I believe lighter battery pack, so selling it at $60k is reasonable when you look at cars like the Karma and Model S prices. But a Buick Voltec sedan at $50k? I dunno ’bout that. At least a CUV would distinguish it more than enough away from the Volt.

    This is a better picture of what a Buick badged Volt would more or less look like
    http://gm-volt.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/Buick-Ampere-550×412.jpg

    Reply
    • andrew says:
      August 21, 2012 at 9:43 pm

      Just to add, if GM wanted all it’s North American brands to have their own take on the Voltec, I’d like to see the new Canyon get it. Which would help distance it from the Colorado (which is apparently what GM is doing with their next line of trucks; going beyond just changing the front fascia to say one is a Silverado:Sierra or Colorado:Canyon). If they could get away from the Volt’s T-shaped battery and incorporate it in under the rear bench seat and bulkhead of the truck it wouldn’t take away bed space or interior room.

      But with that said, they should also play it safe and not dilute the image of what the Voltec is. Offering a version under each brand in a totally different application is a good idea. But it would make it hard for the Voltec to become it’s own brand, like what is happening with the Prius line. Saturn would have actually been perfect as an Eco brand.
      If GM branded the Voltec like the trend is going with Toyota and the Prius, it would limit the design language for the vehicles. If you look at the Prius, Prius plug-in, Prius V, Prius C, they all have the same look.. Actually they all have the same look, boring, but that not because they’re Priuses, it’s because they are Toyotas, so bad example.
      But the same idea could be said if the Voltec went that same sort of direction. Sure there could be a Voltec sedan, coupe, CUV, but they would all look similar. If a person wanted that technology, they are stuck with basically the same look.

      Where with each brand getting a version, each brand gives it it’s own design language and personality.

      Well… I’m just rambling pros and cons so I’ll stop.

      Reply
    • Alex Luft says:
      August 22, 2012 at 10:53 am

      One of the many ways that a Voltec-powered Buick could be differentiated is by following Buick’s tried and true approach to luxury: comfort, silence, and total occupant isolation. Think Lexus rather than BMW (Cadillac).

      Reply
  3. vic1212 says:
    August 21, 2012 at 9:35 pm

    But IF the Ampere comes out, then how much would it be?? Since Volt is selling around $39k to $45k and my guess for the ELR will be around $70k to $80k then would the buick sell around $50k to $60k? Also if the Ampere looks exact like the ampera, then wouldn’t it just be kind of a rip off?

    Reply
  4. James says:
    August 21, 2012 at 9:44 pm

    I agree with you guys. It’s a shame that there is no Voltec CUV as this is such a hot segment right now, and will be for some time to come.

    I look at Orlando, and the Voltec spinoff ( called MPV5 ) that appeared at the Shanghai Auto Show a couple years back and shake my head they never made it, or Orlando for the ‘States either. Sure, the pricepoint with that expensive lithium pack misses the boat with the common CUV buyer. You’re right that a more premium price could float labeled as a Buick.

    The ELR price has me puzzled – they have to compete with four door Teslas… A $50k mark for a Buick Voltec is too high. I’d say it’d have to look a lot different from a Volt – and to do that and sell it for under $50k probably is undoable.

    Reply
  5. vic1212 says:
    August 21, 2012 at 9:54 pm

    or not unless they want to bring a CT200H competitor?

    Reply
  6. James says:
    August 21, 2012 at 10:03 pm

    @ Andrew:

    Agreed. Voltec should eventually (it took Toyota 15 years to make Prius a line of cars, if not a “brand”) become it’s own division spun off from Chevrolet.

    A Voltec Colorado-sized truck would ROCK! ~ VIA Motors, with Bob Lutz assisting, is selling fullsized Chevy trucks, vans and SUVs with an EREV ( very Voltec-like ) drivetrain – for $79,000-up. At this price, they’re obviously very low volume items and should escape the wrath of GM lawyers. GM could build these, but at such a price – it’s not a profit-making proposition. A Colorado/Canyon EREV/PHEV for around $40,000 before $7500 federal kickback could work. I’d buy one tomorrow! See ya later to my present 20 mpg V-6 pickup.

    The T-shaped battery pack in Volt works for the MPV-5 and also pickup trucks because of their increased ride height. In this way , the Orlando-based MPV-5 had a three passenger backseat – and the VIA T-shaped pack works underneath the high truck bed and van – SUV floors.

    Reply
  7. Rocky says:
    August 22, 2012 at 5:25 am

    Some peoplecwont buy Chevy but will buy Buicks.
    So it makes sense to badge it as a Buick.
    But badge engineering does smack of the old days, the 1980′s. Not GM’s finest hour.

    Reply
  8. timothy says:
    August 22, 2012 at 7:31 am

    NO,NO, NO! Buick should not have a car version of the Chevy Volt. I mean come on, then people will realize the badge engineering, of the Cadillac ELR. This won’t turn out good. But, if they did use the Voltec technology and made a CUV, then by all means do it.

    Reply
    • andrew says:
      August 22, 2012 at 9:52 am

      The ELR isn’t badge engineering. It’s a coupe, with very different styling inside and outside. Yes the platform and drive train are the same, but that’s globalizing platforms and everyone is doing it.
      Badge engineering is taking a Cavalier, removing the Chevy badge and putting a Pontiac on and calling it different.
      If only one car could be based off a certain platform, and only that car could utilize a certain engine, brands would only sell 5 different models.

      Reply
  9. jd says:
    August 22, 2012 at 8:12 am

    I think we have done a good job of making the looks of cars on the same platform look differant and function differantly. v-tec has many applicaitons that will help the company meet mpg targets. the caddy and chevy are very differant but yet on a very similiar chassis the buick will also be very differant ’14 will show alot of change in the v-tec system and broaden the use in a 2 door 4 door and then the buick. all I can tell you is there will be 3 distinct models in the 2.0 release of voltec. we are very proud of our system and the upgrades will be game changing and will be robust enough for many applications, I think you will like. keep an eye out for news more to come.

    Reply
    • vic1212 says:
      August 22, 2012 at 12:50 pm

      So then there will be a Voltec Buick right jd?

      Reply
    • andrew says:
      August 22, 2012 at 5:42 pm

      1, Why is someone from GM hiding behind a screen name, that isn’t really they’re executives style. Not to mention the amount of spelling mistakes makes me think your are just voicing your thoughts and opinions like the rest of us and you aren’t actually an insider (remember what Russell Crowe went though?!)
      2. v-tec=Honda, involving a change in cam-lobe profile and rocker arms which when activated about whatever RPM holds the intake valves open longer. sick v-tec bro!

      Reply
      • Grawdaddy says:
        August 22, 2012 at 6:16 pm

        1 – JD can be as right or as wrong as he pleases. Ultimately, we, the users of GMA, will judge his accuracy and wether or not we can value what he offers reguarding future products.

        Nobody here is betting their lives on everything he types out. Things could change tommorow, and the ELR may be forced to drop the coupe can be offered as a sedan only. He may or may not be able to comment on this, or he may causually forget to mention it.

        Nobody is holding JD’s feet to the fire and demanding 100% accuracy for all products; whatever he can drop, we can keep a record of. Simple.

        Reply
        • Silent Electrician says:
          August 22, 2012 at 6:34 pm

          Andrew – are you really questioning the validity of JD’s comments? He has been right on the mark ever I’ve been here. And as far as “spelling mistakes”… engineers don’t need to be great writers. Let’s get real here: JD is not only welcome here but he also brings some great insight into the company.

          Reply
          • andrew says:
            August 22, 2012 at 9:25 pm

            More or less I guess I was. As an engineer myself I can attest to the fact to proper spelling is important; being a great writer, you are correct, not important.
            I didn’t say he wasn’t welcome, I just found it funny (not “ha-ha” funny) that he is an insider talking product planning while using a screen name. GM execs and engineers have never really gone anonymous to a public forum while still claiming to be within the company. And Akerson just the other week said “media leaks are an act of treason”.

            The use of “we” as an inclusion within General Motors combined with the piss poor spelling was humorous and that’s merely what I was commenting on.

            As for the accuracy of his claims now and previously, everything I’ve seen I had already heard/read elsewhere. He could just be a dealer who has seen a product road map.

            I wasn’t necessarily comment ‘at’ him as much as I was commenting on his comment.

            Reply
      • Babersher says:
        August 22, 2012 at 6:34 pm

        Well if I was GM but would was not authorized to leak information than I would hide between a screen name too, and jd has been right before, and I even though vtec is associated with honda I think jd means Volt – tech by v-tec.

        Reply
  10. Stanto27 says:
    August 23, 2012 at 4:28 pm

    Oh no no no. Please no. We already have the chevy, and getting a Caddy. I dont think we need a copy Buick.

    Reply
  11. James says:
    August 23, 2012 at 5:11 pm

    Food for thought, though… There was cost-cutting with Volt and Ampera in things like the door panels and back seat. The driver-passenger experience is good, but the back seat of the Volt is a sea of plastic, and there are some funky bits. A Buick Voltec could change all that with some new door panels ( leather ) and possibly a dash w/o the capacitive buttons – maybe a nice wood look, or a faux carbon fiber. There is no bling inside the Volt, it’s nice – but it’s purpose-built. I prefer Volt because my backseat passengers can live with plastic and I wouldn’t pay extra for the glitz. But there’s plenty who would, I believe and the h – series Lexus are way ahead with versions of Hybrid Synergy Drive. It might be a good inroad for Buick to get some green from green-minded, better-healed folks who would look at a Lexus like the E series hybrid.

    I still agree that just pasting a Buick moniker on the nose and tail wouldn’t hack it. Ampera body bits might do the trick and they’re already in the parts bin. The Buick grille is a challenge, but I can see a waterfall grille with fillers working just fine.

    Reply
  12. Raymondjram says:
    August 25, 2012 at 4:25 pm

    Buick has the perfect vehicle to become a Voltec platform: the LaCrosse, It is big, has plenty of luxury (Shaquille said so!) , and the eAssist helps its MPG, but having the full Voltec system would improve its range and become the new Electra.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


nine × = 63

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.


  • Login or Register

    Log In
    Register Lost Password
  • GM Authority Newsletter

    Get the latest GM News delivered to your inbox daily.
    * = required field
  • Sponsors

  • Fresh Off The Press

    • Recent Posts
    • Most Popular
    • Comments
    • 2014 Cadillac Escalade 012014 Cadillac Escalade, Escalade ESV Get Minor Changes For Last GMT900 Model Year: RPO CentralMay 19, 2013
    • Chevy Equinox Enough Room For A Hockey GoalieThe Chevy Equinox Has Enough Room For A Hockey Goalie: Ad BreakMay 19, 2013
    • GMC Granite ConceptGeneral Motors Reapplies For ‘GMC Granite’ TrademarkMay 18, 2013
    • 2014 Cadillac SRX2014 Cadillac SRX Gets Improvements For New Model Year: RPO CentralMay 18, 2013
    • Car-Clash-Buick-Encore-vs-Chevy-EquinoxCar Clash: Buick Encore vs. Chevy EquinoxMay 17, 2013
    • Holden MalibuHolden Malibu Awarded 5-Star Safety Rating In AustraliaMay 17, 2013
    • Chevrolet-Mi-Ray-ConceptHow Might GM Bring An Affordable Small RWD Chevrolet To Life?May 8, 2013
    • Cadillac LTS TrademarkGeneral Motors Closer To Registering “Cadillac LTS”, “LTS” TrademarksApril 20, 2013
    • GM Authority Garage - 2010 Chevrolet Equinox-29Spied: Next-Gen Opel Antara, Chevrolet Captiva/Equinox Mules Caught In SwedenApril 19, 2013
    • Bob Socia - Auto Shanghai 2013General Motors Open To Exporting Vehicles From China To The U.S., Says GM China PresidentApril 20, 2013
    • GM 4.3 Liter V6 Ecotec3Here’s How GM’s All-New 4.3L EcoTec3 V6 Stacks Up To The CompetitionMay 6, 2013
    • 2013 Chevy Volt - CaliforniaCommunity Question: Should GM Discontinue The Chevrolet Volt?May 16, 2013
    • bronc624 on:General Motors Reapplies For ‘GMC Granite’ Trademark
    • Kyree S. Williams on:2014 Cadillac Escalade, Escalade ESV Get Minor Changes For Last GMT900 Model Year: RPO Central
    • Kyree S. Williams on:2014 Cadillac Escalade, Escalade ESV Get Minor Changes For Last GMT900 Model Year: RPO Central
    • Grawdaddy on:General Motors Reapplies For ‘GMC Granite’ Trademark
    • bronc624 on:General Motors Reapplies For ‘GMC Granite’ Trademark
    • Manoli Katakis on:General Motors Reapplies For ‘GMC Granite’ Trademark
  • Sponsors

  • Recent Forum Topics

    • 2014 Z28 Transmission
    • Dayton, Ohio GM plants
    • 2014 Equinox info, details
    • Intellilink – blue tooth device won’t delete
    • 2012 equinox syncing contacts from iphone 4
    • recent motor trend article of the ATLAS concept
    • Sierra Production
    • tires terrain denali
    • Rendezvous hard start when warm engine
    • Bluetooth non responsive
  • Sponsors


  • Galleries

    2010 Chevrolet Silverado Hybrid2011 Holden Cruze Series II2013 Cadillac ATS Press PhotosGM Authority Garage - 2013 Buick Verano TurboGM Authority Garage - 2010 Buick LaCrosse CXS1946 Chevrolet Suburban2012 Chevrolet Silverado2007 Chevrolet Camaro Convertible ConceptPicture Of The Day - Sick Solstice
  • The Archives

  • Home
  • Buick
  • Slip-Up Or Fiction: Dealer Pre-Announces Buick Ampere, Quickly Issues Retraction
  • Fresh Off The Press

    • Recent Posts
    • Most Popular
    • Comments
    • 2014 Cadillac Escalade 012014 Cadillac Escalade, Escalade ESV Get Minor Changes For Last GMT900 Model Year: RPO CentralMay 19, 2013
    • Chevy Equinox Enough Room For A Hockey GoalieThe Chevy Equinox Has Enough Room For A Hockey Goalie: Ad BreakMay 19, 2013
    • GMC Granite ConceptGeneral Motors Reapplies For ‘GMC Granite’ TrademarkMay 18, 2013
    • 2014 Cadillac SRX2014 Cadillac SRX Gets Improvements For New Model Year: RPO CentralMay 18, 2013
    • Pontiac G8 G3Poll: Should GM Bring Back Pontiac?March 28, 2012
    • Chevrolet logo on Silverado HDShould Chevrolet Replace Holden In Australia, New Zealand?May 2, 2011
    • 2014 Corvette ZR1 SideThe 2014 C7 Corvette: What We KnowNovember 14, 2011
    • GM Authority Garage - 2010 Chevrolet Equinox 5RPO Central: 2012 Chevrolet Equinox With Desirable ChangesAugust 6, 2011
    • bronc624 on:General Motors Reapplies For ‘GMC Granite’ Trademark
    • Kyree S. Williams on:2014 Cadillac Escalade, Escalade ESV Get Minor Changes For Last GMT900 Model Year: RPO Central
    • Kyree S. Williams on:2014 Cadillac Escalade, Escalade ESV Get Minor Changes For Last GMT900 Model Year: RPO Central
    • Grawdaddy on:General Motors Reapplies For ‘GMC Granite’ Trademark
  • ABOUT GM AUTHORITY

    GM Authority is a must-read for GM news, GM rumors, GM reviews, and information about General Motors cars and trucks.

    Join others in discussing The General in our GM Forums and browse photos of GM vehicles in our GM pictures gallery.

    Also, please note that GM Authority is an independent publication and is not sponsored, owned, or in any other way condoned by General Motors Company, its brands, subsidiaries, or partners.
  • Search

  • Get Social

    Follow @gmauthority
  • Login or Register

    Log In
    Register Lost Password
  • News
  • Forum
  • Photos
  • Videos
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Tip Us

© COPYRIGHT 2013 AUTO AUTHORITY, LLC. POWERED BY LSX V8 ENGINES, LOVE & REVERENCE.